Missouri University of Science and Technology (BS) and University of Wisconsin-Madison (PhD) she pursued an engineering education and outreach post-doc and taught at Madison College for several years.Dr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Melkus Bayles is a Professor, Teaching Track, in the Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department at the University of Pittsburgh, and serves as the Undergraduate Program Director. She has spent part of her career working in industry with Exxon, Westinghouse, Phillips Petroleum and Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center (now NETL). Her industrial experience has included process engineering, computer modeling and control, process design and testing, and engineering
Paper ID #41264A Wellness Course for Engineering StudentsGlaucia Prado, University of California, Davis Glaucia Prado is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in Chemical Engineering at University of California Davis. She began her career in food engineering from the University of Campinas (Brazil) before earning a PhD in chemical engineering from the University of Alberta. She teaches a variety of courses such as thermodynamics and senior design and developed a new food engineering elective course for chemical engineering students that consists in applying engineering concepts in the context of food processing. Her
experience. One of the modules offered as a part ofthe summer program is “Introduction to Chemical Engineering,” which aims to provide studentswith a preview of the exciting world of chemical engineering (ChE). The goal of the module isalso to raise awareness of various career possibilities in chemical engineering. Students work onhands-on activities and tours of research laboratories. One of the hands-on activities is that ofmini fluid flow experiments showcasing one of the most important topics in the realm of ChE:fluid flow phenomena.Improving the experiential learning of college-level students has gained special attention. Oneexample is the creation of a desk-scale kit on fluid flow, aiming to facilitate the understanding offrictional losses and
, with real-world application of ODE modeling can inspirestudents for a STEM career path 7–10. While these cases relied on MATLAB or R, guided by theinstructor's detailed instructions, emerging AI technologies offer a promising alternative to inspirestudents' self-paced learning and spark their interest in pursuing STEM career paths. To addressthis, this project aims to implement ChatGPT and AI as supplementary tools for studying ODEmodels in the course Chemical Process Control. While this project is ultimately designed for senior students taking Chemical Process Controlin Spring 2025, nine high school students of differing mathematical and coding backgroundsvoluntarily participated in a pilot study in Summer 2024. The nine high school
educational outcomes achieved inthe required design courses are met, while providing the instructors a great degree of flexibilityin the scope of the independent study project. One of the students remarked (paraphrasing) thatthe independent study experience was satisfying because it gave her a chance to applyfundamentals learned in other courses (e.g., Transport Phenomena and Chemical Reactor Design)to design a system to address emerging processing challenges. Despite the small sample size oftwo students, the educational outcomes suggest that the independent study experience fosteredinterest in research careers; one student has entered a Ph.D. program at RPI, and the secondstudent has recently applied to Ph.D. programs in chemical engineering
introduced to the tool of a “team Contract” and presented with asimplified template recommended to be used in team projects later in the career. A secondlecture addresses the topic of “Social Loafing”. With some cases presented in class fordiscussion. In the spring semester they are introduced to the topic of “Conflict resolution” andrevisits the alignment of team contract with high performance teams. For these sections and theother activities in these introductory courses, students are placed in teams of 2-3 by CATME,and they get trained in the use of the resources it provides. Later in the career, some professorstake the initiative of introducing or reinforcing teamwork skills with some lectures or exercises,mainly to deal with conflict resolution
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Work-in-Progress: Developing a Research Plan for a Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Bridging Courses on Student Success in Graduate Studies1. IntroductionNorth Carolina State University’s Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (CBE)regularly accepts accomplished students to its graduate program with backgrounds such aschemistry, physics, or biology. However, these students may lack the prerequisite knowledge ofkey chemical engineering topics, such as transport phenomena and thermodynamics. Otherstudents may have an undergraduate background in chemical engineering but enter graduatestudy after an industrial career and would like a refresher on complicated topics
