Conference Session

Outreach and Beyond in the Chemical Engineering Classroom

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Byron Hempel, University of Arizona; Paul Blowers, University of Arizona; Kasi M. Kiehlbaugh, University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

co-teaching, classroom technologies, active learning in the classroom, and various classroom-based affective inter- ventions targeted at fostering self-efficacy, belongingness, metacognitive learning strategies, and growth mindset affect outcomes such as student retention and success, particularly during the freshman and sophomore year. Her field of research is undergraduate engineering education. Dr. Kiehlbaugh com- pleted her BS and MS at the University of Arizona and her PhD at UC Berkeley. She is now a Research Assistant Professor in the College of Engineering at her undergraduate alma mater. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 1 Scalable and Practical

Conference Session

ChemE Curriculum: Junior, Senior, and Graduate

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University; Margot A. Vigeant, Bucknell University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Amy Frances Golightly, Bucknell University; Carrine Megan Gadoury, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

learnabout heat and temperature, students outperformed those doing just a physical lab [34]. Other factors may influence the effectiveness of instructional methods, including labgroup composition and gender. Even with effective implementation methods, there can also bedifferences in learning based on the composition of lab groups. For example, Ding, Bosker, andHarskamp [5] found that females in single-gender dyads significantly outperformed females inmixed-gender dyads. For males, this pattern was not evident. One factor that could impactfemales’ performances in lab groups is self-efficacy. MacPhee, Farro, and Canetto [13]discovered that when starting college, females tended to regard themselves as academicallyweaker than males. However, by

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University; Paul E. Post, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

in the subject domain.MethodsWhile the data analysis is ongoing, the survey questions had a 4-Likert scale to measurestudents’ perceptions. Most survey questions utilized a 4-item Likert scale from StronglyDisagree, Disagree, Agree, to Strongly Agree. Multiple items asked students about theclassrooms’ environment, activities and interactions as well as self-efficacy. 42 of the 46undergraduate chemical engineering students consented to participate in the study. A closed-ended survey was administered to participants with a 52% response rate.Preliminary Results74% of the responding students indicated the homework and in-class worksheets were mostconducive to their learning while reading the textbook was perceived by 60% of the respondentsas the

Conference Session

Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Jamie R Gomez, University of New Mexico; Victor Law, Program of Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico; Sophia Bowers, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Process: An Expert Study of Advanced Practicing Professionals, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2005, ASEE: Portland, OR. p. 1-27.55. Carberry, A.R., H.S. Lee, and M.W. Ohland, Measuring engineering design self‐ efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(1): p. 71-79.56. Nocito-Gobel, J., et al., Are Attitudes Toward Engineering Influenced by a Project-Based Introductory Course, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: The Changing Landscape of Engineering and Technology Education in a Global World. 2005, ASEE: Portland, OR. p. 693-706.57. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People

Conference Session

Work-in-Progress Oral Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Reis, Louisiana Tech University; Katie A. Evans, Louisiana Tech University; Dexter Cahoy, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

students who did not submit homework (in either format)for that specific quiz topic were removed for the statistical analysis.To assess student perceptions regarding the use of WeBWorK in the course, online pre- and post-course surveys were sent to the students. Both pre- and post-course surveys asked for studentopinions regarding their identity and self-efficacy as engineering students. The post-coursesurvey also had questions measuring the level of agreement to various statements regarding theuse of WeBWorK as a homework delivery system and their experiences with it.Statistical Analysis of Quiz ScoresA binomial generalized linear mixed effect model was used to analyze the data mainly becauseof the variability between baseline student

Conference Session

Diversity and Global Experiences

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

, not unlike distillation. Byunderstanding these specific experiences, we can make chemical engineering more relatable tothe students who are least likely to persist.This approach has been shown to be effective in engineering education. For instance, Mejiaidentified Latinx high school students’ funds of knowledge tied to the engineering design process[2], [41], [42], [43]. He found that students were able to build on their everyday experiences toaddress community problems. He also showed that students used professional skills, such ascommunication, collaboration and project management to reach design solutions. This approachalso enhanced students’ self-efficacy [44]. Our own work has built on this approach, finding thatdiverse undergraduate

Conference Session

Teaching Professional Skills in Chemical Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robert Wayne Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

. ‘Non-persisting’ students are those leaving engineering because of the academic climate, grades, self-efficacy, high school preparation, career goals, and gender or race [20]. Moreover, students leave STEM because of a lack of belonging [3], [24], “chilly” climate [25], microaggressions [26], conflicting identities [26]–[28], and not identifying with the field [29]–[31]. This literature on student perceptions highlights how their decisions are influenced by how they see themselves as being capable. This suggests how students’ perceptions affect their decisions which can be influenced by several cognitive and non-cognitive factors. Therefore, students’ observations in school inform the actions they take, and what they see as

Conference Session

Business and Professional Literacy Within Chemical Engineering

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristen Ferris, University of New Mexico; Pil Kang, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Susannah C. Davis, University of New Mexico; Sang M. Han, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

communicate to students that accuracy and efficiency are valued over meaning-making. This can serve as an incentive to high-performing students and a disincentive to lower performing students and students with lower self-efficacy. In displaying content-centered courtesy and civic virtue, faculty prepare resources and provide feedback on progress; with few truly low-stakes opportunities for feedback, these reinforce the primacy of accurate and efficient knowledge acquisition. Ruinous Faculty display short-sighted learner-centered altruism and courtesy behaviors, empathy expressing care for students in ways that lower their expectations out of concern