, they may be more likely to seek out mentoring relationships with faculty,which may then provide time for academic inquiry. Need#extra#7me#to#complete#degree?# Play#varsity/intercollegiate#athle7cs?# Men# Par7cipate#in#the#performing#arts?# Women# Par7cipate#in#religious#ac7vi7es?# Par7cipate#in#faculty#research#project?# Become#a#student#leader?# Get#a#job#to#help#pay#for#college#expenses?# Change#major#field?# Par7cipate#in#a#study#abroad#program?# Join#a#social#fraternity#or#sorority?# Par7cipate#in
Ecological Paradigm,” Syst. Res. Behav. Sci., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 575–586, Aug. 2016.[24] K. Gramann, T.-P. Jung, D. P. Ferris, C.-T. Lin, and S. Makeig, Towards a New Cognitive Neuroscience: Modeling Natural Brain Dynamics. Frontiers E-books, 2014.[25] T. Shealy and M. Hu, “Evaluating the potential of neuroimaging methods to study engineering cognition and project-level decision making,” presented at the EPOC-MW Conference, Engineering Project Organization Society, Fallen Leaf Lake, CA USA, 2017.[26] T. Shealy, J. Grohs, M. Hu, D. Maczka, and R. Panneton, Investigating Design Cognition during Brainstorming Tasks with Freshmen and Senior Engineering Students using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. 2017.[27] M. Strait and M
from different universities,undeclared first-year students, and a few students in different majors, including students from theSustainable Urban Environments degree program who are required to take this class during theirfirst or second year,The objectives of the Introduction to Civil Engineering course are 1. List the subdisciplines of civil engineering, identify types of projects that engage each, and understand the multidisciplinary nature of most large infrastructure projects; 2. Explain the overall role of civil engineers in design and operation of urban infrastructure, with understanding of the range of typical day-to-day tasks and responsibilities; 3. Discuss the ethical responsibilities of engineers to their
there is an unfortunate upper constraint. This constraint is not present in real lifeopen-ended projects, so this constraint is somewhat artificial. The reader can see that only oneteam (Team 5) out of the 5 teams performed above the maximum individual. Three of the teamsscored below the maximum individual, and one team did the same as the best individual. As aside note, with three of the teams performing worse than the best individual, this demonstratesthat one member did not carry/dominate the entire team. Still only one of the five teams had this Page 11.1061.7super-performance. Given the circumstances of newly formed teams, the result was
around the nation areincorporating sustainability into their curriculum.The National Research Council (NRC) notes several challenges to effective undergraduateeducation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Thesechallenges include providing engaging laboratory, classroom and field experiences; teachinglarge numbers of students from diverse backgrounds; improving assessment of learningoutcomes; and informing science faculty about research on effective teaching3-5. Researchsuggests that team based projects can also enhance student learning in STEM fields since itpromotes active and collaborative learning while simultaneously promotes individualaccountability, personal responsibility, and communication skills2. In
availablewithin the CE program, and several electives in environmental engineering are also availablefrom outside the program. The program currently offers no additional course in constructionmanagement or hydrology and hydraulics.Constituent FeedbackReports from the field indicated that CE graduates were adequately proficient in the traditionalareas of civil engineering, but lacked additional expertise in areas like project management,power generation and distribution, geomatics, transportation, and infrastructure assessment.Constituent survey results showed that topics could be categorized into three groupings toinclude “essential,” “necessary” and “nice to have.” Tables 2 and 3 below specify the “essential”and “necessary” topics, respectively. The
program as well). Finaltotals for 2013 are projected to be at 450 students with a trend that increases roughly 50 studentsper academic year going forward. SI will not be the only initiative used to continue increasingretention, but it will continue to be at the forefront of efforts by the faculty and staff at The Page 24.1346.11Citadel. Full-time Enrollment by Major 400 350 300 Number of Students 250 200 150 100 50
the students they focus on and the types ofproblems they address. Many, if not most civil engineers are familiar with the Steel Bridge and Concrete Canoecompetitions. The first national level steel bridge competition was held in 1992 and continuesthrough today. It is sponsored by the American Institute of Steel Construction and the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers and its mission is“to supplement the education of civil engineeringstudents with a comprehensive, student-driven project experience from conception and designthrough fabrication, erection, and testing, culminating in a steel structure that meets clientspecifications and optimizes performance and economy” (14). In this competition, the all bridgedimensions are set and the
Paper ID #32606The Merits of a Civil Engineering Certification to Validate Fulfillmentof the CE-BOKMr. Bradley F. Aldrich, American Society of Civil Engineers Bradley F. Aldrich, P.E., F.NSPE, F.ASCE is President of Aldrich + Elliott, PC an environmental engineer- ing firm and also serves as vice-chair of the Board of Professional Regulation for Engineers in Vermont. He earned his bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the University of Vermont. Over his thirty-five year career, Mr. Aldrich has held project management and leadership positions with a national general contractor and several engineering firms before
York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and
from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commis- sioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice
