learning while still ensuring students are provided with the requiredtechnical material can be an issue due to time constraints. Most engineering courses need the fullin-class time throughout the semester to ensure students are taught the technical content that isrequired for future courses or a future career. To allow for both active learning and teaching therequired technical material, a fundamental change in how the course is taught is needed. Byhaving students learn the lecture material outside of class, the time spent in class can be used tobetter engage students in active learning. In this approach, often called a flipped classroom,students partake in assigned materials before class by either watching prerecorded lecture videos,reading
Paper ID #33165Implementing a Virtual Surveying LabDr. John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007 and was appointed as a Distinguished Teaching Fellow in 2015. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. He earned his Doctorate in Education and is currently the Associate Chair of the Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental Engineering Department. His
education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Prof. Eakalak Khan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Eakalak Khan is a Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Department and the Director of Water Resources Research Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. From 2002 to 2017, he was a Professor in Civil and Environmental
Paper ID #32606The Merits of a Civil Engineering Certification to Validate Fulfillmentof the CE-BOKMr. Bradley F. Aldrich, American Society of Civil Engineers Bradley F. Aldrich, P.E., F.NSPE, F.ASCE is President of Aldrich + Elliott, PC an environmental engineer- ing firm and also serves as vice-chair of the Board of Professional Regulation for Engineers in Vermont. He earned his bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from the University of Vermont. Over his thirty-five year career, Mr. Aldrich has held project management and leadership positions with a national general contractor and several engineering firms before
interest is in civil engineering curriculum development that enhances student engagement and inclusion. One of the first to develop and teach an introductory course on Geomatics in 1993 at Georgia Tech. A similar course is now required in numerous CE curriculums including Clemson’s.Mr. Matthew Ryan Stanley, Clemson University Hello! My name is Matthew Stanley and I am a graduate student in the Clemson University Glenn Department of Civil Engineering. I am pursuing a master’s degree in transportation systems, and plan to pursue a career in surveying engineering or roadway design. I am a graduate teacher’s assistant for the Geomatics course offered at Clemson University. American
Science, University of California Transportation Center Student of the Year Award, New Faculty Award by the Council of University Transportation Centers, the Cunard, Fred Burggraf and D. Grant Mickle outstanding paper awards by the Transportation Research Board, Harry West Teaching Award by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Penn State, Out- standing Teaching Award by the Penn State Engineering Alumni Society, and Faculty Early Career De- velopment (CAREER) Award by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Professor and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering
Paper ID #34703Understanding Key Student Perspectives in an InterdisciplinaryFlex-model Sustainability Course as Compared to a Traditional In-personCourseDr. Tony Lee Kerzmann, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Tony Kerzmann’s higher education background began with a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University, as well as a Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. After graduation, Dr. Kerzmann began his career as an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at Robert Morris University which afforded him the opportunity to research, teach, and advise in numerous
principles of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties”[3]. Using both the UN SDGs and Envision is a realistic way to bridge the gap between theundergraduate design experience and the professional expectations students will be obligated toconsider in their future careers [4].Rubrics are frequently used in academia for assessing student performance and evaluatingprogram outcomes. Rubrics are advantageous because, in addition to allowing for assessingstudent work, they can be used to directly assess student performance while meeting the criteriaestablished by both ABET and ASCE. When focusing on sustainability, the literature is rich withexamples of rubrics that focus on environmental, social and economic goals for
, challenge institutional violence, and minimize hostile environments forminority students [7]. Diversity & Inclusion Fellows (DIFs) engage in readings and workshopsthat help them to interrogate their own pedagogical philosophies related to inclusive pedagogyand develop and refine strategies and interventions for creating more inclusive classrooms.Faculty participants then implement these practices in one of their courses in the followingsemester. Meetings take place once or twice a month, and led by two experienced DIF facultymembers who serve as Lead Fellows.Eight DIFs were selected for the 2020 – 2021 academic year, including a librarian and seveninstructors at varying stages of their professorial careers. The DIFs included representativesfrom
demonstrate it.* The definition of “meeting a course objective” is achieving a “C” level (70%) on the task. Table 2: CE401 Course Assessment for 2020 Course Objective Assessment How Evaluated and Remarks a. Describe challenges facing civil All graded events in the course address this engineers in professional practice now 4 objective and students solidly met the and in the future. requirements. b. Develop short-term and long-term This specific course objective is only professional goals, to include directly addressed by the Career Paper, but