Paper ID #48056Community Building in Chemical EngineeringDr. Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh Taryn Bayles is a Professor, Teaching Track and Undergraduate Program Director in the Chemical Engineering department at the University of Pittsburgh. She has spent part of her career working in industry, as well as academia. She has led over 160 workshops with over 7,500 participants and her various outreach programs and curriculum development have impacted more than 22,000 K-12 students. She has been recognized with the ASEE Lifetime Achievement Award in PCEE, Donald R. Woods Lectureship Award - ChED, Chancellor’s
Paper ID #39263Chemical Engineers’ Creating Concept Maps: A Prewriting ActivityDr. Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes experience in infectious disease
students for their self-evaluationon how the EOP project facilitated their learning in chemical process control and how much theymastered the EOP mindset. Table 4 shows the average scores for each question shown in Table 1.As for “Q1 - The term project helps you understand the concepts in process control”, an averagescore of 2.74 was obtained. An average score of 3.18 was obtained for “Q2 - The term projectallows you to implement process control in real-life scenarios”. Students evaluated their projectswith higher scores for “Q3 - The term project makes you aware of your responsibility inengineering for one planet” (an average score of 3.59), “Q4 - You will keep EOP mindsets in yourfuture careers” (an average score of 3.69), and “Q5 - Your future
,retaining, and pursuing a career in engineering, with underrepresented groups like womenexperiencing identity conflicts and gender roles that affect their retention in the field [27-29].The Current StudyThe study aims to update classroom content by introducing contemporary industry-relevantproblems designed by industry professionals. The research uses design-based research withmultiple implementation cycles to answer the question of how effective this approach is inpromoting professional identity formation and industry-relevant competencies. The study alsoaddresses questions about students' understanding and interest in these applications, therelationship between students' identity and course performance, and the impact of the approachon
project-based approaches, which means that morestudent teamwork is required. However, many international students lack the essential teamworkskills as the development of these skills is often under-emphasised during their previous studies. Inaddition, most of these students have limited or no relevant work experience. Consequently,developing strong teamwork competencies not only enhances the effectiveness of their presentacademic endeavours but also augments their prospects for future career progression. By recognisingthis need, this study presents an inclusive workshop framework, aiming to provide master’s studentswith the opportunity to develop general teamwork proficiencies whilst exploring new team roles anddynamics that are more appropriate
the discipline,interact with the faculty from that discipline, and gain exposure to topics and applicationsrelevant to the field. In this study, the learning experience consists of a three-credit hour course,taught in-person and supplemented with online course materials. An overview of the course isincluded in Table 1 below, which lists topics in the course, concepts which are introduced by wayof showing students about the coursework later in the curriculum, and topics which are specificto the career of the instructor and the university. Of the three credit hours, approximately onehour is focused on basic programming skills. The course includes two exams, a programmingproject, and a final exam.Table 1: Topics which are touched upon, to
Engineering at Rutgers University. During the last year at Rutgers University, she led the efforts of the university advancing the careers in STEM for women at Rutgers as an Associate Vice President of the University. Dr. Ierapetritou’s research focuses on the following areas: 1) process operations; 2) design and synthesis of flexible production systems with emphasis on pharmaceutical manufacturing; 3) energy and sustainability process modeling and operations, including biomass conversion and plastics upcycling, and recycling; and 4) modeling of biopharmaceutical production. Her research is supported by several federal (FDA, NIH, NSF, ONR, NASA, DOE) and industrial (BMS, J&J, GSK, PSE, Bosch, Eli Lilly) grants. Among
, Bucknell University Dr. Elif Miskioglu is an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. She holds a B.S. ˘ in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Ohio State University. Her early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. As a result, her diverse background also includes experience in infectious disease and epidemiology, providing crucial exposure to the broader context of engineering problems and their subsequent solutions. These diverse experiences and a growing passion for improving engineering
10, with an average number of 3 codes per excerpt.Across all student responses (among both cohorts) the most frequently occurring code wascommunication, followed by technical analysis/claims, and self-actualization.Table 1: Description of codes Code Description communication writing, delivering, formatting an oral and/or written report connection connection of topics from other courses with the laboratory, connection of laboratory course to the CHE discipline, one’s future career, or professional competencies equipment elements having to do with exposure to laboratory equipment (specific or general), including
