Conference Session

Real and Virtual - "New" Approaches to Teaching "Old" Courses

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darinka del Carmen Ramirez, Tecnológico de Monterrey (ITESM), México; Manuel E Macías, ITESM, Campus Monterrey

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

first and second-year chemical engineering students. Dr. Ramirez’s main subjects include Material Balances, Energy Balances, and Thermodynamics. She also teaches to students from the master’s program in Education using Technology at the Universidad Virtual del Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey. She has worked on projects with Canam-Romisa, Danisco Ingredients S.A. de C.V., GBM-Grupo Bioqu´ımico Mexicano,. Grupo Industrial Chihuahua S. A. and Siemens. She was trained in Problem Based Learning strategy by the Wheeling Jesuit University-NASA at Wheeling, West Virginia. Dr. Ramirez has several publications, including the chapter ”El profesor como agente de cambio a trav´es del trabajo colaborativo” (Translated: The teacher as an

Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Oral Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Reis, Louisiana Tech University; Katie A. Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Dexter Cahoy, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, 2016.[4] D. Doorn, S. Janssen and M. O'Brien, "Student Attitudes and Approaches to Online Homework," International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, 2010.[5] R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik and M. Morgan, "The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events," Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 213-238, 1991.[6] D. M. Nguyen, Y.-C. Hsieh and G. D. Allen, "The Impact of Web-based Assessment and Practice on Students' Mathematics Learning Attitudes," Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 251-279, 2006.[7] J. P. Carpenter and B. D. Camp, "Using a Web-based Homework System to Improve Accountability and Mastery in

Conference Session

Work-In-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael David Mau Barankin, Colorado School of Mines; Justin Franklin Shaffer, Colorado School of Mines; Logan Riley Nimer

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Open (flow) systemsbelieve familiarity of voice is 11 15:29 Reversibility, Heat Engines & T.E.R.'s 12 08:37 Entropy & 2nd Law of Thermoimportant to the students’ connecting 13 08:16 Entropy Balance & Rankine Cycleto the material3. The theory videos 14 11:11 Reactions & Reaction Extentsrequired roughly 2-3 hours of work, Total 2:11:11most of which (1-2 hours) wasoccupied by scripting and editing the text. Fixing up the PowerPoints and writing the quiz tookroughly 30 minutes, while recording (and re-recording) audio for a 10-minute clip also tookabout 30 minutes4. While this ratio (12:1

Conference Session

Early ChemE Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

ScienceFoundation.References1. Jonassen, D.H., Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2000. 48(4): p. 63-85.2. Perrenet, J., P. Bouhuijs, and J. Smits, The suitability of problem-based learning for engineering education: theory and practice. Teaching in higher education, 2000. 5(3): p. 345-358.3. Heitmann, G., Project-oriented study and project-organized curricula: A brief review of intentions and solutions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1996. 21(2): p. 121-131.4. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014: p. 201319030.5

Conference Session

Computer-Based Learning in Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC #1623105. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundationReferences[1] E. P. Byrne and J. J. Fitzpatrick, “Chemical engineering in an unsustainable world: Obligations and opportunities,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 51–67, 2009.[2] S. Perdan, A. Azapagic, and R. Clift, “Teaching sustainable development to engineering students,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 267–279, 2000.[3] S. H. I. Papert, “Situating Constructionism,” Constructionism, pp. 1–11, 1991.[4] D. H. Jonassen

Conference Session

Virtual and Web Learning in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessie Keeler, Oregon State University; Thomas W Ekstedt, Oregon State University; Ying Cao, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

simulations.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References 1. Bowen, A. S., Reid, D. R., & Koretsky, M. D. (2015). Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in Thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Education 49(4), 229- 238. 2. Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R.. (2003). Enhancing teaching-learning environments in undergraduate courses. Occasional Report, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, The University of Edinburgh

