incompletewithout engineers becoming more aware of long-term implications of their engineering work onsociety, especially those concerning how costs and benefits of civil engineering projects aredistributed across different social groups and affect their wellbeing in the long-run [3]. Forexample, it has been argued that engineering education should put greater emphasis onengineers’ social responsibility toward "an equal distribution of rights, opportunities, andresources in order to enhance human capabilities and reduce the risk and harms among thecitizens of a society" [4, p. 10]. Thus, complementary education on social justice implications ofcivil engineering may benefit civil engineering education further.We argue that integration of social implications
scope of this paper is naturally limited due to the focus on only one cohort for eachcourse (the fall 2022 semester). As these changes continue in further instances of the courses, welook forward to comparing multiple cohorts before and after said changes. We will also be able toconfirm if the increased retention rate is maintained. Future work includes further integration offocused team-development and story-driven learning in other courses in the curriculum andassessment of the impact of compounding engagement in EML.Conclusion Teams are not only an integral part of modern engineering, but they also support students’entrepreneurial mindset by providing a space to engage with the 3Cs collaboratively. Similarly,story-driven learning
investigate strategies for integrating AI intocivil engineering education. While this integration could be done using new elective courses onAI and civil engineering (see [11]), we were interested in relevant topics that could incorporatedinto existing coursework. Our assumption is that the technical details of using AI would becovered in other courses (e.g., data science). Here, we were interested in demonstratingapplications, providing opportunities to interact with and use AI efficiently, and providing clarityaround the ethical issues of AI.AI in the curriculum: Infrastructure monitoringAs civil infrastructure systems age there is an increasing need for methods and tools that allowowners to efficiently monitor and maintain these systems over time
2002.[11] J. D. Ford, L. A. Riley, “Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 92(4), pp 325-328, October 2003.[12] D. C. Andrews, “An Interdisciplinary Course in Technical Communication”, Technical Communication, Vol 50 (4), pp. 446-451, November 2003. [13] S. Manuel-DuPont, “Writing-across-the-curriculum in an Engineering Program”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 85(1), pp. 35-40, January 1996.[14] J. D. Ford, L. A. Riley, 2003. “Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: A Look at
design offers students entering the field greater knowledge andconfidence with the material. To provide students with the opportunity to understand thefundamentals of timber design and construction without introducing an additional requiredcourse into the curriculum, a hands-on engineering design project was implemented in anundergraduate structural analysis course. In this project, students worked in teams to design,analyze, construct, and test a 16-ft long timber truss. Students learned the basics of approximateanalysis, design of axial wooden members and connections, and principles of timberconstruction. The engineering design project has been included in the structural analysis coursesince 2017. This paper presents the six-year evolution of
-doctoral fellow in the Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University, and he has worked as a K-16 STEM instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based active and passive learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia, where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer in 2012. His research interests are grounded in the learning sciences and include how K-16 students develop engineering thinking and professional skills when addressing complex socio-technical problems. He aims to apply his research to the design of better educational
City & Regional Planning. She completed a B.S. Management Studies, at the University of the West Indies (Mona), Jamaica.Dr. Celeste Chavis, P.E., Morgan State University Celeste Chavis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Transportation & Urban Infrastructure Studies in the School of Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore, MD. Dr. Chavis is a registered professional engineer in the State of MaryDr. Eazaz Sadeghvaziri, Morgan State University Dr. Eazaz Vaziri is a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Urban Mobility & Equity Center and an Adjunct Faculty in the Department of Transportation & Urban Infrastructure at Morgan State University. Also, he is an Engineering
students’ perceptions of Equity in Developing Infrastructure ResilienceAbstractRecent years have seen a substantial shift in the field of civil engineering (CE) and constructionmanagement (CM) education and workforce development, with an increased emphasis onsustainability and resilience. Sustainability considers economic, ecological, and social aspectswhile addressing problems pertaining to human welfare, the environment, and communityimpact. Resilient infrastructure maintains both structural and functional integrity whilesupporting interdependent social, transportation, water, and energy systems, even aftercatastrophic disasters. Although many civil engineering programs address sustainability,resiliency is
