Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 383 in total
Conference Session
E-Learning in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeremy VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Aubrey Sykes, Calvin College; xiuhua si
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
transfer class;concurrent with thermodynamics. In this paper, we present a non-iterative method students canuse to solve multiple effect evaporator problems using a free add-in for Microsoft Excel.In a typical multiple effect evaporator homework problem (Figure 1) the feed conditions andflow rate (F) are given. The overall heat transfer coefficients (Ui) are assumed to be known. Thedesired final concentration (x1) is specified as well as the pressure (or equivalently, thetemperature) of the saturated steam used as the heat source (Ps). Additionally, the pressure inone effect (usually the last) is specified (P3). The task of the students is to find the amount ofsteam that must be fed to the first effect (S), the unknown liquid and vapor flow rates
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mahdi Malmali, University of Minnesota; Kevin Wagner, University of Minnesota; Michael H. Reese, University of Minnesota - West Central Research and Outreach Center; Edward L. Cussler, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Alon V. McCormick, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
ammonia production? When needed? Expertise available to operate?) - What is your production target? What is the target scale/size/weight? (Hand- pulled or animal-pulled cart, car trunk, tractor, etc.) - Who is going to be the end-user? What expertise you expect they have? Consider different degrees of complexity! A farmer? An explorer? A trained research technician? - What balance do you envision about uses of ammonia: e.g., as fuel, as fertilizer, as a hydrogen source for H2 fuel cells, etc? - What mode(s) of production should you consider? (batch, continuous, other?) - What might affect the optimum pressure and temperature for the production facility, considering the limitations by the
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Oral Session
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jason R. White, University of California, Davis; Ahmet Palazoglu, University of California, Davis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
market for the product(s) and other revenue generating streams was discussed (Outcomes 2 and 6). e) A clear recommendation as to whether the project should be considered in more detail was made. This recommendation was based on the I/O economic assessment, as well as on environmental and social measures. It was also made clear which process alternative(s) were viable, if any (Outcomes 1 and 4). f) The proposal was written in a logical format. There were minimal typos and formatting errors, the figures were clear and readable, and the references were cited correctly (Outcome 1).Students were assigned the prompt on the first day of class and were allowed eight weeks tocomplete the
Conference Session
Broad Perspectives on the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Watson L. Vargas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá; Oscar Alvarez P.E., Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá; Jorge Mario Gomez, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
, teaching/learning approach and assessment procedures.Key questions that we have pondered about are centered on what defines a chemical engineer inthis century, what are the current trends and how best to equip our graduates with competitiveskills both in the context of our country and internationally. Taking and innovator´s approach toour curricular intervention, we have tried to solve four simple questions 21:What orthodoxies can we challenge? Page 26.2.8    How can we best harness the current trends in the field, both in research and education?How can we take advantage of our available resources and strengths?What are the most important needs
Conference Session
Innovations in the ChE Laboratory
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine Taconi, University of Alabama, Huntsville; R. Michael Banish, University of Alabama, Huntsville
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Introductory Course.” Journal of EngineeringEducation, Vol. 82, No. 1, 15-21.5. Farrell, S.; Hesketh, R.P.; Slater, C. S. ”A Laboratory Project to Design and Implement a Process for theProduction of Beer.” Proceedings of the 1999 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference andExposition, Session 3226, June 20-23, Charlotte, North Carolina.6. Farrell, S.; Kadlowec, J.; Marchese, A.; Schmalzel, J.; Mandayam, S. “Hands on the Human Body! a.k.a.Introducing Freshmen to Multidisciplinary Engineering Principles through Application to the Human Body.”Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session1526, June 16-19, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.7. Hesketh, R.; Farrell, S.; Slater, C
Conference Session
