AC 2010-895: USING HISTORY TO REINFORCE ETHICS AND EQUILIBRIUMWilfrid Nixon, University of Iowa Wilfrid Nixon is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Iowa, and has been on the faculty there since 1987. In addition to his research on winter highway maintenance, he has also conducted research into student learning, and ways in which faculty can enhance such learning. He has been involved both with the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE and with the ASCE Committee on Faculty Development, and has also both attended and served as a mentor at ExCEEd Teaching Workshops. He plays bad golf, and also dances the Argentine Tango
currently the chair of the BYU Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. His research efforts are in Finite Element Modeling and Professional Engineering Ethics.Ronald Terry, Brigham Young University Ron Terry is a Professor of Technology and Engineering Education at Brigham Young University. His scholarship centers on pedagogy, student learning, and engineering ethics and has presented/published numerous articles in engineering education.Rollin Hotchkiss, Brigham Young University Rollin Hotchkiss is a Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Brigham Young University and has also been on the faculty at The University of Nebraska and Washington State University. He
, the committee identified Outcomes 5 – Material Science andOutcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fullyimplement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of Montana State University’scivil engineering curriculum with respect the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureatedegree. Specific emphasis is given herein to these identified “challenging” outcomes.Institutional ProfileOn February 16, 1893, the Agricultural College of the State of Montana was founded as thestate's land-grant college. Renamed The Montana College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, theinstitution was popularly known as Montana Agricultural College, or MAC. By the 1920s, theinstitution's preferred
– Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fullyimplement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the University of Louisiana’scivil engineering curriculum with respect the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureatedegree. Specific emphasis is given herein to these identified “challenging” outcomes.Institutional ProfileThe University of Louisiana at Lafayette is a public institution of higher education offering thebachelor, master, and doctoral degrees. It is the largest member of the University of LouisianaSystem with an enrollment of approximately 16,000 students. Within the Carnegieclassification, [University A] is designated as a Research University with high research
– Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, 20 – Leadership, and Outcome 24 –Professional & Ethics. While there are multiple contributing factors for identifying a givenoutcome as challenging, in general the difficulty for most programs relates to the BOK-specifiedlevel of achievement for the outcome.A comprehensive analysis is presented of [University A’s] civil engineering curriculum withrespect to the BOK2 outcomes at the levels of achievement associated with the baccalaureatedegree. The current curriculum addresses, in some fashion, all 24 BOK2 outcomes. Theprogram fully addresses, to the recommended level of achievement, 6 of the 24 BOK2 outcomes;the remaining 18 BOK2 outcomes are not addressed to the specified level of
– Humanities, 4 – Social Sciences, 10 –Sustainability, 11 – Contemporary Issues & History, 12 – Risk & Uncertainty, 17 – PublicPolicy, 18 – Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, and 20 – Leadership. Inaddition, the committee identified Outcomes 5 – Material Science and 24 – Professional &Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fully implement.The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) provide an analysis of Northern Arizona University'scurrent undergraduate civil engineering curriculum with respect to the BOK2 with attentiongiven to the challenging outcomes; (2) propose a revised BOK2-orientated curriculum withinNorthern Arizona University's context; and (3) provide an analysis of that
desired needs needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability 3(d) An ability to function on multi- An ability to function on multi- disciplinary teams disciplinary teams 3(e) An ability to identify, formulate, and An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems solve engineering
(i.e., Outcomes 3 – Humanities, 4 – SocialSciences, 10 – Sustainability, 11 – Contemporary Issues & History, 12 – Risk & Uncertainty, 17– Public Policy, 18 – Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, and 20 –Leadership). In addition, the committee identified Outcomes 5 – Material Science and Outcome24 – Professional & Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fully implement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the University of Alabama’scivil engineering curriculum with respect to the second edition of the BOK2, or more specificallythe BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureate degree since the BOK2 includes outcomesfor baccalaureate and post-baccalaureate formal
similar courses7. In our course,local professionals presented lessons and exercises on various topics including ethics, Page 15.283.3professional licensure, leadership, communication, and project management. Course contentfocused on topics emphasized in two textbooks on project management 8,9.In addition to participating in discussions with practitioners and completing supplementalassignments, the students in our professional practice course completed a Statement ofQualifications (SOQ) for a local engineering project. The students worked in teams of four tosix students during the entire quarter to complete a written SOQ document. At the end of
development in 1996 in its Code of Ethics,stating in Fundamental Cannon 1: “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfareof the public and shall strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in theperformance of their professional duties” (http://content.asce.org/Sustainability.html).5 Morerecently, the ASCE adopted Policy Statement 418 to define “The Role of the Civil Engineer inSustainable Development.”6 The ASCE Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 2nd Edition(BOK2) articulates the role of civil engineers “entrusted by society to create a sustainable worldand enhance the global quality of life....”7 The BOK2 lists sustainability as one of the requiredtechnical learning outcomes. Individuals with a Bachelor’s degree