appears to have been disadvantaged both in class time and location. Sections A, B andC were taught on MWF, back-to-back, in the same pilot classroom that has whiteboard paint onall four walls, desks on rollers and seven projector screens that project directly onto the writeablewalls easily allowing student groups to report answers on projected problems. Each section was65 minutes long with section A starting first at 9:15 am. Section E was also taught MWF in thesame pilot classroom during the winter quarter. The T/Th section D had the earliest start time at8:30 am and required students to engage for 100 minutes. The class was taught in a traditionalclassroom where the projector screen covered close to half of the room’s two chalkboards. Thedesks
Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a commis- sioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initia- tives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education
AC 2012-3876: THE ”RAISE THE BAR” INITIATIVE: CHARTING THEFUTURE BY UNDERSTANDING THE PATH TO THE PRESENT - MOD-IFYING THE MODEL LAWS AND RULES FOR ENGINEERING LICEN-SUREMr. Jon D. Nelson P.E., Tetra Tech, Inc Jon D. Nelson, P.E. is Senior Vice President of the central region of the Engineering and Architectural Services group of Tetra Tech, Inc. in Tulsa, Okla. He has been a consulting engineer for 34 years, focusing on municipal water and wastewater projects. He has been with Tetra Tech for 27 years. He holds a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Kansas State University and a M.S. degree in environmental engineering from Oklahoma State University. Nelson is licensed as a professional engineer in four states and
technological growth.”Here the ASME paper suggests that we must preserve low standards for entry into the professionto ensure that we have an adequate supply of engineers to ensure our technological growth. Yetthere is compelling evidence that our future global competitiveness demands not more engineers,but better educated engineers.Consider the report produced by a National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored project called“The 5XME Workshop: Transforming Mechanical Engineering Education and Research in theUSA.”9 The 5XME project report describes the ongoing global commoditization of engineering Page 25.1361.4* The ASME position paper uses the
with his students on bridge related research projects and student competitions.Dr. Brian J. Swenty P.E., University of Evansville Brian J. Swenty, Ph.D., P.E. is a professor in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering Department at the University of Evansville. He earned his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Missouri-Rolla (Missouri ST) and his M.S. degree in civil engineering from the University of Florida. He is a licensed professional engineer in California, Florida, Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana. He has held positions as an active duty Army officer, a senior civil engineer with a consulting firm, and the director of Missouri’s Dam and Reservoir Safety Program. Since 1993, he has been at the University
course material introduces students to the construction project lifecycle from theconceptual design phase through construction completion and operation and maintenance. All thecontent delivery was online asynchronous, but there were online synchronous TA and instructoroffice hours. The course was designed to individualize each interaction the students had with theLMS interface (e.g., lecture page visits, discussion page visits). The design took into accounthow Canvas measures user interactions inside of modules like the one shown in Figure 2. Eachweekly module was unlocked Monday at 12:00 AM. The expectation was to complete thematerial in the module by the following Sunday at 11:59 PM. Since the course wasasynchronous, the instructor pre
Paper ID #21188Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using Mobile Learning in Engineering Dy-namics and Vibrations CoursesDr. Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University Zhaoshuo Jiang graduated from the University of Connecticut with a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering. Before joining San Francisco State University as an assistant professor, he worked as a structural engi- neering professional at Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) LLP. As a licensed professional engineer in the states of Connecticut and California, Dr. Jiang has been involved in the design of a variety of low- rise and high-rise projects. His
education provides agreater understanding of the multifaceted nature of civil engineering.(7,8) They can be used tosimulate a variety of learning protocols such as: design and analysis experiences,interdisciplinary issues and concerns, costs, hazards, owner preferences, and compliance withstandards and guidelines. Cases, by and large, describe situations, projects, problems, decisions,etc., and are primarily derived from actual experience, and do reflect thoughts, outlook, andconcerns of: managers, professionals, regulatory agencies, communities, and owners. Cases arealso widely used in other disciplines such as: education, medicine, and law.This paper describes the steps taken in planning, developing, and executing a case study/ casehistory course
engineering problems, including fluids, geotechnical, and structural problems. She is a CEE faculty mem- ber since January 2010 and she was also member of the faculty of Universidad Simon Bolivar, Venezuela, for fifteen years.Dr. Lili Steiner, Florida International University I design and implement education solutions that are efficient, effective, and scalable. Specifically, I focus on the development of meaningful learning innovation from discovery and design through production and deployment. My research and experience have shown that a full-cycle approach is the most effective way to deliver value. Because of this, I work on full-cycle, full-scale projects. Conceptually, this means that I’m involved in every
Lehigh University. Dr. Lenox served for over 28 years as a com- missioned officer in the U.S Army Field Artillery in a variety of leadership positions in the U.S., Europe, and East Asia. He retired at the rank of Colonel. During his military career, Dr. Lenox spent 15 years on the engineering faculty of USMA – including five years as the Director of the Civil Engineering Division. Upon his retirement from the U.S. Army in 1998, he joined the staff of the American Society of Civil En- gineers (ASCE). In his position as educational staff leader of ASCE, he managed several new educational initiatives – collectively labeled as Project ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education). As ASCE’s Executive Vice President
