2006-281: CEAE DEPARTMENT ETHICS ACROSS THE CURRICULUMStanley Rolfe, University of KansasFrancis Thomas, University of Kansas-Lawrence Page 11.314.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 CEAE Department Ethics Across the CurriculumAbstractEngineering ethics is an extremely important part of the education of all engineers includingCivil, Environmental and Architectural Engineers. Although personal ethics are the foundationfor engineering ethics, personal ethics generally are developed prior to the time students arrive atthe University and, for a variety of reasons, are not discussed as part of engineering
2006-2285: INTEGRATING ETHICS INTO A CIVIL ENGINEERING COURSEChristy Jeon, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAdjo Amekudzi, Georgia Institute of Technology Page 11.784.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Integrating Ethics into a Civil Engineering CourseAbstractEthics is a critical component of Civil Engineering education and practice. This paper discussesa case study to integrate ethics into a required undergraduate Civil Engineering course -- CivilEngineering Systems -- at Georgia Institute of Technology. The course introduces systems andsustainability concepts in Civil Engineering planning, design, operations, and renewal, and thuspresents an
AC 2010-895: USING HISTORY TO REINFORCE ETHICS AND EQUILIBRIUMWilfrid Nixon, University of Iowa Wilfrid Nixon is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Iowa, and has been on the faculty there since 1987. In addition to his research on winter highway maintenance, he has also conducted research into student learning, and ways in which faculty can enhance such learning. He has been involved both with the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE and with the ASCE Committee on Faculty Development, and has also both attended and served as a mentor at ExCEEd Teaching Workshops. He plays bad golf, and also dances the Argentine Tango
AC 2007-1724: USING A HYBRID CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT FOR THEINSTRUCTION OF ETHICS AND CONTEMPORARY CIVIL ENGINEERINGISSUESDonald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Page 12.1532.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Using a Hybrid Classroom Environment for the Instruction of Ethics and Contemporary Civil Engineering IssuesAbstractEvery ABET accredited civil engineering program has to consider how to successfully measurewhether its students attain the program outcomes, including ABET mandated outcomes (a) – (k),which include what many consider to be “soft” outcomes since they are not based on scientific ortechnical knowledge. ABET outcomes
Paper ID #27283Experiencing Failure - Recreating the Hyatt Regency Collapse to Teach Stat-ics, Ethics, and Lifelong LearningDr. Laura Doyle, Santa Clara University Dr. Laura Doyle is a lecturer in the Civil Engineering Department at Santa Clara University where she teaches undergraduate courses in civil engineers. Before coming to SCU, Laura was a post doctoral scholar for the John Muir Institute of the Environment at University of California, Davis where she used multi-dimensional models to examine water quality of the San Francisco Bay Delta system. She earned her masters and doctoral degrees at UC Davis and her
Paper ID #13026Assessing the Ethical Development of Students in an Undergraduate Civil En-gineering Course using a Standardized InstrumentDr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering at Lawrence Technological University where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter has served as the University Director of Assessment and the founding Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning. He conducts funded pedagogical research and development projects, has published numerous engineering education papers
Paper ID #27057Addressing the Cognitive and Affective Domain of Ethics Across the Civil andEnvironmental Engineering CurriculumDr. Jennifer Mueller PE P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic Change Happen (MACH) program. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University, and he holds his
Paper ID #28528Listening to Community Voices as Part of Ethical Civil Engineering:Experiences in Civil Engineering CoursesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where
sustainability. He has served on numerous technical committees for ASCE, TRB, ITE and ASEE.Dr. Kevin C Bower P.E., The Citadel Dr. Kevin Bower is an associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel, in Charleston, South Carolina. He recently received the ASEE Environmental Engineering Meritorious Service Award and he was the 2011 Harry C. Saxe teaching award recipient awarded for outstanding un- dergraduate engineering teaching at The Citadel. Dr. Bower’s teaching research interests are in improving active learning environments, recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations to civil engineering, and the development of classroom pedagogy to improve moral and ethical development in engineering
currently the chair of the BYU Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. His research efforts are in Finite Element Modeling and Professional Engineering Ethics.Ronald Terry, Brigham Young University Ron Terry is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholarship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education.Rollin Hotchkiss, Brigham Young University Rollin Hotchkiss is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Brigham Young University and has also been on the faculty at The University of Nebraska and Washington State University. He
at least 50% ofaccredited civil engineering programs in the United States. The credit hour requirements are theaverage value for each course [22]. The topics in column 3 are the proposed topics for a newthree-year civil engineering program. Most three year topics remain at approximately the samenumber of credit hours as the average four year program. The CE (Civil Engineer) seminarcourse is designed to cover professional issues in engineering listed in the EAC-ABET civilengineering program criteria including business, public policy, leadership, professional ethics,licensure, and professionalism. Topics that were eliminated include dynamics, constructionmanagement, engineering economics, and computer aided drawing (CAD). The topics that
with a minor in International Relations, from the University of Texas at Tyler in 2016. She received a Master of Arts in Human Rights and Global Ethics from the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom in January 2019. Her research interests are in the area of government, policy, and international relations.Dr. James K. Nelson Jr. P.E., Texas A&M University System Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Dr. Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineer in
, with a focus on environmental river mechanics, from Colorado State University. Dr. Mueller’s teaching and research areas focus on environmental and water resources engineering, including stream restoration, sustainable design, environmental river mechanics, and stormwater management practices for low-impact develop- ment. As graduates of Rose-Hulman typically leave with technical competency, she feels strongly that students need to understand the importance of also developing skills in non-technical areas, including sustainability, ethics, and critical thinking. Additionally, Dr. Mueller aspires to continue to provide mean- ingful experiential learning opportunities for her students. Through these experiential
pedagogy to improve moral development in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Enhancing Student Learning Through AccreditationEmployers commonly note ethical reasoning skills as a top desired skill in college graduates.Within our own institutional context, the focus and institutional belief in the importance ofethical reasoning is even more pronounced. In addition to the mission to “educate and developour students to become principled leaders in all walks of life by instilling the core values of TheCitadel in a disciplined and intellectually challenging environment,”1 The institution espousesthree core values: Honor, Duty, and Respect. The institution’s core value of
licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Challenges of a Professional Issues Course in Civil Engineering: Comparison Across Two YearsAbstractThere are a number of professional skills that civil engineering students should possess whenthey graduate with a Bachelor’s degree, as articulated in the ASCE Body of Knowledge SecondEdition (BOK2) and the civil engineering program specific criteria under ABET EAC-accreditation. An analysis of the curriculum at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU
systems’” [7].Several previous studies have been devoted to studying trends surrounding social justice inengineering and to maintaining student engagement with the social surroundings of theirprojects. In one paper, George Catalano and Caroline Baillie explored the influence thatengineers have on justice and peace, concluding that engineering ethics should be expanded tothe overall social impact a product of engineering creates [8]. Catalano explores this further byexamining engineering ethics as described within different professional engineeringorganizations. He poses that the main issue with engineering ethics is the demand that anengineer should work to protect the public without a specific definition of who that includes.Rather, the author
4 Triple Bottom Line/Sustainability 5 Social impacts of infrastructure 6 Teamwork 7 Ethics I 8 Ethics II 9 Traits of effective written and oral communication 10 Financing public works 11 Safety/licensure 12 Land use and planning/growth/forecastingThe process to create these lessons is as follows. Team assignments – teams of faculty members were assembled to create each lesson. Faculty members were asked to give preferences to the 12 lessons they would like to develop. Teams contained three
civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data; design a system, component, or process in at least two more than one civil engineering contexts; include principles of sustainability in design; explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership; analyze issues in professional ethics; and explain the importance of professional licensure.Understanding the Proposed CriteriaThis section is intended to provide both civil engineering program faculty and programevaluators an improved understanding of the new Civil Engineering Program Criteria. Thefollowing is based largely on the draft new commentary7 and provides a summary of both“what” is intended by each criterion and “why” the provision is
AC 2007-783: FINDINGS FROM WORKSHOPS ON FAILURE CASE STUDIES INTHE CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS CURRICULUMNorb Delatte, Cleveland State UniversityPaul Bosela, Cleveland State UniversityKevin Rens, University of Colorado-DenverKenneth Carper, Washington State UniversityKevin Sutterer, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Page 12.745.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Findings from Workshops on Failure Case Studies in the Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics CurriculumAbstract The study of engineering failures can offer students valuable insights into associatedtechnical, ethical, and professional issues
(CEE 4601) is a senior-level holistically-oriented course designed toexpose mature undergraduate students to a wide range of practical aspects in the profession ofengineering, including the following: Page 13.1004.2- An examination of self-abilities and interests- Leadership and management- Organizational structure and theory- Management of self- Management of others- Communications (verbal and written)- Teams, groups, and group thinking- Project management- Ethics in engineering- Marketing professional technical services- A global view of the emerging engineering marketplaceAn Examination of Self-abilities and InterestsFor
students’ understanding. Ethics, for example, is often taught in civilengineering through the use of case studies. Further, case studies offer an opportunity forinterdisciplinary discussions centered on human dignity and justice goals [8] and likewisedevelop empathy for the users impacted by the project. Empathy is increasingly beingrecognized for the central role it may play in connecting crucial inter- and intrapersonal skillswith enhanced abilities to understand and productively work in multidisciplinary environmentswith diverse stakeholder groups [9]. Finally, some professors may not feel comfortable directlydiscussing race and related topics within an otherwise technical classroom environment; casestudies allow the emphasis to be taken off of
