(Award Number DUE-1552448) and an NSF CAREER award to Shannon Bartelt-Hunt (AwardNumber CBET- 1149242).ReferencesCrossgrove, K. and K.L. Curran. (2009). Using Clickers in Nonmajors- and Majors-LevelBiology Courses: Student Opinion, Learning, and Long-Term Retention of Course Material.CBE-Life Science Education, 7: 146-154, doi: 10.1187/cbe.07–08–0060Crouch, C.H. and E. Mazur. (2001). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results.American Journal of Physics, 69(6): 970-977, doi: 10.1119/1.1374249Freeman, S., Eddy S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okorafor, N., Jordt, H., and WenderothM.P. (2013). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering andmathematics. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 111
exercises developed and implemented in this project. Further details about our evaluation methods and results can be found in the ASEE 2016 paper entitled ‘ Enhancing Student Cognition and Affect through the Creative Art of Structural and Civil Engineering ’ [9]. Figure 7: Survey results pertaining to interactive teaching methods Acknowledgements This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no.: 1432426. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
calculating structures." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice 139.3 244-247.6. Hsieh, S. J. (2003). “Animations and intelligent tutoring systems for programmable logic controller education.” Int. J. Eng. Educ., 19(2), 282–296.7. Cuadra, C. (2010). “Challenges in building structure engineering education.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Education and Educational Technology, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society, Stevens Point, WI, 123–125.8. Planchard D. & M., (2013) “Engineering Design with SolidWorks”, Schroff Development Corporation.9. Valentino J., and DiZinno N., (2011) “SolidWorks for Technology and Engineering”, Industrial Press, Inc.
future?; and (2) Make asuggestion(s) for improving the course (a criticism alone is not helpful; tell your instructor howyou would fix any problem).ProcedureData from the course evaluations were collected once each semester had ended. Students in theFall 2013 course participated in the traditional version of the course while those in the Fall 2014and Spring 2015 courses participated in the flipped version. There were no differences in GPA,age, or gender between students in the traditional versus flipped courses. However, students inthe flipped sections had slightly more International students.Quantitative resultsAnalyses were run to test whether differences existed between a traditional versus flipped courseon student performance, course
head training, thisarticle will hopefully help suggest the types of topics that might be included based on existingtraining programs and a survey of current civil engineering department heads.Bibliography1 Graham, S. and Benoit, P., “Constructing the Role of Department Chair”.http://www.acenet.edu/resources/chairs/docs/Graham_Constructing.pdf ACE Department Chair Online ResourceCenter, American Council on Education, Washington D.C. 2004 Accessed January 1, 2007.2 Estes, A.C., Survey Results, Department Head Training. Conducted October 6, 2006. Civil EngineeringDepartment Head list serve, Educational Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1-5.3 University of Texas, Agenda, Workshop for Department Chairs and Organized Research
, according to Marchese and others, is an elusive goal. This paper explains a techniquedeveloped and implemented by several Civil Engineering faculty members teaching structuralmechanics, analysis, and design at the United States Military Academy in the Spring, 2009 andthe Fall, 2009 terms to encourage mastery of critical skills and transfer of these skills tosubsequent courses. The concept is called “Problem Set Zero” to stress the fact that the materialbeing evaluated is from the prior course(s) and must be mastered before a student beginsProblem Set One.1. Introduction1.1 Curriculum Structure A common feature of Civil Engineering and other curricula is the establishment ofprerequisite courses which allow students to progress from basic math
. Pavill, “Creating Immersive and Interactive Surveying laboratories in virtual reality: A differential leveling example,” ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 9–15, 2020, doi: 10.5194/isprs-annals- V-5-2020-9-2020.[8] H. Mills and D. Barber, “A Virtual Surveying Field Course for Traversing,” in Sharing Good Practices: E-learning in Surveying, Geo-information Sciences and Land Administration FIG International Workshop, 2008, no. June, pp. 11–13, [Online]. Available: http://www.itc.nl/external/fig_elearning2008/Documents/Invited_Mills.pdf.[9] H. L. Kuo, S. C. Kang, C. C. Lu, S. H. Hsieh, and Y. H. Lin, “Using Virtual Instruments to TeachSurveying Courses: Application and
