, steel design, reinforced concrete design,and structural dynamics. This paper summarizes the details of two iterations of the workshopand each of the associated modules. The paper also includes a summary of pre and postassessments of the faculty participants from both workshop cohorts. The assessments includeevaluation of each participants’ active learning practices and their incorporation andunderstanding of EM principles.Introduction An ABET accredited undergraduate engineering program in civil engineering requires theinclusion of a variety of topics. In the Civil Engineering Program Criteria (CEPC) the list oftopics includes sustainability, risk, resilience, diversity, equity, inclusion, an engineering code ofethics ethical dilemma along
topics relevant to seven engineering disciplines, including chemical, civil, electricaland computer, environmental, industrial and systems, mechanical, and “other” engineeringdisciplines. The civil engineering FE exam questions are categorized into 14 different subjects,including mathematics and statistics, ethics and professional practice, engineering economics,statics, dynamics, mechanics of materials, materials, fluid mechanics, surveying, water resourcesand environmental, structural, geotechnical, transportation, and construction. Most questions onthe FE exam are multiple-choice format, with a single correct answer. All questions are scoredas either correct or incorrect; no partial credit is given. The exam is computer-based andadministered
[6]. During the Middle Ages, professionalguilds established regulations akin to codes of ethics, ensuring the quality of construction andpenalizing breaches with financial loss or expulsion from the guild [7]. The term “civil engineer”emerged in the 18th century, distinguishing engineers working on civilian infrastructure frommilitary projects. With the formal establishment of engineering societies such as the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in 1852, efforts to standardize practices gained momentum,culminating in the formation of key organizations like ASTM International (1898), AASHTO(1914), and NIST (1901) [8].Standards, specifications, and codes are typically developed in response to identified needsarising from industry
” is not a valuable use of time, especially when other jobrequirements and expectations are more pressing.Furthermore, there is a burden to ensure and sometimes prove that new material is in factrelevant to the course and does not represent a dilution of the required course material. Thisobstacle is particularly salient when interdisciplinary material is considered. Finding a place formeaningful engagement with concepts like engineering ethics and environmental justice isdifficult when courses are already filled with technical content. If there is no dedicated course forsuch interdisciplinary material, it is easy for it to be pushed to the side.The authors have not encountered institutional opposition; rather, it is institutional inertia