Paper ID #28528Listening to Community Voices as Part of Ethical Civil Engineering:Experiences in Civil Engineering CoursesDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, Ph.D., P.E., is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where
at least 50% ofaccredited civil engineering programs in the United States. The credit hour requirements are theaverage value for each course [22]. The topics in column 3 are the proposed topics for a newthree-year civil engineering program. Most three year topics remain at approximately the samenumber of credit hours as the average four year program. The CE (Civil Engineer) seminarcourse is designed to cover professional issues in engineering listed in the EAC-ABET civilengineering program criteria including business, public policy, leadership, professional ethics,licensure, and professionalism. Topics that were eliminated include dynamics, constructionmanagement, engineering economics, and computer aided drawing (CAD). The topics that
with a minor in International Relations, from the University of Texas at Tyler in 2016. She received a Master of Arts in Human Rights and Global Ethics from the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom in January 2019. Her research interests are in the area of government, policy, and international relations.Dr. James K. Nelson Jr. P.E., Texas A&M University System Dr. James K. Nelson received a Bachelor of Civil Engineering degree from the University of Dayton in 1974. He received the Master of Science and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in civil engineering from the University of Houston. During his graduate study, Dr. Nelson specialized in structural engineering. He is a registered professional engineer in
systems’” [7].Several previous studies have been devoted to studying trends surrounding social justice inengineering and to maintaining student engagement with the social surroundings of theirprojects. In one paper, George Catalano and Caroline Baillie explored the influence thatengineers have on justice and peace, concluding that engineering ethics should be expanded tothe overall social impact a product of engineering creates [8]. Catalano explores this further byexamining engineering ethics as described within different professional engineeringorganizations. He poses that the main issue with engineering ethics is the demand that anengineer should work to protect the public without a specific definition of who that includes.Rather, the author
students’ understanding. Ethics, for example, is often taught in civilengineering through the use of case studies. Further, case studies offer an opportunity forinterdisciplinary discussions centered on human dignity and justice goals [8] and likewisedevelop empathy for the users impacted by the project. Empathy is increasingly beingrecognized for the central role it may play in connecting crucial inter- and intrapersonal skillswith enhanced abilities to understand and productively work in multidisciplinary environmentswith diverse stakeholder groups [9]. Finally, some professors may not feel comfortable directlydiscussing race and related topics within an otherwise technical classroom environment; casestudies allow the emphasis to be taken off of
the pastfew years at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. The course is required for students inthe civil engineering and natural resources engineering bachelors’ degree programs. The coursewas developed based on input from the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand(IPENZ). Unlike in the U.S., an engineering degree in New Zealand does not require asubstantial general education component. Course topics include engineering history,investigation of failure cases, teamwork, ethics, risk management, and engineering today andtomorrow. This paper details the development of the course to date and its associatedassessments, and discusses lessons learnt in teaching professional engineering skills in thisformat. It also compares
-structured education that we currently utilize and wereprimarily known as peacetime builders who relied on an apprentice-based, hands-on, tinkeringmodel of training up until the late 18th Century [2, 3]. While present-day civil engineers are stillresponsible for such socially-responsible domains, civil engineering now exists as a professionthat is acquired through a formal education process that is deeply rooted in and influenced by thehistorical advancements of the discipline [3-10].Today, the education of undergraduate civil engineering students is largely shaped by thebehaviors, practices, and knowledge that have been established and are valued by the discipline’sgoverning professional societies. Topics such as ethics [11, 12]; design regulations
- gineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics. Dr. Barry is the 2020 recipient of ASEE’s National Outstanding Teaching Award.Major David Carlson P.E., United States Military Academy Major David Carlson is an instructor of Civil Engineering in the Department of Civil and Mechanical En- gineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He was commissioned as an Engineer Officer from the U.S
was on the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) from 1993-2003 and was chair in 2001- 2002. He is currently a member of the NAE Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society Advisory Group, the ASCE Committee on Sustainability and the Board of Directors of the Civil Engineering Certification Board. He is a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers and ABET.Dr. J. P. Mohsen, University of Louisville Dr. Mohsen is Past President of the American Society for Engineering Education. He has served on the ASEE Board of Directors previously as Vice President for Member Affairs and Vice President for Professional Interest Council. J. P. Mohsen is professor and chair of the Civil and Environmental
