- Conference Session
- Android TA: Course Automation and the Fate of the Professor
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Pil-Won On, University of Missouri, Columbia; Hani A. Salim, University of Missouri, Columbia
- Tagged Divisions
-
Civil Engineering
Page 25.1374.4randomly selected question set is generated for a weekly test. A weekly Q&A forum is setup sothat students can interact with each other any time and share common troubles they experience inthe course.Based on the feedback from the pilot period, the authors revised the course, as shown in Figure 2,to improve the learning process. The major revision includes excluding the use of publisher’shomework system and reorganizing learning activities to be more logically sequenced. Page 25.1374.5 Figure 2. Revised Learning Process for Spring 2012During the pilot phase, it was discovered that an independent
- Conference Session
- Hey You: Effectively Engaging Students in the Classroom
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Samuel Holton Lee, University of California, San Diego; Jacqueline Linh Le, University of California, San Diego
- Tagged Divisions
-
Civil Engineering
literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.[8] Draper, S.W., Cargill, J., & Cutts, Q. (2002). Electronically enhanced classroom interaction. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 18(1), 13-23.[9] Van Dijk, L., et al, (2001). Interactive Lectures in Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 15-28[10] Simon, B., et al, (2010). Experience Report: Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing, SIGCSE ’10 Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Milwaukee, WI, March 10-13.[11] Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Instruction, A User’s Manual, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.[12] Eugene, J. (2002). Learning from past and
- Conference Session
- The Teacher as Manager: Best Practices for Culminating Design Experiences
- Collection
- 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
James B Guthrie P.E., California Polytechnic State University; Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University; Jill Nelson P.E., California Polytechnic State University; Brent Nuttall P.E., California Polytechnic State University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Civil Engineering
facultymember may grade any or all of the teams’ presentations and submittals. The facultymember scores are averaged and used for the team grade. A sample grading rubric, forthe final submittal in Fall quarter 2011, is shown in Figure 1.P3 Submittal /PresentationSubmittal Weight Presentation Weight3.1, 2 Letter and TOC 10 Introduction 53.3 Executive Summary 5 Delivery Style 103.4 Respondent's Qual’s 10 Graphical Quality 203.5 JV Proposal 30 Content Quality 203.6 Project Overview 25 Q+A 103.7 Conceptual Design