innovate continuously to succeed in the global marketplace. This paperdiscusses the value and importance of teaching and learning human-centered design thinking forengineering graduates. Achieving significant and continuous innovation through design requireslooking beyond current systems design practices. Engineering educators must adapt new ways ofthinking, teaching, and learning engineering design from other disciplines. This paper discussesthe modes of engineering thinking and how they differ from those of contemporary innovatorsand examines how a human-centered approach to design can replace approaches that considerhuman values and ethics as constraints to the design. The authors will discuss current efforts toinsert the teaching and learning
-playing is to introduce students to a professional environment and to enable to not onlyfocus on their technical skills but also on their professional skills. Related styles of role-playingmay have students not only role-play different potential company positions, but also be scoredusing game-style grading to advance to new positions 1, 12.Role-playing has also been utilized to let students assume the roles of expert witnesses beinginterviewed in a mock trial with the intent of having the students encounter ethical dilemmas andpractice responding as professionals 5, 6. By placing students into a situation which forces themto ‘make the call’ in their role, the instructor is more likely to engage the students as they learnengineering ethics than
more demanding.The priority of topics covered has also shifted slightly away from written and oralcommunication; although communication remains important, engineering ethics and projectplanning are now the most prevalent topics taught (Figure 7, Table 1). Additionally, conceptgeneration has replaced decision making in the top five topics addressed in the course. Thepercentage of programs that taught concept generation in 2005 is about the same as it is today,but in 2005 concept generation was not among the top 10 topics. Page 15.1217.7 Oral Communications Teamwork Project Planning
posting. The culvert allows a 100-year flow to pass, and accommodatesthe one-foot freeboard requirement. The intersection design included improved sightlines andsignage, and grading which eliminated guardrails. The wingwalls were designed to avoid therelocated water line, and riprap was extended to cover the waterline location. A localizeddrainage problem was resolved by extending a corrugated metal pipe to discharge directly intothe stream.ABETA number of ABET outcomes were measured in this class, including ‚ ethics (f): the ASCE/NSPE ethics workshop was utilized as a formal training event. Students complete assignments using NIEE ethics cases. ‚ communication skills (g): the students made a formal design presentation to the senior
can then build upon the designskills in the second semester capstone course via a real world engineering problem.Three-semester capstone experiences/courses, though uncommon in undergraduate programs,tend to be used when testing and prototyping are required. This approach is in place at the UnitedStates Military Academy (USMA) where the three-semester capstone model begins with a coursethat does not include an official senior capstone project.23 Instead, the course emphasizes the“soft” sciences, including “design process, methodology, project management, communications,economics and ethics.”23 Students are introduced to the engineering design process andmethodology, and they apply this knowledge to their junior projects before being immersed
became more aware of some issues in code of ethics for engineers6 after working onthese projects. They had better understanding of why engineers shall undertake assignments onlywhen qualified by education or experience in the specific technical fields involved and whyengineers shall continue their professional development throughout their careers.Discussion on freshmen design projectThe freshmen course was team taught by two of our department’s professors and we rotatedteaching the course every year with other two, so a total of four professors taught the lecture intwo years. We all agree that spaghetti bridge was a beneficial cornerstone project which enabledfreshmen students to learn about the design process and work together in a team. It
methods to qualitatively andinductively study how and why teams used constraints to shape their final design. Videoobservations and interview sessions were transcribed and open coded for elements representingconstraints as part of the design process. The video data of early team meetings were coded forconstraints that arose as part of the conversation in ideation/ brainstorming sessions. Weconstructed an overall typology of constraints after the initial analysis of what teams, in general,identified as constraints when thinking of final design solutions. The general design constraintssurrounding engineering design projects were categorized as Manufacturability, Health andSafety, Life Cycle, Ethical, Ergonomic, and Quality. Constraints that arose
Students in Engineering Design through Engineers Without Borders ProjectsAbstractIt is important that first year engineering students learn that the engineering design processinvolves more than mathematics and physics. To accomplish this, students choose designprojects from a variety of disciplines, developed with Engineers Without Borders (Canada) andsituated in either a developing country or a remote area of Canada. All projects required, not onlya technical solution, but also consideration of ethics, health and safety, economics, and impact onthe community. Among the design projects were a rain-water harvesting system and ceramicwater filter for villagers in Cambodia and a press for extracting oil and producing biodiesel
real-world problem satisfies all specified project requirements, such as marketing, engineering, and constraints. 4. Evaluate the effectiveness of one's own team and other teams' designs. 5. Effectively contribute one's own disciplinary knowledge on a team as well as locate and evaluate new information. 6. Contribute to effective project management (e.g., through the use of Gantt charts). 7. Effectively communicate with others in a team, fulfilling one's individual role in the project and in interfacing with customers. 8. Employ principles of effective communication. 9. Employ ethical practices in all aspects of the design process. 10. Reflect on aspects of design and the design process.Content and experiences
