ofScience in Project Management Program.MIE 7440 Taguchi Methods of Designing Experiments This course was developed in 2001 and made available online with the assistanceprovided by the University of Wisconsin Learning Innovations (UWLI). It was taughtusing the Prometheus course management system once. In 2002, the course was move tothe Blackboard course management system. It was taught using the Desire-to-Learn(D2L) course management system from 2003. This DOE course provides experience in planning, conducting, and analyzingstatistically designed experiments using the Taguchi methods. The primary objective ofthe course is to educate and train students in the quantitative and qualitative methods forquality planning, measurement
. Complete the prototype Complete product design and design and construction plans to build and test Critique design and plans; input from high- End of fall semester prototype. Advisor evaluates building plans school students team member’s performance incorporated to benefit and issues semester grade
, known inindustry as a final comp sketch, to conclude this stage. Page 12.1372.5 Stage 4: ArrangeIn Stage 4, students formally arrange their ideas by positioning and placing the visual elementsof their final comp into concrete two dimensional construction plans. These plans are created bydrawing traditional orthographic drawings (top, front, side views) of their project. In addition tothese views, students draw perspective sketches of various angled views to illustrate andcommunicate their concept in three dimensions. Examples of these perspective sketches include:drawings of characters in action, called character sheets, typical eye level
improvement plan for a specific professional skill. We propose that this is anauthentic way to demonstrate achievement of the ABET professional skills outcomes.Literature SearchTraditional methods of educating engineers have come under considerable criticism in the pasttwo decades. Studies have found shortcomings in what was once the standard engineeringcurriculum. In 1994, a report released by the American Society for Engineering Education(ASEE) explained that, in addition to engineering fundamentals, an “understanding of thesocietal context of engineering” should be taught to students1. Explaining the role of engineeringas an “integral process of societal change” had been put forward previously in a paper thatencouraged educators to create an
the designprocess. Selected topics include customer requirements and specifications, conceptual design,decision making, project management, cost estimating, budgets, documentation and formalreports. Each project group is required to give three oral presentations during the semester. Thepresentation topics are project proposal, midterm review, and final design. The semesterconcludes with submission of a comprehensive design report.The spring semester includes less time in the classroom and more spent building and testing thedesigns. Students are required to develop a comprehensive test plan to prove the specificationsdeveloped in the fall semester. They then fabricate and test the design, and in most cases,proceed directly to redesign
explore knowledge gaps. 1f View problems with an open mindset and explore opportunities with passion. 4c Provide and accept constructive criticism, including self-evaluation. 4f Manage informal communications.The single-point rubric format was explicitly chosen for its abilities to clearly state performanceexpectations and solicit qualitative feedback. The rubric layout was divided into a set ofcategories that roughly follow the timeline of a typical client interaction: preparatory activities,status reporting, planned questions, and follow-up questions. Two additional categories, mindsetand professionalism, were also included to capture traits that should be present throughout theinteraction. For
the creation of the company, the feasibility analysis of the selected site for the proposed use,and the development of conceptual drawings, preliminary drawings, and final drawings, along with a costestimate and specifications for the selected alternate solution. It must be pointed out that due to thelimited amount of time, the level of construction drawings are limited to a complete set of plan drawingsof the site plan, architectural, structural and transportation but without the level of detail and quality in thedrawings. The mechanical, electrical and plumbing drawings are limited also to the site information. Thespecifications are also limited to the architectural, site and structural.1. IntroductionFor the past years, the current
forward operating base with low environmental impact.This project also evolved to include a disaster relief aspect, also a focus area of DoD as they areoften called upon to be early responders to disasters around the globe.The main SE learning goals that have been pursued in our project to help develop the SEframework for participating students are described below. These are aligned with the SECompetency Areas of DoD known as SPDRE-SE/PSE5, which means Systems Planning,Research, Development and Engineering (SPRDE) – Systems Engineering (SE) and ProgramSystems Engineer (PSE) and shown in Appendix A. This was developed for the defenseacquisition community and is one of a number of such competency models that have been
lessons are helping to shape plans for future development and assessment arediscussed.The National Landscape of High School EngineeringUntil just a few years ago, there were very few high schools that had any sort of engineeringcurriculum other than a small selection of graphics courses such as drafting and computer aideddrafting. As of late, there has been a push to get more engineering content into high schoolcurriculums. Today several state education standards address engineering to some degree, butthere is considerable variation among those state standards, and the national effort to introducesuch standards is still in its infancy. Indeed, the National Academy of Engineering is currentlyconducting a study (due out in March 2010) on K-12
control requirements.Prism tests are also conducted to familiarize the students to the possibility of debonding of themasonry from the mortar. Design using the materials at a system (building) level is then taughtin a laboratory format. In this later format, the students prepare complete constructiondocuments (structural calculations, structural plans and structural specifications) for realmasonry structures using architectural plans. Understanding of the construction process ofmasonry structures is highly emphasized in the process of preparing the construction documents.As a result of this two tier coverage of design of masonry structures, graduates from this programhave earned a reputation in California of “being ready on day one” after