New Pedagogical Approaches in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John L. Gossage, Lamar University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Figure 6:Figure 6: The name “zf” entered in Name Box 3. Name the other variable cells in Column B. Use the names “q”, “xd”, “xb”, “RR”, and “eta” in rows 3 to 7, and “Azeo” (no period!), “xf”, “yf”, “N”, and “Nf” in rows 11 to 15. The purpose of naming these cells is so that the names can be used in the subsequent equations on the spreadsheet. Any mistakes made while entering the names can be corrected by clicking on Formulas/Name Manager (or Ctrl-F3). 4. Enter these headings in cells Q1 to S2: Q R S 1 Equilibrium Data 2 Point # x y 5. Enter a 1 in cell Q3. 6. Enter the following formula in cell Q4: =IF(R4<>"",Q3+1,"") 7. Copy cell Q4
Conference Session
Perspectives and Approaches to Teaching Simulation and Design-Based Courses
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Ramirez Apud Lopez Zaira, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10): 906–911.6. Schraw, G., and Dennison, R. S. 1994. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19: 460-475.7. Stewart, P. W., Cooper. S. S., and Moulding, L. R. 2007. Metacognitive development in professional educators. The Researcher, 21(1): 32-40.8. Gassner, L. 2009. Developing metacognitive awareness: a modified model of a PBL-tutorial. Thesis for the Bachelor of Odontology in Oral Health. Malmö University. Sweden.9. Jonassen, D. H. 2010. Assembling and Analyzing the Building Blocks of Problem-Based Learning Environments, in Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace, Volume One: Instructional Design and
Conference Session
Contemporary Issues in CHE Education
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Phillip Wankat, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
for the NewDiscipline of Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., 95 (4), 259 (2006).6. Wankat, P. C., “Pedagogical Training and Research in Engineering Education,” Chem. Engr. Educ., 42 (4), 203(2008).7. Lucena, J., G. Downey, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, “Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re-Organization ofEngineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America,” J. Eng. Educ., 97 (4), 433 (2008).8. Jesiek, B., L. K. Newswander, and M. Borrego, “Engineering Education Research: Discipline, Community orField? J. Eng. Educ., 98 (1), 1 (2009).9. Wankat, P. C., R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith, and F. S. Oreovicz, “The Engineering Approach to the Scholarshipof Teaching and Learning,” in M. T. Huber and S. Morreale (Eds.) Disciplinary Styles in
Conference Session
Novel Classrooms
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ayman M. Alabdullatif, Oregon State University; Shane Paul Lorona, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
transfer [3]. We recommend that instructors frame the activity intheir classroom (e.g., examples, group problems, and homework) in ways that help studentsbetter connect their work to that of professional practice. Such framing can be included both inthe problem statement itself, and in how it is communicated to students.AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the National Science Foundationthrough grant EEC 1519467. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References: [1] M. D. Koretsky, D. Montfort, S. Nolen, M. Bothwell, S. Davis, and J. Sweeney. “Towards a stronger
Conference Session
ChE: Innovation in the Laboratory
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edgar Clausen, University of Arkansas; William Penney, University of Arkansas
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
+ + + + + 330 325 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 Time (s) Figure 6. Temperature vs. Time Experimental Data (+) and Predicted by Equation 4 Multiplied by a Factor of 1.4 (hEXP = 8 W/m2K at TSURFACE = 352 K)Forced Convection Heat Transfer from an Upward Facing Horizontal PlateForced convection heat transfer occurs when the fluid surrounding a surface is set in motion byan external means such as a fan, pump or atmospheric disturbances. This study was concernedwith forced convection heat transfer from a
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Poster Session & Unit Operations Lab Bazaar
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William M. Clark, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
ofoperating conditions for the heater and temperature control experiments but also allows for aninteresting experimental study of the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics for a flow system.Table 2 shows example data and results that demonstrate that energy is conserved and the 2nd lawis not violated in this novel device. H and S values were evaluated assuming ideal gas withtemperature dependent heat capacity. Page 23.126.8Figure 6. Example temperature readings with vortex tube in operation.Table 2. Example vortex tube data and results. Inlet Cold stream Warm stream Total Air flow mol/s 0.142
Conference Session
New Classrooms, New Challenges II: Assessing Non-traditional Approaches
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tracy Q. Gardner, Colorado School of Mines; Susan E. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines; Frank V. Kowalski, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
