United States Army.The Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering is one of 11 departments at the Academy,and both the civil and mechanical engineering programs are ABET accredited. The mission ofthe Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering parallels the Academy’s mission, whilefocusing on educating and inspiring students in the fields of civil and mechanical engineering2:To educate cadets in civil and mechanical engineering, such that each graduate is acommissioned leader of character who can understand, implement, and manage technology; andto inspire cadets to a career in the United States Army and a lifetime of personal growth andservice.The civil engineering program established 16 student outcomes to achieve the mission and meetthe
highest grade point average (GPA) students. The other group seems to experience great difficulty with the open-ended learning and the independent problem solving that is needed for successful project completion. Sometimes they struggle greatly to carry their part of the work for the team to completion. This group does not necessarily correspond to the lower GPA students. The department hopes to explore further how to facilitate better open-ended problem solving earlier in the students’ careers. Perhaps this reflects the need for a combination of the triplet of Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes necessary for successful civil engineering practice. • There continues to be some confusion with the multiple
familiarize students with material properties that affect asphalt durability, but also to provide multiple hands on fundamental type 8 9.6 8 to 10 experiences. Based on your assessment of the final class presentation, did it? Non-numerical responses (3): a) Yes; b) Yes; c) Yes 4. In your assessment, do classes of this nature help prepare students for careers in 8 9.8 8 to 10 asphalt paving? Non-numerical responses (3): a) Absolutely; b) Very Much!; c) Yes, very good 5. In your assessment, was industry/agency support used effectively during the
1995, respectively.Mr. Nephi Derbidge, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA After completing my undergraduate studies at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, I worked for a private geotech- nical consulting firm in California for over 15 years. My consulting career provided a broad range of experience on mostly public works projects. Over the last 10 years I have managed the geotechnical laboratory which served more than 5 offices throughout the state for domestic and international projects. I have been teaching mostly geotechnical laboratory courses at Cal Poly for over 10 years. Utilizing Cal Poly’s ’Learn by Doing’ mantra, I share my practical project experience with my students during laboratory activities
Page 26.1029.9fields. This approach addresses best the multidisciplinary nature of sustainability and expandstraining and career opportunities for students in Civil Engineering fields.The recently introduced “Sustainability Design and Rating Systems” course reviewed planningand design practices for implementing sustainable transportation systems and helped students tobetter understand and appreciate the role of transportation in sustainable development. Moreover,it introduced and contrasted principles of various sustainability rating systems for transportationand neighborhood development and provided students the opportunity to implement aspects ofthe LEED-ND rating methodology as part of a group project. Further information regarding
classes such as Statics–a course in which physical intuition isdeveloped and utilized over the course of one’s career. This paper describes the creation andcomponents of a hybrid learning environment in a Statics course where a variety of pedagogieswere implemented. Notable activities included the use of an interactive online textbook, peerinstruction, in-class group problem solving sessions, video examples, and instructor led numericproblems. To investigate the effectiveness of the course, and where applicable the individualcontributions of unique activities, a number of feedback mechanisms were implemented over theduration of the course. These mechanisms included isomorphic questions to measure theeffectiveness of peer instruction, the use of
# Climate#for#minority#students#on#campus# Campus#safety# Cultural#and#fine#arts#programming# Men# Career#Services# Women# Library#services# Computer#services#and#supports# Study#abroad#programs# Student#interac>on#with#faculty# Faculty#availability#outside#of#class# Major#advising
Pacific Luke Lee is Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific, where he teaches courses in structural mechanics and structural design and conducts research in infrastructure renewal, structural health monitoring, and durability of composite materials.Dr. Gary M. Litton, University of the Pacific Gary Litton is a professor in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of the Pacific where he teaches courses and conducts research in environmental engineering. Dr. Litton has over 30 years of water quality experience with specialization in water quality investigations. The first six years of his career were spent with the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board, where he
student responses and thinking processes through the evolution of responsesfrom individual to team to individual; identifying factors that may influence student thinkingprocesses during these exercises; and developing suitable performance measures. The findingswill inform instructors on the effectiveness of these active learning exercises in the classroom.This paper reports on the salient results of this two-year experience. In particular, it is discussedand demonstrated how the decision worksheets and written evidence from active learningexercises were used to extract information to help understand how students: (a) learn about andapply knowledge of new and career-relevant information; and (b) influence each other’s learningprocesses when
post surveys for question 2 and it can be seenthat 28 students knew the correct answer at the beginning of the semester and by the end of thesemester, this number increased to 70 students. This shows that the percentage of students thatknew the correct grade of US infrastructure increased from 38.9% to 92.1% after taking thecourse. Figure 2: Bar graph showing the results from pre and post surveys for Question 2 (Note: the correct answer is C)Question 10This question was used a means to measure the interest of students in civil engineering disciplineas a career. We wanted to observe if the course was able to sustain the interest in the civilengineering discipline. The choices for this question were: “A
- scale). For his dissertation, he conducted a research on the mechanical and structural performance of cement composite materials, which incorporated sustainable materials (Meso-scale). During his postdoc- toral career, he deeply explored the effects of Micro- and Nano-materials as additives in cement composite materials (Micro- and Nano-scale).Mr. Alan M. Hunter, University of Central Florida I am a student at the University of Central Florida, with educational background in Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Psychology, as well as study in Education, Philosophy, History, and Literature.Dr. Xi Wang P.E., University of Mount UnionProf. Boo Hyun Nam, University of Central FloridaDr. Yong Je Kim, University of Central FloridaDr
programs, especially during the first years. Education researchhas shown an increase in class success, retention, and graduation rates when the studentsparticipate in relevant learning experiences[1-7]. A growing number of research publications inengineering education support the necessity to complement purely traditional lecture-basedlearning environment with practical class applications and demonstrations to adequately preparestudents to succeed in the collaborative and challenging engineering career. The use of strategiessuch as studying physical models, manipulatives, multidisciplinary teamwork, and experientiallearning has been documented to enhance spatial visualization and to help in closing engineeringstudents’ gap between theory, previous
requirements be modified sothat students would use their general education classes to pursue a “theme.” For example,students could graduate with a theme in government by taking several general educationcourses on government and public policy. Other suggested themes were: Ethics Business Management Geography International Studies Engineering HistoryThe goal of the theme requirement would be to help students develop an area of competencyuseful to them in their future careers as citizen engineers. This theme requirement was in-spired by the curriculum ThreadsTM requirements employed by the College of Computing atthe Georgia Institute of Technology.9New Infrastructure Course(s)One goal of the revised curriculum is to create a
business practices, and new players are converging globally and will markedly change the way business is conducted. Chapter 6 suggests loss of American dominance partly because fewer young people are pursuing mathematics, science, and engineering careers and because of a decline in ambition of American youth relative to counterparts in other countries.)• Graham, L. R., 1993. The Ghost of the Executed Engineer: Technology and the Fall of the Soviet Union, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. (Argues that the Soviet Union failed to become a modern industrialized country, in spite of its vast natural resources and huge number of engineers, because of "misuse of technology and squandering of human energy," including its
for each laboratory. Theform includes a cover sheet indicating the point value for each part of the report that is used bythe TA for reporting the report grade to the student. Some data is collected by the studentsworking on teams, other data is collected by the class as a whole. While students are encouragedto discuss their findings, all reports are to be the work of the individual student. Some of theexperiments were taken from the courses students take later in their academic careers thusfreeing up time in those later courses for more advanced work. Other experiments were new andunique to CAEE210. The content of the various laboratory/field experiment is described below. • Environmental Engineering Laboratory 1 – Calibrate a multi
performance of their professional duties [6]. The rest of the canons requireengineers to: (1) perform services only in areas of their competence; (2) issue public statementsonly in an objective and truthful manner; (3) act in professional matters for each employer orclient as faithful agents or trustees who shall avoid conflicts of interest; (4) build theirprofessional reputation on the merit of their services and not compete unfairly with others; (5)act in such a manner as to uphold and enhance the honor, integrity, and dignity of theengineering profession; and (6) continue their professional development throughout their careers,and provide opportunities for the professional development of those engineers under theirsupervision [6].3. Environmental
that students who are self-regulated, who keep their goals inmind, and know what they are doing and why they are doing it feel competent and do their workat a level that would enable them to do well in the class. This finding aligns well with empiricalstudies in cognitive science29. The implications of these findings suggest the importance ofmotivation, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in student learning process. While contentknowledge is important, keeping students motivated, self-regulated, and efficacious wouldcertainly help students reach their academic and career goals.Acknowledgements This project was funded by the National Science Foundation TUES Program through the Division of Undergraduate Education (Proposal 0837647). The authors
and Engineering Tech- nology programs covering topics such as control systems, digital signal processing and electromagnetics.Manuel Alejandro Martinez, Virginia Tech Manuel A. Martinez is a sophomore at Virginia Tech majoring in Chemical Engineering. He hopes to pursue a career in the chemical industry with a focus on monitoring chemical impacts on environmental Page 23.783.1 health. He participated in the summer 2012 NSF REU Program, Water Sciences and Engineering, as a water quality monitoring technician in the LEWAS Lab. Based on his performance in this program, he was brought on as a student member of
academic careers about the impact of learning these geotechnicalconcepts for other classes, graduate school or jobs.CONCLUSIONSThe installation of an educational module that for the first time integrates remote major researchinstrumentation into an undergraduate class appears to have been successful. Students’perceptions of the module were very positive. Students agreed that observing the stressdistribution under the footing and loading it to failure in the live experiment helped them betterunderstand stress distribution and bearing capacity. Additionally, many students showed interestin interacting with students from other schools. Many students showed interest in seeing moreexperiments like this one for other applications in geotechnical
