engineering major, potentially serving as an indication oftheir reported increase in academic self-efficacy. Past research supporting this idea has foundthat co-op often has a positive impact on students’ academic performance and their persistence ingraduating. 6 7 8 9 10 A common feeling for these students was “I just want to graduate and startworking!”Transition between Cooperative Education and Academic Studies Although none of the interview questions specifically aimed towards gaining informationabout an individual’s transition between co-op and school, an interesting theme emerged in thequalitative analysis. Two undergraduate subjects and one full-time engineer subject mentionedexperiencing difficulty in this transition. One explanation
. Both researchers then reviewed the data together for inter-raterreliability.Students were asked to respond, in writing, to seven, open-ended questions: background story,reason for choosing the institution and the program, impact of the program, impact of thefinancial support provided by the program, plans after graduation, and best program memory aspart of the program evaluation process. The question of interest related to the value-addedprogram activities was the students’ responses to “best program memory” (RQ1, RQ2). Promptsfor “best program memory” were: “talk about working with your mentor, interaction with othersin the program, etc.” The prompts served as stimulants to recall types of most-memorableexperiences. Woike’s21 study on the
objectives, design learner-directed experiments and assesslearning (figure 1). Topics are chosen based on participating engineers’ research and experienceTwo well established lesson plan approaches are utilized: the Learning Cycles lesson approach22and Inquiry-based instruction23. Engineers practice teaching using few technical terms, real-world analogies and multi-media to ensure understanding for audiences with limited education.Engineers learn to use assessment practices such as graphic organizers to ensure families makesignificant knowledge gains24. Engineers also design a pre/post assessment in order to measuretheir effectiveness. Weekly preparation includes a reading assignment, instruction planning andreflective practice. Engineers are
their program of study.Refining Career Plans and Finding an Area of Interest Within Mechanical/ManufacturingEngineeringWalmsley, et. al. [4] writes – universities use internships/co-ops to enable students to develop arange of skills and to help clarify and refine employment intentions and improve their careergoals.As individuals what we perceive at times is totally different than the reality of working full timein a profession. Often you hear individuals say “I would have liked to have been a researcher oran engineering designer, but I could not see myself working all my life in that setting.” A co-opjob allows students to try out the jobs they may wish to pursue in the future and to prepare for thepossibility of working in those settings
SolvingAbstractWorkplace problems are different from traditional textbook or classroom problemsbecause they are ill-structured and complex in nature. Research shows that engineersneed a wide range of knowledge and skills in order to succeed in workplace problemsolving. However, it is unclear how engineering students, who will become professionalsin the workplace after graduation, experience real world engineering problem solving.Motivated by a desire to better understand engineering problems and prepare students forengineering practice, this study aims to explore students’ experiences of workplaceproblems solving. As previous research points out that educational programs such as theCo-Op program provide opportunities for students to observe and experience
, 'Which Abet Competencies Do Engineering Graduates Find Most Important in Their Work?', Journal of Engineering Education, 101 (2012), 95-118.6 CHEVILLE and BUNTING, 'Engineering Students for the 21st Century', in Advances in Engineering Education, ASEE (2011).7 Michael J. Prince, and Richard M. Felder, 'Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases', Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2006), 123-38.8 Karl A. Smith, Sheri D. Sheppard, David W. Johnson, and Roger T. Johnson, 'Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices', Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (2005), 87-101.9 Timothy W. Simpson, Marcus Shaffe, Elisha Clark Halpin, Amy Dupain Vashaw, and Dr. Dorothy
Engineering from Old Dominion University and a Masters Degree in National Security and Strategic Studies from the U.S. Naval War College. His research interests include optimization using agent-based modeling techniques, response surface methodology utilizing generalized polynomial chaos, design process methodology, and engineering education pedagogy. He is currently serving as the Director of the Center for Innovation and Engineering.Dr. Luksa Luznik, United States Naval Academy Page 24.960.1Capt. Wesly AndersonDr. Steven J. Condly, United States Military Academy c American Society for
multidisciplinaryprogram designed to produce competent engineers across all engineering disciplines. Themission of the General Engineering program is to provide students with the highest qualitytechnical and professional engineering education, with a particular emphasis in new or evolvinginterdisciplinary areas. The primary educational goal is to provide students with a rigoroustheoretical, laboratory-centered, practice-oriented, hands-on education that will allow them toimmediately participate and to excel in the complete spectrum of professional environments,industrial or academic. Graduates will have engineering, design and problem-solving skillsrequisite to develop and market competitive products and services for human benefit. With itsemphasize on a multi
Paper ID #13961What is global preparedness? Arriving at answers in collaboration with stu-dent engineers working with underserved communities globallyDr. Bhavna Hariharan, Stanford University Bhavna Hariharan is a Social Science Research Associate at the Kozmetsky Global Collaboratory in the School of Humanities and Sciences at Stanford University. Her field of inquiry is Engineering Education Research (EER) with a focus on engineering design for and with underserved communities around the world. For the last nine years, she has worked on designing, implementing and managing environments for interdisciplinary
emphasis on structural engineering, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Envi- ronmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She serves as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt is the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research
educationemployers that would provide additional data for the student achievements of ABET outcomes a-k. Since we did not want to have a negative impact on the return rate of the current surveys, weheld a focus group with a small group of employers to find out the best way to present theseadditional assessment questions without negatively impacting the return on our surveys. Thispaper will present the feedback from this focus group, the survey developed for this assessment,and the results from the first several semesters of the survey, including the affect on return rates.BackgroundMississippi State University (MSU) is a public, land-grant, doctoral, research universityclassified as Doctoral/Research-Extensive by the Carnegie Foundation. Enrollment
curricula with industrial needs. The proposed three-year project would focus on: a) identifying curricular activities exhibiting astrong correlation with student co-op work performance; b) designing andimplementing processes allowing the systematic use of employer assessment incurriculum design; c) evaluating the impact of changes in curricular design uponstudent work performance; d) piloting and contrasting projects in both differentacademic fields and at different colleges; and e) developing a set of best practicesto be used for further refinement and dissemination of the process. Initialcollaborators include University of Cincinnati (UC) academic units as follows:the Department of Architecture (College of Design, Architecture, Art, andPlanning
%2012-01-08.pdf; last accessed 1/5/11. 3) http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/iegps/study-abroad.html; last assessed 1/5/11. 4) Parkinson, Alan. “Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best Practices.” Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, 2.2, 2007. 5) Fry, Cynthia C. “The Development of a Summer Study Abroad Program for Engineering and Computer Science Students at Baylor University.” , 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA, 2004, T3D-1 – T3D-6. 6) Katula, Richard and Threnhauser, Elizabethhttp://ocs- web2.ocs.lsu.edu/apa/summer/International%20Proposal.pdf. “Experiential Education in the Undergraduate Curriculum”. Communication Education. Volume 48
Paper ID #6919Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Workplace Problem SolvingRui Pan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rui(Celia) Pan is a Ph.D candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She hold a M.S in Statistics and B.S. in Electrical Engineering.Dr. Johannes Strobel, Purdue University, West Lafayette Johannes Strobel is Director of INSPIRE, Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning, and As- sistant Professor of engineering education and learning design and technology at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations fund his research. His research and teaching focuses on