Paper ID #38224Flipping the Classroom to Create a Student-Centered Learning Environmentin Three Undergraduate Civil Engineering CoursesDr. Amie Baisley, University of Florida I am currently an Instructional Assistant Professor at the University of Florida teaching primarily 2nd year mechanics courses. My teaching and research interests are alternative pedagogies, mastery-based learning and assessment, student persistence in their first two years, and faculty development.Prof. Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Keith D. Hjelmstad is President’s Professor of Civil Engineering in the School of
engineering decision curriculum look like? While another, more specificstudy should be done to determine the most effective way to educate civil engineering studentson biases and how to reduce them in professional practice, we can form an initial idea, basing thecurriculum on existing courses [7],[8],[9],[10]. Using these studies, primarily focused in themedical field, we can extrapolate a few key components of educational curriculum. The maincomponents we found in these studies were: curriculum that had students identify biases incertain case studies or clinical trials [8],[9], small group discussion [9],[10], and evaluation ofstudents ability to reduce bias post-curriculum. In these studies, researchers looked into thecurrent bias training for
Research, School of Engineering, and Human Rights Institute to promote and advance interdisciplinary research in engineering with a clear focus on societal outcomes. Davis is working with several faculty on campus to develop research and curriculum at the intersection of human rights and engineering, such as the one discussed herein. Davis completed his Ph.D. in Transportation and Infrastructure Systems at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, in 2018. His research interests include transportation equity, human rights, environmental justice, and economic resilience. He grew up in Cusco, Per´u, where he obtained his B.S. in civil engineering at the University of San Antonio Abad of Cusco. He also earned an MSCE
, allnecessary data was available in geospatial repositories, such as PASDA2 (Pennsylvania SpatialData Access), which did not provide a practice of planning and collecting data for suchapplications. Due to the fact that orbital imagery and aerial missions are labor and expensive foreducational purposes, the authors proposed the development and usage of an CS-TMMS forapplications related to parcels.Figure 1 provides an explanation of the steps carried out during the process of implementing thisteaching/learning strategy.1 https://naip-usdaonline.hub.arcgis.com/2 https://www.pasda.psu.edu/ Step 1: The development of the system (sensor integration and software development
challenges of the engineeringprofession. Through equipping the educators with this resource, we aim to reinforce the ethicalfoundation of young engineers, ensuring they are well-prepared to uphold the highest standardsof integrity as they embark on their professional journeys.IntroductionEngineers have a major responsibility for protection of public welfare and the environment dueto the nature of engineering projects and designs being closely related to both (Bielefeldt, 2022).Engineering education has long recognized the importance of integrating ethics instruction intothe curriculum to prepare future engineers for the ethical challenges they may face in theirprofessional careers. For this reason engineering educators have been developing modules
among students toward the subject matter [9].Undergraduate education faces substantial challenges, notably observed in expansive universitylecture classes [10, 11]. These challenges stem from increasing class sizes that make itprogressively arduous for college instructors to motivate students for class preparation andparticipation in discussions. To address this issue, integrating student-led group lecture deliveriesinto the curriculum has been proposed as a potential solution in this study. The importance ofstudent engagement, especially within group interactions, is instrumental in cultivating essentialskills crucial for academic success and holistic development [10]. This emphasis on activestudent involvement spurred further investigation
Conference, Session 1315, 2001.[19] Jaksic, N., “Pair-to-Pair Peer Learning,” Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE AnnualConference, Paper #31373, 2020.[20] Martinazzi, R., “IMPLEMENTING “STUDENT LEARNING TEAMS” IN ENGINEERINGECONOMICS,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 1639, 1998.[21] Feland, J., Fisher, C., “Cramming Twenty Pounds into a Five-Pound Bag: IncreasingCurricular Loads On Design Students And Enjoying It!” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE AnnualConference, Session 2125, 2002.[22] Renshaw, S., Dockter, A., Helps, C., Ekstrom, J., “Experiences Using UndergraduateStudents to Develop Information Technology Course Curriculum, “Proceedings of the 2003ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2558, 2003.[23] Bailey, J., “Exploring an Inquiry
