Asee peer logo
Displaying results 271 - 300 of 1307 in total
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students, Faculty, and Profession
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marisa Orr, Clemson University; Zahra Hazari, Clemson University; Philip Sadler, Science Education Department, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Gerhard Sonnert, Science Education Department, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
identifying high school factors that influence thepersistence of females in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) disciplines.Funded by the National Science Foundation, PRiSE is a large-scale study that surveyed anationally-representative sample of college English students about their interests and experiencesin science and engineering. The development of the PRiSE survey was guided by three majorcomponents: i) an extensive literature review to extract factors that might influence persistencein STEM fields, ii) open-ended, free-response questionnaire responses from 259 high schoolscience teachers and 153 scientists/engineers on what factors, especially in high school, influence
Conference Session
Retention and Persistence in Engineering
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Amy E Thompson, University of New Haven; Terance Joshua Thomas, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
,computer science, and information technology as potential areas of study. This research seeks todetermine why students choose one engineering field vs. another and what influencers affect thatdecision. This research also seeks to investigate why students chose to change majors into thefield of engineering or why students switch from one engineering major to another. Research Question 4: How do important influencers on the choice of engineering major affect students’ choice to select an engineering major or switch majors within the engineering field?Understanding results could lead to the development of K-12 programs that expose students tocorrect perceptions of the wide variety of engineering majors and careers, and allow
Conference Session
Identity and Culture
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida; Mirka Koro-Ljungberg, University of Florida; David J. Therriault, University of Florida; Christine S. Lee, University of Florida; Nathan McNeill, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
education from Purdue University, an M.S. in mechan- ical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and a B.S. in engineering from Walla Walla University. Page 25.471.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012    Discourses and social worlds in engineering education: Preparing problem-solvers for engineering practiceAbstractSocial and linguistic representational systems, also known as Discourses, shape how individualsperceive their social worlds
Conference Session
Problem-based and Challenge-based Learning
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin; William F. McKenna, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
classrooms.Mr. William F. McKenna, University of Texas, Austin Bill McKenna received his master’s of mathematics from the University of North Texas about 10 years ago, and, after a brief career in acoustical test enclosures, he is working towards a doctorate in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. McKenna’s current research focuses on high school engineering students. In this work, he strives to connect student participation in authentic discourse prac- tices, student understandings of the content under study and the process of effective communication, and the products they are designing. He is also pursuing the relationships between professional engineering practices and the ecology of high school
Conference Session
Research Methods II: Meeting the Challenges of Engineering Education Research
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Reed Stevens, Northwestern University; Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
] Downey, G., A. Donovan, & T.J. Elliott (1989). “The invisible engineer: How engineering ceased to be a problem in science and technology studies.” Knowledge & Society, 8:189-216.[15] Parsons, Keith (ed.) (2003). The Science Wars: Debating Scientific Knowledge and Technology, Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY USA.
Conference Session
Student Motivation and Faculty Development
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon University; Elizabeth A. Powell, Tennessee Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #12746Not all curves are the same: Left-of-center grading and student motivationDr. Joanna Wolfe, Carnegie Mellon UniversityDr. Beth A Powell, Tennessee Technological University Page 26.1190.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Not all curves are the same: Left-of-center grading and student motivation Joanna Wolfe Elizabeth Powell Carnegie Mellon University Tennessee Tech
Conference Session
Motivation and Engagement
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan C. Hilpert, Georgia Southern University; Gwen C. Marchand, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Technology Education, 2(1), 49-52.Borrego, M., & Newswander, L. K. (2008). Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 123.Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207.Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2004). The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the university– industry research revolution: a brief history featuring an interview with Erich Bloch. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3-4), 365-375.Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and
Conference Session
Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lance C. Perez, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Presentacion Rivera-Reyes, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Presentacion Rivera-Reyes is currently a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. He formerly held a position of teaching assistant in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State University. He also held a position as Professor of Telecommunication Engineering at Technological University of Honduras teaching courses of Transmission System to senior students. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Na- tional Autonomous University of Honduras. He has experience in the telecommunication industry where he worked as a Project Manager developing solutions of high-speed transmission
