Conference Session

Professional Skills and Teaming in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd W. Polk, University of Texas, Dallas; Margaret Garnett Smallwood, University of Texas, Dallas; Jeanne Sluder; Robert Hart P.E., University of Texas, Dallas; Joe Pacheco Jr., University of Texas, Dallas

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

engineer’s success. Engineering schools strive to prepare their students in both of theseareas through rigorous education and practice. Technical abilities are taught and practicedthroughout the curriculum, and capstone is where students are given the opportunity to gainvaluable “real world” experience on an open-ended, team-based engineering project.The other component to success in engineering, particularly for new college graduates, is theability to master professional or soft skills such as communication, project management andinterpersonal skills. Companies routinely look for and prize individuals that exhibit theseprofessional skills [1-4].Teamwork is an important skill needed for success in engineering capstone courses. A recentnationwide

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Teaming in Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Colin M. Gray, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Marisa Exter, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Terri S. Krause, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

thefirst time during the first semester of their junior year. Based on analysis of this transitionalsemester, we identified strategies that students used to build an individual sense of competence,in both technical and “soft” skills. These strategies allow for a fuller conversation regarding howstudents adapt competence gained in their group experiences and identify new areas ofcompetence that must be confronted and mastered. These findings indicate the need to furtherunderstand the differences in the ways that the sequencing of group and individual work mightimpact the development of competencies in individual students, and the ways in which a project-based environment can encourage this development in a systematic and sustainable

Conference Session

The Best in DEED

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University; Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

earlier in the undergraduate experience through more exposure to open-ended problemsin their courses prior to Capstone.IntroductionEngineering capstone design courses have been extensively studied due to their unique ability to teachintegration of engineering principles as well as professional soft skills. Students are provided a chance toprepare themselves for practicing real-world engineering design prior to entering the workplace whilesimultaneously learning project management, resiliency, and teamwork skills [1]. We have observed greatengineering students become disillusioned quickly with the capstone process when they encountercustomary levels of uncertainty in their projects. We have students who have, up until the onset ofcapstone in their

Conference Session

DEED Postcard Session 1

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louise Chan, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Mark Ahrens, Normandale Community College; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 657-662, 2003.14. C. E. Hmelo-Silver, “Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?,” Educational psychology review, vol. 16, no. 3, Sept. 2004.15. S. Kumar and J. K. Hsiao, “Engineers learn ‘soft skills the hard way’: Planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes,” Leadership and Management in Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18-23, Jan. 2007.16. M. Frank et al., “Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 273-288, Oct. 2003.17. R. N. Savage et al., “Integrating project-based learning throughout the undergraduate engineering

Conference Session

The Best in DEED

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gina M Quan, University of Maryland, College Park; Chandra Anne Turpen, University of Maryland, College Park; Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park; Emilia Dewi Tanu, University of Maryland, College Park

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

paper describes the embodiment of these goals byhighlighting several key features of the seminar. We conduct quantitative and qualitative analysisof several data sources (surveys, instructor reflections, field notes, and coursework) to assess theextent to which the embodiment of our values helped us meet our goals. Finally, we describechallenges and identify areas where we were not meeting our goals and describe some of theaspects of the seminar that we plan to revise in the next iteration.IntroductionEngineering education research has increasingly focused on the learning and teaching ofdesign,​1-7​ including design thinking and associated “soft” skills such as communication andteamwork. Another trend is the growing number of schools of

Conference Session

Making, Hacking, and Extracurricular Design

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Skills The Enhancement of Soft Skills 6 4 2 The Strengthening of Problem- 8 4 4 Solving Skills Perceptions of Gain in Student Group and Peer Affinity 9 5 4 Engagement Professional and Disciplinary 10 6 4 Affiliation Community Involvement and 5 3 2 Spirit Perceptions in Gain in Self- Social Confidence 8 4 4 Efficacy Technical Confidence