engineering? • was the experiment to the work of chemical engineers? Engineering identity How true or untrue is each statement below of you? (7-point Very untrue of me / Very true of me scale) • My classmates see me as an engineering person • My engineering instructors see me as an engineering person • I feel like I belong in engineering Persistence intentions (7-point Strongly disagree to Strongly agree ) I intend to • pursue a career in engineering in the future. • work in engineering for at least 3 years in the future—as a professional engineer, a graduate student, and/or researcher. Demographics • Growing up, what language or languages were spoken in your home? (Only/mostly a language or languages
, technoeconomics, and life cycle assessment. She leads the Sustainable Design and Systems Medicine lab (https://yenkiekm.com). Her teaching methodology to incorporate computational tools for explaining theoretical concepts led to her selection as one of the 20 Outstanding Young Chemical Engineering Educators by CACHE (Computer Aids for Chemical Engineering) Committee in 2019. Her ongoing research on machine learning, graph theory, water treatment, solvent recovery, optimizing lube-oil operations, and water utilities energy and asset management are funded by the USEPA, NSF, ExxonMobil, AstraZeneca, Atlantic County Utilities Authority, and American Water. She has won the 2022 AIChE Environmental Division Early Career Award, the
engineeringstudents with active, hands-on learning opportunities to enrich their education and better preparethem for their chosen careers (1-3). Chemical engineering is a multidisciplinary field of studywith a large depth and breadth of material to cover in just four short years, so learning should beboth efficient and reinforcing of basic concepts to maintain student retention and success. To better facilitate better learning outcomes in our current NSF sponsored work, our teamdeveloped several ultra-low-cost desktop learning modules (LCDLMs) which can serve as a full,unit operations experiment without need for a full laboratory budget and set up to facilitate (4-6).The more recent kits are on the order of 10” x 4” x 1” (1) meaning they can be used
then submitte. Not surprisingly, sixteen students in summer 2022 and 48students in Spring 2023 successfully completed this module. This accomplishment played asmall part (1/10th) of an assessment associated with Student Outcome 7, where studers wererequired to complete 9 of 10 assigned Level One and Level Two SAChE modules tosatisfactorily demonstrate their ability to acquire and apply new knowledge.After attend two 2-hour lectures on professional ethics given by a guest lecturer, who had a 40+year chemical engineering career with several companies, most notabliy Lubrizol, the studentstook a 40 or 67 questions exam focused soley on professional ethics. The standard for thisABET direct assessment of Outcome 4 was 80%. In summer 2022, the grades
Medicine lab (https://yenkiekm.com). Her teaching methodology to incorporate computational tools for explaining theoretical concepts led to her selection as one of the 20 Outstanding Young Chemical Engineering Educators by CACHE (Computer Aids for Chemical Engineering) Committee in 2019. Her ongoing research on machine learning, solvent recovery, optimizing lube-oil operations, and water utilities energy and asset management are funded by the USEPA, ExxonMobil, AstraZeneca, Atlantic County Utilities Authority and American Water. She won the 2022 AIChE Environmental Division Early Career Award for her contributions to solving challenging environmental chemical engineering problems. She also won the 2023 AIChE-Delaware
to allow studentsmore personalized paths towards different careers [5]. One critical aspect of a chemical engineering program is course(s) on process/plant design. Processdesign is often treated as the culmination of the undergraduate chemical engineering curriculum. Thiscourse draws on knowledge from previous chemical engineering courses including transport, balances,controls, and more. Students are often reminded of what they learned in previous courses and are firstrequired to pull knowledge from multiple previous courses. This means students are likely to see the in-terconnectivity of the curricula for the first time at the very end of their education. Additionally, processdesign tends to focus on the design of a single process
Paper ID #43624Development of a Learning Module to Teach Chemical Engineering StudentsAbout Moral Reasoning in the Context of Process SafetyProf. Adam T Melvin, Clemson University Adam Melvin obtained a BS in Chemical Engineering and a BA in Chemistry from the University of Arizona, a MS in Chemical Engineering (with a minor in Biotechnology) and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University. He spent the first 10 years of his independent career as a faculty member in the Cain Department of Chemical Engineering at Louisiana State University. He recently joined the faculty in the Department of Chemical
1: Survey Questions Survey Questions Which courses did you use the CHE Calculator in? How frequently did you use the CHE Calculator during the courses? How was the CHE Calculator integrated into your coursework? (HW, project, resource) What challenges, if any, did you face while using the CHE Calculator? (Select all that apply) How intuitive was the CHE Calculator interface? How effective was the CHE Calculator in helping you understand complex chemical engineering concepts? How do you think the CHE Calculator compares to other computational tools you've used in chemical engineering? (Aspen, Python, etc.) (effectiveness, usefulness etc) Did the CHE Calculator help you develop problem-solving skills relevant to your professional career
motivated by the need to enhance student engagement with sustainability principles andsocial responsibility, preparing them for careers that increasingly demand consideration of thesefactors. The redesign also aimed to foster an entrepreneurial mindset by encouraging students toidentify market-driven solutions to societal challenges.3.1 Core Design PrinciplesThe course followed a structured engineering design process that required teams toconceptualize, design, and test innovative processes addressing societal needs. Students engagedin iterative design thinking, which allowed them to refine their ideas based on feedback and newinsights.3.2 Project SelectionProjects were sourced from alumni, faculty, and industry partners, ensuring that they
attributes that are tied to theirfuture careers [3]. Thus, incorporating the student perspective into chemical engineeringlaboratory course design is critical.Thirty-one students responded to the survey. Survey responses included demographic andbackground information, which can be used to situate the survey responses in the context of therespondents’ experiences. Additionally, respondents were asked to rank the five most importantlearning outcomes for laboratory-intensive chemical engineering courses, identify whichoutcomes respondents are weakest in, and which outcomes the chemical engineering curriculumshould do a better job covering. Finally, open-ended questions were included to identifyadditional important learning outcomes and provide comments
categories: particular knowledge, intellectual engagement,and emotional engagement. “Particular knowledge” would indicate an emphasis on ethical codes,common ethical issues, and case studies of ethical precedent. This details guidelines to studentsof what ethical practice may look like in the engineering careers, and it is accounts for many ofthe engineering ethics curricula. “Intellectual engagement” deals with student understanding ofthe principles of moral reasoning and how to engage with ambiguous scenarios. Here, studentsare asked to practice how to make ethical decisions and what may be guiding these decisionframeworks from a provided ethical framework. Finally, “emotional engagement” may be themost important but least explicitly covered
about any actions they may have already taken. I did notencounter direct resistance to the initiative, which allowed for productive dialogue. As wecontinue to move forward with this work, the neutral faculty have the potential to shift into whatis known in change theory as the early or late majority,[16] depending on their comfort level andthe continued momentum of the initiative. With further support, they could become moreactively involved, helping to broaden the collective impact of our efforts.Positionality StatementWriting this paper has been one of the most challenging yet rewarding tasks of my career. Fornearly three years, I struggled to craft a narrative, frequently questioning my expertise andwhether my voice belonged in the
, and even attitudesabout engineering as a career. Without question, the most widely recognized factor in predictingsuccess in engineering is math preparedness, placement and performance [3-9]. Bego et al. [3]showed that engineering students who complete the required sequence of four mathematicscourses had a 93% graduation rate and Galbraith et al. [4] showed that the likelihood ofgraduation increased with the higher the math class in which the student was initially enrolled.Bressoud [5] cautioned that success with calculus in high school does not necessarily guaranteesuccess in college. Successful college students must also be able to think critically, learn on theirown and use techniques for critical analysis of problems. Pembridge and
third of the number of students thatanswered that survey question, did not have a clear understanding of EDI and either stronglydisagreed, disagreed or nether agreed nor disagreed with the statement that they understoodand applied EDI provisions (18 from 57 which accounts for 31.6%). This in itself isproblematic, especially as earlier research suggests that students in higher education settingdo not believe that EDI matters to their future career prospects [14]. Furthermore, A sizeablenumber of students were unaware of how to report incidents of inappropriate behaviour witha total of 26 from 42 respondents (62%) uncertain as to how to do this. An initial assessmentof this data suggests that the awareness of what EDI is and the protection