Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patrick Terenzini, The Pennsylvania State University; Lisa Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University; Matthew Ohland, Purdue Engineering Education; Russell Long, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

likely given that validity is not aproperty of the instrument, but is instead related to the scores, which must be interpreted incontext.6 Page 13.207.3ABET resisted rigid specification of what institutions must to in assessing their students' learningand discouraged reliance on any single measure. The consequence of the generality of ABET'sspecifications and the associated flexibility in operationalizing EC2000’s Criterion 3 learningoutcomes led to the emergence of a wide array of items, scales, and instruments for assessingstudent performance on one or more of the criteria. Few, if any, of these measures, however,appear to have been developed

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Howard Evans, National University; Shekar Viswanathan, National University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

attend professional conferencesthat will enhance their professional growth and further the mission of the university. Eachfaculty member has a budget of $2,400 per academic year for this purpose.Faculty scholarshipsA scholarship support system is set up to enhance faculty research, funded internally by theuniversity. The scholarship is awarded to the faculty member(s) who demonstrates that he/she is Page 13.907.5more deserving of the award than his competitors.Presidential awardsTo support faculty research and/or to assist faculty who are completing their terminal degrees, aspecial fund is established annually. Faculty members who wish to apply

Conference Session

Student Learning

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Prince, Bucknell University; Margot vigeant, bucknell; Katharyn Nottis, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

a turbine? Stream 1: Steam flow rate = 10 kg/s. Temp. = 200C Pressure = 2 atm Stream 2: Steam flow rate = 100 kg/s Temp = 190 C Pressure = 2 atm. Page 14.469.8 a. Stream 1 has the potential to produce more electricity b. Stream 2 has the potential to produce more electricity c. Either stream has the potential to produce the same amount of electricity d. Not enough information given Explain your reasoning.This question was somewhat easy, with 71% of students being able to answer it correctly.However, it was a poor discriminator with a discrimination index of only 0.02

Conference Session

Using Classroom Technologies

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University; Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University; Gül Okudan, Pennsylvania State University; Mieke Schuurman, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

effective in teams attributes as compared to the architecturaland civil engineering students. Table 2: Rubrics for assessment of MDL dimensionsKnowledge: Pts.Level Awarded Description Student does not have an understanding of the characteristic, e.g., does not A 0 mention any of the attributes related to the characteristic. Provides a good understanding of the characteristic or provides A 1 evidence/artifact(s) that suggest a good understanding of the characteristic. Provides evidence/artifact(s) and a good understanding of the characteristic A 2 but does not connect the two together

Conference Session

Measurement Tools

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elliot Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

.”using prior knowledge: Some students expressed that they did not look solely at the informationin the problem, but also looked to prior knowledge that might help them. Jose felt that your levelof prior knowledge affected how you might answer a question. “I know, because I have seen theword maybe a thousand times by now…But if we bring [in] someone that [does] not…know[s]anything about the problem, this would not be enough information.” For Alice, the ability to useknowledge is a key component of critical thinking: “I had to really like, reach in and kind of pullout something that maybe wasn’t right on the paper. And when you have to like go through yourfiling cabinet of stuff, then that would be a lot more critical.” Mike saw critical thinking

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veronica Burrows, Arizona State University; Michael Oehrtman, Arizona State University; Anton Lawson, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Professor in the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University. He received his Ph.D. in 1973 from the University of Oklahoma. Dr. Lawson' s research centers on the nature and development of scientific reasoning patterns such as hypothetico-deductive, probabilistic, proportional, combinatorial, analogical and correlational reasoning. Major interests involve determination of factors that influence the development of these reasoning patterns during childhood and adolescence and determination of their relationship to each other and to scientific concept acquisition. Page 11.470.1© American Society

Conference Session

Experiences of Underrepresented Students in Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Manuel A. Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

National Science Foundation under Award No. 1833869.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, G., “Social cognitive career theory”, Career choice and development, vol. 4, pp. 255-311, Oct 2002.[2] D. K. Gosser, M. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, and P. Varma-Nelson Peer-led team learning: A guidebook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.[3] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, Active learning: cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1991.[4] J. Y. Chan and C. F. Bauer

Conference Session

Problem Solving, Adaptive Expertise, and Social Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning:Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47(1), 1-32.Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, student motivation, student needsatisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: Testing a sequential path model.Educational Psychology, 28(6), 711-724.Flynn, D. (2014). Baccalaureate attainment of college students at 4-year institutions as a functionof student engagement behaviors: Social and academic student engagement behaviors matter.Research in higher education, 55(5), 467-493.Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of theconcept, state of the evidence. Review of educational

Conference Session

Assessment I: Developing Assessment Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; P.K. Imbrie, Texas A&M University; Teri Kristine Reed, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 3. Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N., Stevens, R., Streveler, R. A., Smith, K. A., Miller, R. L., Leifer, L. J., Yasuhara, K., & Lund, D. (2010). Enabling Engineering Student Success: The Final Report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers 4. Bowman, B. A., & Farr, J. V. (2000). Embedding leadership in civil engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126(1), 16-20. 5. Cox, M. F., Cekic, O., & Adams, S. G

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David B. Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Craig Zywicki, Purdue University; David A. Evenhouse, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

characteristics likely to predict their success in Dynamics? 2. Is this DFW rate improvement most closely related to the gradual improvement in the Freeform environment or instructor characteristics as (s)he implements the course environment?The authors hypothesize that the likelihood of DFW would drop in each year following theinception of Freeform as the new environment is institutionalized as the standard for ME 274and as instructors add and enhance the ABC components of Freeform (RQ2). Moreover, as anygiven instructor becomes comfortable with the environment and more confident and strategicabout their implementation of the course, the likelihood of student success would also increase.However, over the same time period for Dynamics at