explorethe sims to the point where they thought they understood as much from them as they could,students’ scores increased from pretest averages in the 30’s to 50’s up to averages in the 50’s to70’s. The average increase from PRE to AFP on a given sim for the six topics presented herewas ~12%, or one letter grade (if letter grades below 60% were differentiated!). The scores thenfurther increased to AGP averages in the 70’s to high 80’s, by an average of 21% more, or twomore letter grades, after the students played with the sims again in class with guided questioningby the instructor. Coupling formative assessment using pen-based mobile technology in theclassroom with exploration of interactive computer simulations thus lead to significantlyincreased
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Paper ID #29057The Design and Impact of a Combined Makerspace, Wet Lab, andInstructional Design Studio for Chemical Engineering CurriculumProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Associate Professor (Lecturer) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory, capstone laboratory, first year design laboratory, and the introduction to chemical engineering. His research interests focus
Conference Session
Perceptions, Reflections, Collaborations, and Student Support in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Yu Xia, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Dawn McFadden, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
like to acknowledge the support from Leonhard Center for Enhancement ofEngineering Education at College of Engineering in Penn State.References[1] Ohland, M. W., Giurintano, D., Novoselich, B., Brackin, P., & Sangelkar, S. (2015). Supporting capstone teams: Lessons from research on motivation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 1748-1759.[2] Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.[3] Passow, H. J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work?. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-118.[4] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs,” 2018
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering in the Junior and Senior Year
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jeffrey Stransky, Rowan University; Landon Bassett, University of Connecticut; Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
apair of dilemmas include Dilemma 2 does the pair have a highly significant relationship; anyother compared pairs were found to be not significant. This result shows that there weresignificantly more Can’t Decide responses to Dilemma 2 as opposed to Option A or B responseswhen compared to other dilemmas in the EPSRI. When seeking to explain why this takes place,we can look at a summary of Dilemma 2’s prompt for insight: The second dilemma in the EPSRI places the students into the position of a plant engineer at a chemical company in the suburbs of a major city. There’s a severe hurricane heading towards the plant, and if the plant floods, there is the possibility of extreme hazardous events such as an explosion. It is
Conference Session
Grasping the "Concept"
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Debra Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Talia Sidne Finkelstein, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
. For [this] class, um, I kind of felt like I didn’t want to do that, I didn’t want…them to just be sitting back and listening to me talk”S/he went on to describe the benefit of attending the ASEE Summer School, and specificallyher/his familiarity with and motivation to use the Concept Warehouse, “I was aware of it beforeand kind of played around with it, but uh really tried to use it a little more this semester.” Someparticipants simply described the Concept Warehouse as something that “seemed like a greatidea.” In other cases, participants cited previous experience with pedagogy as a contributingfactor to their implantation of the Concept Warehouse, such as the following statement from oneparticipant, “I was already familiar with the
Conference Session
Perspectives and Approaches to Teaching Simulation and Design-Based Courses
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Hossein Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Larry Everett Pearson, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
educational outcomeswithout students having to spend sleepless nights in the campus computer room, or isolated inthe corner with their calculator, spewing numbers out. The contents of this paper weredeveloped over many years of teaching a variety of chemical engineering courses where use of Page 23.468.2process simulation facilitates the incorporation of real world design experiences into theclassroom.Background of Process Simulation at Mississippi State UniversityAt Mississippi State University (MSU), a discussion of the curriculum in the early 90’s focusedon numerical analysis tools and how best to educate students in their use. At that time
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
D. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park; Esther Gomez, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park; Manish Kumar, The Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