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 14: Thinking about the Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba; Robert Renaud PhD, University of Manitoba
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #26081Determining the Dependencies of Engineering Competencies for EngineeringPractice: An Exploratory Case StudyDr. Jillian Seniuk Cicek, University of Manitoba Dr. Jillian Seniuk Cicek is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education at the University of Manitoba, in Canada. She teaches technical communication. Her areas of investigation include program evaluation; outcomes-based teaching and assessment; engi- neering competencies; instructor pedagogical practices and belief-systems; engineering epistemology; and student culture, diversity, perspectives, and
Conference Session
Special Session: Impacts of Service in Engineering
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Linda Barrington, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; John Duffy, University of Massachusetts Lowell
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
https://engineering.purdue.edu/EPICS/(EPICS) – begun at Purdue in 1995Illinois Institute of Technology - 1995 http://ipro.iit.edu/Interprofessional Projects (IPRO)Design for the Other 80% (D80) – Michigan http://www.mtu.edu/d80/Tech since 1996University of Michigan Ann Arbor - http://www.engin.umich.edu/societies/pts/ProCEED/Program for Civic Engagement inEngineering Design (ProCEED) c. 2000Service-Learning Integrated throughout a http://slice.uml.edu/College of Engineering (SLICE) – UMassLowell begun in 2004Humanitarian Engineering Program – http://humanitarian.mines.edu/Colorado School of MinesHumanitarian Engineering and Social http://www.engr.psu.edu/eceEntrepreneurship Program – Penn
Conference Session
K-12 Activities
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leilah Lyons, University of Michigan; Zbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
2006-2132: ENHANCING ENGINEERING OUTREACH WITH INTERACTIVEGAME ASSESSMENTLeilah Lyons, University of Michigan Leilah Lyons is a doctoral student in the Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Michigan. Her interests include use of technology in informal and pre-college education.Zbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Dr. Pasek is an Associate Professor at the Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor, Canada. He was previously with University of Michigan. His research interests include manufacturing automation and system design, informal engineering education, and decision-making processes in organizations
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students II
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Roman Taraban, Texas Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
1Civil Engineering 1 1Computer Engineering 1 0Computer Science 5 1Electrical Engineering 5 4Engineering Physics 1 2Engineering Undecided 6 1Industrial Engineering 7 3Mechanical Engineering 20 11Mechanical Technology 1 0Petroleum Engineering 26 49TOTAL 73 73Note. The Freshman/Sophomore group are those students who completed 61 or fewer credit hours, and theJunior/Senior group were students who completed more than 61 credits.Materials and ProcedureThe materials included the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Questionnaire
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jean Felix Ndashimye, Universty of Missouri-Columbia; Rajeev Darolia, University of Kentucky
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 College Engineering Attainment among Rural Students (Work-In-Progress)IntroductionAttracting more and diverse students into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) majors has been identified as one of the strategies for achieving the overall national goalof increasing the number of STEM graduates needed in the United States workforce [1].However, research shows that barriers to entry and high dropout rates for students in engineeringprograms pose a challenge to achieving this goal [2]. Although much attention has been given tothe gap in engineering degree attainment across racial and gender groups (for example, see [3],[4], [5
Conference Session
Self-efficacy and Emotion: ERM Roundtable
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ellen L Usher, University of Kentucky; Natasha Aniceto Mamaril, University of Illinois ; Caihong Li, University of Kentucky; David Ross Economy, Clemson University Department of Materials Science and Engineering; Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
engineeringstudents. Some evidence suggests that social messages affect women more than men. Womenwho pursued careers in mathematics, sciences, and technology consistently reported that themessages sent to them about capabilities in these male-dominated fields served as crucial sourcesof their self-efficacy21, a finding echoed in interviews conducted by Hutchison et al.15 withsecond-year engineering students. Other researchers have shown more generally that beingencouraged by peers and faculty makes students more likely to put forth effort and persevere intheir majors4, 11, 15.Fewer studies have focused on examining the influential role of emotional and physiologicalstates on the students’ sense of efficacy in engineering. Hutchison et al.20 found that
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students III
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Guili Zhang, University of Florida; YoungKyoung Min, University of Florida; Matthew Ohland, Clemson University; Timothy Anderson, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
, Florida A&M University,Florida State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Carolina A&T State University,North Carolina State University, University of Florida, University of North Carolina at Charlotteand Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. To protect the rights of humanparticipants, each university is assigned a letter that is only known by the researchers involved inthe study.The following nomenclature is used consistently in this study to define the student populations. • Stayers: Undergraduate students who matriculated in an engineering field as defined in Page 11.1324.4 the Classification of
Conference Session
Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED)
