ASEE PEER - Search Results

Displaying all 19 results

Automated Process Control Laboratory Experience: Simultaneous Temperature and Level Control in a Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor System

Conference Session: Improving Laboratory Education in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joshua A. Levinson, Lafayette College; Eric L. Maase, University of Massachusetts-Lowell; Glen Thomas Tennyson
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT., June 2004. Page 24.220.97. Moor, S., Keyser, D., and Piergiovanni, P., “Design-Build-Test: Flexible Process Control Kits forthe Classroom,” ASEE Conference Proceedings (2003).8. Bequette, B.W., Aufderheide, B., Prasad, V., and Puerta, F., “A Process Control Experiment Designed for aStudio Course”, AIChE Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, November 2000.9. Smith, C.A., Corripio, A.B., Principles and Practice of Automatic Process Control, Second Edition, p. 566(1997

Relevance Score: 0.021173185

A Creative Experience for Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering Students in a Material Balances Course

Conference Session: Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Silvia Husted, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

. An interesting observation regarding these last result was detectedthrough students’ comments during the self-assessment stage: in these teams with lowerperformances, the commitment level of some team member(s) was not the adequate throughoutproject development, which was reflected on the quality of requested deliverables, including thefinal presentation.The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) is a powerful tool used by creativity researchersin which panels of expert judges are asked to rate the creativity of creative products such asstories, collages, poems, and other artifacts18, 23. In our case, experts in the domain (chemical,food, and environmental engineering teachers and senior undergraduate students) in question(material balances

Relevance Score: 0.012224344

Mitigating Chemical Engineering Design Team Miscommunications with Knowledge of Myers-Briggs Type

Conference Session: Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kathryn F. Trenshaw, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Troy J. Vogel, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

inward Preference to focus on the present, the The preference we use Sensing (S) details, and personal to take in information knowledge Sensing (S) or and determine the Intuition (N) Preference to focus on kind of information we prefer to trust the future, the big

Relevance Score: 0.011899266

Results from the AIChE Education Annual Survey: Chemical Engineering Electives

Conference Session: Curriculum Development and Assessment in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

relative to the paper-‐based survey used in the 1980’s. Results Demographics We asked chairs to characterize the size of their departments as well as the number of electives typically offered, as shown in figures 2, 3 and 4 below. Page 24.1050.3 2

Relevance Score: 0.011432445

Simulation-Based Guided Explorations in Process Dynamics and Control

Conference Session: Virtual and Online Learning Tools in Chemical Engineering Education
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Mary M. Staehle, Rowan University; Babatunde A Ogunnaike, University of Delaware
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

, and the temperature is controller. The high sensitivity Company A cannot exceed 20°C modulated by an ethanol cooling thermocouple can be or the material will spontaneously stream which spirals around the approximated as a first order combust and eradicate a 3 mile tank. We found that as an isolated system with the following transfer radius around the transporting truck. Company B cannot use the system, the open loop response of function: g(s) = 0.995

Relevance Score: 0.011317544

A Course in Problem Solving with Experimental Design

Conference Session: Improving Laboratory Education in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

portions of the course.The deliverables that are used to provided preliminary assessment of ABET outcomes are listedin Table 3. For formal accreditation purposes, these outcomes are considered again in the senioryear in at least one course each; examples are given in the table. Page 24.39.6 Table 3: Deliverables for ABET Criteria AssessmentABET criterion Typical deliverable(s) in this Later course to assess this course outcomeb (ability to design and conduct Exams; Lab Reports Unit operations labexperiments and analyze

Relevance Score: 0.009240735

Studio-based Learning in Multiple Material/Energy Balance Classes

Conference Session: Improving Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Richard L. Zollars, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

that enters the system. The liquid stream from the heater is recycled and is mixed with the fresh water to form the water feed entering the scrubber. Find the unknown values for all streams?The solution contained a number of intentional errors. Attached to the solution was a smallpacket of Post-it®’s in one of four different colors. The students were given ten minutes toexamine the solution, find areas where they disagreed with the solution, write on a Post-it®where they disagreed with solution, what the disagreement was, and how to change the solutionto resolve the disagreement. Each place where they found a disagreement was to be noted on aseparate Post-it

Relevance Score: 0.008855534

The Paperless Lab – Streamlining a Modern Unit Operations Laboratory Course to Reduce Faculty Time Commitment