– Very good).Analysis of program ratings revealed overall satisfaction with the REU program (M = 4.17; Mo =4). Ratings of “Good” or higher, as evidenced by mean and mode responses, were obtained forthe following REU elements: working relationship with research mentor(s) (M = 3.17; Mo = 4);working relationship with research group members (M = 3.75; Mo = 4); the amount of time spentwith research mentor(s) (M = 2.83; Mo = 4); the advice given about careers and graduate school(M = 3.45; Mo = 3); and the research experience overall (M = 3.25; Mo = 3). The REU elementof the amount of time spent doing meaningful research received a “Fair” rating overall (M =2.83; Mo = 2), suggesting an important area of improvement for the research program.Table 5
Conference Session
ChE: Departmental Issues and Integrating Freshmen into the ChE Program
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deborah Follman, Purdue University; George Bodner, Purdue University; Mica Hutchison, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
students, animportant measure to consider in attempts to boost both the retention of capable students and theperformance, satisfaction, and enthusiasm of those who persist.Acknowledgments The authors would like to extend their thanks to Dr. Nicholas Delgass for his cooperationand support in this study, Jason R. Green for his assistance in computerizing survey materials,and the ChE Division reviewers for their useful suggestions. Page 11.1259.10Bibliography1. Seymour, E. and N. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduate Leave the Sciences, Westview Press,Boulder, CO, 1997.2. Lent, R. W., S. D. Brown, J. Schmidt, B. Brenner, H. Lyons and
Conference Session
ChE: Innovations in undergraduate and graduate programs
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lale Yurttas, Texas A&M University; Zachry Kraus, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey Froyd, Texas A&M University; Jean Layne, Texas A&M University; Mahmoud El-Halwagi, Texas A&M University; Charles Glover, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 Analysis of experimental data Phase Equilibrium Conservation of mass Atomic species balances Heat of Reaction Recycle/By-pass/Purge Heat of solution Ideal solution vs. nonideal solution Conservation of mass Phase equilibrium Conservation of energy Types of systems Process classification Conservation of mass S-S
Conference Session
Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Silvia Husted, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
. An interesting observation regarding these last result was detectedthrough students’ comments during the self-assessment stage: in these teams with lowerperformances, the commitment level of some team member(s) was not the adequate throughoutproject development, which was reflected on the quality of requested deliverables, including thefinal presentation.The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) is a powerful tool used by creativity researchersin which panels of expert judges are asked to rate the creativity of creative products such asstories, collages, poems, and other artifacts18, 23. In our case, experts in the domain (chemical,food, and environmental engineering teachers and senior undergraduate students) in question(material balances
Conference Session
"Modular" Learning
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Qinghua He, Tuskegee University; Rong Zhang, Auburn University; Jin Wang, Auburn University; Frank Leonard Armstead III, Tuskegee University; Rong Zhu Walburn; Donald Ray Johnson Jr; Julius Lenard Taylor II, Tuskegee University Research Assistant
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
oxidation and pyrolysis) makes contact with biomass from the feeding chute. During the process, free moisture and cell- bound water in the biomass are removed by evaporation. The up-flowing gas mixture consists of 29% H2, 34% CO, 17% CO2, 15% CH4 and 5% H2O, all in mol %. If the heat transfer in this process is 108 kJ/s, the up-flowing gas mixture enters the heating zone at a steady rate of 350… Figure 2 Schematic diagram of an updraft gasifier Page 23.69.8 mol/s at 800oC, what is the temperature of the gas mixture leaving the heating zone? Solution: (omitted)【Homework Problems】 Totally 10
Conference Session
New Classrooms, New Challenges II: Assessing Non-traditional Approaches
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Steven W. Peretti, North Carolina State University; David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
as students enter their junior and senior years. A drawback ofwritten assignments is the potential for plagiarism of outside materials by students. Plagiarism isproblematic from an academic perspective for two commonly-cited reasons: (1) the student(s)who plagiarize neither develop associated writing skills nor learn the intended lesson content1,and (2) students within a class where other students are plagiarizing without knowledge of theinstructor may receive comparatively poor grades even though they are learning and developingthe intended skills.Prior to word processing and the Internet, plagiarism required considerable effort: students mustfirst locate a book, article or old report, then write or type the outside text. However, in
Conference Session
Business and Professional Literacy Within Chemical Engineering
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