Paper ID #19764Dr. Curtis Abel, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteKristin Boudreau, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kristin Boudreau is Paris Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Humanities at Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute, where she also serves as Head of the Department of Humanities and Arts. Her training is in nineteenth-century literature, but for the past 8 years she has taught engineering ethics, first-year en- gineering courses, and humanities for engineers. She has also worked with students and colleagues to develop role-playing games teaching engineering within its complex humanistic context. NOTE: this paper has co-authors. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Stephanie Slocum, Engineers Rising LLC Stephanie Slocum is the founder of Engineers Rising LLC, where she helps engineers learn the leadership and people skills they need to let their technical abilities shine. Prior to founding Engineers Rising in 2018, she worked as a structural engineer for 15 years. She has extensive experience
on Undergraduate Research, undergraduate research is defined as “aninquiry or investigation conducted by an undergraduate student that makes an originalintellectual or creative contribution to the discipline [1].” As stated in literature, undergraduateswho conduct research show improvements in thinking independently, thinking critically, puttingideas together, solving problems, analyzing data, analyzing literature, interpreting researchfindings, conducting ethical research, writing and communicating [2-9]. Literature also assertsthat it is rare for students to have enough opportunity to gain higher-order thinking skills fromtheir undergraduate research experiences [10].Students involved in undergraduate research also report outcomes that may
years.Graduates were provided with a list of skills and asked to rate how important each skill was toperform the work in their profession. Choices were “not important,” “important,” and “veryimportant.” The percentage of women and men describing each skill as very important is shownin Figure 1. Functioning effectively as a team, communicating well orally, and acquiring newskills and knowledge on your own were viewed as very important by more than 80% of bothmen and women. There were only two skills that exhibited more than a 5 percentage pointspread: understand professional and ethical responsibilities (women 7 percentage points morethan men) and write effectively (women 11 percentage points more than men).Alumni were then asked to rate to what extent
cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Comparison Between the New Bodies of Knowledge for the Civil Engineering Professional and the Civil Engineering TechnologistBackgroundCivil engineering relies on a strong formal knowledge and skills base acquired largely throughhigher education and experience. Central to the identity of civil engineering as a profession isthe need for such expert knowledge and skills, independence of thought and judgment, and anethos to serve the public good grounded in a sound code of ethics [1], [2]. The American Societyof Civil Engineers (ASCE) formally endorsed the
et al[10] are adopted as our reference. Gradoville et al studied the service learning in Ecuador as partof senior design course in spring 2011, and developed a survey to measure students’ outcome.The same survey questions (seven questions in Table 2) were included as part of our survey. Thequestions were answered on a scale of 1 – 10. Table 2: Survey questions adopted from Gradoville et al 2011 OUTCOME QUESTION Ethics How much has your senior design enhanced your understanding of professional and ethical responsibility? Communication To what degree has your senior design experience enhanced your ability to communicate effectively? Global/Society To what degree has your senior
Paper ID #16261A Civil Infrastructure System Perspective - Not Just the Built EnvironmentDr. Douglas Schmucker P.E., University of Utah Dr. Schmucker has 20 years experience in teaching and consulting. Focused on high quality teaching following the T4E, ExCEEd, and NETI teaching models, he currently is a full-time teaching professional with a focus on practice, project, and problem-based teaching methodologies.Dr. Joshua Lenart, University of Utah Dr. Joshua Lenart is an Associate Instructor with the Communication, Leadership, Ethics, and Research (CLEAR) Program at the University of Utah where he teaches technical
]. ASCE points to the uncertain tomorrow where engineersmust work together to create innovative solutions to climate change, technological advances inalternative energy, autonomous vehicles, smart cities, advanced construction techniques andmaterials, and new approaches to governance. These tremendous challenges are not designed,built, operated, and maintained in a vacuum. They require experts from a myriad of disciplines tocollaborate, communicate effectively, and make well-informed, ethical decisions in order to besuccessful. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) also recognizes theimportance of collaboration between disciplines as it “promotes the art, science, and practice ofmultidisciplinary engineering and allied sciences
. evaluations. Be aware of, be Teamwork and leadership: Acknowledge the importance - Need to abide with willing to receive, of teamwork, leadership, diversity, and inclusion. code of conduct, and be attentive to Professional attitudes: Acknowledge professional explicitly and a particular attitudes relevant to the practice of civil engineering, detailed in the phenomenon or including creativity, curiosity, flexibility, and syllabi and revisited behavior dependability. throughout semester. Ethical responsibilities: Acknowledge the importance of ethical behavior
States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Dr. Beth Lin Hartmann P.E., Iowa State University Beth Lin Hartmann is a senior lecturer in construction engineering at Iowa State University. Hartmann served 20 years in the U.S. Navy Civil Engineer Corps before joining the faculty at Iowa State in 2009. She currently teaches the civil and construction engineering design-build
an HSI”, Proceedings of the 2020ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 21-24, 2020.[8] American Society of Civil Engineers, “Code of Ethics,” ASCE, https://www.asce.org/code-of-ethics/ [Accessed February 4, 2020].