integrated into every civil engineering curriculum and first-year studentsare introduced to the CEBOK3, the duty of responsible charge, and the “roadmap” that willprepare them for future practice, as part of their undergraduate education. The CEBOK3 can bealigned with course syllabi to reinforce how the courses being taken help fulfill theundergraduate education outcomes in the CEBOK3. Since these outcomes are closely alignedwith ABET criteria for civil engineering programs, this should not prove difficult to do.Throughout the four years of instruction, academia should continue to build understanding ofwhat is ahead for their students once they graduate. Students should have a clear understandingthat their education has only begun and that they will
, the PtD idea has gradually gained acceptance in the U.S. [3]. However,the traditional curriculum offered by civil engineering programs in the United States does notintegrate PtD concepts [4]. It has been suggested that the engineering community will notincorporate PtD into the curriculum until the accrediting body, ABET, includes it in either aGeneral Criteria or the Program Critera. The majority of civil engineering programs in theUnited States are accredited by ABET. Recently, ASCE’s Civil Engineering Program CriteriaTask Committee (CEPCTC) added a requirement for the curriculum to include an explanationof safety, effective for the 2024-2025 accreditation cycle. Specifically, CEPCTC suggests ninelecture topics that can be used to comply
students identify weak areas to aid in theirpreparation for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Exam, and assess the impact of changesmade to the curriculum year to year.The results of the diagnostic exam showed integrating concepts into multiple courses improvedperformance, identifying the type of problem was essential for students to be successful, andinstructors had a difficult time assessing student conceptual understanding when students hadmultiple compounding errors [1]. The latter conclusion was the most significant. To improvestudent performance, it is necessary to understand why the errors occurred. Unless an instructoridentified whether an error was due to a simple calculation mistake or a conceptual gap inknowledge, the instructor was
-incomepeople and/or persons of color [2]. Considering equity as an integral dimension of infrastructureis becoming more common, particularly in transportation [3, 4] and water [5]. The current ASCECode of Ethics [6] implies that civil engineers should strive for equitable infrastructure. Forexample, under the society stakeholder, civil engineers should “acknowledge the community'sdiverse historical, social, and cultural needs and incorporate these considerations in their work.”The idea of equitable infrastructure also aligns with the new ABET civil engineering programcriteria (CEPC). Specifically, in November 2023 the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC) of ABET approved new civil engineering criteria that state: “The curriculum mustinclude: A
engagement in social topicsmore than a traditional approach [20]. This outcome shows how new design methods can helpengineers build better products and systems. Similarly, they can also help engineers to buildpersonal confidence. A study at Lafayette College found through emphasizing morals in theengineering classroom, students were more confident in their abilities to develop solutions insocially complex situations [21]. In another study at Loyola University in Chicago, it was seenthat by including social justice topics across the engineering curriculum, retention rates ofminority engineering students increased [17]..Students who have been negatively affected orseen their community impacted by an engineering project, may feel left out and
Paper ID #39876Enhancing Student Engagement and Skillsets towards TransportationCareers Using Digital Badge Program: A Case StudyDr. Venktesh Pandey, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Venktesh Pandey is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His research integrates intelligent transportation systems and emerging mobility services in traffic operations, congestion pricing, and transportation plan- ning models with a focus on sustainability. Dr. Pandey has broad interests in improving Engineering
study the subject. Turkanet al. [3] launched an iOS marker-based app for third year undergraduates that recognizedtextbook and assignment examples and displayed pre-calculated deflections and loads. Whilestudents reported an improved learning experience, students were also overwhelmed and foundthe app difficult to use.Given the limited integration of AR in structural engineering courses and its potential benefit tostudents who struggle with visualizing complex structural phenomena, this study presentsSTRUCT-AR, as a continuation of previous work by the authors [13, 14] as part of an ongoingstudy on the formation of engineering intuition in structural engineering. STRUCT-AR is amarker-less AR application designed to address the limitations in
well to thedesign of a module in a course, the design of an entire course, design of a sequence of courses, andultimately to the design of an entire curriculum. For this paper, (4) components of the Model wereprioritized in deliberately guiding the upgrades of the course mindful of intentional changes all seeking toimprove the quality of both teaching and learning.Structured organization & appropriate use of technologyThe technical communications course (CE205) required minimal refinement related to structuredorganization compliant with the ExCEEd Teaching Model’s Structured Organization criteria. The course’slearning objectives were reviewed and confirmed to align with the course assignments and weekly lessoncontent designed for the
