educate the future of our Service andhave developed a Coastal Resiliency course that provides exposure into the science of climatechange, its impact on civil engineering infrastructure and on the planning and design of resilientstructures. The Coastal Resiliency course provides preparation for the real-world practice ofengineering by exposing students to the importance of risk and vulnerability assessment withinthe context of changing climatic conditions. As a sea-going service, the majority of the USCG’sassets are along the coastline. As the USCG’s primary accession point for civil engineers,ensuring future engineers are exposed to the potential challenges that will likely occur due torising sea level and other climate-related hazards is an
Experts & 4:20 - 5:10 Workshop Feedback Session Distance Learning6:00 to 8:00 Lab I: Ice Breaker Dinner and Team 5:10 - 5:30 Wrap-up & Thank You's BuildingThe ExCEEd II pilot consisted of sixteen participants, each graduating from one of the threeETW sites between the years of 2001 and 2008. ExCEEd II was staffed by four senior mentorsand the site director who took turns leading various activities and seminars. Like ETW, theparticipants were organized into teams of four and each team was led by a senior mentor. Thepre-organized team-based environment is designed to facilitate small group activities and toprovide a supportive environment for the practice teaching laboratories.An important design
is common to learning communities, yet the use of cross-institutioncollaborative learning is not often used because of numerous logistically challenges. This paperdescribes the development and assessment of a CICL approach to teach sustainable design andthe necessary actions to overcome the logistical challenges. The objectives of the paper are todescribe the CICL approach, evaluate its effectiveness for student engagement and learning, andprovide recommendations to improve and expand in the future.Courses and CICL AssignmentThe CICL activity described here was planned, designed, and tested by Steve Burian at theUniversity of Utah and Defne Apul at the University of Toledo. Students from two graduate levelcourses, CVEEN 6460 Sustainable
, Ethics,And Research).While finishing their graduate degrees in Communication, Rhetoric and Composition, andEnglish, these consultants collaborate with Engineering faculty to develop and implementwritten, oral and teamwork communication education in various departments within the Collegeof Engineering. In the Civil and Environmental Engineering department, faculty and consultantshave developed a capstone course intended to provide students with a unique opportunity to learnand practice written, oral and team communication in a simulated professional firm environment.They produce and present a Proposal, Feasibility Study, and Preliminary Engineering Reportwith 75% drawings and specifications for their community client, making the course a design
his experiences as a consulting engineer into courses covering the practice of civil en- gineering, including a senior level capstone course which runs in parallel with a currently ongoing civil engineering project. His doctoral research was conducted on the long-term field performance of retaining structures in expansive clay.Mr. Hugh Watson Morris, University of Auckland, NZ Hugh Morris is a Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering who had a short period in local government and consulting before joining the University 30 years ago. He has taught timber engineering design to struc- tural engineering students and introductory design to 1000 first year students from multiple engineering disciplines. He has a passion for
Effective written communication skills are essential for engineers, as is widely recognized inthe field of engineering education and by US and international engineering professional andprogram accreditation organizations [1]–[3]. Since implementation of the EC2000 criteria,communication has been also been explicitly required by ABET accreditation criteria forengineering programs. Specifically, criterion 3g states that programs must demonstrate that theirgraduates develop “an ability to communicate effectively” [1]. While the ABET change in criteria push communication skills from the periphery to a centralcomponent of the engineering curriculum, the implementation of writing activities in engineeringcourses is often lacking. Best practices of
-professional setting can also improvecommunication and help students connect key concepts of their principled knowledge. Thus,many engineering senior design courses have investigated collaboration with local industry tosponsor team- and problem-based student design projects.Lessons from capstone industry projectsThere is a wealth of knowledge about challenges and best practices for industry-sponsoredcapstone design courses. These studies evaluate courses that include industry-supervised work,international projects, and multidisciplinary projects. Table 1 shows a compilation of industry-sponsored capstone design courses that include Civil Engineering students, either separately or ina multidisciplinary project. The authors note that this compilation is
