the context of career goals. Biomedical engineeringundergraduates are often drawn to clinical practice rather than to careers in engineering – 54%according to one study [1]. This implies an equivalent self-concept among BME majors asclinicians and as engineers. Indeed, this has been shown to be the case in previous work [2].These data sets were small, however, and they left unknown how malleable self-concept may beover the course of a single semester, for different groups, or in different learning environments.We performed a multi-year study of BME students’ career self-concept as engineers and asclinicians. The goal was to determine (a) if career self-concept, either in the absolute sense or inits change over time, differed by demographic
amongbiomedical engineering (BME) students have increasingly been incorporated in undergraduatebiomedical engineering curricula. This pilot study presents and assesses a clinical immersionframework for biomedical engineering undergraduate students with experienced nurses. Welaunched a summer clinical immersion program utilizing a “Student Experience Educational”Program offered by a not-for-profit healthcare organization.I. Introduction:The goals of this pilot study are to present a new clinical immersion framework for biomedicalengineering students and to assess the effects of this framework on the certainty of participatingstudents in their career aspirations, technology-driven problem-solving skills, engineering designself-efficacy, empathy, and
zero-credit-hour course entitledBMEN 399: Engineering Professional Development as a requirement of graduation. Studentsmust participate in an approved high-impact engineering-centric experience or activity that iscommensurate with a junior or senior undergraduate level. Appendix Table 2 illustratesrepresentative high-impact experiences available to undergraduate students. To receive credit forthe high-impact experience, students must demonstrate proof of participation (documentationrequired varies based on the experience) and submit a two-page reflection assignment. Thereflection assignments from the cohort of students were analyzed for five types of engineering-centric activity experienced: career enrichment experience, clinical immersion
extensive experience in engineering education focusing on recruitment and retention of underrepresented and under resourced students and engineering pedagogy. Her work spans the areas of curriculum instruction and design, program design and evaluation, and the first-year college experience. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Case Study: Exploring the Influence of Home Environments on Tissue Engineering Summer Research Experiences for High School StudentsAbstractHigh school summer research internships assist in the development of STEM identity andinfluence the pursuit of STEM majors and careers, both important in the development of theUnited States STEM
curriculum increases student awareness of frameworks and broader applications to practice AbstractThe intersection of human health and designing novel technologies that improvemedical outcomes requires personal and professional introspection on the ethicaldilemmas that clinicians and engineers will face in their careers. Given the diversefield of biomedical engineering, from imaging modalities to implantable devices toemergent biotechnologies, no singular approach to ethics training will prepare ourstudents to assess their professional obligation to the ethical, social, and legalimplications of their future work. Many engineering programs provide studentswith early modules in engineering ethics during
their log-in time for each event (collected by Zoom andwith respect to the total duration of each event). Finally, we looked into the number of uniquevisits to the Share and Learn webpage [22] to assess offline engagement of the community withthese events.We also surveyed the participants on their perception of the Share and Learn event’s value totheir career, professional development, and teaching enhancement via an online survey after allof the events had occurred. Survey questions included the following questions listed in Table 1.These questions were used to assess research question 2, “what are the demographics of theparticipants of these events in terms of title, role, and institution?” In particular, a quantitativeanalysis of questions
future of modern medical treatment. Advances in tissueengineering, computational protein design, and high-throughput bioanalyticaltechniques across academia and industry motivate the need to develop curriculathat provides opportunities for students to interact and design early in theirundergraduate careers. To meet this need, we created two new junior-level courses:Molecular Engineering (BME305L) and Cellular Engineering (BME306L) thatwere offered in the Fall and Spring of 2022, respectively. We have emphasizedstudent-centered experimental and laboratory practice as the backbone of thesecourses to prepare students for authentic research experiences in any industry.Molecular Engineering integrates computational and experimental learningoutcomes
Biomedical Engineering at Ohio State allows studentsto take up to 4 courses called career electives intended to give a student a choice to buildspecific skills for their desired career path. This industry-classroom course was approved tobe one of the professional elective courses giving the students an incentive to take it. Theonly requirement for this course was being admitted to the BME major and wanting to takethe course. As part of the course, the company also reimbursed students for any requiredtraining and paid them at a rate of $10/hr. The course learning objectives (LOs) are: • Students will be able to: o LO1: Develop a solution to industry challenges by understanding patient needs, business priorities, and design