dynamic and growing new professional field.Educational Program ObjectivesThe robotics engineering program strives to educate men and women to Have a basic understanding of the fundamentals of Computer Science, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Systems Engineering. Apply these abstract concepts and practical skills to design and construct robots and robotic systems for diverse applications. Have the imagination to see how robotics can be used to improve society and the entrepreneurial background and spirit to make their ideas become reality. Demonstrate the ethical behavior and standards expected of responsible professionals functioning in a diverse society.Educational
design thinking and problemsolving in a virtual environment, and to integrate ethics into the project-based course. This fall-term course enrolled the first-year class of approximately 140 chemical, civil, electrical,mechanical, and general engineering students. Interdisciplinary teams worked on projects in thegeneral theme of “Engineering for Social Good.” Project topics included: designing smarter andmore resilient cities, developing therapeutic devices, designing shelter for refugees in flight, andmaking fuel from food waste. The faculty designed and led their own section’s projects whilehaving a set of common activities and deliverables with similar timelines and baseline rubrics.To build community among the students, every project team had
problems relevant to industry. Oral and written communications with participating companies, as well as teamwork, are stressed. Other topics include patents, product liability, safety, ethics, and design for manufacturing.”Class meetings, participation, and role of Course Director and Project Technical Advisor:One faculty member serves as Course Director and is in charge of all administrative aspects ofthe course, including identifying the projects to be conducted by the students. Each group issupervised by a Faculty Advisor (Project Technical Advisor) and a Client Advisor. The ProjectTechnical Advisor and the Client Advisor meet with their groups on a weekly basis.Activities during the class meetings may typically include
per week. There are no course prerequisites. The redesigned fall 2019student learning outcomes for the course were to: (1) Gain awareness of the National Academyof Engineering Grand Challenges for Engineering, (2) Demonstrate an understanding ofengineering ethics, (3) Apply the design process to a National Academy of Engineering GrandChallenge, and (4) Develop/strengthen collaborative skills and abilities as part of a design team.Enrollment in large, introductory courses often fluctuates early in the semester. One-hundred andninety-six students were enrolled at the start of the course. Six withdrew in the first week; threeremained enrolled but completed only initial assignments or none at all. Table 1 displaysenrollment demographics of the
modules shown inTable 1. These topics are offered through an internet based course open to engineering, science,and management undergraduate and graduate students.In addition to providing students with the environmentally conscious perspective, the developedmaterials aims at developing students’ economic, managerial, ethical, scientific, and engineeringskills for critically examining environmental issues in product design andmanufacturing. Emphasis is placed on engineering alternatives for reducing costs and improvingenvironmental performance13. Table 1 – Course Modules and Topics Module # Topic Discussed Module 1 Technology, the environment and industrial ecology
statement; generating andevaluating ideas and specifications; leading and managing the process; and communicating the Page 24.44.3outcomes. Students formed teams following these procedures to complete two projects over onesemester. The course objectives are as follows: 1. Turn an idea into a final design. 2. Develop a problem statement, analyze proposed solutions and evaluate the final design. 3. Find a solution that meets technical, ethical, environmental, legal, etc. requirements. 4. Build ethics into the design process. 5. Use computer aided design software Autodesk Inventor. 6. Work with the Arduino platform, an open-source
theoretical knowledge to solve pressing real-world problems. Each project includes thedevelopment and use of design methodology, formulation of design problem statements andspecifications, consideration of alternative solutions, feasibility considerations and detailedsystem descriptions. Projects include realistic constraints, such as economic factors, safety,reliability, maintenance, aesthetics, ethics, political and social impact. Students are expected topresent orally their results in a series of design reviews. The students document their solutionsusing a written report that includes an executive summary. A working prototype or simulation of Page
past few decades, there has been a push for engineering curriculum to better engagewith the global, ethical, and societal impacts of the field and to prepare students to engage in amulticultural and diverse workspace and world. In an effort to introduce diversity in design andto troubleshoot the concept of the universal user, we adapted the display compatibilityquestionnaire from Smith’s study of display-control stereotype designs, and presented the samedesign questions to 21st century first-year engineering students, non-engineering students, andnon-engineering professionals. This work explores current societal impacts such as gender, age,and occupation on the user expectation of a control’s display and user-interface design.Additionally, the
theypropose, undertake, and complete projects for a variety of clients. The tenor of the sequence focuses on theunderlying principle that engineering is a profession in which services for clients are rendered in an equitable,economical and ethical manner. This paper describes the learning objectives, evolution, current status, andassessment of the four-course sequence. This paper details the content, implementation, activities, teaching loads,assessment, and student reactions to the design sequence.Index Terms – Creativity, Teamwork, Design, Project, Professional.Introduction“. . . the proper study of mankind is the science of design . . .”, Herbert A. Simon1In the mid-90’s, the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department of Rose-Hulman Institute
commonly for each specialty. Students are advised by faculty members in theirdiscipline. In the mechanical engineering specialty, we commonly have two students per project,but when appropriate, as in this project, we will have three students. The student learningoutcomes, associated ABET outcomes, and performance criteria for the course are listed in Table1. In addition to fulfilling the departmental objectives, this course also incorporates thefollowing university core curriculum (UCC) objectives:A. Enhancement of Cognitive Abilities- composition, speech, and math,B. Enhancement of Individual Development- ethics,C. Enhancement of Cultural and Natural Awareness - environmental, economic, health and safety, sustainability aspects of projects, as
