AC 2007-1551: A SWEET PROGRAM REVIEWRichard Zollars, Washington State University Dr. Zollars is a professor in, and director of, the School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado. He has been teaching engineering for 28 years. His interests are colloidal/interfacial phenomena, reactor design and engineering education.Donald Orlich, Washington State University Don Orlich graduated from the University of Montana in 1953 with a B.A. in Education. He received a Masters of Science Education in 1959 from the University of Utah and an Ed.D. in 1963 from the University of Montana. He taught five years as an
AC 2009-2508: ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKING: A MECHANISM TOACCLIMATIZE INCOMING FRESHMEN AND FACILITATE DEPARTMENTCOMMUNICATIONJ.Patrick Abulencia, Manhattan College Page 14.934.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Online Social Networking: A Mechanism to Acclimatize Incoming Freshmen and Facilitate Department Communication.Abstract Online social networking tools such as Facebook and Ning are non-intimidating ways tointeract with other people. The benign nature of this environment serves as a useful mechanismfor introducing incoming freshmen, many of whom are shy and introverted, to their peers prior toarriving on campus. This past summer, Facebook
Control, Wiley, New York. [12] Seborg, D.E., T.F. Edgar, D.A. Mellichamp, F.J. Doyle III (2011). Process Dynamics and Control, Wiley, NewYork.14. Gray, J.J. (2006). Biomolecular Modeling in a Process Dynamics and Control Course. Chemical Engineering Education, 40(3): 297-306.15. Parker, R.S., F.J. Doyle III, M.A. Henson (2006). Integration of Biological Systems Content into the Process Dynamics and Control Curriculum. Chemical Engineering Education 40(3).16. Doyle III, F.J., B.W. Bequette, R. Middleton, B. Ogunnaike, B. Paden, R.S. Parker, M. Vidyasagar (2011). Control in Biological Systems from The Impact of Control Technology – T. Samad and A.M. Annaswamy (Eds.). Available at www.ieeecss.org.17. Moor
taught within the engineeringcurriculum, fewer have looked at communication requirements in industry, as reviewed by Donnellet al. [3]. Through this review, authors determined the key disconnects between what is taught andwhat is required in industry to be 1) goals of communication in the classroom vs. in industry and2) audience of communication assignments. To better address the communication needs ofgraduating engineering students, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has modified the outcomes for engineering programs to include communication to a widerange of audiences [2]. As a result, engineering programs will need to diversify communicationassignments.Some universities have aimed to reconcile the disconnect between
done on the job or a tool used. Like the student above whonarrows down to one specific component of the field, another student reaches a more specificidea of what engineering could look like: Pre: “I see chemical engineers as the innovators of the future. They help to create new base substances that are then used to help other disciplines create even more different technology. I think that chemical engineering just seems to affect so many people.” Mid: “I see them as creating useful substances like new compounds that make products more efficient and less wasteful. I think it is a place where you are able to improve products thus improving society.” Post: “One major thing I think of when I think of
Paper ID #21913Students’ Responses to Professionally Contextualized Activities in a StudioClassMr. Ayman M. Alabdullatif, Oregon State UniversityMr. Shane Paul Lorona, Oregon State UniversityDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level
Paper ID #26269Developing Reliable Lab Rubrics Using Only Two ColumnsProf. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Delaware Dr. Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment and professional development
.2-16, Jan. 2003. [4] M. Frank, I. Lavy, and D. Elata, “Implementing the Project-Based Learning Approach in an Academic Engineering Course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education vol. 13, pp. 273-288, 2003. [5] A. B. Frymier and G. M. Shulman, “What’s in it for me?: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation,” Communication Education vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 40-50, 1995. [6] J. R. White and A. Palazoglu, “Using Student Generated Senior Design Project Ideas to Achieve ABET Student Outcomes in a Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics Course.” in Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education’s Annual Conference and Exposition
Paper ID #15628Computer-Aided Design for Dimensional Stability of Injection Molded Fiber-Reinforced PolymersMr. Christopher J. Hershey, Michigan State University Christopher Hershey is a third year Chemical Engineering doctoral student and a Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. He received dual BS degrees in Chemical Engineering and Computational Chemistry at Michigan State University. During his undergraduate studies, he worked as a Resident Assistant for four years as well as an Undergraduate Research Assistant focusing on computational
, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering and an associate dean of engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and in the ways hands-on activities and technology in general and games in particular can be used to improve student engagement. c American Society
Paper ID #15686Experiments for a Unit Operations in Food Engineering CourseDr. Polly R. Piergiovanni, Lafayette College Polly R. Piergiovanni is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Lafayette College. Besides chemical engineering courses, she teaches an engineering course to nonengineering students. Her current research interests include critical thinking evident in student writing and assessing learning in experiential learning activities.Mr. John H Jarboe Lafayette College class of 2016 chemical engineering student c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Experiments for