Conference Session: Improving Laboratory Education in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

: making ‘groupwork’ work.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 67, 71-82 (1996).14. R. Felder and R. Brent, “Effective strategies for cooperative learning.” Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching 10 (2), 69-75 (2001).15. S. Chandra, “Role and effectiveness of practical laboratory courses in technical education.” AEESEAP Conference Proceedings, 225-230 (1991). Page 24.1236.1216. B. Young, H. Yarranton, C. Bellehumeur and W. Svrcek, “An experimental design approach to chemical engineering unit operations laboratories.” Transactions IChemE Part D, Education for Chemical

Relevance Score: 0.008002711

Improving Student Interaction with Chemical Engineering Learning Tools: Screencasts and Simulations

Conference Session: Virtual and Online Learning Tools in Chemical Engineering Education
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Garret Nicodemus, University of Colorado, Boulder; John L. Falconer, University of Colorado, Boulder; Will Medlin, University of Colorado, Boulder; Katherine Page McDanel, University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering; Jeffrey Steven Knutsen, University of Colorado, Boulder, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualization”, Learn Instr. 14, 325, 2004.7. J. van der Meij and T de Jong. “Supporting students learning with multiple representation in a dynamic simulation-based environment”, Learn Instr. 16, 199, 2006.8. Kadiyala, M., and B. Crynes, “A review of literature on effectiveness of use of information technology in education”, J. Eng. Ed., 89 (2) 177, 2000.9. M. R. Lepper and T.W. Malone. “Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in a computer-based education”, Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, edited by R.E. Snow and M.J. Farr (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), Hillsdale, NJ, 1987.10. N. S. Podolefsky, K. K. Perkins, and W. K. Adams. “Factors

Relevance Score: 0.0074676415

Fostering the Development of Critical Thinking in an Introduction to Chemical Process Engineering Design Course

Conference Session: Improving Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Gladis Chávez-Torrejón, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Silvia Husted, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Americas Puebla; Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

? - Focusing on precision in thinking. Am I providing enough details? - Focusing on accuracy in thinking. Am I certain that the information I am using is accurate? - Focusing on relevance in thinking. How does my point bear on the issue at hand? - Focusing on logicalness in thinking. Given the information I have gathered, what is the most logical conclusion? - Focusing on breadth in thinking. I wonder whether I need to consider another viewpoint(s)? - Focusing on depth in thinking. What complexities are inherent in this issue? - Focusing on justification in thinking. Is the purpose justified or is it unfair, self- contradictory, or self-defeating given the facts

Relevance Score: 0.0068594664

Development of a Drug Delivery Elective for Chemical Engineers

Conference Session: Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Christopher R. Anderson, Lafayette College
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

Engineering”. Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2013. 2. Saltzman W. Drug Delivery. Oxford University Press, 2001. 3. Truskey G. et al. Transport Phenomena in Biological Systems. Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006. 4. Farrell S. et al. “Drug Delivery Education Using Microsphere Technology,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2011. 5. Gu F. et al. “Sustained Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Alginate Beads,” Journal of Controlled Release, 2004, 96(3): 463-472. 6. Gombotz W. et al. “Protein Release from Alginate Matrices,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1998, 31 (3): 267-285

Relevance Score: 0.006600525

Examining the Entrepreneurial Mindset of Senior Chemical Engineering Students as a Result of Exposure to the Epistemic Game “Nephrotex”

Conference Session: Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kerry Michael Rogy; Cheryl A. Bodnar, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

. Page 24.559.11References 1. Crumpton, M.A. (2012). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances. 25 (3), 98-101. 2. Schawbel, D. (2012). Why Students Should Gain Entrepreneurship Experience Before Graduating. TechCrunch. Accessed on June 30th, 2012. http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/30/why-students-should-gain- entrepreneurship-experience-before-graduating/ 3. Kriewall, T. J., Mekemson, K. (2010), Instilling The Entrepreneurial Mindset Into Engineering Undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. 1 (1), 5 – 19. 4. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: It’s Role in Engineering Education. National Academy of

Relevance Score: 0.006534186

Conducting Project-based Learning with a Large Chemical Engineering Freshman Cohort Using LEGO NXT Robotics

