Paper ID #43307Career Readiness: Integrating NACE Career Competencies in engineeringcoursesProf. Ryan C Cooper, University of Connecticut Professor Ryan C. Cooper is an Assistant Professor-in-Residence at the University of Connecticut in the Mechanical Engineering Department. Professor Cooper teaches a number of core mechanical and manufacturing courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Career Readiness in the classroom: Integrating NACE Career CompetenciesAbstractThis study investigates the early outcomes of incorporating the National Association of
engineering program," American Journal of Engineering Education(Special Issue), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–X, June 2017.[4] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association forSupervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), 2005.[5]Sorby, S., Fortenberry, N., & Bertoline, G. (2021). Stuck in 1955: Engineering educationneeds a revolution. Issues in Science and Technology. Retrieved fromhttps://www.issues.org/stuck-in-1955-engineering-education-needs-revolution/[6] L. Dee Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach toDesigning College Courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2013.[7] J. McTighe and R. S. Thomas, “Backward design for forward action,” EducationalLeadership, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 52–55
Paper ID #49219Trust me, I’m an Engineer: Exploring engineering Identity and concepts ofexpert versus novice in the aerospace engineering industryMs. Tara Esfahani, University of California, Irvine Tara Esfahani is a M.S. student at the University of California, Irvine, in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and a full time engineer at an aerospace company in southern California. Her specialization is mechanics of materials and her research focuses on engineering education and industry preparedness.Dr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical
Kolb’s theory ofexperiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting [14]. Our model includes: 1) a series of hands-onworkshops led by university students for industrial personnel, 2) on-site visits related to industrialdigitalization organized for university students by the industrial partner, 3) a collaborative scenario -based project assigned to the cohort of students and trainees, and 4) real-world challenges. The modelis shown in Figure 1. For the university, the model is designed as an extracurricular activity for thethree students, complementing the current curriculum. For the enterprise, the model is structured in amixed format, with the hands-on workshops integrated into the training curriculum for MTR staff andthe collaborative project in a
for industries to attract and recruittalented graduates, offering students potential employment opportunities [6]. Acknowledgingits numerous advantages, UIC is labeled as a strategic approach to enhance innovationefficiency and encourage the practical use of technological advancements in various tertiaryeducation systems worldwide [7] [8].As extensively studied in academic literature, universities employ a comprehensive range ofstrategies to prepare students for successful engagement in industrial collaboration. Thisapproach includes curriculum design wherein universities intricately integrate industry-relevant courses and practical training into their curricula [9]. Study reveals that embeddedand extra-curricular internships, as well as
imperative forbiomedical engineering programs to equip students with AI competencies that align withevolving industry demands [3], [4].To address this need, this work aims to survey leading biotechnology companies to identify themost essential AI tools, techniques, and skills currently employed or actively being taught totheir employees, to gain insights on whether they can be integrated into the biomedicalengineering curriculum. By gathering insights directly from industry professionals, the studyseeks to bridge the gap between academic instruction and practical applications in key areassuch as machine learning, data analysis, and AI-driven automation. The survey is designed tofocus on AI tools currently used in biotechnology research while
pedagogical arrangements thatprepare graduates for work in the twenty-first century [6].Many reforms have been developed that integrate industry and academia and engage students inindustrial practice and/or representatives from corporations into the academic experience. Maleand Kind described an approach that engages members of industry into their curriculum to betterprepare students for their transition into industry [7]. Industrial scholars’ programs can bringmentors into contact with students [8]. Mann et al discussed how the program at SwinburneUniversity has moved from a problem-based learning model to practice based to enhancepreparation of graduates for industry [9]. The model for Iron Range Engineering, which was thefirst experiential
