feelings and worldview” • Self-Knowledge – the ability to identify how one’s own experiences “inform as well as Page 15.417.8 prejudice understanding”Their work presumes that educators want to support students’ development of multi-faceted,sophisticated understanding. Wiggins and McTighe’s facets of understanding can be mapped toBloom’s Taxonomy; both can serve as useful tools for developing learning outcomes andassociated course content.As part of the development of course content, lesson plans, and evaluation approaches, faculty incivil engineering also use the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)requirements to
. 937–949, 1990.20 M. Zeilik, "Concept Mapping," [Online]. Available: http://www.flaguide.org/extra/download/cat/conmap/conmap.pdf. [Accessed 15 December 2013].21 E. Plotnick, "Concept mapping: A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts," ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse, NY, 1997.22 J. M. T. Walker and P. H. King, "Concept mapping as a form of student assessment and instruction in the domain of bioengineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, no. 2, p. 167–179, 2003.23 J. L. Daugherty, R. L. Custer and R. A. Dixon, "Mapping concepts for learning and assessment," Technology and Engineering Teacher, vol. 71, no. 8, p. 10–14, 2012.24 S. Klassen
real-world problems, faculty need todesign modules using what we have learned about CI and misconceptions, how people learn, andeffective teaching practices including problem-based learning,1 technology-enhanced strategies,9and instructional design principles.10 The study of cognitive science has contributed immenselyin the last decade to educators’ understanding of how people learn. How People Learn,11published in 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences, catapulted the energies of educatorsincluding engineering educators to improve how we teach. From this work, three learningprinciples that have profound implications for teaching and engineering education are (1)teachers must draw out and work with the preexisting understandings that their
practicing engineers asadjunct faculty, we will seek continuous improvement, being mindful of the overriding goal ofour department and college –being a world leader in engineering education for the 21st centuryand beyond.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the CEE faculty and College of Engineering administration fortheir help and support with this new initiative. Appendix A: Abstracted Policies Related to Adjunct Faculty “Appointments to the rank of "Adjunct Professor of _____" and "Professor of the Practice of _____" are equivalent and made only to practitioners who have developed a high level of expertise in fields of particular importance to the MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) academic program and
. Number of 2013 graduates in engineering earning a language minor Minor/Concentration Number of studentsFrench Language and Literature 3Italian 1Japanese 2Spanish Language and Literature 5Injecting an international component into already existing classes need not be an onerous taskand many faculty already integrate international examples into their classes. This effort is alsoconsistent with the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) criterion 3h
Paper ID #33956Impact of Remote Instructional Format on Student Perception of aSupportive Learning Environment for Expertise DevelopmentDr. Vikash Gayah Dr. Vikash V. Gayah is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at The Pennsylvania State University (joined 2012). He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Central Florida (2005 and 2006, respectively) and his Ph.D. degree from the University of California, Berkeley (2012). Dr. Gayah’s research focuses on urban mobility, traffic operations, traffic flow theory, traffic safety and public transportation. His
on incorporating life cycle assessment methods into geoenviron- mental and geotechnical engineering to provide decision-making tools for the environmental sustainabil- ity of infrastructure and remediation projects. She researches and implements evidence-based teaching strategies in engineering education and has extensive experience with recruitment and retention of under- represented students. Dr. Gallagher also participated in the development of the NSF ADVANCE funded Executive Leadership in Academic Technology and Engineering (ELATE) program at Drexel University. ELATE is a national leadership development program to advance senior women faculty into leadership.Dr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Andrea L
AC 2007-613: PRACTITIONER INVOLVEMENT IN BUILDING A LANDDEVELOPMENT DESIGN EMPHASIS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: A CASE STUDYRandel Dymond, Virginia Tech Dr. Randy Dymond, PE, CFM is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the Founding Director of the Center for Geospatial Information Technology (CGIT). Dr. Dymond has over 25 years of experience in civil and environmental engineering instruction, research, consulting, and GIT applications. Dr. Dymond has published more than 40 refereed journal articles and proceedings papers, and been the principal or co-principal investigator for more than $1.3 million dollars in research funding. His research areas include watershed
AC 2008-1012: RELIABILITY OF BRIDGES: SIGNIFICANT ADDITION TO CIVILENGINEERING CURRICULUMReynaldo Pablo, Jr., Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Reynaldo M. Pablo, Jr. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Manufacturing & Construction Engineering Technology and Interior Design at Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne, Indiana. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. He also earned his M.S. in Structural Engineering from the Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand and B.S. in Civil Engineering from the Mindanao State University, Philippines. His expertise lies in the areas of bridge design loading