Technology at Sam Houston State University (SHSU). BMET will be a 4-yearconcentration which prepares individuals for careers in medical and health facilities that use medical equipment,different application specific instruments like MRI machine, X-Ray machine, Ultrasound, Cardiac Catheters, ECG,EKG etc. These are the most in-demand skills in the engineering and health fields. To meet this market demand,the proposed concentration prepares learners with the necessary skills for the many biomedical career options inmajor health industries. The proposed concentration consists of a minimum of 122 credit hours and focuses moreon the general Engineering technology courses and in addition more CHEM/BIOL courses to prepare for thebackground information. New
invited talk. Ishita served as the finance chair of the Graduate Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and was the co-founder and president of the Biomedical Engineering Department Graduate Students’ Organization. Her career objective is to pursue translational biomedical research in academia. Her leadership goal is to inspire and uplift women who lack opportunities for education, self-development, growth, and leadership.Mr. Vitali Maldonado, University of Arkansas Vitali is a recent graduate of the University of Arkansas with a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering.Ms. Megan Wilkerson, University of Arkansas Megan is a recent graduate of the University of Arkansas with a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering.Ms. Amanda Walls
styledeliverables (e.g., basic business plans, product launch plans, patents) already verticallyintegrated into the design curriculum.SurveysPre- and post-course surveys were administered to Group A in FA22, and will be administeredlater in SP23, and FA23. Group B will take the pre- and post- course surveys in FA23 only. Thepre-course survey asks students to evaluate their confidence in technical writing and theperceived value of gaining technical writing skills for future coursework, following graduation,and to reach their career goals on a 4 point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, stronglydisagree). In addition to the questions from the pre-course survey, the post-course survey collectsstudent feedback on the efficacy of the technical
thebiomedical engineering students, typically included considering how they could impact others.This was reflected in the scores for each dimension (Table 3), where stories did include aself-focus, but also touched on societal-level change. Other scholars have described how BME isone potential field perceived as placing a higher emphasis on helping others [37, 38], a “humanefield” [39, p. 1567], a perception that could entice more altruistically motivated individuals. As adiscipline, it has been noted to attract students who may seek to pursue careers outside ofengineering, and to lend itself to enhanced occupational pursuits in health and medicine[39, 40].Sharing: “Sharing” was significant only for the D5-DFinal pair (p < 0.001). We want to
manufacturing, biomechanics, and other areas.Therefore, undergraduate BME students need intensive practical training on biomedical toolsand equipment to adequately prepare them for industrial careers. It is expected that upongraduation, most students would seek opportunities in industry [1]. Laboratories offer therequired real-world experience that is reported to significantly impact students’ learningexperience when integrated into the engineering curriculum [2].However, the use of physical laboratories comes with high monetary implications forinstitutions in terms of equipment acquisition, equipment maintenance, and staffingrequirements, especially in a rapidly evolving field like BME. Despite these challenges, thereremains an increasing industrial
” of the course. a) Have new team member identify their “Big Rocks” b) Meet as a team to share and revise “Big Rocks”2) Share team values, organization, and processes3) Have new team member shadow classes4) Share material repository a) Course development documentation b) Syllabi, lectures, assignments, exams, activities c) Material from related courses5) Share logistical information a) Learning management site (e.g. Canvas, Blackboard) b) Consistency in grading between instructors, previous rubrics6) Help make connections with industry, guest speakers, university services (e.g., Student Advocacy and Disability Services, Technology Transfer Office, Career Services)7) Facilitate social events with new faculty
, C. Jancuk, and A. A. Shoukas, “Sharing Best Practices in TeachingBiomedical Engineering Design,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, no. 9, Apr. 2013. [Online].Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0781-y. [Accessed Jan. 1, 2023].[13] Schmedlen, R., & Lee, J. W., & Shekhar, P., & Stegemann, J. (2019, June), The Clinical PeerMentors Program: Student Motivations, Skills and Knowledge Acquisition, and Influence on Career PathPaper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--33376[14] Felder, A. E., & Kotche, M., & Stirling, S., & Wilkens, K. M. (2018, June), InterdisciplinaryClinical Immersion: from Needs Identification to Concept Generation Paper presented at
NSF-CAREER, Qimonda Professorship, Billingsley Professorship, IBE Presidential Citation for Distinguished Service and University of Arkansas Honors College Distinguished Leadership Award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Investigating the impact of international education oncultural understanding, health disparities and collaboration through project- based learningIntroductionInternationalization and promotion of global understanding are important areas of focus foreducators with interdisciplinary approaches emphasizing international health issues, causes, andtechnology-based solutions of global health issues. To effectively solve global
, Signals and Measurements with the PCB project. Overall, it helps with better understanding the design process as other skills like soldering, solidworks, and machining. 3. I learned a lot about the design process, which I feel will help me a lot in my career. 4. This is a class that really helped me connect the elements of design we learned last year with concepts of circuits and systems. 5. I feel like I have a good understanding of the FDA design controls process and can apply it to real world situations. 6. I think it was nice that this class matched up with what we were learning in Circuits, Signals and Measurements. 7. A strength of this course was being able to apply the design process to the PCB Project