inengineering students. The SoSTeM Model emphasizes integrating key skills such ascommunication, problem-solving, and teamwork into engineering education. In our study, wefocused on enhancing these professional skills through an intervention of a one-week pre-internship training program of the intervention group focusing on communication, report writing,and problem-solving. By adopting this model, we built upon proven methods to help studentsdevelop the essential skills needed for their future careers. By evaluating the impact of thisintervention, we hope to provide valuable insights for educators, policymakers, and industryleaders, ultimately strengthening the development of professional skills and aligning engineeringeducation with the evolving
, the theoretical foundation for design thinking is rooted in a varietyof disciplines, including engineering and social sciences, which enables complex problem-solvingthrough alternative, creative, and innovative ways (Foster, 2021; Buchanan, 1992; Dam & Siang,2018; Huppatz, 2015, Razouk & Shoute, 2012). The integration of multiple viewpoints and thesynergy of collective creativity are essential components that significantly enhance theeffectiveness of Design Thinking (IDEO, 2012). Design thinking continues to evolve with thewidely accepted approach, which follows the order of empathize, define, ideate, prototype, andtest. This process is cyclic and continues until an efficient solution is achieved. Jain (2015) positedthat advocates for
Paper ID #48460Best Practices for Industry Liaisons in Engineering Design Projects: Insightsfrom Students and LiaisonsDr. Edward Latorre, University of Florida Dr. Edward Latorre is an Associate Engineer with the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida and the Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program. His current research areas are in support of his teaching in IPPD, a multidisciplinary senior and graduate level design course sequence where student teams develop solutions for industry sponsored projects. https://www.eng.ufl.edu/eed/faculty-staff/edward-latorre
MCC curriculum integrated elders’ knowledge of the particulardesign of unique artifacts. These artifacts are then integrated into mathematical problem-solvingsituations that connect that knowledge to the teaching of mathematics concepts. The authorsbelieve the power of these cases resides in the long-term collaborative work between insiders andoutsiders, resulting in an effective culturally-based curriculum. These studies demonstrate thatMCC’s math curriculum makes a difference in the math performance of AI/AN students and thedata shows that consistent instruction using math instruction with cultural contexts can alsopotentially close academic performance gaps.Acknowledge the Indigenous WorldviewOur conception of the world- our worldview- is
Conference; Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25820Salah, B., Khan, S., Ramadan, M., & Gjeldum, N. (2020). Integrating the concept of Industry 4.0 by teaching methodology in Industrial Engineering Curriculum. Processes. MDPI, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8091007Shamita, V., Yeter, I. H., & Fong, E. (2022, August). An initial investigation of funds of knowledge for first-generation and continuing-generation engineering students in Singapore. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Shepard, Sheri D. (2003). Design as cornerstone and capstone. Mechanical Engineering Magazine.Shin, Y.-S., Lee, K.-W., Ahn, J.-S., & Jung, J.-W. (2013). Development of internship & capstone
provides the REPs with masterydigital badges. The curriculum guides REPs on utilizing mentoring as a leadership developmenttool that helps navigate career advancement in their respective engineering fields. Integrated intoeach of the three courses are best-practices designed to positively influence the development of aself-directed learning mindset and building leadership capacity among REPs as future engineeringleaders.Mentors often cite the ability to increase their professional skills as personal benefits gainedthrough the mentoring process, stating that serving as mentors caused them to reflect on andsharpen their own skills, including coaching, communicating, and introspection.2 We report on ourongoing efforts to scale a novel leadership
Paper ID #48556Using industry standard tools to set up students for successDr. Bridget Ogwezi, ANSYS, Inc. For the last 5 years I have been part of the Academic Program at Ansys, supporting engineering education.Dr. Kaitlin Tyler, ANSYS, Inc. Kaitlin Tyler is currently a Senior Academic Program Engineer at Ansys. Her role focuses on supporting the usage of Ansys tools in academia, with an emphasis on materials teaching and pre-university engagement. She is also the lead for the Ansys Academic Content Development Program, which focuses on developing instructional content to support integration of Ansys tools in curriculum
San Diego, senior undergraduateswork in teams to design engineering solutions for human health. In this year-long experience,students build upon their prior curriculum and engage in real-world open-ended projects todevelop important engineering skills. This experience culminates with an annual in-person eventcalled Bioengineering Day (BE-Day), in which senior students present posters on their designwork. Students have the unique opportunity to interact one-on-one with multiple industrialprofessionals, discussing their senior design at BE-Day. Industrial representatives also providefeedback on students’ professional and design skills for formative assessment of the degree towhich the students developed these competencies. In this work, we
