, teaching with technology, and classroomassessment techniques. To-date over 600 individuals from more than 200 different academicinstitutions have attended the ExCEEd program.[1-3] Over each of the past five years, I haveserved as an Assistant Mentor, Mentor, and/or Instructor during the workshop.During the ExCEEd teaching workshop, a series of demonstration classes are provided by theinstructors for the participants. Instructors are hand-selected to deliver an example class in amanner that embodies the principles associated with the workshop. For many years, one of thosedemonstration classes has been delivered by Dr. Al Estes, Professor and Head of theArchitectural Engineering Department at California Polytechnic State University, San LuisObispo
Vision 2025, which follows:6 Entrusted by society to create a sustainable world and enhance the global quality of life, civil engineers serve competently, collaboratively, and ethically as master: • planners, designers, constructors, and operators of society’s economic and social engine—the built environment; • stewards of the natural environment and its resources; • innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across the public
Computer) and an Engineering Technology Department.There are two freshman engineering courses, a common first semester course (ENGR 1201), anda department-specific second semester course (ENGR 1202). The first semester commoncourse serves as an introduction to the engineering profession and training in some of the skillsneeded for professional success1. The content of the second semester course, even though it hasretained the common course name, has been tailored by the departments to serve different needs. Page 22.339.2In the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, we have offered since2002 an ENGR 1202 course that applies
AC 2011-484: DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENGINEERING MANAGEMENTMS OPTION COUPLED WITH UNDERGRADUATE CULMINATING DE-SIGNDr. Fernando Fonseca, Brigham Young UniversitySteven E. Benzley, Brigham Young University Steven E. Benzley obtained BES and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from Brigham Young University in 1966 and 1967, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of California. He was a member of the technical staff at Sandia National Laboratories. Since 1980 he has been on the faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Brigham Young University. He has also served as Associate Dean of the BYU College of Engineering and Technology, Associate Dean of BYU Honors and General Education, and is currently the chair
capstone courses. Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/36460/1/sp00fa02.pdf 3. Durel, R. J. (1993). The capstone course: A rite of passage in teaching sociology. 223-225. 4. Thomas, A. S. (1998). The business policy course: Multiple methods for multiple goals. Journal of management education 22, (4), 484-497. 5. ABET. Criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs, 2012 - 2013. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3144 Page 24.1344.11
, but those exemptions areunder pressure. This reduction in the number of credit hours in an engineering degree program iscausing much discussion as to whether the baccalaureate degree is adequate for professionalpractice in light of the expanding technology the students must learn. This question is verydifficult to answer until the body of knowledge for a discipline necessary for professionalpractice is developed.Table 1 Credit Hours in Engineering Degree Programs Credit Hours All Engineering Civil Engineering Civil Engineering Statistic Programs in Texas Programs in Texas Programs in SEC Mean 127.9 128.0
, 2011 AE studio - beyond pedestrian access: creating bridges for learningAbstractTechnological advances in digital technologies have made a significant impact on the fields ofarchitecture and structural engineering. The trends in architectural design towards complex or-ganic shapes and the use of Building Information Models (BIM) have generated a demand formore creative and collaborative interaction between architectural and structural professionals.This paper focuses on the case study of a joint Architecture and Engineering studio (AE Studio)offered at Cal Poly Pomona University, designed to bring the two professions closer during theeducational process. The studio is focused on the design of a
Paper ID #33652Lessons Learned in a Mixed-mode Teaching ExperienceDr. Jennifer Retherford P.E., University of Tennessee at Knoxville Dr. Retherford is an alumna of the University of Nebraska, Omaha, and received her graduate degrees from Vanderbilt University. She currently teaches a variety of courses supporting the department of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Tennessee. Among many structural engineer- ing courses, Dr. Retherford manages the Senior Design Project course for all undergraduate seniors.Dr. Kristen N. Wyckoff, University of Tennessee at KnoxvilleDr. Sarah J. Mobley, University of Tennessee
studentretention in engineering programs. For instance, learning communities for first-year students inthe Department of Engineering at Colorado State University-Pueblo improved the retention ratefrom 84% (fall 2008) to 89% (fall 2009) and 94% (spring 2010) [1]. Similar results were alsoseen in the School of Engineering and Computer Science in West Texas A&M University,Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) and Virginia Tech University [2] -[4]. Introduction of learning communities in agriculture engineering and technology programs inIowa State University improved the retention rate by 12.3% in a year [5]. Additionally, somestudies have linked learning communities with enhanced academic performance andcommunication skills in the
Paper ID #14403Introducing Students to Interdisciplinary Perspectives of Building and UrbanDesignDr. Abbie B Liel P.E., University of Colorado, Boulder Dr. Abbie B. Liel is an associate professor of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder.Sarah J. Welsh-Huggins, University of Colorado, Boulder Ms. Welsh-Huggins, LEED Association, is a Ph.D. Candidate in Civil Engineering, studying the life- cycle economic, structural, and environmental impacts of buildings under hazard events and designed for sustainable, green design features. She also recently completed her M.S. in
Paper ID #21611Examining the Impacts of Academic and Community Enrichment Resourceson First-Year Civil Engineering StudentsDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment.Ally Kindel
January 2008.11 California State Polytechnic University, Course catalogue – experimental courses, ARCE x410, Integrated Page 13.1043.14Building Envelopes, http://www.calpoly.edu/%7Eacadprog/2007depts/xcourses07-09.htm accessed 5 January2008.12 ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs,” Effective for Evaluations During the 2007-2008Accreditation Cycle, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,Baltimore, Maryland, 2007.13 Boyer, E.L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, A Special Report. The CarnegieFoundation for the Advancement of Teaching
AC 2009-734: INTEGRATING PROFESSIONAL TOPICS AND ENGINEERINGCONSTRAINTS ACROSS THE CURRICULUMRonald Welch, University of Texas, Tyler Ron Welch is Professor and Head, Department of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia. Until 2 Jan 2007, Ron was an Academy Professor at the United States Military Academy (USMA). Ron received a BS degree in Engineering Mechanics from the USMA in 1982 and MS and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1990 and 1999, respectively. Ronald_Welch@uttyler.edu
work in an engineering firm during the summer, having faculty members spend theirsabbatical leaves in an engineering firm, and having full time engineers spend a year of paidleave in a university. There also exist situations where companies send engineers to theclassroom at the expense of the companies and situations where engineers with many years ofpracticing experience decide to have a second career in academia. Students in primarilyengineering technology programs indicated that as a result of including real world engineeringexperiences in the curriculum they became more job ready and were actually receiving job offersas a result.13,14 More recently and partly in response to ASCE’s Body of Knowledge15 report andPolicy 46316, many schools
. Donavan, “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research, vol.69, no.1, 1999, pp.21-52.14. Wankat, P.H., “Reflective Analysis of Student Learning in a Sophomore Engineering Course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol.88, no.2, April, 1999, pp.195-20315. McLeod, A., “Discovery and Facilitating Deep Learning States,” National Teaching and Learning Forum, Vol.5, no.6, 1996, pp.1-7 Page 11.308.13
engineering, hypothesized that a mandatory first-year introductionto engineering course would likely improve the understanding and commitment of those studentsmost likely to complete their degrees, while encouraging students who were less likely tocomplete their degrees to leave their programs sooner. Ultimately, both groups reap the benefitsof such a course in the long term, developing realistic career goals early and more quicklygetting on a path to achieving them.For a first-year course to be most effective at improving student retention, it must provideinformation that is specifically relevant to its students. In some cases, that may require aconstantly changing curriculum that presents material on the cutting edge of technology or thatadapts to
Paper ID #30024Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure: Lessons Learned from Eight YearsInstruction on the CEBOKWilliam D Lawson P.E., Ph.D., Texas Tech University William D. Lawson, P.E., Ph.D. serves as an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Texas Tech Uni- versity. His career in higher education is characterized by excellence and innovation in teaching, award- winning scholarship and sponsored research, and professional service at the national, regional and local levels. Creative activities encompass both technical research on geotechnical applications in transporta- tion, and interdisciplinary study of
Paper ID #22674Identifying Factors for Retention of Engineering Students in the First TwoYearsMr. Mohammad R. H. Gorakhki, Colorado State UniversityDr. Kimberly Catton P.E., Colorado State University Professor of Practice Civil and Environmental EngineeringNabila A. Huq, Nabila A. Huq recently completed her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Colorado State University, and is currently serving as a postdoctoral researcher at NREL. During her Ph.D., she served as a Graduate Teaching Fellow for the College of Engineering, teaching engineering concepts and studying undergradu- ate engineering retention patterns. She
, Florida Gulf Coast University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21712Dr. Kunberger is an Associate Professor in the Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering inthe U. A. Whitaker College of Engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Dr. Kunberger received herB.C.E. and certificate in Geochemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology and her M.S. and Ph.D.in Civil Engineering with a minor in Soil Science from North Carolina State University. Her areas ofspecialization are geotechnical and geo-environmental engineering. Educational areas of interest are self-efficacy and persistence in
[14]. Bishop[15] makes a strong case for the replacement of in person material delivery, which can be replacedwithout a loss in effectiveness by technological delivery of the content, and replacing it withproblem-based learning which is a much more effective approach for meeting instructionalobjectives.Flipping the classroom can lead to several benefits such as freeing class time for interactiveactivities like active and problem-based learning, presenting the educational material in differentformats to cater to students’ various learning styles and preferences, encouraging students tobecome self-learners, and preparing them for how they will need to learn as practicing engineers[8]. Engaging in the flipped format may also discourage breaches