approaches that have been practiced for 50 years are continued [1, 2]. It isnecessary to find an alternative teaching strategy in engineering courses, particularly forconveying scientific principles to real situations. To assess innovative methods for solving theproblems and limitations of the traditional teaching model in chemical engineering andbiomedical engineering, a half interactive hands-on learning experiment, half lecture-teachingmodel is being explored. In this process, having the aim of a better understanding and absorptionof key principles and difficult concepts in fluid mechanics and neuronal membrane physiology,we are combining multimedia technology with whiteboard and hands-on tabletop units.A Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer course
Utah, in which we have coupled traditional, virtual, and hands-on learning techniques,detailed in3,4.For this course, we have developed a website to act as an online hub for the students in ourdepartment. This system has been designed, in particular, to cater with the increasingly largeclass sizes we have seen in this course, which have been a nation-wide trend engineering coursesin recent years5. This online system is located at vSTEM.org, which stands for virtual STEM(Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). We have created this website to provideour students with various course materials, from interactive simulations to safety training quizzesfor equipment in the lab. We have developed the website to be open-source and freely
2011,27, 458-476.7. Agarwala, R.; Abdel-Salam, T. M.; Faruqi, M., Introducing thermal and fluid systems toindustrial engineering technology students with hands-on laboratory experience. In AmericanSociety for Engineering Education, Hawaii, 2007.8. Ma, J.; Nickerson, J. V., Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparativeliterature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 2006, 38, 7.9. Ribando, R. J.; Richards, L. G.; O’Leary, G. W., A “Hands-On” Approach to TeachingUndergraduate Heat Transfer. In ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congressand Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers: 2004; pp 413-422.10. Minerick, A., Desktop experiment module: heat transfer. In American Society
Paper ID #27548A Time-Saving Algorithm for Team Assignment and Scheduling in a Large-Scale Unit Operations Laboratory CourseDr. Andrew Maxson, Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an assistant professor of practice in chemical engineering at The Ohio State University where he teaches Chemical Engineering Unit Operations. He earned his B.S. in chemical engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his M.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at Ohio State. Having worked as a manufacturing process engineer for ten years, his focus is on optimizing the process of teaching, as well as hands-on, practical engineering
, H.S., LeBlanc, S.E., and Rizzo, B. (2014). Strategies for Creative Problem Solving. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 7. Lucietto, A.M., Scott, A.S., Connor, K.A., Berry, F.C. (2017). “Initial Survey of Engineering Technology Capstone Courses and Teamwork Building Using CATME” ”, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. 8. Alexander, M.L. (2017). “Improving Student-Instructor Coaching in the Chemical Engineering Capstone Design Course”, ASEE Chemical Engineering Faculty Summer School, poster presentation, NC State University, Raleigh-Durham, NC. 9. Kendall, M., Williams, M., Strong, A., Basalo, I., Ural, D., Henderson, G. (2019). “Co- Designing an Engineering Education Research Agenda
Paper ID #28944Quantifying success and attempts on auto-graded homework when using aninteractive textbookProf. Matthew W Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. His current research involves the rheology of complex fluids as well as active learning, reverse engineering online videos, and interactive textbooks. His website is: http://www.utoledo.edu/engineering
; Exposition.[4] F. Gary and M. P. Sharma, "Designing, Developing, And Implementing An Online Engineering Thermodynamics Course Using Web Technology," Albuquerque, New Mexico, 2001/06/24. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/9099. Paper presented at the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[5] G. Silcox, "Comparison Of Students' Performance In Online And Conventional Sections Of Engineering Thermodynamics," Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004/06/20. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/12718. Paper presented at the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[6] K. D. Dahm and D. P. Visco, Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodyanamics. Cengage Learning, 2015.[7] J. M. Smith, H. V. Ness, M
andacting as a mentor in the writing process.Bibliography1. Schleter W and Bennett R. Using Web-Based Homework in an Introductory Engineering Physics Course. Proc.ASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006.2. Penick, J.E. Creativity and the Value of Questions in STS. Science/ Technology/Society As Reform In ScienceEducation. Robert E. Yager, (ed), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 1996.3. Wankat PC and Oreovicz FS. Teaching Engineering, https://engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html4. Armstrong B. The Imperfect Solutions Homework Format, IEEE Transactions on Education. 38 (3) 258-260.1995.5. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds.. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.Expanded edition