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chell A. Roberts, University of San Diego; Rick Olson, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego; Ming Z. Huang, University of San Diego; Leonard A. Perry, University of San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #17976Work In Progress: Developing Changemaking Engineers (Year 2)Dr. Chell A. Roberts, University of San Diego Chell A. Roberts is the founding dean of the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering at the University of San Diego. He assumed his duties in July of 2013. Before joining USD, Roberts served as the Executive Dean of the College of Technology and Innovation at Arizona State University, where he was responsible for designing innovative curricular programs.Dr. Rick Olson, University of San Diego Rick T. Olson is Associate Dean and Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of San
Conference Session
Persistence and Retention
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Van Dyken, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Patrick Gerard, Clemson University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
relatively few students transfer into engineering from other non-STEM(science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) majors3,4, we only included students thatstarted in one of our mathematics courses required for STEM majors (those discussed in StudyOne).To increase the size of our cohort, we collected the same data for graduating engineers in Spring2013. We ran Fisher’s exact tests to compare the enrollments in each course and found that therewas not a statistical difference in course enrollment percentages for the two different years,allowing us to combine them to create a larger data set (𝑛 = 814).ResultsStudy One: Retention in Engineering One Year LaterTable 1 includes retention rates in engineering for students starting in different
Conference Session
Modeling and Problem-Solving
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University; Robert A. Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
AC 2011-311: EXPLORING SENIOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ CON-CEPTIONS OF MODELINGAdam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Adam R. Carberry is a Postdoctoral Research Associate in the College of Technology and Innovation, De- partment of Engineering at Arizona State University. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred University, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research interests include conceptions of modeling in engineer- ing, engineering epistemological beliefs, and engineering service-learning.Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Ann McKenna is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering in the
Conference Session
Understanding Our Students
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ida B. Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and international expertise in early childhood policy and research methods. Her current research focuses on developmental engineering, early education antecedents of engineering thinking, developmental factors in engineering pedagogy, technological literacy and human-artifact inter- actions. She is a member of Sigma Xi Science Honor Society and in 2009 he was awarded the prestigious NSF CAREER Award.Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of
Conference Session
Medley of Undergraduate Programming and Pedagogies
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto; Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Rubaina Khan, University of Toronto
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
for pedagogical innovation and transdisciplinary engineering education.Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto PhD student in the Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education and Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto.Ms. Rubaina Khan, University of Toronto Rubaina is a Ph.D. student within the Department of Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto. She is also pursuing a collaborative spe- cialization in Engineering Education. Rubaina received her M. Sc. Degree in Computer Control and Automation from the Nanyang Technology University in Singapore in 2008. She went on to work for an MIT research
Conference Session
Student Approaches to Problem Solving: ERM Roundtable
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacob Preston Moore, Pennsylvania State University, Mont Alto; Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
research fellow at the National Energy Technology Lab in Morgantown, West Virginia. Dr. Ranalli’s current research interests include development of tools and methods for solar energy resource assessment and the role of technology in engineering pedagogy. Page 26.64.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Mastery Learning Approach to Engineering Homework Assignments1. Introduction:In many engineering courses, homework assignments are intended to be active learningexperiences, where students are asked for the first time to grapple in depth with the concepts andmethods discussed
Conference Session
Discussions on Research Methodology: ERM Roundtable
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sang Eun Woo, Purdue University; Qin Zhu, Purdue University; Kavitha D Ramane, Purdue University ; Neha Choudhary, Purdue University Programs
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Prof. Sang Eun Woo, Purdue University Sang Eun Woo is an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological Sciences at Purdue Univer- sity. She received her PhD degree in industrial and organizational psychology from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include construct validation, psychological measurement (fo- cusing on behavioral assessment), personality and individual differences, turnover
Conference Session
Innovations in Teaching and Learning
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Collura, University of New Haven; Samuel Daniels, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; W. David Harding, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
parallel track with traditional programs where it has been adopted. This is the currentsituation, for example, at Texas A&M and Rose Hulman Institute of Technology, two of themore progressive engineering schools. Thus the sophomore and junior years typically are notchanged significantly from the traditional model. Attempts to develop a multidisciplinaryperspective by using mixed teams in senior design projects is too little, too late to truly developthe broader view. By this time the students have already adopted the strong disciplinaryperspective modeled by faculty mentors.Another approach taken by a few schools has been to eliminate traditional discipline-specificprograms in favor of a broad-based general engineering program. Harvey Mudd
