Asee peer logo
Displaying all 2 results
Conference Session
"Modular" Learning
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Cooper, North Carolina State University - Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
beobvious, the latter conclusion is not.Another advantage of the DOE method is that the φ values calculated for each factor andinteraction may be used as input for a mathematical model which can predict system response foruntested values of each factor within the tested range. For this 3-factor, 2-level experimentaldesign, the model equation predicting experimental response (Ymodel) would be: ϕA Ymod el = ϕ mean + ( A) + ϕ B (B ) + ϕC (C ) + ϕ AB ( A)(B ) + ϕ AC ( A)(C ) + ϕ BC (B )(C ) + ϕ ABC ( A)(B )(C ) (1) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2Equation 1 uses inputs for each factor (A, B, C) based on the specified +1 to -1 scale. Forinstance, if
Conference Session
Using Communication and Writing Techniques to Improve Student Learning
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shannon Ciston, University of California, Berkeley; Sean Poust, University of California-Berkeley
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
organization, data interpretation, and analysis. Using an online simulationprovides an outlet for collection of data within constraints of a stand-alone technical writingcourse: limited time and laboratory equipment resources; and is an effective way to engagestudents in laboratory report writing.Works Cited1 Atman, Cynthia J., Sheri D. Sheppard, Jennifer Turns, Robin S. Adams, Lorraine N. Fleming, ReedStevens, Ruth A. Streveler, Karl A. Smith, Ronald L. Miller, Larry J. Leifer, Ken Yasuhara, & Dennis Lund. (2010).Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the center for the advancement of engineering education.San Rafael, CA: Morgan & ClaypoolPublishers. (http://www.engr.washington.edu/caee/CAEE%20final%20report