Internationalization Efforts at Villanova UniversityAbstractIn 2012, Villanova University joined the American Council of Education (ACE) as a member oftheir Internationalization Laboratory. The goal of joining this laboratory was to develop astrategic plan for comprehensive internationalization that will help strengthen the university’sglobal leadership and engagement. ACE describes a process to develop, implement, and monitoran internationalization plan. This paper will describe the status of current internationalizationactivities at the university; specifically focusing on how the Department of Civil andEnvironmental Engineering can help the university articulate, assess, and attain theirinternationalization goals. This
- reer Course and the Joint Engineer Operations Course. Erik has served three one-year tours in Baghdad, Iraq with the most recent tour ending in June 2010. During that tour, Erik was an Infrastructure Analyst with various infrastructure related duties such as data collection and management, condition analyses of infrastructure systems, and functional subject matter expert for validating national critical infrastructure assets. Past assignments include: Forward Engineer Support Team – Main Detachment Commander; Pla- toon Leader; Infrastructure Analyst at Corps Level; Civil Engineer, Plans Officer and Logistics Officer at Battalion Level. Erik’s Current research focuses on the construction of nuclear facilities and the
insupporting ABET accreditation of the Civil Engineering program as well other programs in thedepartment are presented.1. IntroductionThe Civil Engineering (CE) program started at Indiana University-Purdue University FortWayne (IPFW) in 2006; the only public program offered in the area that enables students to getexcellent public education while living at home and attending school. In December 2008, theCivil Engineering Assessment Plan (CEAP) was developed and approved, based on thedepartment’s existing “one-assessment-plan-fits-all” format that was developed for all programsin 2004. The assessment plan requires intensive effort to implement and lacks consistency anddocumentation in some aspects of assessment. In order to meet the ABET requirements
. Both Howe(2010) and Todd et al. (1994) provide comprehensive reviews of capstone courses across thecountry. Projects involving public and private entities make up a significant portion of both oftheir reviews, indicating the utility of such partnerships to both parties.The projects described above demonstrate the value of partnerships between government andacademia. Additionally, the Department of Civil Engineering at the UMD places great value onhands-on, real-world projects. The UMD recently published a strategic plan consisting of severalgoals. One of these goals was to strengthen ties with local communities in an intentional, visible,and mutually beneficial partnership. Following the publication of the strategic plan, the City ofDuluth
on the applicability of theproject to meet required learning outcomes as well as survey responses from students and themunicipality. Plans for integrating the BMP monitoring into other university course are alsoconsidered based on related studies as well as survey responses from stormwater practitioners.This paper addresses the following research questions: 1. How can the capstone design course objectives simultaneously meet ABET requirements while also providing students with an increased opportunity to gain experience and skills Page 24.567.2 common to stormwater practitioners? 2. How can a partnership between a university
Planning Process Group includes, among other things, estimatingcosts, scope management, risk management, and procurement management. Page 24.325.4Figure 2: Adapted from the PMBOK5 Project Management Process Groups graphicTo utilize the PMBOK5 for a profession such as civil engineering, or an industry such asconstruction, interpretation is necessary, and, indeed, expected. The language of PMBOK5 issufficiently flexible and applicable for use in an engineering design project or a constructionproject.Another aspect of the PMBOK5 is that a management team can select which components toemploy. For example, it is not usual practice for a civil engineering
learning priorities require work by students at these higher levels. This learning is not easily demonstrated with traditional timed tests. A selection of case studies of geologic failures was deemed a better fit for this higher level learning. Learning about failure case studies and how to analyze the failures also requires significant class time. Thus, a much greater emphasis on the use of case studies for in class activities was planned. Page 24.640.4 • Project work that requires the students to apply geologic science to planning civil and environmental engineering projects
