pedagogy to improve moral development in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Enhancing Student Learning Through AccreditationEmployers commonly note ethical reasoning skills as a top desired skill in college graduates.Within our own institutional context, the focus and institutional belief in the importance ofethical reasoning is even more pronounced. In addition to the mission to “educate and developour students to become principled leaders in all walks of life by instilling the core values of TheCitadel in a disciplined and intellectually challenging environment,”1 The institution espousesthree core values: Honor, Duty, and Respect. The institution’s core value of
program, continuing education, experience,and mentoring: material sciences, mechanics, experiments, problem recognition and solving,design, sustainability, contemporary issues and historical perspective, risk and uncertainty,project management, breadth in civil engineering, and technical specialization.(C) Professional outcomes achieved through the degree program, experience and mentoring:communications, public policy, business and public administration, globalization, leadership,teamwork, attitudes, and professional and ethical responsibility.Detailed commentaries on these outcomes, along with their rubrics in the cognitive domain andthe desired level of achievement can be found in the report published by the BOK2 TaskCommittee [1]The BOK3TC
engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Revising the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK): The Application of the Cognitive Domain of Bloom’s TaxonomyAbstractIn October, 2016, The American Society of Civil Engineers
distinction between technical and professional is often blurred.Initially the committee attempted to classify all 21 proposed outcomes using both the cognitiveand affective domains. However, it proved difficult to distinguish the difference betweenTable 4. Example of Actions Demonstrating Affective Attainment. Level Example Receiving Individual reads a book passage and recognizes the relationship to ethical behavior. Responding Individual participates in a discussion about the book, reads another book by the same author or another book about ethical behavior, etc. Valuing The individual demonstrates this by voluntarily attending a
easier to meet than the existingrequirements and present increased flexibility for many programs.Criterion 3 ChangesThe current Criterion 3 (a)-(k) student outcomes1 which have been unchanged since theywere adopted as part of EC2000 are:Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may bearticulated by the program.(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, healthand safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to
Paper ID #21160Perceptions of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge Outcomes by SeniorStudents: Effect of Activities, Internships, and Career GoalsDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for her department. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity
United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a
address uncertainty Probability and statistics At least 4 technical areas appropriate to CE Proficiency in at least 4 CE areas Experiments in at least 2 CE areas Experiments in more than 1 CE area Design in at least 2 CE contexts Design throughout CE curriculum Sustainability in design Basic Concepts: project management, business, Professional Practice Issues: Procurement of public policy, leadership work, bidding vs QBS, design/construct interaction Professional ethics Professional
Paper ID #21056What Do First-year and Senior Civil Engineering Students Think About Rais-ing the Bar on the Education Requirements for Professional Licensure?Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environ- mental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the ABET assessment coordinator for the department. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E
cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Comparison Between the New Bodies of Knowledge for the Civil Engineering Professional and the Civil Engineering TechnologistBackgroundCivil engineering relies on a strong formal knowledge and skills base acquired largely throughhigher education and experience. Central to the identity of civil engineering as a profession isthe need for such expert knowledge and skills, independence of thought and judgment, and anethos to serve the public good grounded in a sound code of ethics [1], [2]. The American Societyof Civil Engineers (ASCE) formally endorsed the
current and future generations. In addition, the Accreditation Board for EngineeringTechnology (ABET) requires curriculum that directly addresses sustainability through criterions3(c) and 3(h). Criterion 3(c) states, “an ability to design a system, components, or process tomeet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social,political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability” while criterion 3(h)states, “the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context” [3]. Incorporating sustainability as partof ABET requirements ensures that students are prepared for sustainability challenges; howevercurrent civil
of the ASCE Committee on the Academic Prerequisites for Professional Practice (CAPˆ3). He has served on the ASCE Committee on Licensure and the Experiential Fulfillment Strategic Planning Subcommittee of the Committee on Licensure and Ethics. He currently serves on the ASCE BOK3 Task Committee which is preparing the 3rd Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century, and represents ASCE on the NCEES POLC Committee. He is the recipient of the ASCE 2012 William H. Wisely American Civil Engineer Award, Dr. Phillips has been an active member of the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) at the local, state, and national levels serving as national president in 1994-95. He is past
responses to the effectiveness of writing exercises inaccomplishing ABET outcomes f through k.Slightly higher ratings were received for WWE for outcomes f, h and i. Similarly, outcomes g, jand k received slightly higher ratings for EES. Again, these observations are as anticipated giventhe nature of the writing exercises incorporated in each of the courses. Writing intensiveexercises in EES enhanced the communication skills, knowledge of contemporary issues andtechniques and skills required for engineering practice11. The design intensive exercises in WWEhelped students realize the professional and ethical responsibility, awareness of broad educationfor engineering solutions, and the need for life-long learning to stay up to the trends