AC 2008-2163: A FIRST YEAR SEMINAR FOR SURVEYING ENGINEERINGSTUDENTS AND THE EFFECTS ON RETENTIONThomas Seybert, Pennsylvania State University - Wilkes-Barre Thomas A. Seybert is Associate Professor of Engineering at The Pennsylvania State Univeristy, Wilkes-Barre Campus. He teaches surveying measurements, stormwater management, and land development design in the surveying program. He is the author of Stormwater Management for Land Development (Wiley, 2006). Address: Penn State Wilkes-Barre, P.O. Box PSU, Lehman, PA, 18627; e-mail:tseybert@psu.edu. Page 13.38.1© American Society for Engineering Education
programs concurrently. Aunique opportunity will be available in 2010, as Shanghai hosts the Shanghai World Expo duringthe time of the scheduled visit. The theme of the Expo will be "Better City, Better Life", and thefocus will be on planning cities for the future.College Educational Emphases and Program ObjectivesThe Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University makessignificant financial contributions towards the travel costs of each student in engineering studyabroad programs such as the China Mega-Structures program. For graduates to be competitivein the fast-changing global marketplace, the College has established five educational emphases,often referred to by the acronym "LIGHT": 1. Leadership 2
2006-1132: PROGRAM ASSESSMENT THE EASY WAY: USING EMBEDDEDINDICATORS TO ASSESS PROGRAM OUTCOMESFred Meyer, U.S. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Karl F. (Fred) Meyer is an Associate Professor and Civil Engineering Structures Group Director in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (USMA), West Point, NY. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. LTC Meyer received a B.S. degree from USMA in 1984, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1993 and 2002, respectively.Allen Estes, U.S. Military Academy Colonel Allen C. Estes is a Professor and Civil Engineering Program Director at the
accomplished the specific community objectives but also important technicalobjectives for the courses. Quantitative deliverables were presented to the community partners.Positive feedback from the students was received.IntroductionService learning (S-L) provides 1) learning for the student and 2) service to the community. TheS-L approach motivates students to work harder, be more curious, connect learning to personalexperience, and demonstrate deeper understanding of subject matter [1].The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) has a relatively new set ofcriteria for engineering programs. In addition to achieving the more traditional technicalobjectives, these criteria require that graduates demonstrate: • an ability to
Information Technology (TCCIT), Committee on Faculty Development (CFD) and Excellence in Civil Engineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative. Dr. O’Neill is a licensed Professional Engineer in California, Florida, Nevada and Virginia. He is a civil engineering program evaluator for the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). He is an American Society of Civil Engineering Fellow (ASCE), a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Homework Graded by StudentsAbstractPermitting senior level university students to grade their individual assignments
. She works with ASCE’s Committee on Education on issues of importance to the undergraduate and grad- uate level education of civil engineers.Dr. Brock E. Barry PE, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is an Associate Professor and Mechanics Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United
beneficial for students, especially for students of opportunity on multiple levels[Carpi et al., 2017; Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Freeman et al., 2014]. Although UG students can gaindifferent levels of relevant skills, attitudes, and conceptual understanding in the same time ofresearch, they can get confidence in presentation skills within a relatively short time and showthe improvement in identifying patterns in data and logical argument in the experiences[Bhattacharyya et al., 2018].In recent years, not only universities but also various agencies have tried programs intended toencourage undergraduate (UG) students to involve in research. Specially, science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines have more opportunities for students to
have a profound influence on Dr. Grayson’s teaching and research accomplishments and goals. Dr. Grayson continuously strives to improve his teaching in the classroom in order to produce principled civil and environmental engineering leaders that are capable of thinking critically about topics while fostering a lifelong love and capacity for independent learning.Dr. Monika Bubacz, The Citadel Dr. Monika Bubacz is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The Citadel. She received both her B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Poznan University of Technology in Poland, and the Ph.D. in Engineering and Applied Science from the University of New Or- leans. Before her current
Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of California, Davis. She joined Pacific in 1999 and is a registered Professional Engineer in California.Dr. David A Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth David Saftner is an Assistant Professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth. He received a BS in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy and MS and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Michigan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Candy Land: Engaging Students in ClassAbstractSocial media, cell phones, Candy Crush, the crossword in the student newspaper, and worriesabout the exam
Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the Transportation Research Board Committee on Education and Training. She previously has served as vice-chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, chair of the ASEE’s Civil Engineering Division, and a member of the Transportation Research Board committees on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Computing, Asset Management, and Emerging Technology for Design and Construction. She received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University, and her B.S.E. from Duke University. c American Society for
% 43% Use quantitative skills 74% 71% Function effectively as a member of a team 88% 86% Acquire new skills & knowledge on your own 82% 81% Use technology & other modern engineering tools 76