REU program that we now use for recruitment. Asample YouTube video is available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLXgAAriFb0Social InteractionsThe REU participants resided in an on-campus residential hall, with dining facilities, in two suites(one each for males and females) on the same floor. Each year we recruited one REU fellow fromVirginia Tech which proved very effective in planning and implementation of social activities.Our REU fellows explored several local attractions and undertook weekend tours to neighboringcities. The author and his graduate students organized 2-3 picnics for social bonding eachsummer.Concluding CeremonyOn the final day of the 10-week program, typically in August, a concluding ceremony lasting 4.5hrs. was
. AbilitiesA given capability typically consists of many diverse and specific abilities. The abilitiesare presented in the EBOK as examples; and are just that -- examples. The specificabilities required in each engineering position and in each discipline will varysignificantly.The statement of each ability begins with an active verb to help clarify the intent. Someability statements include additional active verbs. Consider, for example, the EngineeringTools capability. An example of a supporting ability is “Identify the advantages anddisadvantages of a tool applied within an engineer’s area of specialization.” Or using theCommunication capability, an example supporting ability is “Plan, prepare, and deliveran oral presentation with appropriate visual
activities have primarily been applied to a stream restoration course as part of a baselinemonitoring program for the planned restoration of Lost Creek. The course is structured aroundconducting weekly field labs along Lost Creek. In this environmental river mechanics / streamrestoration course, students are introduced through field labs to the concepts of fluvialgeomorphology, aquatic ecosystems, and sediment transport for application in restoring impairedstreams. During the quarter, the students make frequent visits to Lost Creek for the purpose ofcollection baseline monitoring data that is used to classify channel morphology and process,analyze stream habitat characteristics, estimate sediment transport, and analyze stream stability.The data
such as obtaining work for the firm,planning and running client meetings, and project management. Other essays introduce thestudents to technical aspects such as decision making in the schematic design phase, designingfor constructability, integrating gravity and lateral load systems, coordinating non-structuralelements, creating construction documents, responding to requests for information from the field,and the quality assurance process.The practicum requirements encourage the students to meet multiple engineers within the firm inorder to see their future career from the perspective of several different people. This papersummarizes feedback from the students and employers about the outcomes of the practicum,what worked well in the
-learning projects can be fairly involved and require extensive logistical considerations,especially when they occur outside of the United States. Obtaining a DCP early in the project canhelp significantly. When fielding prospective projects and during initial investigations, a DCPmay have insight into what types of supplies and materials as well as tools and labor will beinvolved. These factors are critical in understanding if the project will be sustainable in theproposed locale. During the design and planning stages, a DCP can help save the project teamtime and effort by making suggestions concerning the practicality of early ideas. Designsgenerated by students, because of their lack of field experience, may not initially consider real-world
original design and construction plans, the project wascompleted on schedule and the bridge was opened to the public.3. Research MethodWe asked the students to keep reflective journals over the course of their travel to Bolivia.Writing prompts were provided to elicit responses that would answer the research questionsposed in Section 1. We devised the reflection questions to measure the expected learningoutcomes, and we timed the questions to coincide with major milestones in the constructionschedule, as shown in Table 1. The students were given the following guidance in keeping theirreflective journals: Enclosed are a series of writing prompts to be completed over the course of your trip to Bolivia. There is no specified word limit (maximum or
university-sponsorededucational research project over the last three years, called the Quality Enhancement Plan(QEP) Phase II. The CE QEP project, which started in the Fall semester of 2010, continuesthrough the summer of 2014. Within the QEP project, the research team uses alternative analysisas the method for developing critical thinking skills. The project includes making several minorrevisions to the curriculum, i.e., interventions, to include discussion of, and exercises in, criticalthinking at four points in the curriculum, spaced approximately one year apart.This paper presents the case for integrating more critical thinking into engineering programs andevaluates one university’s effort to try to enhance an engineering curriculum through a