the pastfew years at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. The course is required for students inthe civil engineering and natural resources engineering bachelors’ degree programs. The coursewas developed based on input from the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand(IPENZ). Unlike in the U.S., an engineering degree in New Zealand does not require asubstantial general education component. Course topics include engineering history,investigation of failure cases, teamwork, ethics, risk management, and engineering today andtomorrow. This paper details the development of the course to date and its associatedassessments, and discusses lessons learnt in teaching professional engineering skills in thisformat. It also compares
direct application of asafety management framework called the Hierarchy of Control and of the principle that theability to influence the achievement of a project goal diminishes over the design and constructioncycle. PtD has been required in Europe for over two decades but adoption in the U.S. has beenslow. This paper provides overviews of the PtD concept and process and identifies thechallenges to the diffusion of PtD, peer-reviewed educational resources on PtD, and ways thatPtD could be added to individual civil engineering courses. It is suggested that PtD provides acompelling context to teach related topics, including engineering ethics, social sustainability,integrated design and construction, life cycle safety, and comparative public
-structured education that we currently utilize and wereprimarily known as peacetime builders who relied on an apprentice-based, hands-on, tinkeringmodel of training up until the late 18th Century [2, 3]. While present-day civil engineers are stillresponsible for such socially-responsible domains, civil engineering now exists as a professionthat is acquired through a formal education process that is deeply rooted in and influenced by thehistorical advancements of the discipline [3-10].Today, the education of undergraduate civil engineering students is largely shaped by thebehaviors, practices, and knowledge that have been established and are valued by the discipline’sgoverning professional societies. Topics such as ethics [11, 12]; design regulations
data; design a system,component, or process in at least two more than one civil engineering contexts; includeprinciples of sustainability in design; explain basic concepts in project management, business,public policy, and leadership; analyze issues in professional ethics; and explain the importance ofprofessional licensure.2. FacultyThe program must demonstrate that faculty teaching courses that are primarily design in contentare qualified to teach the subject matter by virtue of professional licensure, or by education anddesign experience. The program must demonstrate that it is not critically dependent on oneindividual.Where we last left offThe initial paper1 documenting the committee’s work started with a review of the literature
, the committee identified Outcomes 5 – Material Science andOutcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fullyimplement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of Montana State University’scivil engineering curriculum with respect the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureatedegree. Specific emphasis is given herein to these identified “challenging” outcomes.Institutional ProfileOn February 16, 1893, the Agricultural College of the State of Montana was founded as thestate's land-grant college. Renamed The Montana College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, theinstitution was popularly known as Montana Agricultural College, or MAC. By the 1920s, theinstitution's preferred
Public Policy Discuss and explain key concepts involved in Public Policy and Public Administration. Business Explain key concepts and processes used in business. Leadership Explain the role of a leader and leadership principles and attitudes. Interdisciplinary Teams Function effectively as a member of an interdisciplinary team. Self-Directed Learning Demonstrate the ability for self-directed learning. Ethical Responsibility Apply standard of professional and ethical responsibility to determine an appropriate course of action.Fundamentals of Engineering Examination: Since 2012, the results from the NCEES
, and math; or based on the maximum rank minus minimum rank were:sustainability, ethics, math, and breadth. Finally, among environmental engineering students thegreatest differences of opinion based on the standard deviation of the average ranking were forthe natural science, material science, math, and mechanics; or based on difference in themaximum and minimum rank were: math and communication. Differences in the perceptions ofsenior students based on Likert-scale ratings were also determined from graduating seniorsurveys administered by the College of Engineering. In addition, the Fundamentals ofEngineering (FE) exam is required for students in all three majors, and the results werecompared. Recognizing similarities and differences points to
professional, collectively prescribe the necessary depth and breadth ofknowledge, skills, and attitudes required of an individual aspiring to enter the practice of civilengineering at the professional level in the 21st Century. Central to achieving the BOK is theuniversity-level education and those who teach the BOK are critical to this education. The tenprofessional outcomes which include leadership, teamwork, communication, history andheritage, professional and ethical responsibility, and life-long learning, can present challengesto some programs since they fall outside the traditional teaching roles of faculty. Colleges anduniversities will need to adjust their programs to educate and train faculty to teach the BOK.The authors draw on their
– Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fullyimplement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the University of Louisiana’scivil engineering curriculum with respect the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureatedegree. Specific emphasis is given herein to these identified “challenging” outcomes.Institutional ProfileThe University of Louisiana at Lafayette is a public institution of higher education offering thebachelor, master, and doctoral degrees. It is the largest member of the University of LouisianaSystem with an enrollment of approximately 16,000 students. Within the Carnegieclassification, [University A] is designated as a Research University with high research