desired needs - D. Maybe. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams - E. Yes. an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems - F. Yes. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility as well as the importance of professional licensure - G. Yes. an ability to communicate effectively - H. Yes. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context - I. Yes. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning - J. Yes. a knowledge of contemporary issues - K. Maybe. an ability to use the techniques, skill, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering
efforts mentioned above.Table 3. Course learning objectives Course objectives ABET student outcomes Applying appropriate mathematical and scientific models to solve client- a based problems Designing a system, component, or processes to meet desired engineering c and k needs Determining the impact of contemporary issues on the design process j considering realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, regulatory, manufacturability, and sustainability Developing an understanding and being able to explain the importance
competitions they could lead as a junior or senior (i.e., concrete canoe, steel bridge, mini-Baja, ethics, robotics)Fall-Spring Club Meetings Mentorship, connection to future internships and jobs, service opportunitiesFall Mathematics Jeopardy Opportunity to compete using calculus skills only STEM majors are developingJanuary Academic Training for
(written) 75.0% 4 Strong work ethic 72.0% 5 Communication skills (verbal) 70.5% 6 Leadership 68.9% 7 Initiative 65.9% 8 Analytical/quantitative skills 64.4% 9 Flexibility/adaptability 63.6% 10 Detail-oriented 62.1% 11 Interpersonal skills 58.3% 12 Technical skills 56.8% 13 Computer skills 49.2% 14 Organizational ability 47.7% 15 Strategic
goals after graduation. building structure. gaining an internship. Describe the role of professional licensure Describe what you are in ARCE, and how that includes a strong most excited about focus on engineering ethics and regarding studying professional development. ARCEDesign-Project Mentoring: (CE 562, CE 765)Course Descriptions: CE 562, “Design of Steel Structures,” is a senior-level required course forCE and ARCE majors and 38 students were enrolled during Fall 2017. CE 765, “Advanced SteelDesign,” is a graduate-level course of which CE 562 is a pre
goals after graduation. building structure. gaining an internship. Describe the role of professional licensure Describe what you are in ARCE, and how that includes a strong most excited about focus on engineering ethics and regarding studying professional development. ARCEDesign-Project Mentoring: (CE 562, CE 765)Course Descriptions: CE 562, “Design of Steel Structures,” is a senior-level required course forCE and ARCE majors and 38 students were enrolled during Fall 2017. CE 765, “Advanced SteelDesign,” is a graduate-level course of which CE 562 is a pre
Education is Vital for the Future of our Profession.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131, 533–539.Boud, D., and Feletti, G.E. (1997). The Challenge of Problem-Based learning, London: Kogan Paul.Bruhl, J.C., Klosky, J.L., Mainwaring, T., and Hanus, J.P. (2017). “Accelerating the Development of Engineering Judgment in Students through Inquiry-Based Learning Activities.” 19022 Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.Davis, M. (2012). “A Plea for Judgment,” Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 789–808DeGrazia, J.L., John L. Falconer, Garret Nicodemus, and Will Medlin (2012). Incorporating screencasts into chemical engineering courses. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
engineering's ability tomanage its knowledge is a result of its continuous effort to engage in learning, specifically, life-long learning. The civil engineering’s profession’s ability to deliver on the Grand Challenge issupported equally by its unique knowledge base, sense of professional and ethical responsibilityand the profession’s ability to create, innovate, and apply this knowledge throughout project andasset life-cycles.The roadmap to successfully answering the Grand Challenge includes (1) taking appropriatelevels of risks, (2) being proactive, (3) being innovative, (4) developing, maintaining and usingdynamic core competencies, (5) building sustained competitive advantages, and most importantof all (6) creating value for our stakeholders. [1
overcome, evenwith a detailed rubric that includes instructions and training. Because there is still a humanelement in grading, various forms of bias will affect the final scores [3], [11], [12]. The Haloeffect describes many of the biases that a professor might bring into a grading session fromgrading previous work [13], [14]. There are other forms of bias that have been reported, whichinclude attachment toward your students, gender, personality, work ethic, and personal bias [11],[14]. One research project focused on investigating 30 professors in the same department thatgraded undergraduate psychology papers. Significant differences were seen in the grading resultsof professors who graded their own class and professors who graded students
development such as annualethics training. In civil engineering, the program criteria require students to explain basicconcepts in project management, business, public policy, and leadership; analyze issues inprofessional ethics; and explain the importance of professional licensure. These subjects are thefocus areas for many societal presentations and these students bring back these experiences totheir own classroom discussions.Recruiting. Industrial organizations desire to develop their workforce. Some technicians desire tomove up to engineering positons while entry level engineers desire to rise to company leadershippositions. The Citadel has developed full-time evening programs to support the region withworkforce development. Therefore, these
Grant No.1635534. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] ASCE, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[2] P. A. Vesilind and A. S. Gunn, “Sustainable development and the ASCE Code of Ethics,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 72–74, 1998.[3] R. K. comments, “10 projections for the global population in 2050,” Pew Research Center, 03-Feb-2014. .[4] S. J. Davis, K. Caldeira, and H. D. Matthews, “Future CO2 Emissions and
Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering