Paper ID #17214Self-Efficacy in Senior Design: Effects of Time and TeamDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Elif Miskioglu is currently a Visiting Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She graduated from Ohio State University in 2015 with a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and is interested in student learning in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Self-Efficacy in Senior Design: Effects of Time and TeamAbstractMuch of traditional curriculum is designed around individual assessment, but throughout theircareer most engineers are more
Paper ID #17120Unseen Influences on Student Performance: Instructor Assessment StylesDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Elif Miskioglu is currently a Visiting Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University. She graduated from Ohio State University in 2015 with a PhD in Chemical Engineering, and is interested in student learning in engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Unseen Influences on Student Performance: Instructor Assessment StylesAbstractMass and energy balances is the common first course in
Engineering continues to be a strong topic of focus.Students are continually challenged to be mindful of soft skill issues associated with being aprofessional engineer; however, the retention of that knowledge is low. The prevalence ofincreasing student awareness in process safety and ethics beyond the textbook requiresinnovative ways to bridge the discussion between fundamental course content and experientiallearning. Given the time constraints of contact hours an instructor may have for a course, theintegration of practical discussions can be pushed aside to ensure the learning outcomes are met.This, however, can be a disservice to the students as they prepare to take up jobs either in a co-op/internship or full-time position.One approach to
Paper ID #31294Faculty feedback on hub-based approach to national dissemination oflow-cost desktop learning modulesKatelyn Dahlke, Washington State University Katelyn Dahlke received her B.S. in chemical engineering from Iowa State University in 2013. She received her M.S. and Ph.D, in chemical engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2019. She completed a postdoc doing hands-on engineering education research at Washington State University. She will be a faculty associate at the University of Wisconsin Madison starting in Summer 2020.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof
Paper ID #29300How much does student perception of course attributes impact studentmotivation?Dr. Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from Cornell University, and her M.S. and Ph.D., also in chemical engineering, from the University of Virginia. Her primary research focus is on engineering pedagogy at the undergraduate level. She is particularly interested in the teaching and learning of concepts related to thermodynamics. She is also interested in active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, and
andacting as a mentor in the writing process.Bibliography1. Schleter W and Bennett R. Using Web-Based Homework in an Introductory Engineering Physics Course. Proc.ASEE, Chicago, IL, 2006.2. Penick, J.E. Creativity and the Value of Questions in STS. Science/ Technology/Society As Reform In ScienceEducation. Robert E. Yager, (ed), University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 1996.3. Wankat PC and Oreovicz FS. Teaching Engineering, https://engineering.purdue.edu/ChE/News_and_Events/Publications/teaching_engineering/index.html4. Armstrong B. The Imperfect Solutions Homework Format, IEEE Transactions on Education. 38 (3) 258-260.1995.5. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds.. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.Expanded edition
AC 2012-5123: INTERACTIVE SIMULATIONS COUPLED WITH REAL-TIME FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARN-INGDr. Tracy Q. Gardner, Colorado School of Mines Tracy Q. Gardner graduated from the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) with B.S. degrees in chemical en- gineering and petroleum refining (CEPR) and in mathematical and computer sciences (MCS) in 1996 and with an M.S. degree in CEPR in 1998. She then got my Ph.D. in chemical engineering, studying transport in zeolite membranes, from CU, Boulder, in 2002. She did a postdoc at TUDelft in the Netherlands in 2002 and 2003, studying oxygen conducting mixed oxide membranes and teaching reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. I am now a
, Sterling, VA, 2004.5 M. Prince, Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223 (2004).6 B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York, Longmans, Green, 1956.7 R. L. Zollars, C. D. Hundhausen, and M. Stefik, “Visual Learning in a Material/Energy Balance Class,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 24 – 27, 2007.8 R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education”, Engr. Education, 78(7), 674 (1988).9 L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1978).10 C. Quintana, B
AC 2011-1527: TRANSITIONING STUDENTS TO THE WORKPLACE INAN ACADEMIC SETTINGMichael Senra, Lafayette College Michael Senra is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engi- neering at Lafayette College. He is a graduate of the Department of Chemical Engineering at the Univer- sity of Michigan at Ann Arbor. His research related to gaining a better understanding of the fundamental characteristics of waxes crystallizing in subsea oil pipelines. While at Michigan, he was involved in the Engineering Graduate Student Mentor program and was involved in a number of courses dealing with both undergraduate and graduate students in a variety of majors. He received his bachelor’s degree from
they did. After doing this over a period of time, students were able to make some ofthis visualization in their mind and subsequently were able to solve problems without making apictorial translation. Experience in this course showed that an initial training in problem solvingthrough pictorial translation followed by its slow phase out helped biologists to embrace thequantitative learning style typical of engineers. This change is crucial for further learning ofengineering concepts. Efforts will be made in the future to quantify and study the change inlearning style through surveys and other assessment methods.Smaller is better:Lengthy problems and derivations in engineering can intimidate non-engineers. But problems inengineering often