Scientists from Households that Completed the Rainwater Harvesting Project Attributes Collected from Two Entry Interviews Authors' Classification Fralick et al. [13] Intersections Lucas & Hanson [15] Intersections Engineering Skills - Using Tools Objects: Other people L-HoM: Reflection and Materials Knowledge - Engineering Inferred actions: Making L-HoM: Ethical considerations Disciplines Knowledge - Engineering Inferred actions: Designing L-HoM: Collaboration Standards and Codes HoM - Sustainability thinking
Study Infrastructure and Basic Transmission 5 Social Impacts of Calculations 26 Complete Streets 44 Impacts of Infrastructure 35 Electricity COVID-19 on 18 Green Infrastructure 27 Parking Distribution Transportation Systems 6 Teamwork and Stakeholders 19 Water Security 28 Transit 36 Renewable Energy 7 Ethics 1 20 Water Re-Use and 29 Route Selection
engineering students to work at the overlap with public policy, business, law, ethics, human behavior, risk, and the arts, as well as medicine and the sciences Entrepreneurship • Preparing students to translate invention to innovation; to develop market ventures that scale to global solutions in the public interest Global Dimension • Developing the students’ global perspective necessary to address challenges that are inherently global as well as to lead innovation in a global economy Service Learning • Developing and deepening students’ social consciousness and their motivation to bring their technical expertise to bear on societal problems through mentored experiential
A – Model Introductory Infrastructure Course Outline# Module Topic Level1 Fundamentals What is infrastructure and why do we care?2 Fundamentals Basic infrastructure functions3 Fundamentals Systems/network analysis4 Fundamentals TBL/Sustainability5 Fundamentals Social Impacts of Infrastructure6 Fundamentals Teamwork7 Fundamentals Ethics I8 Fundamentals Ethics II9 Fundamentals Traits of effective written and oral communication10 Fundamentals Financing public works11 Fundamentals Safety/licensure12 Fundamentals Land Use and Planning/Growth/Forecasting13 Fundamentals Resilience and risk14 One
change impacts, and other topics. The revised ASCE Code of Ethicsdetails the engineer’s responsibility to society, the natural and built environment, profession,clients and employers, and peers. We use the Code of Ethics for focused discussions aboutcentering inclusivity, equity, climate mitigation and resilience, and social justice in theirengineering work. These activities fall under ABET student outcome 4 (an ability to recognizeethical and professional responsibilities in considering the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal and societal context).2.3 Computational and Data Science for Civil & Environmental EngineeringIn Spring 2021, we adapted a sophomore-level CEE course focused on computational and datascience to include DEI
century.Enhancing student knowledge of sustainability within the capstone design course preparesengineering graduates for the challenges they will face as they move into their professionalcareers while also meeting the ABET criteria, namely to “design a system, component or processto meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social,political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability” [2]. Addingsustainability tasks into their proposed designs encourages the students to think about the largerimpact of their projects. Consideration of sustainability within the undergraduate capstone designis linked to professional ethics for all civil engineers, as noted in the BOK3: “striving to complywith the
water scarce regions and developing communities. Mr. Clarkin’s degree is funded through the DoD SMART Scholarship program, sponsored by ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Can service learning impact student learning and motivation in a required engineering probability and statistics course?IntroductionThere is growing evidence that service learning can substantially improve student understandingand retention of quantitative concepts and technical skills that are the core of engineeringcurricula, as well as help students gain communication and leadership skills and improvedunderstanding of engineering ethics. However, to date, service learning has mostly beenintegrated in
competitions they could lead as a junior or senior (i.e., concrete canoe, steel bridge, mini-Baja, ethics, robotics)Fall-Spring Club Meetings Mentorship, connection to future internships and jobs, service opportunitiesFall Mathematics Jeopardy Opportunity to compete using calculus skills only STEM majors are developingJanuary Academic Training for
Community Service (Freshman) Field trip/mentoring session (construction & engr) Professional Skills Field trip/mentoring session (humanitarian engr) Professional Skills Spring Assignment to designated on-campus dormitory Learning Community Group sessions on college success and life skills Instruction Strategist College and civil engineering student mentoring Life Mentoring Moral and Ethical Development Educational Professional Skills Seminar Multi-part diversity training
cross sections. They later used these profiles and cross sections todetermine the best alternative based on design constraints. d) Application of design constraintsWith this project, the students experienced early-on applications of ABET2 design constraintssuch as economic, social, political, environmental, sustainability, and ethics in addition to thetechnical Civil Engineering design criteria and methodologies. They then critically evaluatedeach alternative under these constraints. e) Recommendation of best alternative:Once the student teams analyzed the alternatives with design constraints, they presented thealternatives and defended their choice during an oral presentation before a panel ofprofessional engineers and industry