should promote learning by indicating levels of proficiency orperformance levels as opposed to just scores for grades.Self-assessment and self-grading activities, when applied correctly, can support the student aspart of his or her learning process. For this reason, these activities should be viewed not asisolated practices but as part of the overall learning process [28]. Despite decades of research onthese promising techniques, self-assessment remains somewhat of a “niche market for theenthusiastic” and self-grading activities, particularly on exams, “remain unlikely due to social,political, and logistical reasons” [16]. Since opportunities remain to develop consistent andsystematic usage of these techniques, further study is needed so that
Washington State University (2013-2014) and George Mason University (2014-2017). Throughout his career, his primary responsibility as a faculty member has been teaching students, for which he aspires to provide them with a quality and enjoyable experience.Dr. William A. Kitch, Angelo State University Dr. Kitch is Professor and Chair of the David L. Hirschfeld Department of Engineering at Angelo State University. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the public and private sector. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado, California and Texas American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Make
(Professional & Educational Strategic Initiatives), Dr. Lenox is leading several educational and professional career-development projects for the civil engi- neering profession – with the overall objective of properly preparing individuals for their futures as civil engineers. A prime example is his long-term engagement in ASCE’s initiative to ”raise the bar” for entry into professional practice. Dr. Lenox received a Bachelor’s of Science degree from the United States Mil- itary Academy, Master’s of Science degree from Cornell University, Master’s of Business Administration degree from Long Island University, and a Ph.D. degree from Lehigh University. He is also a graduate of several Army service and specialty schools to
, and welfare consequential to civilprojects. Additionally, ASCE believes that implementation will enhance the stature of theprofession in general.As the graduate committee in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering atBrigham Young University (BYU), the authors of this paper were charged with planning forpotential impacts that a change in the academic requirements for licensure would have on ourdepartment. The authors used this opportunity to ascertain if civil engineering departments atother universities were making changes in their programs and if they were taking planningactions based on these proposed licensing requirements. The purpose of this paper is tosummarize the results of a survey conducted to aid in this effort
students traveled to Bolivia tocomplete the construction of the bridge. During their four-week stay in Bolivia, the students wereasked to keep reflective journals that were guided by a series of weekly writing prompts. Weconsidered the following research questions in the study: To what degree did the project advance the students’ mastery of technical concepts? Page 24.94.2 How did complexities (e.g., linguistics, local construction practices, diverse social and cultural environment) related to the site affect students’ perceptions of engineering design/construction, particularly within a global and social context? How
Orleans’ Chapter of the Structural Engineering Institute. Norma Jean also has served in the past on several National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) committees and task forces, serving as chair of the Board-level NCEES Education Committee and is an Emeritus Member of NCEES. She was named by the Governor of Louisiana to Louisiana’s licensing board for pro- fessional engineers, LAPELS, serving as Chairman of the LAPELS Board in 2011-12. Mattei received her BSCE in 1982 from Tulane University and practiced as a consulting engineer in the New Orleans area for a decade before returning to Tulane (PhD, 1994). Her research areas of interest include engineering ethics, public policy and leadership
AC 2011-533: INCORPORATING TECHNICAL PEER REVIEW OF CIVILENGINEERING STUDENT PROJECTSLuciana Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Structural Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering, in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She has been with Texas A&M University for more than 10 years, and in that time has taught over a dozen different courses ranging from the freshman to graduate levels. She has received funding for her engineering education research from the Department of Education FIPSE program and from the NSF CCLI program. She also has been involved in several professional developments that were provided by the NT
Page 22.272.2fit within societal, ethical, and cultural contexts. Interestingly, analogous discussions are takingplace in humanities disciplines, such as philosophy, where applied philosophy is in some circlesconsidered essential for making the discipline more relevant. Historically, arguments aboutenvironmental ethics within philosophy have narrowly focused on how best to think about“nature” in order to protect it: should it be viewed as a set of resources to be utilized for human-centered ends or does nature have some “intrinsic value” apart from how it can be utilized byhumans. But the increasingly shrill, narrow and pedantic tone of these arguments has only servedto alienate philosophers from those actually working in the field