15 teams. Through the use of iterative inquiry,student teams in the virtual laboratory project utilize their run data in the constant creation,revision and utilization of modeling components. This leads to a wide variety of project solutionpaths. Overall, this preliminary result shows that virtual laboratory project experience isvaluable to students, as it provide an environment that affords the development of rich model-based solutions. It must be kept in mind that physical laboratories will always have an importantplace in the curriculum of an engineering student, and as such, it is encouraged that both types oflaboratory projects are utilized.References 1. Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories
Paper ID #34096Student Responses to Remote Teaching During the Covid-19 Pandemic:Implications for the Future of Online LearningDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is the McDonnell Family Bridge Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering and in the Department of Education at Tufts University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting
Paper ID #218683-D Printing and Arduino in the Chemical Engineering Classroom: ProteinStructures, Heat Exchangers, and Flow CellsDr. Jacob James Elmer, Villanova University Dr. Elmer earned dual B.S. degrees in Biology and Chemical Engineering from the University of Mis- souri Rolla in 2003 and obtained a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University in 2007. After a short posdoc at Arizona State University and some adjunct teaching at Grand Canyon University, he secured an Assistant Professorship at Villanova University in the Chemical Engineering department. He currently teaches heat transfer and several
Paper ID #9158Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Dif-ficult Concepts in ThermodynamicsAlec Steven Bowen, Oregon State University Alec Bowen is an undergraduate in Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University and expects to receive his B.S. in June 2014. His research focuses on engineering education, particularly in the develop- ment and utilization of educational simulations and student personal epistemology.Mr. Daniel Robert Reid, Oregon State University Daniel Reid is a graduate student in the Institute for Molecular Engineering at the University of Chicago. He received his B.S. in
AC 2012-4310: PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT OF THE AICHE CON-CEPT WAREHOUSEMr. Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University Bill Brooks is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. As an undergraduate he studied hardware engineering, software engineering, and chemical engineering. Brooks has been involved in the development of several educational software tools, including the Virtual BioReactor, the Web-based Interactive Science and Engineering (WISE) Learning Tool, and the AIChE Concept Warehouse. His dissertation is focused on technology-mediated, active learning techniques, and the mechanisms through which they impact student performance.Ms. Debra
AC 2008-1182: COMPETITION BETWEEN STUDENT GROUPS IN THE PROTEINPRODUCTION CHALLENGEBrian Lefebvre, Rowan UniversityLoren Connell, Rowan UniversityKevin Dahm, Rowan University Page 13.316.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Competition between student groups in the protein production challengeAbstractConverting biological discoveries into commercial-scale processes requires that graduatingchemical engineers obtain an understanding of modern bioprocess principles. This paperdescribes the development and implementation of a five week long protein production projectinto a multidisciplinary upper level elective course
Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT7. Douglas J, Iversen E, and Kalyandurg C, “Engineering in the K-12 Classroom: An Analysis of Current Practices & Guidelines for the Future,” ASEE Engineering K12 Center, November 2004.8. Kolb DA. “Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development.” Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1984. Page 11.828.149. Honey P and Mumford A, “The Manual of Learning Styles” Maidenhead: Homey, 1986. 1310. Bransford J, Brown A. and Cooking R. “How people learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.” National Academy Press, Washington DC
Paper ID #27004The Relationship Between Spatial Skills and Solving Problems in ChemicalEngineeringDr. Norman W. Loney, University of Cincinnati Norman Loney received his undergraduate and graduate chemical engineering and mathematics degrees from New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT). He has authored or coauthored more than 64 publications and presentations relating to the use of applied mathematics in chemical engineering since joining the Chemical Engineering department at NJIT in 1991. His most noteworthy publication is the textbook: ”Applied Mathematical Methods for Chemical Engineers” 2nd Ed. published by
Paper ID #25079Direct and Indirect Assessment of Student Perspectives and Performance inan Online / Distance Education Chemical Engineering Bridging CourseDr. Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University Dr. Matthew Cooper is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at NC State University where he teaches courses in Material and Energy Balances, Unit Op- erations, Transport Phenomena and Mathematical/Computational Methods. He is the recipient of numer- ous teaching and pedagogical research awards, including the NCSU Outstanding Teacher Award, NCSU Alumni Distinguished
Paper ID #15316Examining Student Outcomes from a Research Experiences for Undergrad-uates (REU) Program: Year Two ResultsD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a