Conference Session

Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph J. Biernacki, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

hed by the texxt author(s).. In the exam mple shown inFigure 1,, there are foour streams (M=4), ( threee componentts (N=3, air, water and thhe substancee ofthe materrial to be dried on a dry basis, b e.g. wood, w clay brrick, etc.). T The degrees oof freedomanalysis for f this exam mple followss: GDF = M×N M + MFlowws + NRates = 4×3 + 4 + 0 = 16 GC

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tommy George, Harvard University; Alexander Seth Klein; Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

- china.com/product/gyonUFwYCrhp/China-50-5000-Gallon-Continuous-Stirred-Tank- Reactor-fixed-speed-or-convertable-speed-.html. (b.) “Chemical reactor,” Wikipedia, 19-Nov-2019. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_reactor. (c.) T. Geisler, “Isothermal CSTR | James C. Sutherland.” [Online]. Available: https://sutherland.che.utah.edu/teaching/educational-apps/isothermal-cstr/. (d.) K. Wittrup, and William Green Jr.. 10.37 Chemical and Biological Reaction Engineering. Spring 2007. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare, https://ocw.mit.edu. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA. [12] M. D. Koretsky, D. M. Gilbuena, S. B. Nolen, G. Tierney, and S. E. Volet

Conference Session

ChemE Potpourri

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David L. Silverstein, University of Kentucky; Lisa G. Bullard, North Carolina State University; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

relevant course(s). A separate request was sent to the instructors ofrecord for the MEB course during the 2010-2011 academic year when that information waspublically available. From that population, 76 usable surveys representing 67 institutions in theUnited States were received.This 42% institutional response rate represents a continued improvement from the results of the2009 survey4 (31%) and 2010 survey5 (38%), but still falls short of the response rates in 1990(78%) and 1999 (51%). No response data is available for the 1972 survey. Page 25.703.2The complete survey in print form is provided as Appendix A.Quantity of InstructionOf the sixty-three

Conference Session

Adaptive and Supportive Learning Environments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Robert Dickson, University of Strathclyde

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Minorities in Engineering

AC 2012-4681: SELECTION OF EFFECTIVE GROUPS IN ENGINEER-ING PROJECTS USING MANAGEMENT THEORY PRACTICEMr. Brian Robert Dickson, University of Strathclyde Page 25.1148.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012  Selection of Effective Groups in Engineering Projects using Management Theory PracticeA study that is a work in progressIntroductionMany engineering courses incorporate group projects as standard. The challenge for mostacademics is selecting groups that are well balanced and will produce a fair result for allgroup members, that measure their technical abilitie,s and their

Conference Session

Emerging Areas: Biotechnology, Microtechnology, and Energy

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claire Komives, San Jose State University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Theresa A. Good, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Laurent Simon, New Jersey Institute of Technology; John P. O'Connell, University of Virginia; Jeffrey John Chalmers, Ohio State University, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering; Erik Fernandez, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Genencor, a Danisco Division, where she developed a metabolic flux model for an enzyme production process. Additionally, after her postdoctoral research at the ETH-Zurich, she obtained a Science and Diplomacy Fellowship from the American As- sociation for the Advancement of Science to spend a year working in the U. S. Agency for International Development providing technical expertise to the Child Health Research Project which promoted research targeting the reduction of child mortality in third world countries. She has 19 publications and 2 patents, has received over $1MM in grants since joining SJSU. She currently serves on the Executive Committee of the ACS Biochemical Technology Division and on the advisory board of

Conference Session

Focus on Capstone Experiences in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip H. Harding, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

operations lab experiments and provides instruction for the virtualbioreactor. Dr. David Hackleman developed CBEE 416 and served as the Linus PaulingEngineer for 5 years. The authors are indebted to numerous practicing engineers for sharingtheir time and experiences with students. Finally, several faculty members sponsor seniorprojects, committing resources and knowledge.References1. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. J. Eng. Educ., 94, 121–130.2. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.3. ABET Website, http://www.abet.org/, retrieved Jan. 2011.4. Dutson, A., R. Todd, S. Magleby, and C. Sorensen. 1997. A Review of Literature

