all students (372/414) Sophomore/ Winter Preventative; Mandatory for 96% (23/24) junior mass Peer 2023 midterm, final review all students 79% (19/24) transferStudents generally responded positively to the remedial assignment. Most scanned (new) hand-written solutions and recorded audio while screen sharing a pdf on Zoom. A few studentsanimated equations onto PowerPoint, recorded live equation-writing with tablets or filmedthemselves writing on paper. Very few students appeared on camera. Generally, problems werecompleted and explained
University Press, 2014, pp. 601-632.[3] P. Sageev and C. J. Romanowski, "A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in the Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 685-693, 2001.[4] C. A. Hubka et al., "A Writing in the Disciplines Approach to Technical Report Writing in Chemical Engineering Laboratory Courses," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, Florida, 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32019[5] D. Miller and J. Williams, "Incorporating Peer Review Into The Che Laboratory," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004. Available: https://peer.asee.org/13191[6] K. Wright and P. E. Slaboch
courseAbstractRecent years have shown increased success in the use of undergraduate students as teachingassistants or supplemental instructors in core chemical engineering courses. While typicallyutilized in traditional lecture-based courses, there is significant promise in utilizingundergraduate students as a peer resource in a lab-based course. This paper summarizes howundergraduate teaching assistants, referred to at Louisiana State University as coaches, wereintegrated into a junior level lecture/laboratory course. The course is designed to teachexperimental statistics in the lecture component (two days a week) with the students performingexperiments on three different unit operations (one day a week) for 3 four-week experimentalcycles. The main
still lacking in engineering is communication and professionaldevelopment courses. Whether students strive to be in industry or academia, effectivecommunication skills are highly sought after and often a requirement. As students transition fromundergraduate courses to graduate courses, the amount of writing and conveyance of data shiftsdrastically; however, even after twenty years, there still lacks the requirement for formalinstruction of these soft skills. Students have identified that writing is stressful and, thereforecould benefit from more formal instruction in scientific writing.10, 11Teaching Assistantship While formal instruction of professional development and communication is not requiredin many institutions, 36 out of the 100
able to survive in the program. We incorporated the intervention strategies in the regular course environment as part of theweekly group work participation, homework, midterm exams, and group research presentation.During the first week of the semester, we introduced the concept of growth mindset to thestudents. The students watched a talk by Dr. Carol Dweck, the psychologist who proposed themindset theory, and Khan Academy’s video on growing one’s intelligence through struggleduring the weekly group work. We encouraged the students to reflect on their own ideas aboutintelligence and the importance of having a growth mindset while studying chemicalengineering. The students then shared their thoughts with their peers. In Table 2, we
discoveries in the form of progress reports that aresubmitted to the industrial collaborators and federal funding agency sources at the end of eachsemester. The students also learn to use citation software and publish their work in peer-reviewed journals.As researchers, it is important to contribute to the literature on these new advances in arespective field. Conference presentations provide the students with the opportunity of presentingtheir data at various stages of development (preliminary findings, most up-to-date findings, andfuture directions). This allows them to gain constructive criticism from colleagues and polishtheir findings before final documentation. Furthermore, it allows the students to meet otherresearchers and learn the
followed by questionsfrom their peers and professors, along with an individual report submission. We saw in the datathat this aspect was most anticipated among all students, and many students in the traditionalcourse experienced a fulfilment of those expectations. One student wrote: “After lab, I feel much for comfortable presenting on a technical topic. I previously had little comfort with this because I had trouble explaining things in a way that people with limited background knowledge might understand.”Even among students whose initial response didn’t center on written or oral communication,many students in the traditional course chose to write about it at the end of the course. Forexample: Pre: “I expect to be able to design
the instructor (80%) and more generally by apanel (other instructors, TA, experts) (20%). Similarly, the 15-min presentations are alsoprescribed in the number and content of the slides, and the balanced participation of all membersof the team. A panel grades the presentation by evaluating both the team and individualperformance.Team and communication skills developmentThe lab course also provides a comprehensive experience on team development, includingtraining, coaching and performance evaluation (self, peer and external). There is a suggested capnumber of 36 students in the lab, resulting in a maximum of six students per team to cover thesix available experiments. Though 4-5-member teams have also been operative in the past, thecurrent
discretization parameters Metacognitive on the visual depiction ofknowledge the discretized reservoir model. AssessmentTable 3: Assessment Worksheet Learning Objective Assessment LO1: Students should be able to outline the Task: students would write an in-class quiz ordered computational tasks that constitute Acceptable evidence of this learning objective will be: the operation of a reservoir
three-week rotations. Course sections are capped at 15students. The course descriptions and goals are generally similar for both semesters, but theycover different types of unit operations. The learning objectives for the fall semester are that bythe end of the course, students can: 1. Design chemical engineering experiments and create hypotheses 2. Operate chemical engineering tools, equipment, and instrumentation 3. Analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgement to draw conclusions 4. Write and present scientific information clearly to a range of audiences 5. Collaborate with peers and instructors and function as a part of a healthy, creative, and cohesive team 6. Identify safety hazards and preventative measures
organized and non- organized structures in teamwork environments • By the end of this exercise the student should be able to associate leadership and effective teamwork • By the end of this exercise the student should be able to generate steps to enrich teamwork with an attitude of generosityProcedureParticipants sit in individual places in a classroom. It may be convenient to display a commonclock as the time for activities is going to be recorded by participants.The proctor distributes blank cards, two per participant, and asks everyone to write theirnames/last names in front both cards, and mark one card with number “1” at top right, and theother with number “2”. They will be referred to as “card 1” and “card 2
Union, both in chemical engineering. In 2011, he received the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division ”Engineering Education” Mentoring Grant and in 2015 he received the Ray W. Fahien Award. His research interests include particle technology, transport phenomena, and engineering education. His current educational research is focused on peer instruction, technology-enhanced active learning, and electronic textbooks.Prof. Matthew W Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all
, University of Virginia Professional Skills and Safety are my main pedagogical interests. I use the Chemical Engineering labora- tory to implement safety training to improve safety culture, and to adapt assessment methods to enhance development of students’ professional skills. I am an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Virginia and I hold a B.Sc. (University of Saskatchewan) and Ph.D. in Chemical En- gineering (Queen’s University). Complimenting my pedagogical research is an interest in bioprocess engineering, environmental engineering, environmental risk management, and I have authored more than 40 peer reviewed publications in these fields. I’m also active in developing workforce
my classes. I can easily reach out to most people.”Values, Attitudes, and BeliefsThe focus group participants clearly expressed the attitude that CEE has played an enduring rolein the chemical engineering community, both historically and currently, with one participantdescribing CEE as a “needed place." Several participants expressed the value that CEE was auseful source of ideas for lessons, courses, and programs that faculty members can use ininstruction and share with colleagues. They also expressed the belief that the journal, as a peer-reviewed resource for content that is specific to the discipline, is used in practice, citing that, “itserves a really important role as both a research and a practice journal.” In addition, they
necessary to obtain their preferred FPAG. Example Acted on opportunities Knew that resume Knew of potential Behaviors such as internships/co- systems can be resources but chose not ops. automated but does not to use them. No clear Began the process change their approach in decision on preferred early, including writing. FPAG. sophomore year. Asked questions of key socializers such as career counselors and faculty. 2) High