- Conference Session
- Measuring the Impact of Community Engagement on Students
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Matthew Siniawski, Loyola Marymount University; Sandra G. Luca, Loyola Marymount University; Jeremy S. Pal, Loyola Marymount University; Jose A. Saez, Loyola Marymount University
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Community Engagement Division
StudentsAbstractFirst-year engineering students at Loyola Marymount University (LMU), a primarily liberal artsprivate undergraduate institution, can participate in service-learning projects through anengineering living-learning community. In addition, service-learning projects were recentlyoffered at LMU for first-year engineering students not participating in this living-learningcommunity. The impact of service-learning on students’ engineering design self-efficacy andengineering learning outcomes were assessed. An instrument was adapted from a combination ofpreviously validated instruments that measure engineering design self-efficacy and interventionalimpacts on technical and professional engineering learning outcomes. The instrument alsoincludes a
- Conference Session
- Community Engagement in Engineering Education Projects
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University; Guanghsu A. Chang, Western Carolina University; Paul M. Yanik, Western Carolina University; Chip W. Ferguson, Western Carolina University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Community Engagement Division
studentengagement is commonly acknowledged to significantly benefit the students as well as thestudent mentors involved in the program. Data from an initial student survey that measures theefficacy of the proposed mentorship program is included in this paper and these data arediscussed in detail. A 1-5 Likert scale is used for quantitative analysis of the data in order toevaluate the self-efficacy of the program. The group size of the mentorship cohort has beenlimited to a maximum of thirty students at this stage. Preliminary analysis of the data indicatesthat the participating students have a strongly positive opinion of the program.Keywords: Mentorship, Engineering, Project-based Learning (PBL).1. IntroductionMentoring is commonly acknowledged as a means
- Conference Session
- Community Engagement in Engineering Education Projects
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Christine Zakzewski, The University of Scranton; Mark Robert Murphy Sr., University of Scranton, Director of Sustainability; Michael Mahon Ph.D., Abington Heights School District
- Tagged Divisions
-
Community Engagement Division
serve community interests and to developcareer awareness. Lima1 describes key components of service-learning as: service for thecommon good, academic content, reciprocity, mutual learning, and reflection. Thus, effectivelearning can be accomplished through action, interaction, and reflection.Research has shown that well-designed service-learning experiences have a positive impact onlearning and developmental outcomes for students2,3,4. Astin et al (2000) provides acomprehensive study that shows participation in service positively impacts student academicperformance, self-efficacy, leadership, choice of career, and service participation aftergraduation3. Their report indicates that the positive effects of service-learning are strongly
- Conference Session
- Civic Engagement and Volunteerism in Engineering
- Collection
- 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Nathan E. Canney P.E., Seattle University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Community Engagement Division
of social responsibility. Resultsshowed that, irrespective of the weighting system, volunteerism had poor to moderate correlationwith social responsibility attitudes. Looking specifically at the eight dimensions of the PSRDM,the strongest correlations existed between volunteerism and how engineering students weightedthe costs and benefits of volunteering and how they saw their professional obligation to helpothers as engineers or through their profession; though these had only weak correlations (0.3).BackgroundEngaging in volunteer activities has been shown to be very beneficial to students, not only intheir development of personal values and self-efficacy, but also having positive effects onacademic performance measures1. When tied to