, statistical analysis, simulation processes, optimization techniques, and risk analysis at the strategic and network management level. Among his research sponsors are the National High- way Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP), Metropolitan Transportation Commission in California (MTC), the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), the El Paso Metropolitan Planning Organiza- tion (MPO), and the City of El Paso. His academic work is documented in more than 100 publications in peer- reviewed national and international journals, conference proceedings, books, and technical reports. Dr. Chang also serves as the Chair of the ASCE Infrastructure Systems Committee, and Vice President of isMARTI in the U. S Research Coordinator
EEfaculty. One or two progress reports from one discipline to another is necessary to keep both teamson track. 8. References[1] T. D. and J. D. Will. "An innovative multidisciplinary capstone design course sequence." age 8 (2003): 1.[2] D. S. Strong "Toward effective multidisciplinary engineering education: the multidisciplinary design stream at Queen’s University." Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association, CEEA 2005.[3] ABET. 2016-2017. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Baltimore, MD. [Online] Worldwide web address: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting
, D. K. Follman, M. Sumpter, and G. M. Bodner, “Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2006.[8] A. R. Carberry, H.-S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self- Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010.[9] A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co, 1997.[10] C. Speier and Mi. Frese, “Generalized Self Efficacy As a Mediator and Moderator Between Control and Complexity at Work and Personal Initiative: A Longitudinal Field Study in East Germany,” Hum. Perform., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 171–192, Jun. 1997.[11] M. Besterfield‐Sacre, C. J. Atman
scale) in important outcomessuch as teamwork, communication, project management, and design skills.Figure 1: SEE Initiative ComponentsIn terms of the pull v s push components of the SEE Initiative, most of the concrete elementsincluded in the initiative speak primarily to the pull component. They are focused on bringingindustry representatives into the classroom or into other aspects of students’ academicexperience, either directly through guest speakers and panelists or indirectly through thedevelopment of relevant modules/problem sets that reference professional practice. The pushcomponent is more challenging to visualize because it focuses on a change in the departmentculture and relies primarily on students pursuing opportunities for
/ngv:78746.[3] K. A. J. Mohr and E. S. Mohr, “Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment,” J. Empower. Teach. Excell., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2017, doi: 10.15142/T3M05T.[4] H. Hyytinen, A. Toom, and L. Postareff, “Unraveling the complex relationship in critical thinking, approaches to learning and self-efficacy beliefs among first-year educational science students,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 67, no. August, pp. 132–142, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.004.[5] S. K. Wang, H. Y. Hsu, T. C. Reeves, and D. C. Coster, “Professional development to enhance lecturers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons
: 10.18260/p.26912. https://peer.asee.org/26912[6] Barnard, S., Hassan, T., Bagilhole, B., Dainty. A. (2012). “They’re not girly girls: An exploration of quantitative and qualitative data on engineering and gender in higher education.” European Journal of Engineering Education. 37(2): 193-204.[7] Zastavker, Y.V., Ong, M., Page, L. (2006). “Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program.” Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. San Diego, CA. Vol 4: 742- 747.[8] Chesler, N. C. and Chesler, M. A. (2002), Gender-Informed Mentoring Strategies for Women Engineering Scholars: On Establishing a Caring Community. Journal
becomes possible to motivate and educate.References[1] Litton, A., Goodridge, W., Call, B., Lopez, S., (2017) Effect of Mentoring on Undergraduate Students Self-Efficacy and Professionalism: Initial Qualitative Findings Paper presented at 2017 ASEE RMS Section Conference, Provo, Utah. http://www.et.byu.edu/%7Embc57/ ASEE2017/47%20EffectofMentoringonUndergraduateStudentsSelf%20-%20Final.pdf[2] The Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas at Austin, Agile Mind, Inc.. (n.d.). Albert Bandura. Retrieved March 20, 2018, from http://learningandtheadolescentmind.org/people_06.html[3] Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986.[4] Bandura
. For the initial cohort, the programdevelopers expected that the process would be primarily related to the number of applications.After our research results showed Cohort 1’s success was more dependent on personalconnections with a company, networking with companies was given a strong focus throughout2020. Networking was a stronger focus in the training for Cohort 2 students and they had greateropportunities to connect with companies through Bell Program sponsored career fairs. Part ofthis research will look to identify if the program changes made from the first research resulted intangible improvements for Cohort 2 co-op placement.III. Research StudyResearch QuestionThe research question focuses on the second cohort of students for the
Data s Collection Program Design Design Implementation Analysis Design Improvement Evaluation Research Design Research Literature Review Research Documentation Knowledge Question of Learning Design & Publication Creation TheoriesFigure 1. Adapted DBR Process CyclePrevious iterations were focused on how the curricular element would be developed [1] and howstudents and faculty members viewed the
Undergraduate Education in Engineering,” 2013.[11] National Academy of Engineering, Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2013.[12] “CoE Strategic Planning Committee - Educational Experience Commission,” Ann Arbor, MI, 2018. Available: https://umich.app.box.com/s/32m2u2bz9zw9gqaa4ih4yfh3oxl3b28i. [Accessed: 14-Jan-2020].[13] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2019-2020,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/. [Accessed: 14-Jan-2020].[14] J. Vernon, S. Edington, and L. Meadows, “Educating the Whole Engineer: Transforming an