Conference Session

Virtual Instruction of Chemical Engineering Courses

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Maxson, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

theirmouth and nose, including potentially inadequate or ineffective masks. Three possibilities wereidentified: 1. Allow students to attend lab wearing any face covering of their choice 2. Assess the adequacy of face coverings on a case-by-case basis and ask students to leave or change their masks if they are deemed to be inadequate 3. Specify the exact type(s) of face masks which are permitted in labThe first option had obvious problems – from a safety standpoint it was desirable to ensure thatface coverings were adequate and effective. With the second option, instructors would have beenput in the position of having to inspect masks and assess their suitability, which would have beenproblematic in terms of liability and logistics. That

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

opposing preferences, or “balanced” within thedimension. For our study, we look at each dimension separately in correlations withperformance, self-efficacy, perceptions/attitudes, and problem solving strategies as we believethat this will allow us to understand if one dimension is more influential, and, if so, in whatrespect(s).The second study instrument, surveys, are typically Likert-type questions (on a scale from 1 to 5,strongly disagree to strongly agree, respectively), with some multiple choice, true / false, andoccasionally a short open response question. Questions are designed to evaluate student self-efficacy with respect to specific problems and concepts, attitudes, and problem-solvingstrategies.The surveys are administered after

Conference Session

New Trends in CHE Education II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sundararajan Madihally, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

consider in the seminar.REFERENCES[1] Pulko SH and Parikh S. Teaching `soft' skills to engineers. International Journal of Page 14.79.7Electrical Engineering Education. 40 (4): 243-254, 2003.[2] Kumar S, and Hsiao JK. Engineers Learn “Soft Skills the Hard Way”: Planting a Seed ofLeadership in Engineering Classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering. 7(1): 18-23,2007.[3] Harichandran R, Mason D, Prestel D, Merrill J, Streng P, Maleck T, V Galishnikova.Innovation in a Large-Scale Study Abroad Program in Engineering. Proceedings, ASEE AnnualConference, Paper 3460, 2004.[4] Parkinson A. Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best

Conference Session

Early ChemE Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

questions in ’05 & ’06 were worded somewhat differently.References 1. Silverstein, D.1; M. Vigeant2; D. Visco3; and, D. Woods4, How We Teach: Freshman Introduction to Chemical Engineering; Proceedings for 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; June 20-23, 2010, Louisville, KY, pp. 15.658.1-15.658.36; permanent URL https://peer.asee.org/15949 1 U. Kentucky, 2Bucknell U., 3Tennessee Technological U., 4McMaster U. 2. Chickerur, S.1 and O. Shabalina2, Integrating Problem-Based and Project- Based Learning for Effective Teaching learning in Engineering Education—a Case Study of Advanced Database Management Course; Advanced Science & Technology Letters, Vol 36 (Education 2013

Conference Session

ChemE Curriculum: Junior, Senior, and Graduate

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Laura P. Ford, University of Tulsa; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

survey, American Association for Engineering Education,Columbus, OH, 2017.9. Description of Academic Credit Systems,https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ous/international/usnei/us/credits.doc&usg=AOvVaw1EGAH-eLs0EkSXPqXpcr8j, Accessed 2008.10. Boud, D. J., Dunn, J., Kennedy, T., and Thorley, R., The Aims of Science LaboratoryCourses: A Survey of Students, Graduates, and Practising Scientists, European Journal ofScience Education, 2(4), 1980, 415-428.11. Domin, D. S., A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles, Journal of chemical education,76(4), 1999, 543.12. Elawady, Y. and Tolba, A. S., Educational Objectives of Different Laboratory Types: AComparative Study, International Journal of Computer Science and Information

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason R White, University of California, Davis

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

to keep individualsaccountable.References [1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103-120, Jan. 2005. [2] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, June 2014. [3] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering Education – Is Problem-Based or Project- Based Learning the Answer?,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education vol. 3, no. 2, pp