that are based oncalculating relative scores on individual exam topic relative to our comparator group. We doanticipate that through continuing assessment and further refinement of our efforts to prepare andmotivate our students they will achieve FE exam pass rates that meet or exceed the rates seennationally.Bibliography1. Balascio, C., Wehrle, L, Henry, R. and C Hollis. 2008. Nationally normed exams for outcomes assessment of Engineering Technology programs and certification of Engineering Technology graduates. Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education.2. Wicker, R. B., Quintana, R, and A. Tarquin. 1999. Evaluation model
existing courses. The degree programs included civil engineering, architecturalengineering, civil engineering technology, and construction management. Complete details ofthe research project are provided elsewhere 1.As part of this project, data were gathered from student surveys in the courses where failure casestudies were used. Students were asked specifically about the technical lessons learned, as wellas their response to the case studies. Case study questions were included on homeworkassignments and examinations. Survey questions linked student achievement to learningoutcomes.In addition, some student focus groups were held. Due to logistics, this was only possible atCleveland State University. Student focus group findings are reviewed
AC 2012-4932: A FULL-SCALE RUBBLE-HOUSE CONSTRUCTION ANDTESTING PROJECT POWERED BY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT VOL-UNTEERS WORKFORCEDr. Fatih Oncul, Southern Polytechnic State University Fatih Oncul is an Assistant Professor in Civil Engineering Technology program, Southern Polytechnic State University, Marietta, Ga. He received his doctoral degree from University of Colorado, Denver, in 2001. He is currently teaching geotechnical and foundation engineering related courses. His main research interest areas are finite element analysis, subsurface exploration, soil-structure interaction, and geotechnical earthquake engineering.Dr. Wasim Barham, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Metin Oguzmert
AC 2010-597: AN INTEGRATED GRADUATE LEVEL COURSE SEQUENCE INSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERINGJames Morgan, Texas A&M UniversityLuciana Barroso, Texas A&M University Page 15.163.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Integrated Graduate Level Course Sequence in Structural EngineeringAbstractThis paper presents the development/re-structuring of a Masters of Engineering degree toprovide for the greatest development of the skills and knowledge of students focused on enteringthe structural engineering profession. The program now includes a major design exercise duringtheir second semester of study, represented by a graduate
Paper ID #13145Refinement of a Concept Inventory to Assess Conceptual Understanding inCivil Engineering Fluid MechanicsDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and
addressed with severaltactics that are described and assessed in this paper.Course DescriptionHistorically, civil engineers have planned and designed water infrastructure to prevent floods,supply water, collect stormwater and wastewater, generate hydropower, and manage waterways.Recently, challenges facing water resources projects have intensified and diversified becausegrowing metropolitan populations, aging infrastructure, changing climate, improved awarenessof environmental impacts, and policy have become much more nuanced and complex. Nowhereis this more evident than in the western United States, particularly in that region served by theColorado River. In essence, even if the skills, technologies, and solutions available to waterresources
(strategic management of the company, entrepreneurs, business plan: company presentation card), (40); 6) Innovation Management and Technological Management in Civil Engineering. (innovation in civil engineering, innovation in project lay-out, innovation management), (20); 7) Process Reengineering (process reengineering, constant improvement systems, balanced scorecard), (20); 8) Communication and Emotional Intelligence (oral communication techniques, emotional intelligence, communication media: opportunity or threat), (40); and 9) Knowledge and Talent Management. Mentoring and Coaching (knowledge management, business communication and coaching, mentoring and
this toa three-year civil engineering degree are summarized in Table 6.A three-year accredited civil engineering degree would align engineering degrees in the UnitedStates with engineering degrees in Europe and other parts of the world. The degree would be lessexpensive and would enable students to graduate and enter the work force earlier. A possibleside effect of a three-year civil engineering degree is the creation of a “tiered system” within theprofession similar to physician assistants (PA) and physicians in the medical profession. Thecivil engineering profession has historically been challenged with the question of whether toallow engineering technology graduates to take the P.E. exam. A three-year degree may furthercomplicate the
Education. ASEE. Vol. 78, No. 7. April 1988. pp. 674-681.8) Felder, R. M. “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. IV. Instruction Methods.” Journal of Engineering Education. ASEE. Vol. 84, No. 4. October 1995. pp. 361-3679) Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., and Donovan, S. S. “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta- Analysis.” Review of Educational Research. Vol. 69, No. 1. Spring 1999. pp. 21-51.10) Howell, K. C. “Introducing Cooperative Learning into a Dynamics Lecture Class.” Journal of Engineering Education. ASEE. Vol.89, No.2. April 2000. pp. 69-72.11) Terenzini, P. T., Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck, C. L., Parente, J. M
of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the University of Waterloo. She is also re- sponsible for developing a process and assessing graduate attributes at the department to target areas for improvement in the curriculum. This resulted in several publications in this educational research areas. Dr. Al-Hammoud won the ”Ameet and Meena Chakma award for exceptional teaching by