Progress Paper to further illustrate theimportance of communication as a professional skill.Shuman and colleagues [3] looked at professional skills as outlined in ABET Criterion 3 in 2005,and separated them into two different types, process and awareness skills. Process skills weredefined as skills that could be taught via a process and easily assessed [3]. Awareness skills areskills that students should be aware of and considered when solving a problem. The requirementsfor communication, 'an ability to communicate effectively,' [3, pp. 41] was classified as a processskill because communication can be taught systematically and integrated within an engineeringeducation curriculum. Since 2005, ABET Criterion 3 requirements have changed from
of the unique courses in the program.Many of the local employers are in the aerospace industry so the new program will be taughtfrom an aerospace context. This paper will discuss the unique partnership between industry andacademia to help establish a brand-new industry-focused engineering program.IntroductionMany have called for reforms in engineering education. Rugarcia et al. (2000) argue thatengineering education instructional methods have changed very little in decades despite researchthat recommends more effective methods [1]. Tryggvason and Apelian (2006) write, “we need toexamine the (engineering) curriculum from a new perspective and accept the possibility thatchanges that go beyond minor tweaking are needed” [2]. Duderstadt (2008
Paper ID #46808Engaging your Industrial Advisory Board to promote Industrial Connectionsfor Student EngagementDr. Kauser Jahan, Rowan University Kauser Jahan, is Professor and Head of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University. Kauser received her B.S.C.E. from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, an MSCE from the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville and a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Kauser is a leader and innovator in the area of curriculum development. This is evidenced by her high teaching scores, excellent student evaluations, teaching awards, publications on
to encourage trailblazing students to enter STEM fields. We must also activelyincrease accessibility to education and training in STEM for these individuals 10 . We designed andimplemented an assessment-driven approach for targeted technical training. Critical to our methodis supporting each student as an individual, from an asset-based growth mindset, and designingour curriculum to best support individual needs and goals 24,25 . We leverage system integration andcognitive engineering to design approaches that allow for modular, scalable content to support stu-dents with varied experiences and backgrounds. We provide the materials, research, and capacityto deliver high-quality, experiential training for CIRCUIT fellows.Based on the
has integrated non-technical professional skills (e.g.,communication, leadership, lifelong learning, teamwork) into the curriculum through directcurricular activities and, more importantly, through co-curricular and extracurricular activitieswhere students get real experiences practicing and honing their non-technical professional skills.However, according to employers, gaps persist in students’ perceived professional skills. Thepurpose of this paper is to assist in changing the conversation about students’ professional skillsby reviewing the history of how students’ professional skills are developed and making a casefor the importance of professional skills. This study utilized bibliometric and content analysistools to search for and
or in any one ofseveral elective courses the student would enroll in. Programs themselves were also responsiblefor designating a location within the curriculum whereby each item would be assessed as well.Program assessments tend to fall toward the end of a student’s academic career, and many cases,this assessment was handled in one of the capstone courses.Computer ScienceGraduates of the MSOE Computer Science program will have an ability to: 1. Analyze a complex computing problem and apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions. 2. Design, implement, and evaluate a computing-based solution to meet a given set of computing requirements in the context of the program’s discipline. 3
Paper ID #36732Board 49: Project-based learning course co-designed with regionalenterprisesLufan Wang, Florida International University I am an Assistant Teaching Professor at Florida International University.Ruoying ChuDr. Fangzhou Xia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Fangzhou Xia received the dual bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, and in electrical and computer engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, in 2015. He received the S.M. in 2017 and Ph.D. in 2020 both from the mechanical engineering department in Massachusetts Institute of
being in academic career participating in some sort of technical team project. Theactivities most commonly cited by those who took Academic career paths as influential wereResearch, Curriculum and Interactions with Professors; with 58% of those categorized as beingin Academic Career Paths citing those activities as influential. The Figure below shows theinfluential and participation responses for engineering graduates in Academic career paths. Figure 4. Influential Activities and Participation Rates for Academic Career PathsInterviewees that took Academic career paths, or went on to pursue research based graduatestudies, all mentioned the influence of undergraduate research activities. “I got an undergrad research
Paper ID #45806Exploring Undergraduates’ Experiences of a Two Day Quantum SummerSchoolNicholas Dang, Purdue Engineering EducationDr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE) Muhsin Menekse is an Associate Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focuses on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science concepts by creating innovative instructional resources and conducting interdisciplinary quasi-experimental research studies in and out of
) discuss this method, b) provide an analysis of the impacts of theprojects undertaken through its use, and c) provide case study examples of the conversionprocess from advisement to partnership within the engineering programs at select institutions.The Project Unlock Method™, coupled with the KEEN Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM)framework, provides a pathway for engineering programs to leverage the expertise and insight ofindustry in their programs and curriculum. By shifting IABs from reactionary advisory roles toactive partnership roles, the approach demonstrates how academic-industry interactions canbecome more adaptive and impactful. This paper also shares current efforts from a ProjectUnlock ™ training involving over 15 institutions that have now
, Lent and Brown[6] defined SCCT with an emphasis on how self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and personalgoals play pivotal roles in guiding an individual’s career trajectory.This framework closely parallels efforts to define and understand "engineering identity," aconcept many researchers explore. However, SCCT also emphasizes the role of contextual andexperiential factors, such as institutional support or barriers, in shaping these core variables. Byintegrating these factors, this theory is a particularly valuable comprehensive lens for identifyingfactors of professional socialization mechanisms that affect engineers’ job satisfaction and careerpersistence in engineering. My review will integrate the three components of self-efficacy,outcome
the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. After completion of her graduate studies, she worked as an environmental engineer for the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). Her research interests include bioremediation of contaminated groundwater and soils; the fate and transport of pollutants in the environment; biodegrada- tion of industrial and municipal wastewaters; physicochemical treatment of water and wastewater treat- ment; applied microbiology in environmental engineering. Dr. Kauser Jahan has been one of the corner- stones of the College of Engineering at Rowan University. She is a leader and innovator in the area of curriculum development and has become a nationally and internationally
academia, and over 12 years of industrial experience, primarily in the American automotive industry, Dr. Alsayyed has a passion for innovation in education, teaching, research, and training. Integration of academia and industry goals and activities are paramount to Dr. Alsayyed. Sensing the industry needs and preparing future engineers to meet those needs and challenges is an important dimension of Dr. Alsayyed’s ac- tivities. Dr. Alsayyed has published more than forty articles in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. He has seven granted patents. Dr. Alsayyed’s research interests are in the areas of advanced manufacturing, additive manufacturing, design optimization, quality & reliability, engineering
undergraduate experience. For example, some programs engageadvisory board members directly into their undergraduate curricular experiences. This canbenefit the development of an entrepreneurial mindset in students by sparking their curiosity andhelping them to make connections between their coursework and professional future.In 2009 Genheimer and Shelab, surveyed academic programs and their boards to explore howthey perceived the overall effectiveness of the board in several categories, includingpreparedness for ABET, fundraising, forms of student engagement, promoting researchopportunities, and advising programs on curriculum content to meet industry needs [4]. Basedon their findings, they recommended clear communication of the mission of the
Paper ID #47612Adapting to the Workforce: How Microelectronics Engineers Overcome KnowledgeGapsRebecca Semrau, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)Dr. Jennifer S Linvill, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Jennifer S. Linvill is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership & Innovation at Purdue University. Her research examines workforce development, particularly through general and technical workforce needs assessments. Her research examines organizational and leadership issues that span across an ecosystem of partners within the following areas: defense, government, industry