general scheme for thinking about each of the 0 – 4values was adapted from the work by Crosswait [2]. This chart (see Table 1) is provided tostudents in the syllabus for the course and discussed during class time. Evaluation Meaning Score EXCEEDED THE STANDARD You have demonstrated complete mastery of this element by completing 4 assessments with no errors. Your work is exemplary and complete. Translates to a grade of A MET THE STANDARD You have demonstrated proficiency in this element. Your work indicates an
threeunexcused absences. While these policies are not unreasonable, they tend to motivate students toparticipate in these activities. We recommend similar policies adapted to your courses toincentivize students (e.g., those who benefit from more guiding structure or who are tempted toprocrastinate) to stay engaged and not fall behind.Observations and Tips: This is a very different grading structure that many students are notfamiliar with, so it is helpful to review the grading structure and the retesting process more thanonce (e.g., after the first testing session when they may have more motivation to understand thestructure than on the first day of class when the syllabus was presented). In the end, we didn’timpose grade deductions if a student gave a
inadvertentlyadvantaged students of their own background [6]. Some schools have developed programs thatattempt to increase the feeling of belonging for historically marginalized groups, but most ofthese interactions occur outside the classroom [3]. The purpose of this study is to quantify andevaluate the efficacy of a clinical observations and needs-finding course on historicallymarginalized groups, to create a more welcoming and equal learning environment.Methods:To measure students’ perceptions before and after completing the course, a Qualtrics survey wascreated with Likert scale questions and open-response questions that directly aligned with thecourse objectives as stated in the syllabus. The survey was administered to all 75 junior-levelundergraduate
things as "Religion, Literature, Loyalty, & good Morals..." [17].2 The doctrine of discovery is a belief of the idealized conquer model brought by the Christian Europeans tothe American continent that generated a consciousness that presumes racial superiority of EuropeanChristian peoples and was and still is used to dehumanize, exploit and subjugate Indigenous Peoples anddispossess them of their lands [21].– ones that center local, instead of global, issues to transform realities and worlds ofmarginalized populations.In Canada, “Tech steward” terminology has recently gained prominence in engineeringeducation, mainly through the Tech Stewardship Practice Program (TSPP), an online course inwhich more than 2000 engineering students have
recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] American Society for Engineering Education. Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology, 2019.[2] American Society for Engineering Education. Profiles of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology, 2023.[3] USC Center for Urban Education (CUE) Syllabus Review Guide https://cue-equitytools.usc.edu/[4] Emily A. Johnson. Designing the syllabus for an online course: Focus on learners and equity.In Laura Parson and C. Casey Ozaki, editors, Teaching and Learning for Social Justice andEquity in Higher Education: Virtual Settings, pages 45–83. Springer International Publishing,Cham, 2022.[5] Harnish, R. J
focus on community building within engineering. Thenuances of my experiences inside and outside of the classroom over the course of my four yearsat this university inform my following recommendations and speak to the impact of positive andnegative teaching experiences encountered during my educational journey.Preliminary Findings and RecommendationsOur analysis of the instructors’ guide revealed that several policies have been implemented withthe intent of supporting student learning, but their impact falls short in terms of aligning withhigh-impact teaching practices and fostering inclusive learning environments. Syllabus languagewas the first item addressed in the instructors’ guide, with the following recommendationsstanding out to us: 1
lectures for health reasons or other circumstances. The students also had theopportunity to attend lectures online if they were feeling unwell or traveling. Through activelearning strategies, group discussions, and meaningful group projects, we promoted various meansof expression and engagement. The exams were part of the course, but they were not the only wayof assessing learning. As all students might not feel comfortable speaking up during the class, dueto being an introvert, being afraid to be wrong, or coming from a culture where assertiveness isnot the norm, we used online polling and online discussion boards to engage all students. Thegroup projects had oral and written components, which allowed the students to demonstrate theirverbal and
human-centered design approach, (2) the intersection of socialjustice and design thinking, and (3) the implications of design choices on historicallymarginalized groups. Course artifacts, student reflections, and instructional team reflections areused to understand the growth in mindset of the students and instructor through this course.Additionally, these resources are used to present key learnings for future implementation.This project focused on examining systems. Groups historically excluded from engineering,including people of color, disabled, LGBTQ+, and women, were recentered through the humancentered design process. Students evaluated engineering systems for exclusion and ideated on thesource of these design flaws. In doing so, they
and L. Wacquant, ‘Notes on the new planetary vulgate’, Radic. Philos., 2001.[20] C. Chen, ‘(Un)Making the international student a settler of colour: a decolonising autoethnography’, Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 743–762, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2020.1850513.[21] P. Rodrigues Affonso Alves, ‘The awareness of her position as a colonist by a student of Brazilian doctorate in Canada’, 2023.[22] C. Wong, K. Ballegooyen, L. Ignace, M. J. (Gùdia) Johnson, and H. Swanson, ‘Towards reconciliation: 10 Calls to Action to natural scientists working in Canada’, FACETS, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 769–783, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1139/facets-2020-0005.[23] M. Finn et al., ‘Troubled Worlds: A Course Syllabus about
reproduce if we do notimplement inclusive practices with a critical lens.In relation to looking at barriers to inclusion, studying the phenomenon of power in thesociological sense has also gained traction in engineering education. Moving in this direction iscritical as we seek to understand barriers to diversity, equity, and inclusion. In this paper, we usethe Oxford Dictionary definition of power: the capacity or ability to direct or influence thebehavior of others or the course of events. Power as a phenomenon has become particularlyimportant in understanding structural systems of oppression that prevent major change to happenin diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. This paper looks to explore Patricia Hill Collins’framework of domains of
, I took liberties to construct excitingopportunities that would allow me to learn and grow.To do so, I had to change advisors to find the right person to support my path, write essays tovalidate my efforts, and meet with administrators to get approval for unconventional approachesand opportunities. Most of my PhD professors approved requests to modify projects targetedtoward faculty preparation to be more entrepreneurial. For example, for the anchor course,Content Assessment and Pedagogy, instead of developing a detailed course syllabus (which wasthe assignment), I pitched an idea to my client to write new curricula that would go on to be myfirst product in a ~million-dollar portfolio for them. That's right! I got paid to do a