Paper ID #34414Qualitative Analysis of Skills in a CHE Laboratory CourseDr. Heather C. S. Chenette, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Heather Chenette is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology. Her professional interests include enhancing student learning in the classroom and creating op- portunities for students to learn about membrane materials and bioseparation processes through research experiences.Dr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and
Paper ID #34909Integrating a Laboratory into a First-semester Introduction to ChemicalEngineering CourseDr. Susan M. Stagg-Williams, The University of Kansas Dr. Susan M Stagg-Williams is the Charles E. & Mary Jane Spahr Professor and Chair of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Kansas (KU), with a specialty in biomass conversion. She has worked closely with the KU Center for Teaching Excellence and been a champion for course redesign across campus. Her primary focus has been on large freshman and sophomore classes. She is the founder of the KU Biodiesel Initiative which provides opportunities for
Paper ID #32386Work in Progress: Teamwork Skills Development in ChemE CarMr. Declan Thomas Mahaffey-Dowd, University of California, Berkeley I am a B.S. student at UC Berkeley studying Chemical Engineering interested in improving professional skills development in undergraduate engineering co-curriculars.Dr. Shannon Ciston, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Shannon Ciston is the User Program Director for the Molecular Foundry, a Nanoscale Science Research Center, at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Dr. Ciston has formerly been a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Education in the Department of Chemical and
Paper ID #32851Innovative Use of Technologies to Teach Chemical Engineering CoreClasses and Laboratories During the Covid-19 Pandemic at an HBCUDr. Rupak Dua, Hampton University Dr. Rupak Dua graduated with a Ph.D. in 2014 in Biomedical Engineering with a specialization in Tis- sue Engineering and Biomaterials from Florida International University located in Miami, FL. Dr. Dua worked for two years as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute of Orthopedic Research and Education housed in Texas Medical Center - the world’s largest medical center - located in Houston, TX. Before joining Hampton University in the Department of
Paper ID #34768Operation and Student Perceptions of a Large-scale, In-person UnitOperations Laboratory Course During the Covid-19 PandemicDr. Andrew Maxson, The Ohio State University Andrew Maxson is an assistant professor of practice in chemical engineering at The Ohio State University where he teaches Chemical Engineering Unit Operations. He earned his B.S. in chemical engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and his M.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering at Ohio State. Having worked as a manufacturing process engineer for ten years, his focus is on optimizing the process of teaching, as well as hands-on
Paper ID #33339Using Existing University Resources: Integration of the UniversityWriting Center into a Senior-level Laboratory Series for ImprovedLearning OutcomesProf. Stephanie G. Wettstein, Montana State University - Bozeman Stephanie Wettstein is an Associate Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering department at Montana State University in Bozeman, MT. She is associated with MEERC and has been the faculty advisor of the MSU SWE chapter since 2013.Dr. Jennifer R. Brown, Montana State University - Bozeman Jennifer Brown is an Associate Professor in the Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at Montana
Paper ID #33638Development of an At-home Metal Corrosion Laboratory Experiment forSTEMOutreach in Biomaterials During the Covid-19 PandemicMr. Christopher James Panebianco, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Christopher J. Panebianco, B.Eng., is a Ph.D. Candidate at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS). He earned his B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from The Cooper Union in 2016. His research focuses on developing novel biomaterials for repairing injured intervertebral discs. He has been a Teach- ing Assistant at ISMMS and The Cooper Union for 3 years, and has a strong interest in teaching and research in
of partial differential equations(PDEs). In this paper, the methods for introducing sophomore-level students to PDEs and theircomputer-aided solution are described with respect to learning objectives and a detailed exampleof a student exercise. The impact of the instruction is presented in the context of student pre- andpost-instruction self-evaluation, and performance on junior-level laboratory work that involvesthe analysis of a transient system.KeywordsPartial differential equations, numeric methods, chemical engineering transport.1. IntroductionIndividual and combined transport courses make up the instructional core of most ChemicalEngineering B.S. programs in the United States today1-3, a pedagogical focus within thediscipline that
applications in separation pro- cesses and the design of advanced composite materials. About engineering educational research, Vasquez is working on the analysis of assessment methods to improve teamwork, open-ended laboratory experi- ments, active learning, and implementing computational tools to understand chemical engineering con- cepts. Vasquez has a vast experience teaching the Unit Operation Laboratories for six years and has taught many other junior-level chemical engineering courses.Dr. Michael J. Elsass, University of Dayton Michael Elsass is the Director of the Chemical Engineering Department at the University of Dayton. He received his B.Ch.E in chemical engineering from the University of Dayton and his M.S. and