groups [12,13]. In 2006 the NCEES added the requirement for a master’s degree or equivalent education toits model law with a goal for implementation of this requirement in 2020; in 2014 thisrequirement was removed from the model law [14].The primary driver for graduate education is to impart the skills and knowledge needed in theprofession, which also enable a successful and rewarding career. The ASCE has explored theoutcomes that should be met to prepare civil engineers for entry into the profession, detailing“the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for entry into the practice of civil engineering atthe professional level” in the CEBOK [6, p. vii]. The Body of Knowledge has evolved andchanged over time, from an initial document in 2004
and in their future careers.1.0 IntroductionTo properly contextualize Carnegie Mellon’s work around DEI, we need to situate it within alarger movement that has gained traction and momentum around engineering and social justice[1]-[3]. These happenings build upon the seminal work of Baillie [4], Riley [5], and their jointwork with their collaborators [6]. This has sprung a series of engineering and social justice-related or -infused courses, seminar series, and workshops across engineering campuses such asthose at the University of San Diego [7], Colorado School of Mines [8], Purdue [9], Stanford[10], the National Academies [11], and others. The most recent illustration is a series of global,humanitarian, and peace engineering programs that
of the topics. How well the instructor 6.67 7 7 6.47 7 7 6.64 7 7 promoted and meaningful learning experience. The positive attributes of AE 401 in the SRTE comments remained the ability to watch theshort segmented videos ahead of time and review the examples as often as needed with voice over.Students also commended the course organization (notes, topic flow, and Canvas website) in theirability to navigate it. While it was busy at times, the project put the context of the class intoperspective and connected students to content they are likely to see in their careers. In terms ofimprovements, one piece of advice was to keep writing out the variable form of the equationsbefore doing
multiple STEM disciplines. She enjoys observing the intellectual and professional growth in students as they prepare for engineering careers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Home-Based Cantilever Beam Experiment for Civil Engineering Undergraduate StudentsAbstractThere is a growing concern in engineering fields during the ongoing pandemic regarding howstudents will be able to achieve one of the major learning outcomes: an ability to conductappropriate experimentation (away from campus), analyze, interpret data, and useengineering/scientific judgement to draw conclusions. Experimental Centric Pedagogy (ECP) hasbeen shown to
Washington State University (2013-2014) and George Mason University (2014-2017). Throughout his career, his primary responsibility as a faculty member has been teaching students, for which he aspires to provide them with a quality and enjoyable experience.Dr. William A. Kitch, Angelo State University Dr. Kitch is Professor and Chair of the David L. Hirschfeld Department of Engineering at Angelo State University. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the public and private sector. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado, California and Texas American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Make
allowedstudents to reflect on experimentation and interpretation of results. Future work will explorecurriculum planning and design at the departmental level to continuously improve technicalwriting for civil engineering undergraduate students from their first-year courses to their seniorcapstone design projects.IntroductionCompetent technical writing is an essential communication skill for civil engineering students toimprove in undergraduate programs. Engineering students with strong technical writing skills arecompetitive in engineering job searches and career promotion [1]. Engineering educators haverecognized the importance of technical writing for decades and various approaches have beenimplemented to redesign the writing curriculum and improve
and testing challenges can arise, having multiple perspectives is essential to solving them.ConclusionsIn summary, the objectives of this new project-based learning approach included providing thestudents with a hands-on opportunity to understand the construction, performance, and failuremechanisms of solid and FTAO plywood shear walls. Knowledge of the construction of a shearwall provides the student with a deeper appreciation for all the working pieces that comprise thisstructural element. It also aids in their future structural engineering careers in their ability todesign walls and develop creative solutions to non-standard situations. The design of the testwall is like what they experience in the lecture portion of the class, yet
development, earthquake engineering, diversity and inclusion in engineering programs.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmen- tal Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize prac- ticing engineers’ understandings of core engineering concepts. He is a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education.Dr. Matthew Stephen Barner, Mackenzie Structural Engineer at Mackenzie Research interests include: engineering education, diffusions of innovation
University (2014-2017). Throughout his career, his primary responsibility as a faculty member has been teaching students, for which he aspires to provide them with a quality and enjoyable experience. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 AMechanics Race: An Exam Review ActivityAbstractReviewing for exams can sometimes be tedious and overwhelming for students. While it isimperative the students know the content for the exams, reviewing concepts only or usinginstructor-solved examples may not help prepare the students as well as if the students practicedproblems.Welcome to AMechanics Race! In this engaging activity, teams of students race around
P.E., United States Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is the Director of the Civil Engineering Division and Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include