science) cross-curricular scenarios are being developed. However, for the pilot study and instrumentassessment, the scenario of building a spaceport is the focus. As students progress acrosscourses, we plan to collect longitudinal data to measure improvement in student problem-framing skills across semesters or even years.MethodsThe research team developed an initial rubric for the NIC based upon four different levels:beginner, emerging, developing, and informed designer for each of the four sub-categories in theNIC (stakeholders, stakeholder needs, needs statement, and information gathering). Onedelimitation is that we believe these levels represent problem-framing skills at the interval, if notratio level so that the assigned values of 1, 2, 3
, presented a study which indicates that students learn well inteams, in project based activities, and in collaborative environments3. The hands-on projectbased activities will also strengthen students’ skills in critical thinking, communication,collaboration, and creativity/innovation. These skills have been identified by top U.S. companiesas priorities for employee development, talent management and succession planning. It is onlynatural for STEM education to incorporate hands-on practical applications at every stage of astudent’s education. This connection should be made earlier during a student’s high school yearsand be reinforced every semester during student’s college years so as to allow the student toreach a level of maturity expected by
Paper ID #27613Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomesand Student PerceptionsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analy- sis, Human-Machine Systems, and Facilities Planning. She is the Director of the Galante Engineering Business Program as well as Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. Dr. Jaeger-Helton has also been an active member of Northeastern’s Gateway
andadjusted a structured Professional Plan to assure that ME graduates truly experience keyareas of the engineering profession and demonstrate the ability to perform in a professionalmanner. The ME curriculum delivery is guided by this plan, which defines and organizeshow students acquire design tools and skills, integrate their evolving competencies inmathematical and technical analysis to the project experiences, teach and reinforce effectivecommunication in all forms, and couple the design experiences with methods to makeprofessionally ethical decisions. The four Professional Components are defined: Engineering Design (teaching and practicing design skills) Professional Communications (conveying designs and interacting with peers
Paper ID #22315The Write Background Makes a Difference: What Research and WritingSkills can Predict about Capstone Project SuccessDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems. She is Director of the Galante Engineering Busi- ness Program as well as the Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. Dr. Jaeger-Helton has also been an active member of
transitioning seamlessly into thelocal workforce. A recent study by Davis et al., suggests that there is a need to match thecapstone course objectives within an engineering curriculum to the attributes needed of topquality engineers.10 As a result, in order to make the IPT project more beneficial, the IPT facultyengaged the UAHuntsville Department of Education to establish an interdisciplinarycollaboration in order to learn how to evaluate the current programThe first task of the new collaborative research team was to determine what aspects of the IPTproject to assess. While the course assignments, reviews by external review boards, and finalreports were all part of the course, there was no evaluation plan to determine if the capstonecourse had a
are integrated with fundamental and technical knowledge of the disciplines. There aretwo PBL courses (15 credits each) in each year (one in each semester) of the new Bachelor ofEngineering degrees. Each PBL course runs for fourteen weeks and has a minimum of sixcontact hours per week. The PBL courses are integrated with the fundamental knowledgecourses, and staff from all the courses in each year get together to plan and discuss theprojects and the assessment schedules. Page 24.1016.4 Figure 1: The new re-designed engineering curriculumThe central focus of each PBL course is a project based around a theme such as
: • Early in their problem framing work, how do students in an intramural program perceive constraints, problem structure, and their roles in framing engineering problems? • How does this change as students are supported to frame and plan ways to solve engineering problems?Setting and participantsEngineering Intramurals is a co-curricular project-based learning program. The program bringstogether students from multiple departments to solve problems sourced from industry,community groups, and academic competitions. The instructor met with sponsors to ensure theyunderstand the purpose and pace of the project as a learning experience.Projects come from a variety of domains and can vary significantly in their initial goals. Forexample
create engineering designchallenges based in the life sciences. Teams of 3-5 teachers representing a variety of schoolscreated the challenges and posted videos of their plans on an online web-based platform(Edthena, ©2017). Teachers from other teams and the workshop leaders provided feedback onthe online platform about how well the proposed engineering design challenge would allowstudents to engage in engineering design practices. The teachers then revised their plans anduploaded new videos of their work for additional feedback. Both sets of videos were evaluatedand scored using the same engineering design challenge rubric that included criteria such as theopen-endedness of the problem, use of constraints and criteria, and the potential for
thematerial given a project that will engage them in the design activity.”16 The course has beendesignated a Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) course by Texas A&M University – Kingsvilledue to its restructured format including more student engagement.In this restructured course, the sensors and controls were developed by four design teams for asmall six-legged robot. The student teams assessed the problem and developed one or moresolutions. The class used an industry approach to the design. Each team was lead by a teamleader. These lead personnel, students, in turn, were responsible to the overall project manager,another student in the class. The students together chose the best design alternative under theconstraints, such as scheduling, power
