Conference Session

Use of Technology in Civil Engineering Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. A. Karim P.E., Southern Polytechnic College of Engineering and Engineering Technology, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

costefficiency of a hybrid approach—an attractive feature for institutions faced with shrinkingbudgets and classroom space—Brown13 posits that, in the future, institutions will design mostcourses by the 90–10 Rule Q (p. 22). In other words, a mix of face-to-face and online instruction(somewhere between 90% and 10% and 10% and 90%) will be superior to either 100% face-to-face or 100% online courses6. The findings of a study show that online learning can be aseffective as face-to-face learning in many respects in spite of the fact that students in onlineprograms may be less satisfied with their experience than students in more traditional learningenvironments14. In a study, participants who had more experience with the Internet indicatedsignificantly

Conference Session

Proven Strategies in Classroom Engagement Part I: Artifacts for Creative Pedagogy

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Andres Brake, Lamar University; Fatih Alperen Adam

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

% N=68Table 4. Demographics: Engineering Major, Academic Standing, Qualitative SAT, GPA Q Course Engineering Major Standing GPA SAT Civil Chem. Elec. Indust. Mech. Sophomore Junior Test, 12.2% 37.4% 5.2% 13.0% 32.2% 63.5% 34.8% 551 2.98 N=43 Control, 11.0% 33.3% 3.2% 8.9% 43.6% 68.6% 29.3% 556 2.95 N=68Data analysisThe survey responses were pooled based on engineering dimension