% 0% 5.3% n rt es ng s s es io e te po yl
activity.Through instruction, research, and service, the University promotes regional economic andcultural development, explores solutions to national and world issues, and supports scholars whocontribute in the advancement of knowledge, cultivate aesthetic sensibility, and improve thematerial conditions of humankind.During the 1990’s, the State’s Board of Regents was concerned that the length of time requiredto complete a baccalaureate degree was growing beyond the stated four years. Therefore, it wasstipulated that the program length for the baccalaureate degree be 128 semester hours, and anyprogram requiring more than 128 must be properly justified. Baccalaureate degree programs at[University A], in general, are 128 semester credit hours or less, which
Paper ID #33427Is Engineering Education the Weak Link in Licensure’s Three-legged Stool?Dr. Matthew K. Swenty, Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. After obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech, he worked at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. He is currently a professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He teaches engineering mechanics and structural engineering courses and enjoys working
Annual Conference & Exposition, Austin, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--5259[4] Kampe, J., & Edmister, W., & Stimpson, M., & Matanin, B., & Martin, A., & Brozina, C., & Watford, B. (2007, June), Freshman Engineering Living Learning Communities At Virginia Tech, Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2--2769[5] Mickelson, S. (2005, June), Measuring Success In Learning Communities, Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--15280[6] Engineers Without Borders UK. Engineering for People Design Challenge, 2021. Accessed on: May 4, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ewb-uk.org/the-work/design- challenges
Confirm international partner(s) and conduct first conference call September Distribute advertising material and Discuss potential research theme and application form to students project topics October Create a database to collect all student Agree on a research theme. Draft research applications topics November Draft a budget and discuss with partner Finalize research project topics institutions Identify research mentors
, were available on the course website.5.0 Interactive Classroom EnvironmentTo promote active classroom discussions, classes often began with an open-ended question toallow in-depth consideration of a problem and to give students time to develop their own ideasand solutions. For example, the class on green materials started with the question “What criteriado you think we should consider in selection of green construction materials?” or the class onenvironmental life cycle assessment (LCA) started with “Paper or plastic? Which one do youask for in a supermarket?” Students were arranged in groups and were asked to discuss thequestion(s) among themselves and contribute to discussions in groups. This would allow theinstructor to better moderate
Paper ID #20398Horizontal Integration of the Same Design Project in Multiple Structural En-gineering CoursesDr. Benjamin Z. Dymond, University of Minnesota Duluth Ben Dymond obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech before obtaining his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Ben is currently an assistant professor of structural engineering at the University of Minnesota Duluth.Dr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matt Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T then worked as a bridge designer at
their help and make specific requests for all aspects of the project. There will be somecasual advice provided, but it is the students’ responsibility to seek the information they need tomake progress. Table 1. Due Dates and Assessment Weighting for Formal Course Deliverables. % of Due Date(s) Deliverable Final Location Mark Friday Project Site Visit -- Project Site Week 2 Friday Technical Scope and 10 Submitted electronically Week 3 Project Proposal Friday
. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 27-36.[6] Retrieved from https://www.colorado.edu/oda/institutional-research/student-data/retention-graduation-rates-and-time-degree/undergraduate[7] Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., and Sullivan, J. F. (2003, June). Staying in engineering:Impact of a hands-on, team-based, first-year projects course on student retention. ASEEConference and Exhibition.[8] Huq, N. A., Xu, W., Movafaghi, S., and Hemmati, M. (2017). Evaluating the effectiveness ofimplementing active learning opportunities for first year engineering students who are takingmath, physics, and chemistry, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition.[9] Krause, S. J. (2015). Factors Impacting Retention and Success of UndergraduateEngineering Students
theoutcome, but also a sense of ownership or internal valuing of the outcome. Hence the committeeresurrected idea of assessing each outcome in the affective domain, using the Taxonomy ofEducation Objectives Volume II - Affective Domain [7] as a guide.Educational TaxonomiesFrameworks for assessing intellectual and emotional development have existed since at least thelate 1800s, but a common framework and language that defined activities and concepts toeffectively classify and assess intellectual and emotional development across the disparategroups in education did not exist [8]. In the mid-twentieth century a group of educationalexaminers, led by Benjamin S. Bloom, committed themselves to create this common framework.They met annually as a working