courseobjectives at Northeastern University. Capstone is effective for teaching and assessing ABET outcomes 2,3, 5, 6, and 7. Student Outcome #1 on problem formulation and complex problem solving may not bedirectly assessed, but it is a necessary skill in order to successfully complete a design. Student Outcome#4 on ethical and professional responsibilities and global/cultural factors may be difficult for students toapply consistently, and may not be captured by typical capstone assessment instruments, yet theimportance of this factor is emphasized.Previous work has discussed the challenges of assessing the ABET objectives, particularly those relatingto professional skills [9]. Although the ABET criteria, program objectives and student outcomes
alternatives) - Evaluation of the pros and cons of each alternative design are compared. An analysis of engineering ethics, hazards, and failures are considered for health and safety concerns. 5. Implementation - Develop the final solution and fabricate, test, and evaluate design. 6. Reflection and Iteration - Contemplates final design, reviews the failures, and redesigns the product accordingly.Figure 1: Graphical Representation of the Engineering Design Cycle, from Voland 2004Following the engineering design cycle, students are walked through each phase of the cycleusing real world examples. Lectures and homeworks are given for each of the cycle phasesusing different examples in world needs and engineering.This course also
Outcomes3: - An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering - An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data - An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability - An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams - An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems - An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility - An ability to communicate effectively - The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global
Environmental Engineering Design Course ExperienceCourse Motivation and ObjectiveEvery year, the instructors of the senior design course for Civil and Environmental Engineeringdevelop course materials and projects to illustrate the various professional life aspects ofpracticing engineers, including successful project proposal writing, development of statusreports, and final project delivery, analysis of ethics issues, and economics. The students areexpected to work in multi-disciplinary teams to successfully complete a civil/environmentalproject need. Defining the technology opportunity space, a compelling practical need, and aproject that capitalizes on the backgrounds of students in structures and materials, construction
scheduling of theproject.Criterion 3b: Demonstrate the ability to design and conduct experiments as well as analyze andinterpret data.This criterion is met with the data collection and analysis that was required as part of the sitesurvey as mentioned above. In addition, the team’s research and analysis of alternate bridgedesigns also demonstrates their skills for this criterion.Criterion 3c and 3e: Criterion 3c requires students to demonstrate the ability to design a system,component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability.Criterion 3e requires students to demonstrate the ability to identify, formulate, and
ofengineering staff from the sponsoring business provides increased interdependence and thus amore productive cooperative-learning experience.To illustrate the industry impact on system requirements, details of the Spider are presented. Fourmagnetic wheels hold the Spider to ferromagnetic surfaces. The Spider drags behind it a Table 1: Learning outcomes and assessment toolsCourse learning outcome Assessment toolDevelop minimum success criteria for a mechatronic system to be Preliminary reportimplementedManage team tasks by assigning leads for mechanical, electrical, Peer evaluationand coding system componentsExplore case studies in professional ethics
service-learningcourse must nevertheless be focused on career preparation of the college studentsas well. (Narayanan, 2004 e; Honnet & Poulsen, 1989). Furthermore it must be clearlyacceptable to the appropriate accreditation agencies. The Senior Design Project Class,which is a two semester-long course, with a total of four credit hours, can be viewed as aservice learning class, depending upon the project chosen by the select student group. Itcontains a substantial amount of education about ethics, ergonomics, economics,sociology and liberal education principles, in addition to rigorous engineering subjectmatter. The student groups are encouraged to appreciate the realities of the socio-economic impact of their chosen project. In many cases
safety, and professional codes of ethics, and are completed within the required time and budget limitations. 3. Demonstrate the ability to work effectively in a team with other individuals having diverse backgrounds, interests, and abilities, and will demonstrate teamwork skills including cooperative sharing of workload, individual responsibility for the overall team effort and interpersonal communication. 4. Work on projects that require knowledge of components, devices, and systems from disciplines outside traditional computer engineering. 5. Express their understanding of professional and ethical responsibility by formulating a code of ethics for conduct as a team member. 6. Develop their technical
meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern
itsoutcomes criteria [italics added]: (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.In this research, we define contextual competence as an engineer's ability to anticipate andunderstand the constraints and impacts of social, cultural, environmental, political, and
professional ethics. Since 1975, Dr. Pappas has consulted on a wide variety of topics including management skills, technical and scientific writing, public speaking, interpersonal communications, sexual harassment prevention, employee relations, creative thinking, diversity, and conflict negotiation. Page 14.331.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Cognitive Processes Instruction in an Undergraduate Engineering Design Course SequenceI. Introduction Critical to effective and innovative design are the intentional thinking practices that gointo the analysis