support studentdevelopment of professional competencies and engineering identity. Resources include a set ofrubrics for 12 professional competencies often associated with experiential learning (teamwork,ethics, global & cultural awareness, etc.). Structures include our new web-based learningresource platform, which we believe provides important professional and identity developmentsupport to students who engage with it. Furthermore, we believe that this approach can be doneat scale and provide meaningful support to the thousands of undergrads at our institution.Utilizing these supports and analyzing student outcomes will provide an exceptional opportunityto advance our understanding of the professional formation of engineering graduates
secure financial support fromthe PNC Bank to support minority-owned businesses in the Dayton area. The program’s successhas led to the donor donating an additional $100,000 to sustain the program. Generally, thestudents have enhanced their communication, leadership, and problem-solving skills. Moststudents indicated that the program helped them critically review problems and communicateeffectively in multidisciplinary teams. Additionally, the clients expressed satisfaction with thestudents’ work ethics and the quality of project deliverables. Thus, the program offers studentsan experiential learning opportunity to enhance their entrepreneurial and problem-solving skillswhile providing value for community partners through transdisciplinary
Ethical Reasoning Process (CAER) Workshops [40], students appliedanticipatory ethical reasoning using two of the eight key ethical questions, which are organizedby topics such as empathy, fairness, responsibility, character, outcomes, and others [41]. TheCAER approach differs from the way in which engineering students traditionally engage withtraditional professional ethics based on industry standards, honest reporting of data, cost benefittradeoffs, and analysis of case studies when standards or professional codes of practice wereviolated [39].From the above-described body of literature about work-based forms of experiential learning,self-efficacy, STIR, and anticipatory ethical reasoning, a new conceptual framework forSocioTechnical Learning
where the learning is a perception, opinion, or attitude of the student or others.Table 1 below shows each of the twenty SLOs and their definitions [2]:Table 1ACCE Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Slo # Student learning outcome 1. Create written communications appropriate to the construction discipline. 2. Create oral presentations appropriate to the construction discipline. 3. Create a construction project safety plan. 4. Create construction project cost estimates. 5. Create construction project schedules. 6. Analyze professional decisions based on ethical principles. 7. Analyze construction documents for planning and management of construction processes. 8. Analyze methods, materials, and
experiential activities often lead to situations known as ‘disorientingdilemmas’ [4] compelling learners to critically reflect on their preconceived notions andassumptions. This reflection results in modifications to their established meaning perspectivesand the development of new frames of reference through a transformative shift in perspectives[26].A learner’s frame of reference comprises their habits of mind, shaped by life experiences,previous education, personal interests, and social influences [27]. Cranton [28] categorized theseinto six dimensions: Philosophical (dealing with transcendental worldviews), Moral and Ethics(related to conscience and morality), Psychological (pertaining to self-concept and personalitytraits), Sociological (involving
Convergent Thinking Processes ● Innovation ● Production of Novel Ideas ● Production of Useful IdeasEmpathy ● Cognitive Empathy ● Emotional Empathy ● Empathic ResponseEntrepreneurial Mindset ● Entrepreneurial Intent ● Entrepreneurial Skills ● IntrapreneurshipEthics ● Ethical Behavior ● Ethical Reasoning ● Knowledge of EthicsGlobal & Cultural Awareness ● Cultural Competence or Awareness ● Diverse Workplace Competence or Awareness ● Global Competence or AwarenessGrit/Persistence/Resilience ● Navigating Hostile Workplace ● Overcoming Setbacks ● Perseverance for Long-Term Goals ● Pivoting when AppropriateLeadership ● Organizational Leadership
understanding of the importance of mentoring networks andwork ethic [9]. Students were provided with on-campus faculty and staff contacts, and they weregiven access to numerous networking opportunities throughout their time in the institution. Theoverall program incorporated their pre-existing social skills and strengths, and it taught themhow to succeed through the cultivation of professional support networks. How those supportnetworks changed over time and the resilience of those students that cultivated strong networksin persisting in collegiate activities has been reported elsewhere [10], [11], but the impact ofwork place relationships on those networks has not been fully reviewed. The RS program wasdesigned to prepare the students for life-long
CO-OP III Full Academic Term Full Academic Term *Summer Co-op (2020) was cancelled for the Class of 2022 studentsCo-op RequirementsPrior to registering for a co-op, students are required to complete a one-credit-hour course onengineer career training during the spring semester of their sophomore year. The learningobjectives of the course cover topics on communication, professionalism, and ethics. Studentsalso create resumes and cover letters, participate in mock interviews, and network with industryleaders from the various disciplines in civil engineering. While on co-op, students are assigned afaculty advisor who visits the student and the student’s co-op supervisor sometime during themiddle of the co-op
the academic year, allows sophomores to seniors the ability to participate in one offour different tracks: Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Industry, Research, or EngineeringProjects in Community Service (EPICS). Students spend one day a week in meetings learninggeneral topics: user-centered engineering design, engineering ethics, project management,teamwork, technical presentations, etc. Depending on the track students select, they wouldparticipate in additional technical skill sessions to assist with their specific projects. The sessionsare designed to provide instruction in various technical topics directly related to their project orinterest. Student groups meet outside of the normal meetings to work on their projects as a teamand/or with
ResearcherDuration 1 semester 1 semester 1 semester 2 semestersCredly Foundational Intermediate Intermediate AdvancedLevelSkill Tags Communication, Communication, Communication, Communication, Goal Setting, Goal Setting, Goal Setting, Goal Setting, Research, Safety, Research, Procedure Research, Literature Research, Data Ethics Documentation Review Analysis, PresentationExperience Participate in Participate in Participate in
criteria as a guide to see which outcomes students are practicing onproject teams (Bland et al., 2016; Koehn, 2006). While others investigate particular skills such asleadership and ethics that are part of ABET (Burt et al., 2011; Wolfinbarger et al., 2021).However, how project teams facilitate that development is not clear. In their literature review,Johnson and Main (2020) noted how the quality of effort, using skills in authentic environments,and peer interactions all impacted students’ development of skills and abilities in experientiallearning settings. Wolfinbarger et al. (2021) noticed how students on two engineering projectteams – with very different internal structures – measured very differently in their leadershipstages. This study
worked on in front of my peers really helped grow this skill [confidence in my presentation abilities].Performance experience was the most discussed theme throughout the students’ reflections.Being able to present their research in various ways helped them gain confidence in their work.Additionally, the students discussed how they could continue this performance experience attheir home universities or in subsequent summer research experiences.Vicarious experience. Students also participated in research activities supported by mentors.Faculty mentors and postdoctoral/graduate student mentors helped facilitate students’ entry intoresearch activities, modeling the behavior, work-ethic, and task completion. One student had thefollowing to say
(304),Electrical Engineering Tech (54), Mechanical Engineering (808), and Unspecified (4).A total of 736 students chose "teamwork/collaboration in diverse settings" as their first preferencefor the professional skill they wanted to develop through the co-op program, and 924 studentsselected it as their second preference. Figure 1 displays the distribution of professional skillsstudents choose for development during co-op experience. Notably, a small proportion of studentslisted ethical decision-making as a prioritized skill to develop, instead opting for critical thinkingand communication – followed by teamwork and innovation. The distribution of choices for thesecond prioritized skill was much flatter. Across these two choices, 39% of
Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Vols. 2016-June, 6 2016.[8] E. S. Ferguson, Engineering and the Mind's Eye, Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992.[9] D. J. Bayless, "Developing Leadership Skills in Engineering Students-Foundational Approach through Enhancement of Self-Awareness and Interpersonal Communication".[10] C. Rottmann, R. Sacks and D. Reeve, "Engineering leadership: Grounding leadership theory in engineers’ professional identities," Leadership, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 351-373, 8 2015.[11] M. Davis, "A Plea for Judgment," Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 789- 808, 12 2012.[12] J. Larmer, "PBL Works," Buck Institute for Education, 22 July 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.pblworks.org/blog/gold-standard
,motivation, cultural awareness, business acumen, ethical standards, and risk management. Inaddition to project management, teamwork, entrepreneurship, task management, and criticalthinking.Considering the vast literature and increasing demand for developing students' personal andprofessional skills, this paper presents the design and execution of an engineering enrichmentprogram at Texas A&M University at Qatar (TAMUQ).Design of Engineering Enrichment ProgramAligned with common skills and attributes, and to provide a comprehensive and holistic skillsetto undergraduate engineering students for making them ready for the industry, the Center forTeaching and Learning at Texas A&M University at Qatar initiated a program called the
achieve EA professional competencies.It is hypothesised that the module will be somewhat effective in improving engineeringcompetencies. This is because it provides exposure to industrial practice, however comparedto a real field trip or extended industry experience, it may be more difficult for students tounderstand how course learnings can assist with professional competency development.MethodologyHuman research ethicsEthics approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Advisory Panel at UNSW toenable the collection of research participants’ data. All data was collected anonymously.Desktop site tour creationThe DST used for this research explored a brewery site in Sydney. Created in conjunctionwith immersive experience creators, the tour
through multi-year assessment of program SOs [25].However, for all of the papers cited above, the assessment tools were developed for the now-outmoded ABET 2000 “a through k” SOs.More recently, Ozis et al. developed SO assessment methods based on internship experiencesthat map to the modern “1-7” Criteria 3 SOs [13]. Moreover, the authors discuss the impacts thatinternships have on the perspectives and experiences of underrepresented engineering students.The authors identify mapping to six of the seven SOs. The Criteria 3 SOs are, in brief : (1)problem solving; (2) engineering design, (3) effective communication, (4) ethical responsibilities,(5) teamwork, (6) experimentation, data interpretation and engineering judgment, and (7) theability to
. You can't use the excuse that it's a technical job to deny its interpersonal attributes, because your products will always end up being used by a person. (S7)Many students have reported a heightened sense of social responsibility as engineers. Onestudent expressed that 'the training of engineers is the training of a person' (S2). They havebecome significantly more attuned to the societal aspects of engineering and the importanceof integrating social and ethical dimensions into their work. Human-centered issues, such asecology, environmental protection, and life cycle considerations, now occupy a much moreprominent place in their consciousness.Linking theory with practice. WIL represents not only a combination of work experience