below) involves incorporatingthe selected SHRP 2 products into multiple civil engineering courses offered in all four years ofthe undergraduate curriculum and in graduate courses. The approach follows a verticalintegration scheme which first introduces the SHRP 2 products to freshman undergraduatestudents and then presents relevant SHRP 2 products to the junior level classes with a briefreview session at the beginning to refresh their memory. The vertical integration scheme thenpresents relevant SHRP 2 products in senior/graduate level classes. The depth of technicalcontent of the SHRP 2 modules increases from freshman to senior/graduate levels—building onthe information provided in previous year(s). Furthermore, selected senior and graduate
mitigate the potential for anyduplicative efforts by content designers.AcknowledgmentThis work has been funded by the United States Department of Transportation’s UniversityTransportation Center program through the Pacific Northwest Regional UniversityTransportation Center (PacTrans). The authors would like to acknowledge Ying Jiang,University of Washington, for her assistance with this study.References[1] Chang, K. Examining and Defining the Role of Engineering Education in theWorkplace. QScience Proceedings: 2014 Engineering Leaders Conference, 2015. 31.[2] Lipinski, M. ASCE Policy 465: The Impact of Transportation Engineering WorkforceDevelopment. ITE Journal, 2005. 12: 24-27.[3] Lockwood, S. and G. Euler. Transportation System Management and
of their qualitative experiences and translate that meaning intodesign. Future work will include designing a larger constellation of these communication designlearning experiences for students during their senior capstone.Bibliography1. Sheridan, K. M. Envision and Observe: Using the Studio Thinking Framework for Learning and Teaching in Digital Arts. Mind, Brain, Educ. 5, 19–26 (2011).2. Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S. & Sheridan, K. M. Studio Thinking 2: The Real Benefits Of Studio Art Education. 164 (Teachers College Press, 2013).3. Sandell, R., Education, A., Burton, J. M. & Beudert, L. What Excellent Visual Arts Teaching Looks Like. Advocacy White Pap. Art Educ. (2009).4. Percy, C. critical
module can benefit them professionally.ReferencesABET, 2006, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008Accreditation Cycle,” Engineering Accreditation Commission, retrieved January 17, 2007 fromwww.abet.org/forms.shtml .ASCE, 2004, “Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for theFuture,” Body of Knowledge Committee of the Committee on Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice,retrieved January 17, 2007 from www.asce.org/professional/educ/bodyofknowledge.cfm .Covey, S. R., 1989, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic, Simon andSchuster, New York, NY, 340 p.Downing, C. G., 2001, “Essential Non-Technical
,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, February 2006.21 Martin, R., and Delatte, N. J. (2001). “Another Look at the Hartford Civic Center Coliseum Collapse,” J. Perf. Const. Fac., ASCE, 15(1).22 Lichtenstein, A.G. (1993) “The Silver Bridge Collapse Recounted,” ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, November 1993.23 Solava, S. and Delatte, N. J. (2003). “Lessons from the Failure of the Teton Dam,” Forensic Engineering: Proceedings of the Third Congress, pp. 168 – 177, Bosela, Paul A., Delatte, Norbert J., and Rens, Kevin L., Editors, ASCE, October 19 – 21, 2003.24 Storey, C. and Delatte, N. J. (2003). “Lessons from the Collapse of the Schoharie Creek Bridge
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.3. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. (1988). “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education,” Engineering Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, 674-681.4. Herrmann, N. (1995). The Creative Brain, The Ned Herrmann Group, Lake Lure, North Carolina.5. Dunn, R. (1990). “Understanding the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model and the need for individual diagnosis and prescription,” Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 6:223-247.6. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, HarperCollins Publishers, New York.7. Klosky, J. L., Ressler, S. J., and Erickson, J. (2005). “AIM for Better Student Learning: Using Instant Messaging to Facilitate Improved
Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective forEvaluations during the 2008-2009 Accreditation Cycle, “ November 3, 2007. Accessed athttp://www.abet.org/forms.shtml, January 3, 2008.8. Ressler, S. J., R. W. Welch, and K. F. Meyer (2004). “Organizing and Delivering Classroom Instruction.” Journalof Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130 (3), 153-156.9. Ressler, S. J., et. al, “Implementing a Civil Engineering Program for the National Military Academy ofAfghanistan,” Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh,June 2008
information in a way that provides students with a great learningexperience.Bibliography1. Davis, S. (2007) “Learning Styles and Memory,” Institute for Learning Styles Journal, Vol. 1, Fall 2007. pp. 46- 51.2. Rosati, P. (1998). “The Learning Preferences of Engineering Students from Two Perspectives,” Proc. 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 4-7, 1998, Tempe AZ.3. Felder R.M. and Spurlin, J. (2005). “Applications, Reliability, and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles,” International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 21, No. 1., pp. 103-112.4. Mamlouk, M.S. and Zaniewski, J.P. (2006). Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers, 2nd Edition
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Body ofKnowledge (BOK) and come up with recommendations to meet both ABET 2009 criteria andBOK.AcknowledgmentThe author would like to thank the Civil Engineering Curriculum committee that developed theoriginal curriculum for the program. The committee did an excellent job in making this programcomes to life at IPFW. In addition, the author would like to thank the current Civil EngineeringCurriculum committee and all faculty members in the Department of Engineering at IPFW fortheir input and comments on the original manuscript of this paper.Bibliogr aphy1. Ashur, S. and Moor, S. (2007). ÐAssessment of Citrix Impact on Educational Achievement of IPFWEngineering Students0Ñ"Tgrqtv"uwdokvvgf"vq"vjg"Eqnngig"qh
approach to sustainability education, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 142-157.15. Geli de Ciurana, A.M. and Leal Filho, W. (2006), Education for sustainability in university studies: experiences from a project involving European and Latin American universities, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(1), 81-93.16. Shekar, A. (2007), Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education, European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 125-133.17. USGS (1998), Materials Flow and Sustainability, Fact Sheet FS-068-98, U. S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Interior.18. ASCE (2004), Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st
technical writing skills. As with many educational measures, it can bedifficult to attribute positive outcomes to a single item, as a course evolves each time it is taught.However, multiple positive outcomes are evident after the program was included. The authorintends to retain the physical testing program as part of the course in future offerings.Bibliography1. Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education, Grossman Publishers, New York.2. Engineering Education Coalitions (1993). Meeting the Need for Reform, Brochure: NSF 93-58a.3. Aglan, H. and S. Ali (1996). Hands-on experiences: an integral part of engineering curriculum reform, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 4, pp 327-330.4. Estes, Allen C
preference for the selected projectwith the lowest total score (the projects with the lowest scores were not selected). They thenassign students to the second lowest scoring selected project based on strongest preferenceamong the remaining students. This process continues until the last students remaining areassigned to the highest scoring project. The project teams are then reviewed for potentialswitches that would increase the number of students obtaining their top or second choice. Oncethe instructors determine the project teams, faculty members from throughout the departmentpreference which project(s) they will advise as a coach. Mission Compound in Trinidad Missions International The client is a
rich setsof worked example problems” and that of all of the barriers to increasing the use of OER inengineering mechanics courses, this is the most critical barrier to overcome [7]. Table 2. Known (recent) OERs for engineering mechanics courses Lectures and Interactive Principal URL Problem Sets visualizations Field(s) https://web.mst.edu/ Mechanics of MecMovies Yes Yes ~mecmovie/ (obsolete) Materials Engineering
and the director of Missouri’s Dam and Reservoir Safety Program. Since 1993, he has been at the University of Evansville, serving as a professor, department chair, and interim dean. He continues to work as a consultant on projects involving the design and construction of new dams, modifications to existing dams, and the investigation of dam failures.Dr. Matthew K. Swenty, Virginia Military Institute Matt Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He went to Virginia Tech to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering and upon completion worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center