Paper ID #12706Assessments of Ultra-Low-Cost Venturi Nozzle in Undergraduate Engineer-ing ClassesMr. ARSHAN NAZEMPOUR, Washington State University Arshan Nazempour completed his undergraduate study at University of Tehran in Tehran, Iran in Chemical Engineering. Currently, he is a PhD student in Chemical Engineering at Washington State University and working under Professor Van Wie’s supervision on two projects, synergistic influences of oscillating pressure and growth factor on chondrogenesis in a novel centrifugal bioreactor and hands-on learning solution for students.Dr. Paul B Golter, Washington State University
engineering to show modest positive correlation between writing performance andexam performance in courses in thermodynamics and process control.3With the goals of increased practice and metacognition in mind, the SPIT approach has beenadapted in our university’s chemical process control course to replace traditional problem sets.Rather than complete a homework set, students instead work on a single problem a week, but arecharged to work with the problem in four different ways, following the same approach butreplacing the “Summarize” step with “Solving” the problem. Thus, students solve the problem,connect it to their personal experiences, integrate it with their chemical engineeringunderstanding from other courses, and finally propose a related
Paper ID #16377Natural Nanotechnology: Examples of Creating a Culture of Outreach withAccessible and Adaptable ModulesProf. Virginia A. Davis, Auburn University Dr.Virginia A. Davis’ research is primarily focused on using fluid phase processing to assemble cylindrical nanomaterials into larger functional materials. Targeted applications include optical coatings, 3D printed structures, light-weight composites, and antimicrobial surfaces. Her national awards include selection for the Fulbright Specialist Roster (2015), the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Nanoscale Science and Engineering Forum’s Young Investigator
Paper ID #29424Evaluating a new second-year introduction to chemical engineering designcourse using concept mappingMatheus Oliveira Cassol, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Matheus is an undergraduate student in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at The University of British Columbia. His work focuses on improving engineering education using technol- ogy and innovative analysis methods. Matheus’ goal is to follow a research career, using engineering knowledge to move society towards a greener future.Dr. Jonathan Verrett, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Jonathan Verrett is an Instructor in
Paper ID #30631Process Control Design and Practice – A New Approach to Teaching Controlto Chemical EngineersDr. Thomas Andrew Meadowcroft, Rowan University I am a Chemical Engineer, receiving my Bachelors degree from the University of Toronto and my Masters and PhD from M.I.T. I was a M.I.T. Chemical Engineering Practice School Station Director for 2 years following graduation, then went to work in industry. I worked for Union Camp, International Paper, General Electric, Omnova, and Dover Chemical as a Process Engineer, Process Design Engineer, and Process Control Engineer for 25 years. I began teaching as an adjunct at the
2006-1354: THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT: CATALYST ORINHIBITOR TO STUDENTS' CONFIDENCE IN SUCCESS?Deborah Follman, Purdue University Deborah K. Follman is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University in 1994 and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University in 2000. Her research interests include engineering education and gender equity, specifically regarding self-efficacy, issues of gender on student cooperative learning teams, and curriculum development.George Bodner, Purdue University George M. Bodner is the Arthur E. Kelly Professor of Chemistry, Education
, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education; AAAS Press, 2005; pp 147-149.23. Konyalioglu, A. C. An evaluation from studennts' perspective on visualization approach used in linear algebra instructions. World Applied Science Journal 2009, 1046-1052.24. McGrath, M. B.; Brown, J. R. Visual learning for science and engineering. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2005, 56-63.25. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., Eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 1999.26. Frankel, F. Translating Science into Pictures: A Powerful Learning Tool. In Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM
the individuals who are using the AIChE ConceptWarehouse and those who have provided feedback to improve this tool, particularly those whoparticipated in this study. We would also like to acknowledge the people who supported thiswork with their time and help.References 1. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, Free Press, New York, 2003. 2. E. National Academy of, Educating the engineer of 2020 : adapting engineering education to the new century, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005. 3. National Research Council. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000. 4. D. Hestenes, M. Wells and G. Swackhamer, The Physics Teacher, 1992, 141
therequirements given by the internal consultants. This iterative process allows for the generationof new designs and ideas, which are the hallmark of innovation. To support this process,students must build skills related to problem solving, collaboration, and communication, whichare attributes linked to the entrepreneurial mindset.12Research QuestionsWe were interested in understanding whether an epistemic game framework influenced theentrepreneurial mindset of senior chemical engineering students. In order to ascertain whetherthere was an effect, we approached the study with two principal research questions in mind. 1. Prior to the use of Nephrotex: a. What level of involvement did senior chemical engineering students have with
AC 2011-576: SPECIAL SESSION: EDUCATIONAL METHODS AND TOOLSTO ENCOURAGE CONCEPTUAL LEARNINGMilo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He cur- rently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Ronald L. Miller, Colorado School of Mines Dr. Ronald L. Miller is