] K. L. Gunckel and S. Tolbert, "The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 938- 961, 2018.[6] J. L. Hess, J. Strobel, R. Pan, and C. A. Wachter Morris, "Insights from industry: a quantitative analysis of engineers' perceptions of empathy and care within their practice," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1128-1153, 2017.[7] R. C. Campbell, K. Yasuhara, and D. Wilson, "Care ethics in engineering education: Undergraduate student perceptions of responsibility," in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012, 2012, pp. 1-6: IEEE.[8] J. Strobel, J. L. Hess, R. Pan, and C. A
Conference Session
Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn F. Trenshaw, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Troy J. Vogel, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
inward Preference to focus on the present, the The preference we use Sensing (S) details, and personal to take in information knowledge Sensing (S) or and determine the Intuition (N) Preference to focus on kind of information we prefer to trust the future, the big
Conference Session
Teaching Professional Skills in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Robert Wayne Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
while studying chemical engineering.Multiple methods were used to collect data. Demographic information, the grit-S, andengineering identity instruments were collected for chemical engineering students at aresearch institution via Qualtrics. Two students consented to participate in the semi-structured interviews. This pilot contrasts Kate and Dan’s quantitative measures ofsuccess (GPA, grit, engineering identity) with their qualitative experiences from theinterview. Additionally, Kate and Dan’s engineering identity scores were compared to‘other’ senior engineering students’ scores to describe the different ways of definingsuccess.This work shares two student experiences that expand the common definition of success as gettinggood grades. These
Conference Session
Novel Classrooms
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christina Smith, Brown University; Ann Sitomer, Portland State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
development. Table 2 provides a description ofpedagogical topics covered, the associated learning goals, resources used, and the primaryactivities implemented.Table 2. Timetable of pedagogical development seminar topics, main resources, and activities Term Week Topic(s) Goal(s) Resource(s) Activities Studio pedagogy Koretsky, 2015 [1]; Metacognition Tanner, 2012 [14]; Whole class discussion Pre-Fall 1, 2, 3, 0 Fixed vs. growth Dweck, 2007 [15]; Read articleOrientation 4, 5
Conference Session
Poster Sessions for Unit Operations Lab Bazaar and Tenure-Track Faculty
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Deniz Rende, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Nihat Baysal, Yeditepe University; Sevinc Rende, Isik University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
7. Communication skills when interacting with students 8. Overall performanceThe second type of evaluation forms used on the presentation day requires students to evaluatetheir team mates and their own performance during the semester and during the projects. Thisquestionnaire, in Table 7, enables students to evaluate self-performance and the performance oftheir team mates. Table 7: Inquiry about the performance of the teammates Rate over 10 (1 - very poor .. 10 - very good) 1. S(he) has completed perfectly every part of laboratory reports that s(he) was responsible 2. S(he) was eager to help other partners on their parts 3. S(he) contributed her/his
Conference Session
Works in Progress in Chemical Engineering Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Enrique D. Gomez; Scott T. Milner; Yu Xia
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
., Foertsch, J., & Daffinrud, S. (1998). The spend a summer with a scientist program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements for success. Madison, WI: Citeseer.Allen, T. E. & Barker, S. D. (2021). BME Labs in the Era of COVID-19: Transitioning a hands- on integrative lab experience to remote instruction using gamified lab simulations. Biomedical Engineering Education. 1(99-104).Atman, C. (2020. Hope, stress, sketch & kvetch: Emphasizing caring through reflection in online teaching in the pandemic. Advances in Engineering Education. 8(4).Batchelor, R. L., Christensen, A. H.., Gold, A. U., & Okochi, C. (2020). A two-week virtual research experience program for community college
Conference Session
ChE: Safety, Sustainability, and Global Opportunities
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sundararajan Madihally, Oklahoma State University; Randy Lewis, Brigham Young University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
AC 2007-2442: CHEM-E-CAR COMPETITION: INCORPORATING SAFETYWITH THE HELP OF INDUSTRY PARTNERS.Sundararajan Madihally, Oklahoma State University He is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. He received his BE in ChE from Bangalore University and his PhD from Wayne State University in Chemical Engineering. He held a research fellow position at Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School/Shriners Hospital for Children. His research interests include tissue regeneration and the development of therapies for traumatic conditions.Randy Lewis, Brigham Young University Randy S. Lewis is Professor of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University