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

sheet. At aminimum, each process included:  A reactor with catalyst  Incorporation of recycle streams to maximize reactant conversion  Incorporation of a separation system(s)  Heat exchange network (with the eventual goal of applying heat integration principles to conserve energy) The following deliverables were required for the first design project report:  Identification of raw material costs and selling price of the product  Detailed process flow diagram with all major pieces of equipment identified and conditions specified  Develop and effectively communicate the material and energy balances for the process (and each major piece of equipment).Design Project II Each team had to provide detailed

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

students with positive team experiences see greatergains in self-efficacy than students with poor team dynamics and cohesion?Using a modified version of Carberry et al.’s senior design self-efficacy tool,6 we examinedpotential correlations between self-efficacy, team dynamics/cohesion, and team performance.Students were given three self-efficacy surveys, one early in the term, one mid-term, and one latein the term, corresponding to times where they were working on an individual project only, bothon an individual project and group project, and just on a group project.Because we have had low participation in past studies, we were hesitant to use the full Carberryinstrument that contains 36 items (nine items in the context of four self-concepts: self

Conference Session

Novel Student Experiences in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob James Elmer, Villanova University; Noelle K. Comolli, Villanova University; William J. Kelly, Villanova University; Zuyi (Jacky) Huang, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

broadband internet provided on-demand video capability to studentsin the late 1990’s, instructors have been experimenting with the use of online lessons and videosto enhance student learning both inside and outside of the classroom (e.g. flipped classrooms1and distance learning2). Online videos and animations have been shown to be especiallyeffective for teaching molecular biology concepts3,4, which are often too small to see with thenaked eye and difficult to conceptualize.5 Several organizations have already created full lengthonline videos for biology topics that are available free of charge, including the BioVisions seriesfrom Harvard6, Khan Academy7, Open Courseware at MIT8, TED5, and several others9,10. Thesevideos allow students to learn and

Conference Session

Virtual and Web Learning in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Joe Branch, University of Utah; Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implementation and Usage of an Online Environment in a Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractWe have developed an online system to serve as a hub for student activities in our chemicalengineering

Conference Session

ChemE Curriculum: Freshman and Sophomore

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Joe Branch, University of Utah; Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Modeling Student Performance in an Introductory Chemical Engineering CourseWe have developed an open-ended, laboratory-based introduction to chemical engineering, acourse coupling traditional, hands-on, and

Conference Session

Works-in-Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brittany Lynn Butler; Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut; Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University; Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Reaction,” Internet:http://www.csb.gov/assets/1/19/T2_Final_Copy_9_17_09.pdf, Sept. 7, 2009 [Oct. 10, 2017].2) S.J. Dee, B.L. Cox, R.A. Ogle, “Process Safety in the Classroom: The Current State ofChemical Engineering Programs at US Universities,” Process Safety Programs, vol. 34, no. 4,pp. 314-319, 2015.3) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Shares in the Chemical Engineering Classroom,” Education forChemical Engineers, vol. 9, pp. 94-105, 2014.4) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Education through Case Study Presentations,” Education forChemical Engineers¸ vol. 8, pp. 12-30, 2013.5) J. Rest, D. Narvaez, M. Bebeau, S. Thoma, “A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT andschema theory,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 11, pp. 291-324, 1999.6) Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K

Conference Session

New Ideas for the ChemE Core

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

2005,(7) Deslauriers, L.; Schelew, E.; Wieman, C. Science 2011, 332, 862-864.(8) Henderson, C.,; Dancy, M.,; Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. Under review 2011,(9) Laws, P.; Sokoloff, D.; Thornton, R. UniServe Science News 1999, 13,(10) Wieman, C.; Perkins, K. Physics Today 2005,(11) Evans, D.; Gray, G.; Krause, S.; Martin, J.; Midkiff, C.; Notaros, B.; Pavelich, M.; Rancour, D.; Reed-Rhoads, T.; Steif, P.; Streveler, R.; Wage, K. Frontiers in Education 2003,(12) Foundation_Coalition. 2001,(13) Gray, G. L.; Constanzo, F.; Evans, D.; Corwell, P.; Self, B.; Lane, J. Presented at ASEE Annual Conference 2005,(14) Jacobi, A.; Martin, J.; Mitchell, J.; Newell, T. Frontiers in Education 2003,(15) Jacobi, A.; Martin, J.; Mitchell, J.; Newell, T