Missouri University Science & Technology in Civil Engineering in 1999, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 2004. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Michigan.Mr. Michael O’Connor P.E., New York University With five decades of construction and project management experience as a civil engineer, split equally between the public and private sectors involving projects with a total value of several hundred billion (US$s); my goal has always been to deliver solutions that are customer focused and performance that adds value. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Supporting ASCE’s Grand
-Based Learning,” Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[12] N. Salzman, B.C.S. Chittoori, and S. Miller, “Senior Civil Engineering Students’ Views on Sustainability and Resiliency,” Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[13] M. Marincel Payne and J. Aidoo, “Strengthening Sustainable Design Principles in the Civil Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[14] R. Du, M.A. Butkus, and J.A. Starke, “Incorporating Risk and Uncertainty into Undergraduate Environmental Engineering
. Forexample, one participant wrote that s/he liked, “the emphasis of communication in the graded portions [ofthe service-learning module], this is something that Engineering classes do a very bad job at teaching even though itis essential in CE”.Finally, a large number of the student participants said a major benefit of the experience was theopportunity to get to know their classmates and professors better. “This also helped me meet and bondwith classmates, which means more study buddies!”, wrote one participant. Other examples stated, “Duringthe build day, it was rewarding to work with our peers in a challenging setting outside of school. We were able toapply skills in leadership, creativity, and initiative” and, “Volunteering and working with our
Island International Engineering Program (IEP).3 The Rhode Island IEPseeks to train engineers to be able to operate in the international workplace by earning onedegree in an engineering discipline and one in a foreign language. In a similar, but more focusedway, the Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering uses aprogram called the Joe S. Mundy Global Learning Endowment4 to provide an internationallearning experience for students that may include international research or a summer-long studyabroad. In addition to the significant resources often needed to promote study abroad, there areother curricula actions that affect the perceived ability of institutions to promote globalization-related learning outcomes
should have pressed harder to develop the initial, pre-draft outcome rubrics to allow moretime for the constituent survey as the committee would have liked more responses to consider.Nonetheless, a survey open for two weeks is better than no survey. This survey proved critical as it wasused by the CEBOK3TC to determine which outcome statements should be revised and to develop theappropriate levels of achievement for the outcomes.Following the first full draft of the CEBOK3 outcome rubrics, the CEBOK3TC developed and conducted afinal survey seeking input on the outcomes. The survey was structured to allow respondents to providefeedback only on the outcomes they wished to review. Once the respondent selected the outcome(s) ofinterest, they were
Paper ID #30075Licensure Requirements for Teaching Civil Engineering Design Courses inthe United StatesDr. Brian J. Swenty P.E., University of Evansville Brian J. Swenty, Ph.D., P.E. is a professor in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering Department at the University of Evansville. He earned his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Missouri-Rolla (Missouri S T) and his M.S. degree in civil engineering from the University of Florida. He is a licensed professional engineer in California, Florida, Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana. He has held positions as an active duty Army officer, a senior civil engineer with a
following potential impediments on their likelihood ofinfluencing the tenure process: • Teaching load requirements, • Expectation of peer-reviewed journal publications, • Service expectations, • Availability of funds for research in their fields • Appreciation for area of research by tenure review committee(s) • Competition within department for funds, • Availability of Teaching Assistants (TA) to assist with grading, • Availability of students to employ as researchers, • Quality of students to employ as researchers, • Availability of faculty mentoring, • Quality of faculty mentoring, • Interdepartmental politics, and • Managing work-life balanceResultsThe responses to the survey were collected
enableeducational development to occur outside the classroom and the means to assess overall ability indesign. Page 12.200.3 2 Russell, Jeffrey S., et al., “A Systems View of Changing Civil Engineering Education,” ASCE, September2003. Undergraduate versus Graduate Emphasis As development of curricula supporting ASCE Policy Statement PS 465 and the civilengineering BOK began, two questions immediately arose. Those two questions were: ‚ What should be addressed predominantly at the undergraduate level and what should be addressed predominantly at the graduate level? ‚ How will completion of the BOK be assured
county. Barriers will emerge, but with guidance, persistence and determination a good student can overcome most of them.ConclusionsThe programs offered by the department and the institution were significantly enhanced throughthis exploration of remote learning. After offering two different courses in 4 separate countries,all to students at institutions where the conditions going in were unknown, the authors believethe experiment was a success. The department will continue offering courses in engineering tostudents at remote locations, and the prospects for doing that effectively and efficiently in thefuture are excellent.References1. Ressler, S. J., R. W. Welch, and Karl F. Meyer (2004). “Organizing and Delivering ClassroomInstruction