– Material Science and Outcome 24 – Professional & Ethics as ones that may be challenging for programs to fully implement. This paper examines those challenges in the context of NC State. The first edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21 st Century 1 (BOK1) was released in January 2004. Based on various inputs, a second edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21 st Century 2 (BOK2) was developed and released in February 2008. The BOK1 has already impacted accreditation criteria and civil engineering curricula. The BOK2, while being more recent and not yet addressed within accreditation criteria, is motivating additional change in some civil engineering curricula
ethical responsibility, participation in professional organizations, and service (g) an ability to communicate effectively developed through report writing and in- class presentations (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, sustainable, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (l) an ability to apply the fundamentals of civil engineering to the analysis of an existing project component (m) an
topic 5 (Ethics and BusinessFigure 1. FE Exam pass rates for students taking the Civil Engineering PM exam at our University and the corresponding pass rates nationally and for the comparator group (Carnegie RI or Bal/HGC). Our University 0.90 Comparator Group National Average 0.80 0.70Pass Fraction 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 Apr 04 Apr 05 Apr 06 Apr 07 Apr 08 Apr 09 DateTable
within the academic setting as well asactivities like Engineers Without Borders or other service activities to be able to properlydemonstrate accomplishment of the outcome.7 Another example of the difficulty is thatstudents may properly assess a situation based on proper ethical reasoning, but there is noassurance that they will actually act ethically. Some define professional skills as how weperform in professional settings, but how do educators develop and assess such skills? Table 1 UT Tyler CE Program OutcomesGraduates:1. Apply knowledge of traditional mathematics, science, and engineering skills, and use modernengineering tools to solve problems.2. Design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret
– Material Science and Outcome 24 – Professional& Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fully implement.The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the civil engineeringcurriculum at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology with respect to the second edition of theBOK2, or more specifically the BOK2 outcomes associated with the baccalaureate degree sincethe BOK2 includes outcomes for baccalaureate and post-baccalaureate formal education as wellas pre-licensure experience. Specific emphasis is given those BOK2 outcomes that theaforementioned survey data identified as being a challenge for many programs to address withincurrent curricular design. The curriculum, as developed herein, is considered to be in
, Kenya, Peru, Thailand, Philippines, Florida and Louisiana.Rationale for Service Learning Page 15.1060.2As stated in the University’s Mission Statement, students and faculty have a responsibility to“better the human condition”. (3) It is a goal of the university to inculcate in the students a beliefthat they have a moral and ethical responsibility to try to improve the lives of all people. Further,the Mission Statement “encourages students, faculty and staff to engage in service experiencesand research, both locally and globally, so they learn from others, provide public service to thecommunity and help create a more sustainable world”. (3
information from this assignment revealed student attitudes aboutcivil engineering. The course included additional assignments on sustainability (2009 only),ethics, a team West Point Bridge Designer project, a curriculum plan to graduation at CU with aB.S. in CVEN, a paper on a significant event or structure related to civil engineering (such as theThree Gorges Dam, the flooding in New Orleans from hurricane Katrina, etc.), and a shortsummary of a professional society meeting that they attended (such as ASCE or AGC). In thefinal assignment of the semester the students wrote a reflective essay that instructed them to statewhether or not they planned to remain a civil engineering major and why/why not. The studentswere also instructed to comment on
quality and the natural resource base essential for future development.”As Mays2 points out, the concept of sustainability is not new. However, official recognition ofthe concept in practice has come relatively recently. For example, the ASCE Board of Directorsintroduced the concept into the ASCE Code of Ethics a little more than a decade ago3.Equipping civil engineers at the university level to plan and design sustainable developments,buildings, and processes is also relatively new. Even sanitary and in more recent timesenvironmental engineering, which is a fairly mature civil engineering sub-discipline, focusedpredominantly in the environmental and economic spheres of sustainability with less emphasison the social element. Steineman4
AC 2010-1248: DEVELOPMENT OF CORE CONCEPTS AND LEARNINGOUTCOMES FOR THE INTRODUCTORY TRANSPORTATION COURSEKristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College KRISTEN L. SANFORD BERNHARDT is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College, where she teaches courses related to transportation, civil infrastructure, and engineering ethics and researches issues related to infrastructure systems modeling. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University and her B.S.E. from Duke University, all in Civil Engineering.Steven Beyerlein, University of Idaho STEVEN W. BEYERLEIN is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho
that the instructor could choose the activities that he or she preferred. Module developerswere asked to provide advice on how to alter the activities to prevent plagiarism and to include ascoring rubric where appropriate. Service learning and team activities were encouraged, and aninfrastructure assessment assignment was required as one of the out-of-class activities.The specific instructions given to module developers are included in Appendix A.Six modules were developed for the course. The first module covered fundamental topics andoverarching concepts for the course: Introduction to the ASCE “Report Card for America’s In-frastructure,” engineering ethics, licensure, sustainability, public financing, planning, and team-work. The remaining