: Graduates demonstrate the capability and desire to pursue progressive and continued intellectual development. 4. Ethical Reasoning: Graduates recognize ethical issues and apply ethical perspectives and concepts in decision making. 5. Science/Technology/Engineering/Mathematics (STEM): Graduates apply science, technology, engineering, and mathematics concepts and processes to solve complex problems. 6. Humanities and Social Sciences: Graduates apply concepts from the humanities and social sciences to understand and analyze the human condition. 7. Disciplinary Depth: Graduates integrate and apply knowledge and methodological approaches gained through in-depth study of an academic discipline.Each of the top-level
retention rate in the CS department. Dr. Rahman has published a book, two book chapters and around seventy articles in peer-reviewed journals and confer- ence proceedings, such as IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, etc. and presented his works in numerous conferences and workshops, such as ICPR, CBMS, CLEF, CIVR, HISB, SPIE, BIBE, IEEE FIE, etc. His current research is focusing on Crowdsourcing and Deep learning techniques and their application in medical fields, especially for retrieval and diagnostic purposes. Pursuing continuous financial support is an integral part of Dr. Rahman’s research agenda Over the years, Dr. Rahman ¬received (as both PI
completed his engineering ethics courses.Mr. Paul A. Terrell, Texas Tech University Father, Husband, and graduate student interested in the connection between health information and the experience of pain. Former television broadcast news producer. Current IT support specialist for the College of Media & Communication at Texas Tech University.Dr. Sweta Saraff, IHR Kolkata Sweta Saraff is a research associate at IHR Kolkata. She was an ex-faculty in the department of Amity In- stitute of Psychology and Allied Sciences in Amity University, Kolkata. She teaches Behavioral Sciences to University students. Her research interests are cognitive science, linguistics and social-cultural studies.Dr. Ramakrishna Biswal, Department
space has recently been given to WSE education and dissemination [8]. Windengineering (WE) emerged in the mid-1960s when Cermak conducted the first comprehensivestudy of wind loading on a structure for the construction of the World Trade Center Towers. Thisstudy was performed at Colorado State University, since, at that time, it was the only institutionin the world that had an atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) wind tunnel [9]. WSE has only beentaught for about 50 years and thus there are limited wind engineering (WE) tracks within civilengineering (CE) programs worldwide with limited streamlined or ideal curricula.The goal of this study is to identify and propose a streamlined and ideal curriculum for WEtracks within CE programs. To achieve this
into Engineering Curricula: An InterdisciplinaryApproach to Facilitating Transfer at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology,”Composition Forum, vol. 26, 2012.[8] P. Zemliansky and L. Berry, “A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Faculty DevelopmentProgram: An Experience Report,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 60,no. 3, pp. 306-316, 2017.[9] J. Allen, “The Case Against Defining Technical Writing,” Journal of Business and TechnicalCommunication, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 68-77, 1990.[10] N. T. Buswell, B. K. Jesiek, C. D. Troy, R. R. Essig, and J. Boyd, “Engineering Instructorson Writing: Perceptions, Practices, and Needs,” in IEEE Transactions on ProfessionalCommunication, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 55-74, March 2019[11] S. St.Clair
course offered in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, students explore thedirect and indirect stakeholders involved in a coastal engineering design example. During an in-class session, students learn how to brainstorm the values and norms of stakeholders that theyidentify, and then integrate those values into design criteria such that it benefits a broader swathof the community. The students then applied the VSD concepts to a course project that requiredthem to create design criteria that satisfied stakeholder’s needs beyond the original client. Theinclusion of this activity in the course curriculum created students who were more invested andaware of the potential impacts of their design.Introduction and Literature Review
increase the hands-on time with the workshop activities and tools. 7. Creating new Seminars on “Introduction to Active Learning” and “Creating a Civil Classroom” (i.e., to integrate DEI in the ETW curriculum) to make both of these inferred topics more transparent during the workshop. 8. Creating new Reflection-based activities in order to encourage participants to envision how their learnings could be adapted and applied in their classroom in the near-term future.CFD established an implementation plan whereby CFD committee members would proceed withthe creation of new “Base Slides” for the forthcoming Summer 2023 ETW. In anticipation ofthese workshop changes, CFD organized in December 2022 a “Town Hall Meeting