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students II
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joachim Walther, University of Queensland; David Radcliffe, University of Queensland
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
2006-1889: ENGINEERING EDUCATION: TARGETED LEARNING OUTCOMESOR ACCIDENTAL COMPETENCIES?Joachim Walther, University of Queensland JOACHIM WALTHER graduated from The Darmstadt University of Technology (Germany) with a Bachelor in Mechanical and Process Engineering and a “Diplom” in General Mechanical Engineering. As a PhD student he is now member of the Catalyst Research Centre for Society and Technology at the University of Queensland. His research interests lie in the areas of cognitive and social aspects of engineering design and education.David Radcliffe, University of Queensland DAVID RADCLIFFE is the Thiess Professor of Engineering Education and Professional Development in the School of
Conference Session
Student Beliefs, Motivation and Self Efficacy
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nora B. Honken, University of Louisville; Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville; Kate E. Snyder, University of Louisville
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #8649Exploring Engineering Students’ Beliefs on Effort and IntelligenceNora B. Honken, University of Louisville Nora Honken holds degrees in industrial engineering from Virginia Tech and Arizona State University. She will receive a PHD in Education Leadership, Foundations and Human Development from the Uni- versity of Louisville in May 2014. She has held positions in engineering and management for Axxess Technologies, Varian, Amoco and Corning, and has taught in industry, at community college and at the graduate and undergraduate levels. Her research interests include engineering student performance and
Conference Session
Persistence and Retention I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tiffany Tseng, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, P.E., Stanford University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
AC 2011-1968: EARLY ACADEMIC EXPERIENCES OF NON-PERSISTINGENGINEERING UNDERGRADUATESTiffany Tseng, Stanford University Tiffany Tseng is a second year mechanical engineering graduate student at Stanford University with re- search interests in design and engineering education. She received her B.S. in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009.Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a researcher at the Center for Design Research in the School of Engineering and the Stanford Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL) within the Human-Sciences Technologies Advanced Research Institute at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in
Conference Session
Broadening Participation in Engineering
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Coleen Carrigan, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo; Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington; Jim L Borgford-Parnell, University of Washington; Priti N Mody-Pan, University of Washington; Dawn Wiggin, University of Washington; Sonya Cunningham, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #12377Learning from Pell-Eligible Engineering Students’ Class StandpointDr. Coleen Carrigan, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Professor Coleen Carrigan is a feminist anthropologist and an Assistant Professor of Gender, Race, Cul- ture, Science and Technology at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. She investigates the historical and cultural dimensions of underrepresented groups’ participation in science, technology and engineering and the rea- sons why white males still dominate these fields.Prof. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate
Conference Session
Research on Engineering Design Education
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leema Kuhn Berland, University of Texas, Austin; Kirstin Collette Busch, University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
. Page 25.969.4Table 2. Unit Plan for “From Pinholes to Pixels”Lesson Set 1: Understanding and Characterizing (3-5 days)Description Lessons The students are introduced to the topic from 1. We need Engineers and the scientific viewpoint to understand how Engineers Need Us science and technology exist in parallel with 2. Describing the Need the evolution of societal needs and that 3. Characterize and Analyze engineers are the people who apply scientific the System knowledge to solve societal needs.Lesson Set 2: Creating and Selecting a Concept (3 days)Description Lessons The
Conference Session
Knowing Our Students I
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Heidi Loshbaugh, Colorado School of Mines; Tawni Hoeglund, Colorado School of Mines; Ruth Streveler, Colorado School of Mines; Kimberley Breaux
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
engineering undergraduate degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Math-intensive (STEM) institutions experience imbalance unlike most other undergraduatesin co-educational institutions. The curricular demands on those enrolled are particularly intenseand focused, leaving little opportunity for pursuits aside from studies. [1] As engineeringeducation seeks to broaden its enrollment, it becomes important to better understand the studentexperience. This paper explores the question: What is the role of life balance in satisfaction andpersistence of engineering students?Our data indicate that engineering students have a desire for more balance than their academicenvironment will allow. If engineering education wants not only to recruit but to
Conference Session
Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #30095Perceived Motivational Constructs and Engineering Students’ AcademicPerformanceSaira Anwar, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Saira Anwar is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. She is interested in exploring the effects of using technology to enhance students’ learning and motivation. Fur- ther, she is interested in designing interventions that help in understanding conceptually hard concepts in STEM courses, especially programming and software engineering courses. Before Purdue University, Saira worked as Assistant Professor in