___ Generating alternatives ___ Goal setting ___ Identifying constraints ___ Imagining ___ Iterating ___ Making decisions ___ Making trade-offs ___ Modeling ___ Planning ___ Prototyping ___ Seeking information ___ Sketching ___ Synthesizing ___ Testing ___ Understanding the problem
addition to designing and building functional devices as endproducts, the students developed plans of work, kept records in their lab notebooks, consideredalternative designs, wrote final reports including market analysis, and presented their work invisual aided presentations. In the process, students learned to use the design software AutodeskInventor to design the cases housing the circuit boards of the solar-powered chargers and thewands encasing LED circuits. The cases were then printed out on a three-dimensional printer.They also learned to design, construct, and test electronic circuits. Moreover, students learned toprogram a microcontroller, an Arduino board, to control the LED displays. Testing andevaluating of designs as well as teamwork
case study that it is expected aredesign of prototypes of light guide panels by design-around strategies to avoidinfringement of existing patents can be used to illustrate the integrated process.Key Words: systematic innovation, design-around, the theory of inventive problem-solving, patent infringement, light guide panelIntroduction Most of large enterprises adopt a policy distribution of independent technologicalresearch and development and innovation, they supply themselves with the innovationachievements or sell to relevant industries to make profits. The enterprises should hold thesetechnical patents firmly to maintain a market position of leading innovation. However, notonly large enterprises could plan and practice high
Planning (ERP) systems have grown from documentcontrol systems pioneered, developed and perfected by engineering organizationsover the past 100 years. The idea of having controlled and correct informationavailable at the fingertips of any employee has revolutionized the entire businessworld, and contributed to the vast productivity increases seen in the workplace inrecent decades. As a part of a comprehensive capstone engineering experience,exposure to documentation control is used to prepare graduating seniors fortypical of duties they will encounter in the modern workplace, but that are notcovered in traditional engineering curricula. This work describes a basicdocumentation control system used in a multidisciplinary program to trainstudents in
Paper ID #8526Student-Generated Metrics as a Predictor of Success in Capstone DesignDr. Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University Assistant Academic Specialist and Lab DirectorDr. Beverly Kris Jaeger, Northeastern University Beverly Kris Jaeger, PhD has been a member of Northeastern University’s Gateway Team, a selected group of full-time faculty expressly devoted to the First-year Engineering Program at Northeastern Uni- versity. Recently, she has joined the expanding Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU to continue teaching Simulation, Facilities Planning, Human-Machine Systems, and Senior Capstone
, Page 12.191.5skating robots, building sand diggers for children with disabilities and medical equipment. Themost recent project involved designing multi-functional platforms for small rural communities inGhana. These implements were run from exercise bikes to simulate a ten horse power dieselengine found in Ghanaian villages. This project was moderately successful but the distance ofGhana and the lack of resources for the student researchers making the multi-functional platforma difficult design project. Students felt that their designs would make little difference in a countryso foreign and far away from them and no plans went past the prototype stages. The lack offeedback from the Ghanaian community made measuring the success of student
an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the United States Air Force Academy and the Chief of the Electronic Systems Division. He received his BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University in 1989. He completed his MS degree in Systems Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology in 1992. In 2000, he completed his PhD in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His graduate work and research have focused on nonlinear control theory, automated path planning, and decision making. His current research is exploring the control aspects of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2004, he completed a one-year exchange
. Page 15.519.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Enhancing the Undergraduate Research Experience in a Senior Design ContextAbstractThe paper presents an instructional framework developed by the authors that engagessenior students in a 5-credit Research and Development course incorporating projectdevelopment, implementation, entrepreneurship, innovation, creativity, teamwork, andcommunication. The paper discusses the development and accomplishments of the courseover the past four years in the context of the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) - aninitiative at the University of Houston intended to encourage the development andenhancement of undergraduate research skills. The philosophy behind the course is
Paper ID #19941Work in Progress: Quantification of Learning through Learning Statementsand Text MiningMr. Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma Jackson L. Autrey is a Master of Science student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ok- lahoma from Tulsa, Oklahoma. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and currently is involved with research into design-based engineering education. After completion of his Master’s degree, Jackson plans to pursue a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering.Jennifer M. Sieber, University of Oklahoma Jennifer M. Sieber recently graduated
May 2012, has been developed from the ground up to not be anengineering discipline-specific program, but to provide students training with an emphasis onengineering design, systems thinking, and sustainability. Our vision is to produce cross-disciplinary engineer versatilists. One important place in the curriculum where this is achieved isthe six course (10-credit) design sequence which is the spine of the curriculum. Starting withthe sophomore design courses (Engineering Design I and II), the focus is on teaching studentsthe process of design including the phases of planning, concept development, system-leveldesign, detail design, as well as testing and refinement. Grounded on a novel and multi-dimensional problem-based learning (PBL