accomplished by (1) taking aclassroom concept and researching its applications, or (2) researching a phenomena of interestand working backwards to find the fluid mechanics principles that govern it. Each group’s topicwas presented to and approved by the group’s TA. After researching the chosen concept, groupsbuilt a presentation using Microsoft Office’s PowerPoint to teach classmates about what thestudents in that group had learned. Common components of the presentations included anoverview of the chosen real-world application topic under investigation, an explanation of how itrelated to a fluid mechanics principle, and a sample problem to solidify the connection betweenthe two. Each presentation was designed to run five minutes with extra time for
Paper ID #9142Adopting the BOK2 Student Outcomes: A Six-Year RetrospectiveDr. Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Donald D. Carpenter, PhD, PE, LEED AP is Professor of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses on ethics/professionalism and water resources. Dr. Carpenter is an accredited green design professional (LEED AP) and practicing professional engineer (PE) whose expertise includes Low Impact Development (LID), innovative stormwater best management practices (BMPs), hydrologic and stormwater modeling and design, and field data collection for performance monitoring. His University appointments
to go back in time to construct specific assessmenttools for comparison between the classic and inverted formats. Still, a broad comparison ofstudent performance can be made by examining course grades.Figure 3 presents a plot showing average examination scores for the structural design courses atVillanova University from 2009 to 2014. Average examination scores can best be defined asfinal course grades (out of 100 percent) if all non-exam elements of the final grade such ashomework, laboratories, projects, lecture-based quizzes, attendance, or anything else areremoved. Grades are still weighted within each course such that if Exam B was worth more thanExam A it is weighted more heavily in the computed score used for the plot
manager of Materials Testing lab at Missouri S&T, teaches mechanics of materials and develops digital educational resources for the engineering students. He had the opportunity of leading several scientific and industrial research projects and mentoring graduate and undergraduate students. Over the span of his career, Dr. Libre authored and co-authored 3 chapter books, 17 peer-reviewed journal articles and over 60 conference papers. He has advised and co-advised 8 gradu- ate students and mentored over 30 undergraduate students. He has collaborated with scholars from several countries, including Iran, China, Slovenia, Canada, and the US. He also served as a reviewer for 6 journals and a committee member of 5
. Video taping of liveclass sessions for this evaluation was performed with a typical camcorder and tripodsetup. The department has decided to experiment with distance education packages todevelop Best Practices to ensure most of the pedagogically sound and successful ASCEExCEEd Teaching Model is used.Obviously fully taping a live class with natural student interaction, processing it, andposting for student review would be the optimum choice that would allow all aspects ofthe ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Model to be employed except for a high degree of contactand developing positive rapport with the students who are not in class. Those studentswould not be able to pose a question or respond to a question just as some students do notparticipate in live
graduate of West Point and has graduate degrees from Stanford University; he is a licensed PE in California. Page 15.645.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Homebrewing 101: A Vital Part of a Civil Engineering Program!AbstractIn this paper the author shares his experience over several years of teaching civil engineeringstudents to brew beer. This fun exercise, named HB101 (Homebrewing 101) by the students, wasinitially designed solely as a fun social event, but has become a beneficial extracurricularteaching tool that adds value to the overall civil engineering program at the United StatesMilitary Academy at
. Lobbestael is a member of the United States Society on Dams, the American Society of Engineering Education, and the ASCE Geo-Institute and is a member of the G-I Committee ”Embankments, Dams, and Slopes.”Dr. Matthew Sleep, Oregon Institute of Technology Matthew Sleep is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Oregon Institute of Technology. Prior to Oregon Tech, Matthew received his PhD at Virginia Tech researching slope stability, levees, transient seepage and reliability. Current research includes reliability, slope stability and geotechnical engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Investigating the Effectiveness of New Geotechnical Engineering