Engineer Officer Basic Course, Maneuver Captain’s Ca- reer Course and the Joint Engineer Operations Course. Erik has served three one-year tours in Baghdad, Iraq with the most recent tour ending in June 2010. During that tour, Erik was an Infrastructure Analyst with various infrastructure related duties such as data collection and management, condition analyses of infrastructure systems, and functional subject matter expert for validating national critical infrastructure assets. Past assignments include: Forward Engineer Support Team – Main Detachment Commander; Pla- toon Leader; Infrastructure Analyst at Corps Level; Civil Engineer, Plans Officer and Logistics Officer at Battalion Level. Erik’s Current research focuses
sponsor’s interest and is more capable ofproviding the continuous support necessary for the undergraduate design teams to stay on task.This mentor meets with the team weekly, helps plan tasks and time management, and ensurestechnical accuracy and sponsor satisfaction. A faculty member is also assigned to each team andis available for periodic consultation and encouragement to insure that best practices areimplemented and a quality final solution can be delivered to the sponsor. Deliverables include anoral presentation, usually given at the sponsor’s place of work, a final report with drawings andspecifications, and a poster describing the design.BackgroundCapstone ObjectivesCapstone courses have become a widespread culminating experience in
potential circumstance was to request anevaluator who had the requisite experience. If no such evaluator existed, the faculty was Page 24.138.4resigned to having to educate the evaluator on all salient aspects of BOK2. As it turned out, wewere assigned an evaluator with functional knowledge of the BOK2 and was supportive of ourefforts to “Raise the Bar”.B. Revision of Civil Engineering Program Educational Objectives and Student OutcomesThe Department assessment plan requires review of the program educational objectives (PEOs)every three years. In general, the review process commences with faculty who suggest changesif necessary. At the annual meeting
wereused to create a prioritized list of potential changes that could then be evaluated. This paper wasimportant to the CEPCTC because it focused on both the methodology and suggested potentialchanges.Ressler8,9 reported the need for long-term synchronization of the published BOK and itsassociated accreditation criteria. In 2011, CAP^3 formed a special task committee to develop astrategic plan for long-term management of change. The principal objective of the taskcommittee’s work was to propose a systematic and predictable process for continuous change toboth the BOK and accreditation criteria. The task committee proposed an eight-year repeatablecycle that “allows time to formulate and publish a new edition of the Civil Engineering BOK andto
number of engineering students in respective program. The concept ofincreasing the number of engineering students thereby increasing the number of graduates wasanalyzed as part of strategic planning for the School of Engineering. Key indicators found duringthis study were increased marketing, preparedness of the incoming students, retention of thosewho arrive, and the addition of new programs. This paper will only focus on the retention ofthose students who arrive each year as freshman. The School of Engineering used a simplesuggestion by one of its faculty concerning a well-known concept such as SI, supplementalinstruction, to improve retention of engineering freshman by nearly 20%. This paper willestablish the conditions prior to the
, energy production studies, and strategic planning. He spent nearly 30 years as a consulting engineer and also worked for the Corps of Engineers. He also served as adjunct faculty at Seattle University where he taught water resources engineering and fluid mechanics. Mr. Killgore received both a Bachelors of Civil Engineering degree and Bachelor of Arts degree in Spanish from Seattle University (1978) and a Master of Science in Civil Engineering degree specializing in water resources and environmental engineering from the University of Washington (1984). He holds the Diplomate, Water Resources Engineer (D. WRE) specialty certification from the American Academy of Water Resources Engineers and is a licensed Professional
the three-credit CE405 Sustainability & Infrastructure course; asubstitution may borrow a single credit from another course under the old curriculum, such asCIV317 Engineering Economics. The intent in making any of these substitutions is to bothsatisfy accreditation criteria for the selected program of study under which the student plans tomatriculate, while also maximally accounting for course credits already completed by the Page 24.336.8student.Another notable benefit, albeit one that takes some acclimation from current student advisors, isthe course numbering structure that was implemented with the new curriculum. A system wasadopted
No systematic plan or data experiments. Analyzes and experimental plan and someunder load using laboratory gathering; makes no attempt interprets data carefully; analysis and interpretation experiments and compare to relate data to theory. relates theory to data. of results; can relate theorythem with that of traditional to data. materials