onconcerns of conceptual gaps and redundancies in the degree program and the significant time thathad elapsed since the last comprehensive curriculum restructuring. This curriculum redesignwas noteworthy because it was among the first to incorporate the outcomes from ASCE’s CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for theFuture, 2nd Edition (BOK2)1. Other efforts to incorporate the BOK2 holistically into curriculahave been documented at the Universities of Alabama, Arkansas, and Texas-Tyler2 andLawrence Technological University3, with BOK2-driven curriculum analysis and changeproposals discussed at Rose Hulman Institute of Technology4, Montana State University5,University of Louisiana6, Northern Arizona
education and research at US universities. Environmental science & technology, 43(15), 5558-5564.16 Apul, D. S., and Philpott, S. M. (2011). Use of outdoor living spaces and Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning in sustainability engineering education. Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 137(2), 69-77.17 Zhao, C.-M. and Kuh, G.D. (2004). “Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement.” Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138.18 Lenning, O. and Ebbers, L. (1999). The powerful potential of learning communities: improving education for the future. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report vo. 26, no. 6.19 Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An
data and encouraging peer-reviewed publication of this anonymized data.References (1) ABET, 2017. ABET Program Search. Accessed February 10, 2017: http://main.abet.org/aps/Accreditedprogramsearch.aspx (2) Yoder, Brian L. 2015. “Engineering by the Numbers 2015.” from 2015 ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, American Society of Engineering Education, Washington, D.C. Accessed February 10, 2017: https://www.asee.org/papers- and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf (3) ABET Engineering Accreditation Committee, 2014. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, November 2014, ABET Baltimore, MD. Accessed February 12, 2017: http
. Others can see similar results by consideringimplementing the programs listed in Table 1.References 1. Welch, R.W., Bower, K.C., Rabb, R.J., Martin, A.K., Barsanti, R.J. Jr., STEM Scholarships to Engage Exceptional Students, ASEE Annual Conference 2017, Columbus OH, 2017. 2. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), “Going the distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering, Engineering Technology and Computing Students,” Washington, DC, 2012. http://www.asee.org/retention-project. 3. Welch, R.W., Martin, A.K., Bower, K.C., Rabb, R.J., Promoting Engagement through Innovative and Pragmatic Programs, ASEE Annual Conference 2016, New Orleans, LA, 2016. 4. Welch, R.W., Martin, A.K
Paper ID #28370Inclusive Learning Approach to Teach Concepts of Pavement ManagementSystems to Seniors and Graduate Students in Civil EngineeringMr. Harshdutta I PANDYA, Rowan University Harshdutta Pandya is a Research Associate at Rowan University. He began attending the university in the Fall 2014 and completed M.S in Civil Engineering in Fall 2016. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Civil Engineering. The focus of his research includes repair and retrofitting of reinforced concrete structures and pavements, finite element analysis of steel, concrete and pavement structures and rheology durability of cement and asphalt
Paper ID #28760Personalized learning plans for pre-requisite materials in asenior-level traffic engineering courseDr. Vikash Gayah, The Pennsylvania State University Dr. Vikash V. Gayah is an associate professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing at The Pennsylvania State University (joined 2012). He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Central Florida (2005 and 2006, respectively) and his Ph.D. degree from the University of California, Berkeley (2012). Dr. Gayah’s research focuses on urban mobility, traffic operations, traffic flow theory, traffic safety and public
Paper ID #6943Developing and Assessing Student’s Principled Leadership Skills to Achievethe Vision for Civil Engineers in 2025Dr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel Dr. William J. Davis is a professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Tech and is a registered professional engineer. His research interests focus on transportation infrastructure planning and design, highway safety, and active living by design. Courses he teaches include transportation engineering, highway design, concrete and asphalt design, and professional
Paper ID #9178Experiences in Implementing an NSF/REU Site on Interdisciplinary WaterSciences and Engineering during 2007-13Dr. Vinod K Lohani, Virginia Tech Dr. Vinod K Lohani is a professor in the Engineering Education Department and an adjunct faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research interests are in the areas of sustainability, computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering
Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Mary Lynn Brannon is the Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, College of Engineering, at the Pennsylvania State University, USA. She has a master’s of arts degree in education and human development, specializing in educational technology leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She has worked extensively in the design of as- sessment tools for course methods and activities. She is a Faculty Development Consultant with previous experience in instructional design, and the instructor
AC 2012-2963: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PEDAGOGICAL TECH-NIQUES TO TEACH MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGNGUIDEDr. Yusuf A. Mehta, Rowan UniversityDr. Leslie Ann McCarthy P.E., Villanova University Page 25.333.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Comparison of Different Pedagogical Techniques to Teach Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design GuideABSTRACTMechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) is relatively new design methodologyfor conducting pavement structural and materials design. MEPDG is a significant departurefrom the current Association of American Society of Highway