Conference Session

Contemporary Issues in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Zollars, Washington State University; Christopher Hundhausen, Washington State University; Pawan agrawal, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, HI.: ASEE.2 L. S. Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.3 C. Quintana, B. Reiser, E. Davis, J. Krajcik, E. Fretz, R.G. Duncan, E. Kyza, D. Edelson, and E. Soloway. 2004. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, no. 3: 337-386.4 R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman. 1988. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78 no. 7: 674-681.5 D. Norman and S. Draper, User-centered system design, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Mahwah, NJ, Page 15.564.8 (1986).

Conference Session

Virtual and Online Learning Tools in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Garret Nicodemus, University of Colorado, Boulder; John L. Falconer, University of Colorado, Boulder; Will Medlin, University of Colorado, Boulder; Katherine Page McDanel, University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering; Jeffrey Steven Knutsen, University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Mechanical Engineering,

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualization”, Learn Instr. 14, 325, 2004.7. J. van der Meij and T de Jong. “Supporting students learning with multiple representation in a dynamic simulation-based environment”, Learn Instr. 16, 199, 2006.8. Kadiyala, M., and B. Crynes, “A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education”, J. Eng. Ed., 89 (2) 177, 2000.9. M. R. Lepper and T.W. Malone. “Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in a computer-based education”, Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, edited by R.E. Snow and M.J. Farr (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.10. N. S. Podolefsky, K. K. Perkins, and W. K. Adams. “Factors

Conference Session

Adaptive and Supportive Learning Environments

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

W. Vincent Wilding, Brigham Young University; Thomas Allen Knotts IV, Brigham Young University; William G. Pitt, Brigham Young University; Morris D. Argyle, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Minorities in Engineering

Engineer of 2020, Visions of Engineering in the New Century, National Academy of Engineering, 2004.3. Home-Douglas, P., “ASEE Today - President’s Profile - Looking Ahead,” ASEE Prism, American Society of Engineering Education, December 2005, Volume 15 Number 4.4. Harb, J., Rowley, R., Magleby, S., and Parkinson, A., “Going Global: Implementation of a College-Wide Initiative to Prepare Engineering and Technology Students for the 21st Century,” Proceedings Annual ASEE Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2007.5. Hawks, V., Harb, J., Magleby, S., and Parkinson, A., “A College-wide Approach for Teaching and Developing Leadership: Model, Framework and Outcomes,” Proceedings Annual ASEE Meeting, Austin

Conference Session

SPECIAL SESSION: Educational Methods and Tools to Encourage Conceptual Learning I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald P. Visco Jr., University of Akron

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering, Educational Research and Methods

italics were from a previous year. Students were provided the same detailedinformation in the syllabus about the desktop module as in Year 1, but were told that last year’sstudents already completed that. The Year 2 students were told that they were to modify thoseprojects to fix short-comings indicated in the assessments from Year 1. Relevant project reportswere handed over (with grades redacted), which gave the new student teams a place to start. Theywere also given the name of the team leader from the previous year(s) to use as areference/resource.In an effort to help mitigate students back-loading the work on the project to the end of thesemester, teams were required to hand in a weekly memo, which updated the instructor on theprogress on

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering in Silico

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Charles J. Coronella, University of Nevada, Reno; Victor R. Vasquez, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

= (3) dt  T r −T t   z D 10 rThe three parameters are given as Dr = 5560 s, Tr = 50 °C, and z = 4.35 °C. Initially, the rate ofcoliform contamination is specified as 106 CFU/g, and the burger is safe to eat when themaximum N(t) is below 1 CFU/g. Note that kN(T) is changing constantly in each node as afunction of time, as the nodal temperatures increase. Until the temperature rises above 50 °C,the rate of destruction is quite slow. The rate increases rapidly after