course demanded. To achievethe goals of the project, the challenges needed to be difficult in order to engage the students in Page 23.281.10authentic practice. Some students with little prior knowledge may find the challenges toodifficult; therefore, a great variance among the responses may occur on items related toperformance. The students also appreciated the classroom learning experience and instructor.Students reported these experiences prepared them for their engineering career, but were neutralabout how well the challenges prepared them for the exam. This finding was not too surprising,because the objectives of the exams were more focused on
and approaches. While studying as an undergraduate I hadtaken classes in civil engineering materials, transportation engineering and pavement design,which provided me a working knowledge to preparing me for career. The clinics expanded myunderstanding of the material and introduced me to new material like reclaimed asphaltpavement, warm mix asphalt, modified binders, which typically aren’t discussed in detail inclass. Furthermore the clinics provided an opportunity to hone my soft skills by writing projectreports and presenting our research and designs to our clients and other professors. Byperforming hands on testing and analysis as an undergraduate I gained a deeper understandingof testing results which has helped me extensively in my
. The learning experience at Rose-Hulmanfeatures a strong emphasis on • thorough treatment of the theoretical foundations of students’ degrees, • practice-oriented project-based learning, • highly accessible faculty mentors, • proactive assistance with internship and career placement, and • a campus environment with ample opportunities for development of leadership skills, community outreach, and programs to broaden students’ perspectives through local, national and international activities.The Department of Civil Engineering includes approximately 170 students with seven full timefaculty members. Every department faculty member holds a professional license or is preparingfor professional licensure, and every
., is a Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Before joining the U of A faculty in 1996, he served in the US Army as an engineer officer for 24 years. During his military career Dennis had the unique opportunity to build roads, airfields and other facilities on six different continents and spend over 11 years as a member of the faculty at the US Military Academy. His current research interests include laboratory and field determination of geotechnical material properties for transportation systems and the use of remote sensing techniques to categorize geohazards. He has published over 85 peer reviewed articles relating to his research and
. At the beginning of the semester did you see yourself aligned as a humanist or technologist when considering solutions to water resources challenges? Do you feel your attitudes have changed such that you might align more or less with the other group? 2. Which topic/discussion provided you the greatest insight into the other group (humanist or technologist)? 3. As a result of this course, do you feel you better understand and can articulate the position of perspectives different than yours as they relate to water resources engineering projects? 4. List one concept outside of your disciplinary major that you learned in this course. Do you feel it will be helpful for you in your future career? How so? 5
include these skills into engineering solutions throughout theircourse. This method of using assignments throughout the curriculum allowed faculty tounderstand how students were building their competence throughout their collegiate careers toobtain the final desired level of performance 12.B. Depth of CE ProgramsThere is also motivation to ensure students are obtaining more depth on key topics, particularly Page 25.1217.4engineering design. One university implemented a converging–diverging model of design for asophomore –level course on engineering design and technical writing. This course initially useda semester long design project, but
AC 2011-1366: COMBINING HANDS-ON DESIGN, ENGINEERING ANAL-YSIS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING IN A FRESHMAN CIVIL ANDENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING COURSEJames D. Bowen, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPeter Thomas Tkacik, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Peter Tkacik is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Motorsports focus area. His largest area of research is in the engagement of High School Students and early career Engineering College Students through Hands-On learning activities and exciting visual and experiential research programs. Other research activities are related to the details of the visual and experiential
2008 and spring 2009) and one semester after (fall 2009) the course format change.One of the first questions asked students to rate the statement “This course has increased myinterest in Civil Engineering.” Figure 1 shows the responses, where the grey bars are the“before” case and the black bars are the “after” case. These findings indicate a strong shifttowards self-reported student interest in their major and future career. Page 15.159.9 8Page 15.159.10Page 15.159.11Page 15.159.12Page
‘Somewhat Confident’ answer frequency, Page 24.1295.7see Figure 3B.After analyzing the answers to the final course reflection survey, some trends were identified.Though the questions did not directly ask about the flipped classroom teaching method,advantages associated with it were frequently mentioned in the student responses. More thanhalf of the UPitt students (16/30) stated that they frequently were able to put their classknowledge to use during activities of the class and that they learned skills that are useful fortheir future or their future careers. Some of the skills mentioned include adaptability (15/30),leadership (18
” come first, and to the extent that the nearly 200 firms who recruit our students at the twiceyearly career fairs have expectations that NC State students will have a particular suite of civil engineering skills, and the department aims to provide those skills. It also does assert that ABET requirements are viewed as minimum requirements that must be met, not an optimal target. Expanding the scope of those expectations (read as being constraints), unnecessarily, as might easily occur with an explicit conformance to either BOK1 or BOK2, is not advantageous nor is it necessarily important in meeting the needs of our customers. This having been said, the department’s “customers” are true civil engineering firms, both local and
P.E., United States Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is the Director of the Civil Engineering Division and Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include