Conference Session: Design, Creativity and Critical Thinking in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Bill B. Elmore, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, 55 – 70. From http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume6/Chambers.pdf 3. Kolodner, J.; P. Camp; D. Crismond; B. Fasse; J. Gray; J. Holbrook; S. Puntambekar; and M. Ryan; Problem-based Learning Meets Case-based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classrom: Putting Learning by DesignTM into Practice; J. of Learning Sciences; 12:4 (2003) pp.495-547. 4. Maida, C.A. (2011). Project-Based Learning: A Critical Pedagogy for the Twenty-First Century. Policy Futures in Education, 9(6), 759-768. Retrieved January 1, 2014 from http://www.editlib.org/p/111000. 5. Elmore, Bill B., A freshman design course using LEGO® NXT Robotics, Chemical Engineering Education

Relevance Score: 0.006534186

A Systematic Approach to Prepare for ABET Accreditation

Conference Session: Curriculum Development and Assessment in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Vincent Wilczynski, Yale University; Isabella M. Quagliato, Yale University: School of Engineering & Applied Science
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.005600731

Writing Abstracts of Homework Problem Solutions: Implementation and Assessment in a Material Balances Course

Conference Session: Improving Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

Fall of 2012. Based upon both published results on “writing to learn” from the literatureand the authors’ observations from Fall 2012, it was reasonable to hypothesize that the activity ofwriting homework abstracts would lead to improved attainment of the course instructionalobjectives. However, the control experiment that was conducted in the Fall of 2013 did notproduce any evidence to support of this hypothesis.Literature Cited i Felder, R.M., “Stoichiometry without Tears”, Chemical Engineering Education, 24(4), 188-196, 1990. ii XXXX and YYYYY, “Effects of Requiring Students to Write Abstracts for Homework Problem Solutions,”Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013). iii Maharaj, S

Relevance Score: 0.00528042

Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in Thermodynamics

Conference Session: Virtual and Online Learning Tools in Chemical Engineering Education
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Alec Steven Bowen, Oregon State University; Daniel Robert Reid, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

the National Science Foundation under thegrant TUES 1245482. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References1. Ma, J., and J. Nickerson. 2006. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1-24.2. Wieman C. and K. Perkins. 2005. Transforming physics education. Physics Today,58(11), 36-41.3. Perkins, K., Adams, W., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N., Reid, S., Wieman, C., & LeMaster, R. 2006. PhET: Interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 44, 18.4. Finkelstein, N.D., W.K. Adams, C.J

Relevance Score: 0.004667276

Examining Diffusion Networks and Identifying Opinion Leaders: A Case Study of the AIChE Concept Warehouse

Conference Session: Curriculum Development and Assessment in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Debra M. Gilbuena, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; Bill Jay Brooks, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

-158. 5. A. Elby, American Journal of Physics, 1999, S52. 6. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Journal of Engineering Education, 2005, 57-72. 7. C. Crouch, J. Watkins, A. Fagen and E. Mazur, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 2007. 8. A. Fagen, C. Crouch and E. Mazur, The Physics Teacher, 2002, 206-209. 9. M. D. Koretsky and B. J. Brooks, Chemical Engineering Education, 2012, 46, 289-297. 10. E. M. Rogers, Addictive behaviors, 2002, 27, 989-993. 11. M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd and T. Simin Hall, Journal of Engineering Education, 2010, 99, 185. 12. M. Borrego, S. Cutler, J. Froyd, M. Prince and C. Henderson, in Australasian Association for Engineering

Relevance Score: 0.0046203677

Comparing Misconceptions in Fluid Mechanics Using Interview Analysis Pre- and Post-Hands-on Learning Module Treatment

Conference Session: Improving Laboratory Education in Chemical Engineering
Collection: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors: Jacqueline Gartner Ph.D., Washington State University; David Finkel; Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University-Pullman
Tagged Divisions: Chemical Engineering

Shift, in Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, S. Vosnidou, Editor 2008: Hilsdale, NJ.9 B.S. Bloom and D.R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1984.10 Krathwohl, D.R., A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 2002. 41(4): p. 212-218.11 Burgher, J.e.a., New Hands-On Fluid Mechanics Cartridges and Pedagogical Assessment. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.Appendix Interview ProtocolConcept Questions AskedFlow Regimes A) What are the main regimes of flow? B) Can