greater percent gains on the concept inventory than either Section B or D. The 0.089points loss appears to be offset by the 0.12 points gain seen in students of an instructor withtraining in active-learning pedagogies.Student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy is known to improve student engagement andperformance.12 Professors 1 and 4 began their quarters with discussions on best practices forstudent success, explained why the course was using active learning techniques, and learnedstudent names by the second week. Professors 2 and 3 report not learning names or explainingthe purpose of the active learning modules. Professor 3 did tell the students he was usingmaterial developed by other faculty without providing a full explanation of the
?” (Emphasis in the original.) Re-sponses were measured with a 4-point Likert scale:Very Unconfident Unconfident Confident Very ConfidentThe expected grades for both groups of students are shown in Figure 1, and the responses to thefollow-up question are shown in Figure 2. Expected Grade 60% Percentage of Students Responding 50% CEE 3110 (n=62) 40% CEE 3150 (Comparison Group) (n=35) 30
engineering education.Dr. Tanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University Dr. Kunberger is an Associate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering in the U. A. Whitaker College of Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Dr. Kunberger received her B.C.E. and certificate in Geochemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering with a minor in Soil Science from North Carolina State University. Her areas of specialization are geotechnical and geo-environmental engineering. Educational areas of interest are self- efficacy and persistence in engineering and development of an interest in STEM topics in K-12 students.Dr. Thomas A. Lenox, American Society of Civil