Page 25.738.2expertise appropriate for professional practice”. Civil engineering graduates must “demonstratethe ability for self-directed learning, and develop their own learning plan”. “Self-directed 1learning is a mode of lifelong learning because it is the ability to learn on one’s own with the aidof formal education”.In the literatures on civil engineering education, however, few research efforts have been foundto deliberately cultivate students’ self-directed learning or SRL skill development by usingexplicit integrative instructions based on effective theoretical frameworks from cognitive scienceand educational psychology. It remains up to
support teaching and learning activities, a struggle for educators isdetermining which tools work best for different scenarios and teaching approaches [19-21]. Supporting factors that influence teaching and learning activities include learningenvironments, lecturer competences, learning media, curriculum, teaching materials, facilities, andinfrastructure [22]. Teacher competency, facilities, and adequate infrastructure become supportingfactors for successful implementation [23,24]. To achieve excellence in online teaching andincrease student retention, best practices should be adopted to develop high quality onlinematerials that can additionally be used in resident instruction [23,25]. While such research hasinfluenced the development of
designprojects. These expectations are articulated in Outcome 10 of the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing theCivil Engineer for the Future (BOK2)2, which references Outcome 3k of ABET Inc. ProposedCriteria for Accrediting Engineering Program3. The BOK2 Levels of AchievementSubcommittee recommends that civil engineers who have earned a baccalaureate degree shouldbe able to achieve the third level (application) of the six-level cognitive domain in this outcome.At that level, graduates should be able to3: List the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools that are necessary for engineering practice. Explain how these techniques, skills, and modern
University.Joshua Hewes, Northern Arizona University Joshua Hewes is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Civil Engineering, Construction Management, and Environmental Engineering at Northern Arizona University. He received his BS, MS, PhD in structural engineering from the University of California at San Diego. Prior to NAU, Hewes spent 4 years as consulting bridge engineer in California. His research interests are related to the analysis and design of bridge structures for seismic loads, and the development of new ductile fiber reinforced masonry materials. Hewes is a registered professional engineer in the state of California
., R.W. Welch, and S.J. Ressler, The ExCEEd Teaching Model. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2005. 131(4): p. 218-222.3. Estes, A.C., R.W. Welch, S.J. Ressler, N. Dennis, D. Larson, C. Considine, . . . T. Lenox, Ten Years of ExCEEd: Making a Difference in the Profession. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 26(1): p. 141-154.4. Barry, B.E., Phone Conversation with Al Estes, 2012.5. Lowman, J., Mastering the techniques of teaching. 2nd ed. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. 1995, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. xxiv, 344 p.6. Nilson, L.B., Teaching at its best : a research-based resource for college instructors. 3rd ed. The Jossey
of the practice of professionalengineering (where a PE license is required), but they all generally conform to the definitionincluded in the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) ModelLaw (4) as follows: “The term “Practice of Engineering”, as used in this Act, shall mean anyservice or creative work requiring engineering education, training and experience in theapplication of engineering principles and the interpretation of engineering data to engineeringactivities that potentially impact the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The services mayinclude, but are not limited to, providing planning, studies, design, design coordination,drawings, specifications, and other technical submissions…”As the world
University in 1987 and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 1997.Dr. Pamalee A. Brady, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Pamalee Brady is a Professor at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She teaches courses in structural systems, concrete, steel and wood design as well as structural engineering courses for architecture and construction management students. Prior to joining the faculty at Cal Poly she worked in applied research at the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory in Champaign, Illinois. She is a member of the Education Committee of the ASCE Forensic Engineering Division and an Asso- ciate Editor of the ASCE
at multiple universities to conductcyberinfrastructure (CI) research in the water resources area. The impetus was a NSF-fundedproject (EPS-1135482 and EPS-1135483) to provide and use CI tools, especially high-performance computing, to enhance the capacity for water resource planning and management inthe two-state region of Utah and Wyoming. The project has as a goal to link technical experts,modelers, analysts, high-performance computing experts, stakeholders, and the public through CIimplementation (Figure 1). Approximately 25% of the graduate students in the course also areworking on the research project as funded research assistants. However, the course is notexclusively designed to train graduate students working on the project. The more