R&D laboratories that link fundamentaldiscoveries to innovative products and services through applied research.To meet these recommendations, we propose the transition of engineering education to a medicalcenter model that includes the following key elements: Clinical Experiences at the Post-Baccalaureate Level Incorporation of Clinical Experiences into Program Learning Outcomes Appropriate Mix of Research and Clinical Faculty Industry Ownership of Professional Practice Training Clinical Sites – industry practice based laboratories, internships, and collaborative researchWe have initiated the first step toward development of a medical center-type model byestablishing a prototype for the practice-based education
interests include the areas of reconfigurable computing, analog circuit design, and semiconductor testing.Mukul Shirvaikar, University of Texas at Tyler Dr. Mukul Shirvaikar is the Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler, where he develops curriculum and laboratories in computer engineering. Prior to this he worked at Texas Instruments specializing in real time imaging systems. Dr. Shirvaikar graduated with his doc- torate from the University of Tennessee. He also has a M.S. degree from the University of Maine, and a B.Tech. from Banaras Hindu University, India. His current research interests include real time imaging and engineering education
been working to build a VoIP telephone system in thetelecommunication laboratories – a new “VoIP initiative” 2. The idea is to use simple strategiesto adapt undergraduate laboratories on computer networks to the teaching of VoIP protocols.New laboratory experiments were created to introduce our junior-level undergraduate students to Page 22.21.3VoIP protocols, such as the session initiation protocol (SIP) and the real-time transport protocol(RTP).However, industry support is essential to the success of this VoIP initiative and the creation ofnew laboratories, in terms of industry - donating equipment, - funding student workers and
generation of engineering faculty that are being trained in ourPFF program will be able to derive maximum benefit from the knowledge base being developedin the engineering education field and perhaps even to contribute to it themselves in the future.Changes in the Undergraduate ExperienceAmong a number of changes in a typical engineering undergraduate curriculum, one that standsout is a focus on undergraduate research. While a senior design project, often with industry input,is a staple of most curricula, laboratory-based research under the guidance of a faculty memberor senior graduate student is now also becoming a popular option, especially for undergraduateswho are identified as good candidates for graduate work. This trend has been found to
was able to assist us. Working closely Page 22.280.3with an active and energetic member of our IAC, this ELET faculty member was able to securePLC equipment valued at approximately $100,000.00 and suitable to begin lab work. As ourPLC laboratory began to take shape, we were also able to secure other units from variousmanufacturers. The demonstrated commitment of the IAC and our industrial partnersencouraged the College to make supplementary purchases of various PLC-enabling software andsupporting programs that would not have occurred otherwise. Today, our PLC laboratory is thebest equipped in our State and the western area of a neighboring
AC 2011-296: AN INDUSTRY-GOVERNMENT-ACADEMIA PARTNERSHIPTO DEVELOP TALENT AND TECHNOLOGYLueny Morell, Hewlett-Packard Corporation Lueny Morell, M.S., P.E., is Program Manager in the Strategic Innovation and Research Services Office of Hewlett Packard Laboratories in Palo Alto, California. She is part of the team facilitating co-innovation with government, partners and universities. From 2002-2008, she was in charge of developing engineer- ing/science curriculum innovation initiatives worldwide in support of HPL research and technology areas and former director of HPL University Relations for Latin America and the Caribbean in charge of build- ing research and education collaborations with universities throughout the
Professional Engineers, and the United States Society on Dams. Rick’s research focuses on laboratory and field testing of soils and remote sensing applications within geotechnical engineering.Micah Hale, University of Arkansas Page 22.707.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Faculty and Student Involvement in a Graduate Level Civil Engineering Seminar SeriesAbstract: In an effort to establish a “community of learning” within the Civil EngineeringDepartment at the University of Arkansas, a new graduate student seminar series was created
Profs. Edward Coyle and Leah Jamieson7-9. The program has grown steadily in bothsize and breadth to where it is recognized as its own academic program under the College ofEngineering. It has dedicated laboratories in the Armstrong Hall of Engineering. In the 2010-2011 academic year, almost 700 students participated on 90 projects , addressing needs rangingfrom data management for human services to creating energy efficient, sustainable home designsfor low income families and from designing learning centers for local museums to developingcustom play environments for children with disabilities. EPICS spans all engineering disciplinesat Purdue and includes students from over 60 majors across the university.Each project involves a team of eight to
Francisco, 2009.11. P. Dunn, Creating industrial partnerships with construction-management technology programs, proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2009-1114.12. K. McManus, The effects of integration of industry faculty into a construction management postgraduate coursework program in the Australian environment, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-1562.13. F.S. Gunnerson, R.T. Jacobsen and G. Pillay, A strategic alliance between regional universities and industry at a national laboratory, proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
,Adam Barker, and Jake Knapp, without whom I would never have learned so much nor had somuch fun doing so. I extend sincere thanks to the The Helen Riaboff Whiteley Center of theFriday Harbor Laboratories of the University of Washington for providing the peacefulenvironment that enabled me to complete this manuscript. And finally, I am grateful to thestudents in my Software Engineering and Interaction Design courses, whose openness andenthusiasm to learn are ever an inspiration.References Cited 1. Amabile, Theresa. How to Kill Creativity. Harvard Business Review 6(5), 1998. 2. Blumenfeld, Phyllis, Elliot Soloway, Ronald Marx, Joseph Krajcik, Mark Guzdial, and Annemarie Palinscar. Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the
is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued en- gineering education research focused on early engineering; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/CISE.Ms. Cindee DresenKysha L. Frazier, Corporation for a Skilled WorkforceLouise Paquette, Lansing Community College Louise A. Paquette Lansing Community College Mathematics and Computer Science Department Degrees EdS in Curriculum and Instruction with a minor emphasis in Systems Science, Michigan State University, 1982 MAT in Mathematics Education with a