that faculty implementing active-learningmodules receive adequate training in classroom best practices.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Santa Clara University Office of Faculty Development forthe support of the Teaching with Technology grant to develop the course modules and hands-onactivities applied in this work and our two colleagues for their willingness to experiment and usethe developed teaching modules.Bibliography[1] S. Freeman, S. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt & M.P. Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 11(23), 2014, pp. 8410- 8415. http://www.pnas.org/content/111/23
Communication, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 127-131, 1974.[7] Diederich, N. A., & Schroeder, S. J., “Effect of Writing Centers and Targeted Pairings on Students Repeating First-Year Composition,” Learning Assistance Review, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 17-26, 2008.[8] McDonald, M., “Respectful Alignment of Programs as a Possible Factor in Remedial Writers' Pass Rates,” Learning Assistance Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85-101, 2017.[9] Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A., “Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula, courses, and support systems.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 325-328, 2003.[10] Burkett, A. R., & Dunkle, S. B., “Technical writing in the undergraduate curriculum
Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(1).7. Savage, R.N., Chen, K.C. and Vanasupa, L., 2007. Integrating project-based learning throughout the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 8(3/4), p.15.8. Selvi, E., Soto-Caban, S., Taylor, R.S. and Wilson, W.R., 2011. Similar Consecutive Bridge Design Projects for Freshmen and Sophomore Level Engineering Courses. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. Vancouver, B.C., Canada, June 26-299. Clayton, G., 2010. Introducing engineering design using impromptu design projects. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education. Louisville, KY
[lesson]&[activity] Describe the campus - foot, bicycle, and vehicle Transport with case study of Highway funding issues in the traffic - identify problem areas, then Denmark/Sweden train/ferry government (postponed 36 times). use the engineering design process to transport; Kandersteg Switzerland car Then have teams of 2 or 4 develop and develop solution(s) (Liz Adams) transport on train
plan toconduct similar studies in which we investigate the role of class level (i.e., freshman andsophomore classes versus junior and senior), major, and historically underrepresented groups,such as women and minorities. This preliminary study resulted in the development of a resourcethat instructors can hand out or show their students on the first day. Ultimately, in a field oftendriven by numbers, there is great power in showing engineering students that, mathematically,their academic success depends on consistent class attendance, diligent note-taking, and keepingup with the instructor during class.References1. Hall, C. W., Kauffmann, P. J, Wuensch, K. L., Swart, W. E., DeUrquidi, K. A., Griffin, O. H., & Duncan, C. S
, programs may includebiology, ecology, geology, and geomorphology – areas of significant interest and increasingimportance for civil engineers. This list is by no means all-inclusive. However, for topics otherthan those listed above, it is the program’s responsibility to demonstrate the selected area(s) ofscience provides breadth beyond physics and chemistry. In general, an advanced course inphysics or chemistry (i.e., a physics or chemistry course that is part of a physics or chemistrysequence for which a basic-level physics or chemistry course serves as a prerequisite) would notfulfill this requirement because such a course would provide additional depth rather thanadditional breadth. Courses such as geo-physics, seismology, organic or bio
motivated me to work harder than a conventional class project 1.63 (0.49) 1.91 (0.55) I like the idea of having professionals/online visitors reviewing my project, as opposed to 10 1.53 (0.52) 1.64 (0.41) just the instructor 11 Preparing the web-based project was more stressful than a conventional project 2.68 (0.41) 2.09 (0.50) Working on a web-based project forced me to work more closely with my teammate(s) 12 2.47 (0.40) 2.18 (0.45) than I would have for a conventional project 13 Receiving
perceive this as a valuable activity.References[1] C. Gunn, “The value of scavenger hunts in the life of a freshman,” in Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper AC 2008-2912, Pittsburgh, PA: American Society for Engineering Education, June 2008.[2] S. Gray, E. Lindsay and J. Walraven, “ORIENTHUNT: The development of a scavenger hunt to meet the needs of a first year engineering orientation,” in Proceedings of the 22nd AAEE Conference, Dec 5-7 2011, Fremantle, WA: Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2011, pp. 543-549.[3] E. Lindsay, S. Gray, and N. Lloyd, “Students’ Responses to a Scavenger Hunt for First Year Engineering Orientation,” World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF