Paper ID #43307Career Readiness: Integrating NACE Career Competencies in engineeringcoursesProf. Ryan C Cooper, University of Connecticut Professor Ryan C. Cooper is an Assistant Professor-in-Residence at the University of Connecticut in the Mechanical Engineering Department. Professor Cooper teaches a number of core mechanical and manufacturing courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Career Readiness in the classroom: Integrating NACE Career CompetenciesAbstractThis study investigates the early outcomes of incorporating the National Association of
Paper ID #49219Trust me, I’m an Engineer: Exploring engineering Identity and concepts ofexpert versus novice in the aerospace engineering industryMs. Tara Esfahani, University of California, Irvine Tara Esfahani is a M.S. student at the University of California, Irvine, in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and a full time engineer at an aerospace company in southern California. Her specialization is mechanics of materials and her research focuses on engineering education and industry preparedness.Dr. David A. Copp, University of California, Irvine David A. Copp received the B.S. degree in mechanical
for industries to attract and recruittalented graduates, offering students potential employment opportunities [6]. Acknowledgingits numerous advantages, UIC is labeled as a strategic approach to enhance innovationefficiency and encourage the practical use of technological advancements in various tertiaryeducation systems worldwide [7] [8].As extensively studied in academic literature, universities employ a comprehensive range ofstrategies to prepare students for successful engagement in industrial collaboration. Thisapproach includes curriculum design wherein universities intricately integrate industry-relevant courses and practical training into their curricula [9]. Study reveals that embeddedand extra-curricular internships, as well as
imperative forbiomedical engineering programs to equip students with AI competencies that align withevolving industry demands [3], [4].To address this need, this work aims to survey leading biotechnology companies to identify themost essential AI tools, techniques, and skills currently employed or actively being taught totheir employees, to gain insights on whether they can be integrated into the biomedicalengineering curriculum. By gathering insights directly from industry professionals, the studyseeks to bridge the gap between academic instruction and practical applications in key areassuch as machine learning, data analysis, and AI-driven automation. The survey is designed tofocus on AI tools currently used in biotechnology research while
, the theoretical foundation for design thinking is rooted in a varietyof disciplines, including engineering and social sciences, which enables complex problem-solvingthrough alternative, creative, and innovative ways (Foster, 2021; Buchanan, 1992; Dam & Siang,2018; Huppatz, 2015, Razouk & Shoute, 2012). The integration of multiple viewpoints and thesynergy of collective creativity are essential components that significantly enhance theeffectiveness of Design Thinking (IDEO, 2012). Design thinking continues to evolve with thewidely accepted approach, which follows the order of empathize, define, ideate, prototype, andtest. This process is cyclic and continues until an efficient solution is achieved. Jain (2015) positedthat advocates for
MCC curriculum integrated elders’ knowledge of the particulardesign of unique artifacts. These artifacts are then integrated into mathematical problem-solvingsituations that connect that knowledge to the teaching of mathematics concepts. The authorsbelieve the power of these cases resides in the long-term collaborative work between insiders andoutsiders, resulting in an effective culturally-based curriculum. These studies demonstrate thatMCC’s math curriculum makes a difference in the math performance of AI/AN students and thedata shows that consistent instruction using math instruction with cultural contexts can alsopotentially close academic performance gaps.Acknowledge the Indigenous WorldviewOur conception of the world- our worldview- is
San Diego, senior undergraduateswork in teams to design engineering solutions for human health. In this year-long experience,students build upon their prior curriculum and engage in real-world open-ended projects todevelop important engineering skills. This experience culminates with an annual in-person eventcalled Bioengineering Day (BE-Day), in which senior students present posters on their designwork. Students have the unique opportunity to interact one-on-one with multiple industrialprofessionals, discussing their senior design at BE-Day. Industrial representatives also providefeedback on students’ professional and design skills for formative assessment of the degree towhich the students developed these competencies. In this work, we
to encourage trailblazing students to enter STEM fields. We must also activelyincrease accessibility to education and training in STEM for these individuals 10 . We designed andimplemented an assessment-driven approach for targeted technical training. Critical to our methodis supporting each student as an individual, from an asset-based growth mindset, and designingour curriculum to best support individual needs and goals 24,25 . We leverage system integration andcognitive engineering to design approaches that allow for modular, scalable content to support stu-dents with varied experiences and backgrounds. We provide the materials, research, and capacityto deliver high-quality, experiential training for CIRCUIT fellows.Based on the
Paper ID #36732Board 49: Project-based learning course co-designed with regionalenterprisesLufan Wang, Florida International University I am an Assistant Teaching Professor at Florida International University.Ruoying ChuDr. Fangzhou Xia, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Fangzhou Xia received the dual bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, and in electrical and computer engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, in 2015. He received the S.M. in 2017 and Ph.D. in 2020 both from the mechanical engineering department in Massachusetts Institute of
being in academic career participating in some sort of technical team project. Theactivities most commonly cited by those who took Academic career paths as influential wereResearch, Curriculum and Interactions with Professors; with 58% of those categorized as beingin Academic Career Paths citing those activities as influential. The Figure below shows theinfluential and participation responses for engineering graduates in Academic career paths. Figure 4. Influential Activities and Participation Rates for Academic Career PathsInterviewees that took Academic career paths, or went on to pursue research based graduatestudies, all mentioned the influence of undergraduate research activities. “I got an undergrad research
Paper ID #45806Exploring Undergraduates’ Experiences of a Two Day Quantum SummerSchoolNicholas Dang, Purdue Engineering EducationDr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PWL) (COE) Muhsin Menekse is an Associate Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research focuses on exploring K-16 students’ engagement and learning of engineering and science concepts by creating innovative instructional resources and conducting interdisciplinary quasi-experimental research studies in and out of
, Lent and Brown[6] defined SCCT with an emphasis on how self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and personalgoals play pivotal roles in guiding an individual’s career trajectory.This framework closely parallels efforts to define and understand "engineering identity," aconcept many researchers explore. However, SCCT also emphasizes the role of contextual andexperiential factors, such as institutional support or barriers, in shaping these core variables. Byintegrating these factors, this theory is a particularly valuable comprehensive lens for identifyingfactors of professional socialization mechanisms that affect engineers’ job satisfaction and careerpersistence in engineering. My review will integrate the three components of self-efficacy,outcome
reported directly to multiple VPs of Global Product Management and was responsible for a variety of products Profit and Loss that worth USD $550M. He worked over 20 industrial sectors from 80+ U.S. and global facilities. Achieved over $100M in savings for multiple LSS Enterprise CI programs. Dr. Fong graduated with his MSME and PhD from Virginia Tech. He obtained his BSME from U. of Texas-Arlington. He is an IISE Fellow, a Registered P.E. (Virginia), a ASQ-Certified Quality Engineer, a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt (Caterpillar), and a DFSS-Master Black Belt (GE Healthcare).Dr. Patrick Brunese, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Patrick A. Brunese is the Assistant Head of the School of Industrial Engineering at