, 2016http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-alerts/rationale-for-revising-criteria-3/ (24January 2016).14 Bloom, Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Longman, 1956.15 Wikipedia. Natural Science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_science (28 January 2016)16 Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R., Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing, A: A Revision of Bloom'sTaxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition, New York: Pearson, 2001Appendix A: Defining the Gap Between the BOK2 Baccalaureate-Level Standard and the Proposed ABETAccreditation Criteria Civil Engineering BOK2 ABET Accreditation Criteria
andeducation have grappled with the adequacy of the baccalaureate degree as preparation for acareer in engineering, especially licensed professional practice. Technological advances andexpanding societal needs demand that coursework cover more content, while the credit hoursrequired to obtain a bachelor’s degree continue to decline. Up until the early 1960’s the averageengineering curriculum required 145-150 credit hours of coursework. Many programs todayhave curricula approaching 120 credit hours for a baccalaureate degree.As far back as 1968, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) authored Goals ofEngineering Education1, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The reportconcluded: “The increasing complexity of the
, 2014.4. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.5. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2015-2016 (http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2015-2016/). ABET, 2014.6. BOK-Accreditation Strategic Planning Committee. Final Report. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.7. Ressler, S. J. and D.R. Lynch. The Civil Engineering Body for Knowledge and the Accreditation Criteria: A plan for Long-term Management of Change. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2011. Appendices Appendix 1: Student Learning Outcome Levels of
Engineering Programs. Engineering Accreditation Commission.2. Polman J. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. Teachers College Press.3. Barron, B. J. S. (1998). Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-based Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 271-3114. Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What's so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61-79.5. L.R. Barroso and J. Morgan (2005). “Introducing Projects into Undergraduate Structural Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus-Christi, TX. March 23-25, 2005.6. J. Morgan
Achievement Applicable to the Body of Knowledge Required for Entry Into the Practice of Civil Engineering at the Professional Level, Reston, VA, September. (http://www.asce.org/raisethebar)4. Bloom. B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst. E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York, NY.5. Fridley, K.J., et al., 2009. Educating the Future Civil Engineering for the New Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge,” Proceeding of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2009, Austin, TX. Page 15.654.136