University in St. Louis. She earned her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University in 2015. Her research focuses on implementation of process safety material in the chemical engineering curricu- lum, effective laboratory instruction, and active learning in core chemical engineering courses.Dr. David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is also the Director of the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs in Paducah, Kentucky, where he has taught for 22 years. His PhD and MS studies in ChE were completed at Vanderbilt University, and his BSChE at the University of Alabama. Silverstein’s research interests
Engineering Department at the Uni- versity of New Mexico. The research in her lab is focused on understanding the dynamics and structures of macromolecular assemblies including proteins, polymers, and lipid membranes. Undergraduates, grad- uate students, and postdoctoral scholars are trained in a multidisciplinary environment, utilizing modern methodologies to address important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engineering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are
students that take a position in an environmental, safety, andoccupational health department within a plant. The aim of this work is to share the instructionalapproach on safety and environmental compliance in our capstone course to obtain feedbackfrom other design education experts to improve our instruction.The need for enhanced process safety instruction in chemical engineering curricula has beenrecognized for a while in our discipline [1], [2], [3]. A greater awareness of this need resultedfrom the T2 Laboratories runaway reaction and explosion that occurred in Jacksonville, Floridain 2007 [4]. This event served as an impetus for ABET to specifically include process safety as arequired instructional component in chemical engineering curricula
decision was made to keep the plant running, instead of shutting it down,aligning the holes in the final safety barrier of the Swiss cheese model. Since it is evident thathuman decision making is integral to the overall safety of plant operations as poor decisions canimpede the effectiveness of other safety barriers, it is necessary to ensure appropriate training isprovided to students before they enter the workforce. Figure 1. Example of the Swiss cheese model [18].Process Safety EducationSince 1992, the Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SAChE) program has helped tobring process safety to engineering schools by providing teaching materials and programs forstudents [19]. After the events of the T2 Laboratories
discouragement of passive behaviors; however, students who completed in-person implementations felt more interactively engaged than those who completed virtualimplementations, highlighting the lack of valuable peer interaction in an asynchronousenvironment. The authors plan to conduct more detailed analysis including fall 2020 and spring2021 data prior to the final conference presentation and provide evidence-basedrecommendations for best use of virtual, hands-on experimentation activities in an online coursespace. We believe the development of virtual laboratory activities can benefit traditionally onlineprograms and resource-limited institutions, although in-person activities should still be employedwhere possible
,” Interface, no. August 2008, pp. 1–14, 2016.[2] ABET, “ABET Engineeirng Acceditation Commission.”.[3] NCESS, “NCEES engineering.” [Online]. Available: https://ncees.org/engineering/#texas.[4] K. Aljuhani, M. Sonbul, M. Althabiti, and M. Meccawy, “Creating a Virtual Science Lab (VSL): the adoption of virtual labs in Saudi schools,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40561-018-0067-9.[5] W. L. Jason L. Williams, Marcus Hilliard, Charles Smith, Karlene A. Hoo, Theodore F. Wiesner., P.E., Harry W. Parker, “The Virtual Chemical Engineering Unit Operations Laboratory,” Eng. Educ., vol. 2, no. December, pp. 6–8, 2003.[6] AICHE, “Safety and Chemical Engineering Education (SAChE) Certificate Program,” AICHE. https
. 28th Annual (Vol. 3, pp. 1133–1138). IEEE.Guglielmino, L. M. (1991). Developing self-directed learners: Why and how. Changing Schools, 19 (2), 6-7 &11.Mabrouk, P. A., & Peters, K. (2000). Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. CUR Quarterly, 21(1), 25–33.Porter, L. A. (2017). High-impact practices in materials science education: Student research internships leading to pedagogical innovation in STEM laboratory learning activities. MRS Advances. doi:10.1557/adv.2017.106 7Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., McCullough, J., Roessner, J. D., & Storey, C. (2005). Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate
2021. She has been a part of Dr. Ashlee N Ford Versypt’s research lab in the department of chemical engineering since May 2019. Her interests include biomedical computations, mathematical models, and 3D modeling and printing.Mr. Troy Lamarr Adkins II, Oklahoma State University Troy Adkins graduated in 2021 from Oklahoma State University with a bachelor’s degree in Microbiology & Molecular Biology with an option in Medical Laboratory Sciences. Troy has decided to further his academic career and obtain a masters in Public Health.Mr. Ted Anderson Sperry, Oklahoma State University Ted Sperry graduated with a bachelor’s degree in from Oklahoma State University in 2019, and has since pursued a PhD in Chemical
Chemistry Lecture Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2565- 2572.13. Rodríguez Núñez, J., & Leeuwner, J. (2020). Changing Courses in Midstream: COVID-19 and the Transition to Online Delivery in Two Undergraduate Chemistry Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2819-2824.14. Simon, L. E., Genova, L. E., Kloepper, M. L., & Kloepper, K. D. (2020). Learning Postdisruption: Lessons from Students in a Fully Online Nonmajors Laboratory Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2430-2438.15. Vielma, K., & Brey, E. M. (2021). Using Evaluative Data to Assess Virtual Learning Experiences for Students During COVID-19. Biomedical Engineering Education, 1(1), 139- 144.Appendix A. Sample responses to the