consultation with military and corporateleaders, have validated and developed the institution-specific leadership model [1] and itsassessment within courses. As shown in Table 1, The Citadel Leadership model seeks to developthe following seven aspirational behavioral characteristics, in alignment with its mission toproduce principled leaders across all career paths. Table 1: Characteristics of Principled Leaders [1] Leadership Attribute 1. Leads with humility; creates conditions for the team to succeed as a whole. 2. Embraces a true, authentic self; develops and leads according to a principle-based leadership philosophy. 3. Acts and speaks with courage; performs critical leadership functions to overcome
infrastructure, protective structures, and engineering education.Dr. Brock E. Barry P.E., United States Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is the Director of the Civil Engineering Division and Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en
it is on their own. This hunger for knowledge, spurred by PBL and inclear support of ABET Student Outcome 7, establishes a crucial aspect of professionaldevelopment in young students that will serve them well as they progress through their careers[1].Student feedback from open-ended questions in the author survey agree that PBL improvesstudents’ ability to apply new knowledge to real-world problems. Students use all of theirknowledge, integrate them, in order to solve the problems. The COVID-19 also creates anenvironment that engineering students have to be more initiative to solve problems on their own.A remote learning education requires students to acquire new capabilities in, for example,technology, information collecting, etc. Thus
instructors and students perceptions.” Journal of Mechanical Design. 129 (7). 2007. doi: 10.1115/1.2739569.[3] J. C. Blickenstaff, “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education, 17(4), pp. 369–386, 2005.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study.” J Eng Educ.101(1):6-27. 2012. doi:10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2012.tb00039.x.[5] R. Suresh, “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering.” Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), pp. 215–39, 2006/2007.[6] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, CO, 1997.[7] J
start/stop recording and upload recordings to their LMSfor asynchronous students. Faculty can hear and see remote students during the class while alsoemploying recorded instruction for those who missed class or for future remote/online offerings.This allows the instructor to use the traditional lecture format, transmitting information from oneto many, while mitigating the ‘disconnecting’ of the physical classroom, student, and teacher.Capturing both teacher and student interactions and reactions, studies on Swivl’s impact onpedagogy reveal that early-career educators as well more established instructors both benefitfrom using Swivl in the classroom [4]. Because the Swivl follows and captures the instructorthroughout the classroom, the resulting
and Computer Information at Hazard Community and Technical College. Watts began her career at Appalshop, a non-profit media arts center located in the coalfields of Eastern Kentucky, serving as a director, educator, filmmaker, and youth media trainer. For the last ten years, her work has focused on placed-based visual learning and distance learning methodologies to facilitate rural classroom equality. Watts is passionate about distance learning, accessibility, and Appalachia. She believes there is a classroom for everyone. Natasha has a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting and Electronic Media, with a minor in Appalachian Studies from Eastern Kentucky University. A Master’s of Science in Education with an emphasis on
introduce new faculty to the model and how to apply it as they begintheir teaching careers at our university.Making DecisionsThe model is a useful point of reference in making decisions about allocation of resources setaside for teaching.The same commission that worked to develop the model administers grants for excellence inteaching and for innovative teaching each year. We have developed rubrics for scoring grantapplications that are aligned with the institutional teaching model. Not only does this removesome subjectivity from the award process, but it also increases awareness of the model.The commission also works with students each year to administer an Excellence in TeachingAward. We have recently used the institutional teaching model to
Paper ID #32681Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California (USC) in 2012. Prior to joining UIUC,he was a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineeringat USC in 2012-2013 and in the Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute at the University of Utahin 2013-2014. He is the recipient of the NSF CAREER Award to study fast computational models forenergy-transportation systems. He is also the recipient of the student paper award in probabilistic methodsat the ASCE Engineering Mechanics Institute Conference in 2012. His research interests are uncertaintyquantification, scientific machine learning, and decision making under uncertainty. American
York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional en- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and
Engineering at Miami Dade College. During his academic career, he has taught more than 25 different undergraduate and graduate courses in Argentina, Puerto Rico, Mexico, and the USA, most of them in the Civil and Construction En- gineering fields. He is a California licensed professional engineer and a member of ASCE. Currently, he is a faculty member at Georgia Southern University and his research interests include structural analysis and design, vibrations, earthquake and wind engineering, remote sensing and education.Dr. Shahnam Navaee, Georgia Southern University Dr. Navaee is currently a full professor in the Department of Civil Engineering and Construction in the Allen E. Paulson College of Engineering and Computing