, indicatingtheir level of agreement with a given statement. We include herein the findings pertaining to theremote teaching experience of instructors, followed by the remote learning experience ofstudents.A. Feedback from InstructorsAll respondents to the Survey of Instructors (N = 6) agreed to some extent (strongly orotherwise) with the following statements ‘I am receiving all the support I require for remoteteaching of my program-specific subject/s’ and ‘I am receiving all the support I require forremote teaching of my program-specific subject/s’. Respondents to the Survey of Instructors were asked to note things they liked and thingsthey did not like about remote teaching. Their responses can be summarized as follows: • They liked the greater
Awareness and Training through a Multidisciplinary OSINT Course Project Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2— 34367[2] Carpenter, A. (2018, June), A Hardware Security Curriculum and its Use for Evaluation of Student Understanding of ECE Concepts Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—29688[3] Whipple, A., & Smith, K. B., & Rowe, D. C., & Moses, S. (2015, June), Building a Vulnerability Testing Lab in an Educational Environment Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23640[4] Dvorak, R., Dillon H., Ralston, N., Welch
Oneself. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.6. Pistrui, D., Layer, J. and Dietrich, S. (2013). Mapping the Behaviors, Motives and Professional Competencies of Entrepreneurially Minded Engineers in Theory and Practice: An Empirical Investigation. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, ASEE Special Issue, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 39-54.7. Dietrich, S. (2012). A Critical Examination of the Construct Validity of the TTI Performance DNA Survey for the Purpose of Differentiating the Entrepreneurially-Minded Engineer. Doctoral Dissertation, College of Technology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI.8. Pistrui, D., Bonnstetter, R., Bonnstetter, B. and Fry, C. (2011). Creating, Educating and Assessing a New Class of
of Engineering, Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leadersin the Context of New Modes of Learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2013.[9] Harrisberger, L., & others. Experiential Learning in Engineering Education. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education, 1976.[10] Fisher, D. R., Bag, A., & Sarma, S. Developing Professional Skills in UndergraduateEngineering Students through Co Curricular Involvement. Journal of Student Affairs Researchand Practice, 54, 3, pp. 286–302, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2017.1289097[11] Simmons, D. R., Creamer, E. G., & Yu, R. Involvement in Out of Class Activities: A MixedResearch Synthesis Comparing Outcomes of Engineering to Non- engineering UndergraduateStudents
Agriculture (USDA) supported project(s) has continued to provide additional impetus andbreadth to these endeavors. Besides supporting graduate students as well as undergraduate studentsat UMES, these efforts have continued to be integrated with UMES component of the SummerExchange Program among UMCP, UMES, UMBC, Capital Technology University, and MSUinitiated in summer of 2009 with support from NASA HQ and continued through all subsequentsummers so far with MDSGC funds [11,12] ) .For the exchange program two student interns are identified from each of the five participatingcampuses in the state and supported by MDSGC funds, for 10 weeks of the summer to work onongoing experiential learning and/or research projects at one of the other four
andInterpret the Results", Interaction Design Foundation. [Online]. Available:www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/stage-2-in-the-design-thinking-process-define-the-problem-and-interpret-the-results.[10] M. Ovando, "Constructive Feedback", International Journal of Educational Management,vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 19-22, 1994.[11] A. Bandura, "Self-Efficacy", in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 4th ed., V.Ramachaudran, Ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81.[12] S. Dalton (2012). The 2-Hour Job Search (1st ed.). New York, NY: Ten Speed Press.[13] S. Iyengar and M. Lepper, "When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of agood thing?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, no. 6, pp. 995-1006, 2000.
., & Jordan, F. F. (1997). Effects of instruction on communicationapprehension and communication competence. Communication Education, 46(2), 104-114.[8] D. Grossman, “6 Steps for Effectively Connecting with Your Audience(s),” The GrossmanGroup. [Online]. Available: https://www.yourthoughtpartner.com/blog/6-steps-for-effectively-connecting-with-your-audiences. [Accessed: 02-Feb-2020].[9] R. Boyatzis, K. Rochford, and K. V. Cavanagh, “Emotional intelligence competencies inengineer’s effectiveness and engagement,” Career Development International, vol. 22, no. 1, pp.70–86, 2017.
,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2014, pp. 1–4.[17] F. Cirillo, “The Pomodoro Technique,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://francescocirillo.com/pages/pomodoro-technique. [Accessed: 03-Apr-2018].[18] D. Maher, L. Seaton, C. McMullen, T. Fitzgerald, E. Otsuji, and A. Lee, “‘Becoming and being writers’: The experiences of doctoral students in writing groups,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 263–275, 2008.[19] G. E. S. Stilling, “Learning to ‘light out after it with a club’ : The story of a faculty learning community for scholarly writing,” Coll. res. libr. news, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 390–398, Jan. 2012.[20] J. R. Chittum and L. H. Bryant, “Reviewing to Learn: Graduate Student
, mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/design-thinking-explained. Accessed 19 Mar. 2021.[4] Northwestern University Segal Design Institute. “Design Innovation.” Design Innovation, design.northwestern.edu/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2021.[5] Brown, Tim. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review, 28 Aug. 2015, hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking.[6] Bowman, Jordan. “What No One Explains about the Design Process.” UX Tools, 17 Mar. 2021, uxtools.co/blog/what-no-one-explains-about-the-design-process/. Accessed 17 Mar. 2021.[7] IDEO. “Design Thinking.” IDEO | Design Thinking, designthinking.ideo.com/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2021.[8] J. Kirtley and S. Omahony, “What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms