, I will ask for help fromcolleagues, I am sure I can learn that when I need to”, replies the candidate.Clearly the second candidate would have a hard time convincing the accreditation panel, yetthe first candidate has happily admitted ignorance of critical issues which we now know to lieat the core of engineering practice.The challenge in considering engineering education changes is to provide a more appropriatebalance between social science and technical issues, an appropriate level of rigorousintellectual treatment at different levels of the course, and an appropriate balance betweendidactic and experiential learning in laboratories, role playing exercises, fieldwork, co-op(industrial placement) programs and team projects. The balance can
Curriculum, Course, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Program of theNational Science Foundation, the P360 research effort examines the curricular, pedagogical,cultural, and organizational features that support undergraduate engineering education that iswell-aligned with the goals of the National Academy of Engineering’s Engineer of 202012. (Anadditional goal of this study is to identify educational practices that facilitate the success ofwomen and minority students in engineering.)Our findings reveal how engineering faculty and administrators implicitly and explicitly defineinterdisciplinarity. After demonstrating the different, sometimes conflicting, understandings ofthe term, we comment on the conceptualization of interdisciplinarity that guided
alternatives to prevalent educationalpractices. For example, a variety of educational approaches were presented in the plenarysession of the 2011 ASEE annual conference. Examples of some of the approaches presentedincluded active learning, formative assessment as a strategy to support learning, and problem-based learning. Each description of an approach included a summary of research-based evidenceon specific educational impacts. The National Science Foundation, which funds projects forimproving STEM education through its Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Improvement(CCLI) and Transforming Undergraduate Education in STEM (TUES) programs, has sponsoredforums in which panels of practitioners and scholars were commissioned to investigate the issueof
ispresented in the following list. Items referenced with [29] are quoted from the THE ThomsonReuters Survey and those with [31] from the ARWU.1. Financial indicators a. Income from research grants and awards (may be intramural or external) [29] Page 15.1008.14 b. Total expenditures [29] c. Income from teaching [29] d. Analysis of income sources (government, private, competitive, industry) [29] e. Analysis of expenditures (staff salaries, teaching, reserch, library, real estate) [29] f. The size of the resource supporting the program i) Size of the endowment ii) Number and state of equipment of the laboratories and facilities