such as regulatory, economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, constructability, and sustainability. (4) Provide a platform where student performance against the ABET general criteria for engineering programs 3 a-k and civil engineering program specific criteria can be assessed.The senior design experience was tailored to ensure coverage of the appropriate programmaterial – items (1) – (3) in the above list suggests this. In some ways, constructing theappropriate assessment vehicle(s) was a more considerable challenge. The open-endednature of realistic design does not always lend itself to concrete assessmentmethodologies. The rest of this paper briefly outlines the UT Tyler CE program
this objective is to incorporate humanities issues into existingcourses in the civil engineering curriculum. It has been suggested that much of the exposure ofcivil engineering students to the humanities must come from civil engineering professors12.Hayes12 highlighted the importance of having civil engineering professors broadly read in thehumanities incorporate ethics, knowledge of engineering history, and broader societal concernsinto the classroom at every opportunity as a means to provide civil engineering students exposureto the humanities12. In general, the civil engineering professors will be best at framingengineering problems and solutions for students from the humanist viewpoint and discussing theimpacts from a humanist perspective
compared to my colleagues, my immediate supervisor generally believes that I have good communication skills.”PM 2-2. 50% or more of CE graduates will respond “agree or strongly agree” to the statement, “My engineering education at UE prepared me for the ethical situations I have encountered in my career as an engineer”PM 2-3. 50% or more of CE graduates will respond “agree or strongly agree” to the statement “I stay abreast of current issues in civil engineering by reading professional publications on a monthly basis.”PM 2-4. 50% or more of CE graduates will respond that they have active memberships in ASCE.PM 2-5. 50% or more of CE graduates will answer in the affirmative to the statement “I have
to the EAC/ABET general engineering program Criteria 3 (d),and (f) through (j): Page 15.125.2 (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams, (f) an understanding of professional, and ethical responsibility, (g) an ability to communicate effectively, (h) …to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context. (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning, and (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.1,2Incorporating these outcomes into Civil Engineering curricula has been challenging since mostCivil
y 2graduates who have an ability to function on in diverse teams multidisciplinarymultidisciplinary and diverse teams (ABET D). and/or diverse teams. Outcome 1: StudentsGoal 3 - Objective 2: The Civil Engineering will take pride in theProgram at Rowan University will produce profession of civilgraduates who have an understanding of engineering and nprofessional and ethical responsibilities (ABET recognize theirF). professional and
, social,political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility(g) An ability to communicate effectively(k) An ability to use…engineering tools necessary for engineering practiceFor undergraduate degrees, the Program Educational Objectives of the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering19 include providing students with:1. The knowledge, tools and understanding of analysis, measurement, and design processes;2. The ability to work and communicate effectively and efficiently individually and collaboratively; and,3. An ability to recognize and respond in an appropriate
meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process (often iterative), inwhich the basic sciences, mathematics, and the engineering sciences are applied to convertresources optimally to meet these stated needs.”More specifically, general criterion 3 (c) states that, “Engineering programs must demonstratethat their graduates have...an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,” and hence design is essential topreparing civil engineers. Below we will describe in more detail the evolution of the capstonedesign class.I – CREATION (1994-2004)A new department-wide capstone
course that has been conceived to do the following: (1) Give students a real-world, design office design experience tackling an open- ended design scenario that encompasses high level Bloom’s2 cognitive thinking across seven CE sub-disciplines (2) Ensure students wrestle with professional issues such as communication with engineers, policy makers and the public (3) Ensure students are faced with issues associated with typical design constraints such as regulatory, economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and Page 15.260.3 safety, constructability, and sustainability
students.Topic 11, Teaching Professional Skills, captures an interest in how to integrate skills such aswriting, presentation making, ethics, professionalism, and life-long learning into the civilengineering classroom.The CFD, motivated by the strong interest detected through the longitudinal survey results, tookon the challenge of designing an advanced ExCEEd and seeking out ASCE's approval for thepilot. Their work began at a fall 2008 meeting whereby they made decisions about workshoplength, timing, costs, and potential topics. Further development occurred at the spring of 2009meeting11. The determination of final details, planning, and implementation was lead by theExCEEd II site director and supported by the chair of the CFD. The final topics and
and Technology’s (ABET) General Program Outcomescriteria1 require engineering programs to demonstrate that their students attain an “ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical health and safety, manufacturability (orconstructability), and sustainability” and “an ability to use techniques, skills, and modernengineering tools necessary for engineering practice.” For organizations responsible fordesigning, constructing, and maintaining levees and dams, these are two especially importantqualifications for apprenticing engineers. Committee members agree that one of the mosteffective means for achieving these two criteria is through