reaching their full potential [7]. The National Academy ofEngineering proposes a dramatic and fundamental transformation of engineering education tobetter prepare engineering students for the future as part of the Engineer of 2020 Project [8].However, much of the literature focuses on what the instructor is going to do to deliver contentrather than focusing on how best to get a student to interact with the content and/or takeresponsibility for their own learning [9].In a traditional lecture class, an instructor serves as an information provider while the studentscommonly serve as recipients of that information. Students should, instead, be activeparticipants in the learning process. While many traditional classrooms attempt to incorporateactive
employing the ExCEEd Teaching Model highly, many, if not most,of them were not retaining essential information from one course to the next. The bestexplanation for the students’ lack of retention was that they were only minimally engaged withthe material. Analysis of student time survey data consistently showed that students spent largeamounts of time cramming for tests and major projects immediately before the event, smalleramounts of time completing homework the night before it was due, and almost no time in dailypreparation.To rectify this issue various instructors developed a variety of different initiatives. Problem SetZero (1) experimented with making the first homework assignment in a given class a review ofthe materials from the previous
technical areas of civil engineering and analyze and interpret the resulting data explain basic concepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership analyze issues in professional ethics explain the importance of professional licensureTable 3: Observed Distribution of Hours by B.S. Degree Program Type Math & Basic Science Credit Average Average (% minimum maximum Std. Dev. Program (hours) total hours)1 (hours) (hours) (hours) COV (%) Civil 35.55 27.47 32.00
Grant No.1635534. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] ASCE, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[2] P. A. Vesilind and A. S. Gunn, “Sustainable development and the ASCE Code of Ethics,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 72–74, 1998.[3] R. K. comments, “10 projections for the global population in 2050,” Pew Research Center, 03-Feb-2014. .[4] S. J. Davis, K. Caldeira, and H. D. Matthews, “Future CO2 Emissions and
given freedom to openlydebate on the topics when required. The facilitator helps students to think independently,ask questions and find answers to their questions. By doing this, students learn to beindependent while solving the engineering problems. The facilitator also acts as acounselor when required. Thus it makes more sense to call the SI session a discussionforum. The SI session is not intended to help students solve their home work problems.Student queries on the homework problems, assignments and projects are addressed bythe TA or the instructor in separate office hours.Figure 3. Visual Syllabus for Weekly Supplemental InstructionResultsThe work of the participants in the SI session as well as in the regular class has beenmonitored
paper and project: A term paper presenting a case study of sustainable concrete buildingdesign will be required. Students will also submit two term projects. The first will compare a Page 24.477.10conventional reinforced concrete to a sustainable reinforced concrete from the perspective ofstructural design. The second will do the same yet from mixed design perspective.Poster presentations: Students in teams will present posters on special application of sustainableconcrete. Topics will be coordinated in order to cover several concretes. Each poster will includedescription, implementations, manufacturing, proportioning, and construction and will
-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, and water resources. In a major ($1M+, NSF) curriculum reform and engineering education research project from 2004 to 2009, he led a team of engineering and education faculty to reform engineering curriculum of an engineering department (Biological Systems Engineering) using Jerome Bruner’s spiral curriculum theory. Currently, Dr. Lohani leads an NSF/REU Site on ”interdisciplinary water sciences and engineering” which has already graduated 56 excellent undergraduate researchers since 2007. This Site is renewed for the third cycle which will be implemented during 2014-16. He also leads an NSF/TUES type I project in which a real-time environmental monitoring lab is being
who is active and is involved in thelearning process by asking questions, teaching others, or participating in hands-on activities.They showed that these learners more often develop a comprehension of the ideas and conceptsof the material being presented and do not just memorize the facts being presented. Theirconclusion was that active learners are more often able to apply the learned skills to newsituations. In this context, a study that included a survey of more than 4000 adult learners from avariety of backgrounds who participated in a training project at the University of TennesseeTransportation Center7, identified hands-on exercises as very useful and often described howmuch fun they had learning the material in this format.To address
Foundation Distinguished Teaching Award (2017) and Alex G. and Faye Spanos Distinguished Teaching Award (2015); Outstanding Teacher Award from the College of Engineering (2014); and Outstanding Teacher Award from the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction (2014). Currently, he is lead PI of a $2.5M National Science Foundation project titled ”Enhancing Critical Transitions in Civil Engineering Degree”.Dr. Jee Woong Park, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Jee Woong Park earned his master’s degree and doctoral degree in civil engineering from Stanford Uni- versity and Georgia Institute of Technology. He is currently working as an assistant professor within the Department of Civil and Environmental