openness in students’discussions, these focus groups were conducted independently at the absence of the courseinstructor. The sample courses where these focus group discussions were conducted included: • CVE 312 – Structural Analysis I • CVE 403 – Construction Planning and Principles of Estimating • CVE 422 – Reinforced Concrete Design • ESC 211 – Strength of MaterialsDiscussions in these courses occurred at multiple times, across different courses, over time,thereby capturing the views of a wide range of students, the views expressed seemed to beconsistent over time. A summary of these focus group discussions is provided in the remainingpart of this section under the subheadings: Failure Cases Discussed, Usefulness of Cases
existing knowledge schema.8 They can be used by students as a study tool, andby instructors for enhancing teaching, facilitating curriculum planning, and as an assessment ofstudent learning.9Concept maps are typically created through a series of steps.6 These include (a) defining the top-ic or focus question; (b) identifying the key concepts that apply to this domain; (c) ordering con-cepts from general to specific; (d) drawing links between concepts; (d) creating phrases that de-scribe the link; and (e) cross-linking concepts in different segments or domains of knowledge onthe map. When used for assessment, they can be scored quantitatively through techniques in-volving counting of concepts, links and propositions and qualitatively based on the
Spring 2011 no book Connecticut Engineering University of TTE 4004 x Transportation (Mannering, Florida Engineering Kilareski, and Washburn 2009) University of ENCE 370 x Introduction to Spring 2009 (Papacostas and Maryland Transportation Prevedouros 2001) Engineering and Planning University of CE 3100 x Transportation Spring 2009 (Mannering and Missouri
planning guide, and an assessment tool30-32. Hierarchy A Hierarchy B (Level 1) (Level 1) Cross-Link between Hierarchy C Hierarchies B and C (Level 2) Figure 1. Cmap hierarchies and cross-links31.2. Theoretical Basis for CmapsUse of cmaps is supported by cognitive psychological research in the area of semantic memorytheory. Semantic memory refers to an organized database of concept-based knowledge, such asmeanings, understandings, and images. Unlike episodic memories, semantic memories containfactual
, however, so I’ll pass around a sign-up sheet. Today there’s a benefit to sitting in the front row – you get to choose first! Technique: You decide what will be most effective. You must speak, but you can decide whether or not to use slides (and if so, how many). You can perform a skit or a monologue, you can dress up, you can do a demo…whatever you think will aid in getting your message across in 180 seconds. I only ask two things – 1.) if you use slides, please send them to me the night prior so I can incorporate them into our class presentation, and 2.) if you plan to use fire or other potentially dangerous demonstrations, let me know so we can make a plan for safety. Team: This is an individual assignment, but I highly encourage you to
the Senior Resident Scholar and Reinvention Fund Program Manager for the Institute. Dr. Riley also leads multiple DOE funded energy centers, including the Northern Mid-Atlantic Solar Education and Resource Center, and the Grid-Smart Application and Resource Center. In 2009 he initiated the launch of the National Energy Leadership Corps (NELC), a hands-on program that challenges college students to engage residents in their communities in meaningful home energy and sustainability planning and actions. He is now working with collaborators at numerous institutions to advance the and replicate the NELC in sustainable and high-impact applications.Dr. Lisa Riley Brown, Penn State UniversityDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of
University17. The fundamentalobjective of the ISI Envision partnership is to aide multi-discipline professionals, from bothpublic and private sectors, in creating infrastructure plans using sustainability metrics as aguiding principle. ISI Envision uses a life-cycle assessment approach to measure thesustainability of each project. This includes evaluating the project for its environmental impacts,life-cycle costs, and socio-economic influences and priorities. Specifically, the rating system isdivided into the following five categories: Quality of Life, Leadership, Resource Allocation,Natural World, and Climate and Risk17. Each ISI Envision category has a list of criteria wheresustainability credits are accumulated if applicable to a specific
various phases of project to assure steady progress throughoutthe term on the projects.3) Provide template for manuscripts that requires students to produce a document of a highlyspecific configuration.4) Distribute the final papers to promote cross-pollination of ideas and allow content to beincluded as part of course content (e.g., final examination). In addition, provide opportunity forstudents to present their work as an oral presentation. These together promote students teachingstudents. Watch for errors in presentations and/or papers and delicately highlight such errors tothe class.5) Plan on increased grading time earlier in the term (paper drafts) as compared to conventionalend of term projects, increased administrative tasks related to