AC 2007-224: ASCE POLICY 465 ? THE MEANS FOR REALIZING THEASPIRATIONAL VISIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING IN 2025Jeffrey Russell, University of Wisconsin-MadisonGerry Galloway, Univ of MarylandThomas Lenox, American Society of Civil EngineersJames O'Brien, American Society of Civil Engineers Page 12.257.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007ASCE Policy 465 - the Means for Realizing the Aspirational Visions of Civil Engineering in 2025Russell, Galloway, Lenox and O’BrienASCE Policy 465 –a Means for Realizing the Aspirational Visions of Civil Engineering in 2025 Jeffrey S. Russell 1, Gerald E. Galloway2
Engineering Education, 2012 Incorporating Clickers and Peer Instruction into Large Structural Engineering ClassroomsAbstract Interaction and feedback are particularly challenging in large lecture environments,where class size limits student-faculty interaction. Clickers can be used to ensure studentsunderstand fundamental concepts by providing instant feedback to the instructor about studentknowledge gaps or misconceptions [1]. The use of clickers also helps maintain students’motivation and engagement in what’s going on in class, and provides an opportunity for PeerInstruction (PI). Clickers have been used since the 1980’s in many science and humanitiescourses such as physics, biology, chemistry, history
students are members ofclubs and classes throughout the Philadelphia School District and participate in various Page 15.1060.9competitions during the academic year. Mentors spend three hours a week at an assigned school.In total five schools were visited during the six week competition period for BEST Robotics. Inaddition, in 2006, almost two dozen Robotics educators, from the School District of Philadelphia(SDP), gathered at Villanova University' s Center for Engineering Education and Research(CEER) to take part in an AT&T sponsored three-day computer-aided design workshop. Thisprogram was repeated in 2007 when 26 teachers visited Villanova
vintage, 8000 sf unreinforced masonry building and the construction of a 10,000 sf building for an Historical Archive Complex • Green Building Competition - 1,000 sf residences in New Orleans, $100,000 budget, sustainable and accessible with the main floors elevated above the maximum predicted flood levels • Sedgewick Nature Reserves • Crandall Gymnasium & Natatorium - Redevelopment of a 1927 gymnasium and adjacent 1937 natatorium into a state of the art digital fabrication center. • UCSB College of Creative Studies – 60,000 sf building(s), parking, site work • Athletic Department Complex – 100,000 sf building(s), 1,000 car parking structure, 15,000 seat stadium, building renovations, sitework
, Professional and Ethical Responsibility, andTeamwork than did the seniors. She also found that extracurricular activities were important inmeeting the BOK2 outcomes, that a student’s role(s) within design teams impacts the perceptionof importance for certain outcomes (e.g. a team project manager is more likely to assign higherimportance to Leadership and Project Management), and “as students gain a better understandingof the attributes desired for civil engineering professionals, they will be better equipped to seekout experiences and courses to develop these skills.”15As ASCE notes, it is the student, the “fledgling engineer,” who is responsible for meeting theappropriate level of achievement for each outcome as he or she prepares for professional
AC 2010-941: COLLABORATING WITH LOCAL PRACTITIONERS TO LEAD ACAPSTONE CIVIL ENGINEERING DESIGN COURSEGregg Fiegel, California Polytechnic State University Gregg L. Fiegel is a Professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo. He is a registered Professional Engineer in California, and he serves as the ASCE Student Chapter Faculty Advisor. Dr. Fiegel received his B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Cal Poly in 1990. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of California, Davis in 1992 and 1995, respectively.Jay DeNatale, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Jay S
time,Bibliography 1. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) (2008). Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, 2nd Edition. Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers. 2. Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 93, Issue 3, pp. 223-231. 3. Toto, R. and Hien Nguyen (2009). Flipping the Work Design in an Industrial Engineering Course. 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX. 4. Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., and Lee, H.W. (2009). ‘Flipping’ the Classroom to Explore Active Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course
to apply concepts presented in lectures. • Combining Analysis and Design: future work is underway to streamline the course and evaluate other programs that teach both analysis and design into one course. We will identify the most critical topics needed for teaching both analysis and design, match the topics with the more interesting case studies, and create new ones in some cases, to continue enhancing student understanding and learning of structural analysis and design. Future work also includes tracking student performance in subsequent and more advanced classes.References[1] S. Singer and K.A. Smith, Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate
engineering comprise one thread of currentresearch. Originating from Mead and Metraux’s 1957 study of high school student images ofscientists [10], more recent research has focused on comparing K-12 student drawings ofscientists and engineers [11-14].The Fralick et al.’s 2009 [13] study is of interest to our work in progress because it developed arobust taxonomy for comparing drawings of scientists (DAS) and engineers (DAE) by middleschool level students (see Appendix A). They developed three general categories: species;objects; and inferred actions. We employ the Fralick et al. taxonomy to identify intersectionsbetween the descriptions of engineers and engineering we collected from our citizen scienceparticipants and images produce by K-12