today!Those who teach design face the dilemma of needing to teach “old fashioned” equipment designmethods so that students will understand the fundamentals and also attempt to teach moderncomputer aided design techniques, knowing that most design engineers, who work for largecorporations may never use these “old fashioned” design methods again in their working careersand will rely heavily on modern computer technology. However, this is an environment wheresmaller organizations are probably different.Should we abandon traditional design methods and just teach modern methods or should we tryand pack both into already overloaded courses? The authors propose that students must get anappreciation of both traditional and modern design methods in some
future, assessment will berequired, and if it must be done, why not gather valuable information? The authors stronglybelieve that all high-quality assessment plans should include direct assessment methods tocomplement surveys and similar indirect assessment methods.Bibliography1. Briedis, D., “Enabling Faculty in Effective Program Evaluation and Assessment,” workshop conducted at the “Best Assessment Processes Symposium,” February 27-29, 2006, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN.2. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, ABET, Inc., http://www.abet.org.3. Rogers, G., “Assessment 101: Direct and Indirect Assessments,” Community Matters, ABET, Inc., August, 2006.4. Nichols, James O., “The Departmental Guide and
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Comparing a Modified Problem-Based Learning Approach To a Traditional Approach to Teaching Heat TransferAbstract: Experience has convinced me that traditional lectures are easy for the professor, butare not always the best educational approach for the majority of my students. Over the years Ihave tried to incorporate more active approaches in the classroom. I incorporated many activelearning activities and added technology-driven modifications to my courses. More recently Itried adding problem-based learning (PBL) to my classes. I found that light use of a modifiedform of PBL along with a variety of other active learning elements have improved the level
Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. She ob- tained her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an assistant professor of Chemical Engineering and adjunct professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has made signif- icant contributions to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National
AC 2012-4671: MAKING THEIR BRAINS HURT: QUICK AND EFFEC-TIVE ACTIVITIES FOR THERMODYNAMICSDr. Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell UniversityDr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell UniversityDr. Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University Katharyn Nottis is an Educational Psychologist whose research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education, approached from the perspective of human constructivism. She has authored several publications and given numerous presentations on the generation of analogies, miscon- ceptions, and facilitating learning in science and engineering. She has been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, seismology, and chemical engineering
-, and biomedical engineer- ing education.Dr. Tom Merrill, Rowan UniversityDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has made contributions to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the American Society of
ethics include: 1. Engineering and moral complexity 2. Moral reasoning, technology, values and society 3. Commitment to safety, risk and product reliability 4. Engineering as a social experiment 5. Workplace rights and responsibilities 6. Environmental ethicsIn the second part of the course real world case studies are discussed. Typical casesrelated to chemical engineering that have been studied in the past include: 1. The chemical disaster at Bhopal India 2. Dow Corning breast implants 3. Environmental clean-up and problems with the superfundThe Deepwater Horizon disaster on April 20, 2010 is an interesting case for an ethicscourse. It was included for the fall 2010 semester and is planned to be included for thespring 2011
AC 2011-1908: THE RESEARCH PROPOSITION AND PROFESSIONALDEVELOPMENT: UPDATE ON FIRST YEAR GRADUATE STUDENT PREPA-RATIONDavid F. Ollis, North Carolina State University David Ollis is Distinguished Professor of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. He has taught professional development and technical writing courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels. Page 22.1494.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Research Proposition and Professional Development: Update on First Year Graduate Student Preparation Twenty years ago, our
annually to the most innovative teacher at WSU. (509) 335-4103 (Off); (509) 335-4806 (Fax); bvanwie@che.wsu.edu.Gary Brown, Washington State University Dr. Gary R. Brown obtained a PhD in Education from Washington State University in 1994 and is currently the Director for the Center of Teaching, Learning and Technology at Washington State University. 208-818-1413; browng@wsu.edu.Paul Golter, WSU Paul B. Golter obtained an MS from Washington State University and is currently pursuing his PhD while working as the Laboratory Supervisor in the School of Chemical Engineering and Bio-engineering at WSU. He is married with two children.509-338-5724
2002 PIC-III Award, the 2003 Joseph J. Martin Award, the 2004 Raymond W. Fahien Award and the 2005 Corcoran Award from ASEE.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has contributed to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has
Paper ID #7531Promoting Metacognition through Reflection Exercises in a Thermodynam-ics CourseProf. Mariajose Castellanos, University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland Baltimore County Dr. Joshua Enszer is a full-time lecturer in Chemical Engineering at the University of Maryland at Bal- timore County. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to en- gineering science and material and energy balances to process control and modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations