Paper ID #37520How We Teach: Capstone DesignDr. Laura P. Ford, The University of Tulsa LAURA P. FORD is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Tulsa. She teaches engineering science thermodynamics and fluid mechanics, mass transfer/separations, and chemi- cal engineering senior labs. She is a co-advisor for TU’s Engineers Without Borders - USA chapter and is a co-PI for the Refining Technologies Joint Industry Project.Dr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in Chemical and Biological Engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and
Paper ID #41284Prioritizing Learning Outcomes for Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses:Student PerspectivesDr. Chris Barr, University of Michigan Dr. Christopher Barr is the Instructional Laboratory Supervisor in the Chemical Engineering Department at University of Michigan. He obtained his Ph.D. at University of Toledo in 2013 and is a former Fellow in the N.S.F. GK-12 grant ”Graduate Teaching Fellows in STEM High School Education: An Environmental Science Learning Community at the Land-Lake Ecosystem Interface”. His main responsibilities are supervising and implementing improvements to the undergraduate labs. He also
disciplines. The College ofEngineering and Computer Science (ECS) amended the ECS bylaws in 2020 to specify thatpromotion from Assistant to Associate teaching faculty must have demonstrated both “very high-quality teaching” and secondarily “high quality service,” and for Associate to Full, demonstrationof “excellence” in teaching and “very high quality service” in addition to leadership whereopportunities exist. The bylaws note that teaching may encompass various professionalactivities relating to undergraduate or graduate education, including classroom effectiveness,lecture and laboratory course development, and adoption of more effective teaching practices,whereas service includes program administration, committee participation, student and
surpassedthose experienced by undergraduate, master’s and PhD/postdoctoral trainees completing our morecomplex IBL bioadhesives module [29], which was expected since middle school students wouldlikely have never been exposed to bioadhesives before. Moreover, these learning gains werecomparable to those experienced by freshman engineering students [41,42] and middle schoolstudents [28] completing IBL laboratory modules. These significant learning gains demonstratethat this IBL bioadhesives outreach module effectively teaches students principles of bioadhesives.Pre/post-surveys demonstrated that students did not experience significant improvements in theirattitudes towards STEM from participating in our IBL bioadhesives outreach module. Theseresults were
Paper ID #41378Work in Progress: Implementation of a Curricular Development Project forExperiential Learning in a Senior Capstone Product-Design CourseDr. Chris Barr, University of Michigan Dr. Christopher Barr is the Instructional Laboratory Supervisor in the Chemical Engineering Department at University of Michigan. He obtained his Ph.D. at University of Toledo in 2013 and is a former Fellow in the N.S.F. GK-12 grant ”Graduate Teaching Fellows in STEM High School Education: An Environmental Science Learning Community at the Land-Lake Ecosystem Interface”. His main responsibilities are supervising and implementing
Engineering at the University of California, Davis. Dr. White has been a faculty member at UC Davis since 2015, and he teaches process design and economics, process safety, bioseparations, and senior laboratory courses. He has helped lead the creation of the CHEM E CAD and Industrial Automation club at UC Davis, and he has sought to develop authentic, project-based learning experiences for his students in his courses. Dr. White also serves as the accreditation lead for the chemical engineering program at UC Davis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Impact of The Design of Coffee, A General Education Chemical Engineering Course, on Students’ Decisions to Major in STEM
Dutch and in English. During this time his primary teaching and course develop- ment responsibilities were wide-ranging, but included running the Unit Operations laboratory, introducing Aspen Plus software to the curriculum, and developing a course for a new M.S. program on Renewable Energy (EUREC). In conjunction with his teaching appointment, he supervised dozens of internships (a part of the curriculum at the Hanze), and a number of undergraduate research projects with the Energy Knowledge Center (EKC) as well as a master’s thesis. In 2016, Dr. Barankin returned to the US to teach at the Colorado School of Mines. His primary teaching and course development responsibilities here include the Unit Operations Lab and
/j.compedu.2013.10.013.[34] D. C. Lagoudas, J. D. Whitcomb, D. A. Miller, M. Z. Lagoudas, and K. J. Shryock, “Continuum Mechanics in a Restructured Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum,” Int. J. Engng Ed, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 301–314, 2000.[35] P. Piergiovanni and S. S. Moor, “Experiments In The Classroom: Examples Of Inductive Learning With Classroom Friendly Laboratory Kits,” in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Nashville, Tennessee: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2003, p. 8.557.1- 8.557.10. doi: 10.18260/1-2--11569.[36] B. Bender, “Concepts for Purposive and Motivational Teaching and Learning in Engineering Design Courses,” Int. J. Engng Ed., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 336–341, 2001.[37] M. van Manen, “On the
Paper ID #42238Using Comics to Promote Student Interest in the Breadth and Depth of ChemicalEngineeringIra Hysi, Northeastern UniversityDr. Luke Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Luke Landherr is a teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in comics and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Using Educational Comics to Promote Student Interest in the Breadth and Depth of Chemical Engineering Abstract To encourage students to pursue chemical engineering at undergraduate and
authorityfigure, who traditionally was male. Authority has been studied related to other issues likeclassroom and laboratory work, but reading/following directions is not central to these studies[42]. A third possible explanation is that female students who self-select into engineering arebetter students on average than male students, which would involve a subset from other studiesof first-year college students [43]. This third hypothesis could be examined using standardizedtest scores or high school grades or rank. Since most students in the MEB course are in theirsecond semester of their engineering education, only one semester of grade data is available fromtheir university transcripts.When focusing on higher education, few examples of
.)The learning outcomes for this project were for students to be able to: - Draw information from a variety of online models and databases, - Estimate atmospheric pollutant concentrations given limited information, and validate against existing datasets for model accuracy, - Develop substantive hypotheses regarding potential causal societal factors for pollutant concentrations, and - Use a statistically appropriate method to infer trends, or lack thereof.Students were allowed to present their results in any form of summary that they deemedappropriate: while most employed a more typical laboratory report style structure to their reports,some employed PowerPoint, or slide style presentations to emphasize the