opportunities. References[1] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology, 2021,” 2022.[2] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2019,” 2019.[3] E. Higginbotham and M. L. Dahlberg, The impact of COVID-19 on the careers of women in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. 2021. doi: 10.17226/26061.[4] A. Patrick, M. Borrego, and C. Riegle-Crumb, “Post-graduation plans of undergraduate BME students: Gender, self-efficacy, value, and identity beliefs,” Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 49, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02693-9.[5] A. E. Winkler, S. G. Levin
comfortable workenvironment with lowered barriers to engagement in a large lecture course. However, lowattendance rates amongst students at office hours suggests that the increased anxiety around thecourse likely increased cognitive barriers to help-seeking and threshold to office hoursattendance despite high academic need. Combined with the observation that reasons that studentsin the study reported attending office hours and barriers to office hours are consistent withliterature, we posit that ideas about office hours are solidified early in students’ college careersand that these beliefs may affect students’ likelihood of accepting new strategies implemented incourses taken later in their college careers. Future work will focus on better
engineeringundergraduate training in a clinically relevant design experience. Students earn four credits forsuccessful completion of this course. This course prepares students for a real-world designproblem, with an emphasis on the development, evaluation, and recommendation of alternativesolutions subject to realistic constraints that include considerations of effective teamwork andtechnical communication, patents, quality controls, human factors, FDA regulation,professionalism, and ethics with an emphasis on preparing students for careers in bioengineering.Each year 85-95 students enroll in the course. Students assemble into project teams based ontechnical interests and skills.Capstone Design Course, Bioengineering 575 – Master of EngineeringThis capstone
information I would have to present when it was mygroups turn.” Lastly, we looked at several metrics ofhow students valued the experience ofusing the different presentation modes.Results demonstrated that students feltthat in-person presentations hadsignificantly more impact on them as anaudience member and that the mode ofpresentation was a significant factor(Fig. 4A). When evaluating time inputrequired versus perceived long-termimpact students responded that pre-recorded presentations requiredsignificantly more time (Fig. 4B,p<0.05) to complete but that in-personpresentations were significantly morevaluable for career preparation (Fig. 4C, Figure 4. Impact of presentation mode A) on student asp < 0.0001). In the future, a more
skills that would properly equip graduate TAs for success in theclassroom and their future careers. The course filled an urgent need in the Bioengineeringgraduate curriculum while the design and content of this course empowered participants toachieve the course learning objectives. Through this course, participants developed an increasedmastery of pedagogical theory and practices, including active learning, inclusive teaching, andmore. Further, through the final project, participants solidified their knowledge by applyingcourse content to their own areas of interest. In the future, we plan to evaluate both the efficacy of the course and the longer-term impacts ofcourse participants as graduate TAs within the broader bioengineering community. We
success in academics and professions. While the results of this study maynot present a surprise, it does confirm that we have created a reliable and valid instrument thatcan correlate general engineering self-efficacy to useful skills necessary for biomedical engineersto succeed in clinical environments. Using this instrument periodically throughout the durationof special courses and programs may provide a general evaluation of how effective a particularimmersion program is.LimitationsAs both a survey and a cross-sectional study, our study serves to provide a snapshot of a singletime point in participants’ careers. While we can draw a correlation between IDENT, SOLVE,and WRITE skills and a participants general engineering self-efficacy, a
, pp. 32-38, 2003.[6] T. A. Nocera, A. Ortiz-Rosario, A. Shermadou and D. A. Delaine, "How Do Biomedical Engineering Graduates Differ from Other Engineers? Bridging the Gap Between BME and Industry: a Case Study," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[7] C. P. Rivera, A. Haung-Saad, C. Wang and A. A. Wang, "Preparing early career biomedical undergraduates through investigations of stakeholder needs: A qualitative analysis," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.[8] S. Higbee and S. Miller, "Work in Progress: Vertical Integration of Engineering Design in an Under-graduate BME Curriculum," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[9] J. Xue, T. Wu, Y. Dai and Y. Xia, "Electrospinning and
students are brought up throughout theireducational careers in an ecosystem with mature, reliable tools in place to discover academicmisconduct, then a culture that such behavior is impermissible may root out all but the mostmalicious incidences.The time-log analysis tool does have potential drawbacks as well. Notably, its effectiveness in avariety of settings and compatibility with various classes and question types has not been studied.A larger-scale, diverse rollout of the method with relevant control data would be necessary tounderstand how its utility varies between application settings. Longitudinal monitoring ofdetection rates also may be merited, as students may adjust their behavior over time to simplyavoid the appearance of cheating to