Conference Session

Approaches to Assessment and Student Reflection

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ephraim Zegeye, Liberty University; Tom Eldredge, Liberty University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Jennison, "Saving the law professor: using rubrics in the teaching of legal writing to assist in grading writing assignments by section and provide more effective assessment in less time," UMKC Law Review, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 20, 2011.[5] L. Silvestri and J. Oescher, "Using Rubrics to Increase the Reliability of Assessment in Health Classes," International Electronic Journal of Health Education, vol. 9, pp. p25- 30, 2006.[6] D. R. Sadler, "Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 159-179, 2009/04/01 2009.[7] G. L. Taggart, S. J. Phifer, J. A. Nixon, and M. Wood, Rubrics: A Handbook for Construction

Conference Session

Preparing for Practice

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; James Edwin Cawthorne Jr., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

/market relatedquestions. Page 23.857.6Principles Course Content The 'enduring understandings' that a student should take away from Principles areestablished based upon prior entrepreneurship research that identified critical entrepreneurialskills and are assumed to be the following: 15 • Opportunity Recognition18 ( Mitchelmore, S. & Rowley) • Presentation Skills 9 (Hood and Young) • Entrepreneurial Competencies 18 (Mitchelmore, S. & Rowley) Mitchelmore, S. & Rowley cite the ability to recognize and evaluate a new ventureopportunity as a dominant entrepreneurial thinking skill as do many other researchers 18-20

Conference Session

Knowing our Students, Faculty, and Profession

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Pereira, Michigan Technological University; Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University; William Helton, Michigan Technological University; Leonard Bohmann, Michigan Technological University; Chris VanArsdale, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Page 15.149.6The F value is calculated as: sbt 2 Fcalc ? swt 2where 2 π f s f 2 − π m sm 2 swt ? π f − πm 2 2 sbt ? ∗ nf yf / y + − n ∗y m m

Conference Session

Student Beliefs, Motivation and Self Efficacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony Bourne, Wright State University; Nathan W. Klingbeil, Wright State University; Frank W. Ciarallo, Wright State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

) Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-288.(6) Le, H., Casillas, A., Robbins, S. B., , & Langley, R. (2005). Motivational and Skills, Social, and Self- Management Predictors of College Outcomes: Constructing the Student Readiness Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(3), 482-508.(7) Peterson, C. H., Casillas, A., & Robbins, S. B. (2006). The Student Readiness Inventory and the Big Five: Examining social desirability and college academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 663-673.(8) Robbins, S. B., Allen, J., Casillas

Conference Session

Understanding Students and Faculty

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shane A. Brown, Washington State University; Nadia Frye, Washington State University; Devlin B. Montfort, Washington State University; Paul M. Smith, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

coded for the interviewee’s perceptions through the lenses of the DI and CBAMframeworks.ResultsAlthough all five characteristics were included in the interview methodology, only RelativeAdvantage and Compatibility were consistently important in the participants’ responses to IDeX.Relative advantage was often implied by faculty members’ desire to develop research projectsfrom the designs and ideas developed in IDeX and is illustrated by I3’s response to the questionregarding their reasons for participating in IDeX, “And I also am really interested in, just as aresearch topic, in sustainability, sustainable design, and we really [want] to focus on that…”Compatibility was often implied in the tie between interviewees’ perceptions of the goals

Conference Session

Student Learning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ricky Castles, Virginia Tech; Vinod Lohani, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

]: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1967.[4] D. P. Ausubel and F. G. Robinson, School learning; an introduction to educational psychology. New York,: Holt, 1969.[5] J. Bruner, "Learning and thinking," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 29, pp. 184-192, 1959.[6] B. E. Cline, C. C. Brewster, and R. D. Fell, "A rule-based system for automatically evaluating student concept maps," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, pp. 2282-2291, March 15, 2010 2009.[7] S. H. Harrison, J. L. Wallace, D. Ebert-May, and D. B. Luckie, "C-Tools Automated Grading For Online Concept Maps Works Well With A Little Help From "Wordnet"," in First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain, 2004.[8] D

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning 2

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Jane Grigg, Clemson University; Jennifer Van Dyken, Clemson University; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Beshoy Morkos

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, pinpointing underutilization of key tasks that have been linked tosuccessful problem solutions as well as identifying errors committed in each segment of theprocess. The complete assessment consisted of eight stages and a measure of solution accuracy.Next, the assessment tool was modified into a form that could be used to assess problemsolutions in the absence of a complete recording of the problem solving process. This ensures atool that is more generalizable to the target user group of instructors and education researcherswho would not necessarily have access to a complete digital recording of student problemsolving attempts. To accomplish this, the first two of Pretz et al.’s stages were combined forsimplicity, and two stages were eliminated due

Conference Session

Engineering Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Matthew Aldeman, Illinois State University; Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, the Kruskal-Wallis test does not identify whichsample(s) are not taken from the same population of data. However, inspection of Tables 2-5 andthe underlying data shows that the courses that were taught in a face-to-face format in Fall 2020received lower evaluation scores in Fall 2019. This is also consistent with the Wilcoxon SignedRank Test results, which showed that the face-to-face courses were the only courses where someof the scores showed statistically significant improvement from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020. Incontrast, some of the scores for courses taught in other modes of instruction in Fall 2020 showedstatistically significant decreases between Fall 2019 and Fall 2020. It is logical, therefore, thatthe Fall 2019

Conference Session

Assessing Hard-to-Measure Constructs in Engineering Education: Assessment Design and Validation Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Hillary E. Merzdorf, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Blake Williford, Sketch Recognition Lab; Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, “Drawing on experience: Connecting art and language/bridging the theme,” Primary Voices K-6, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2, 2001. [3] R. M. Yasin, L. Halim, and A. Ishar, “Effects of problem-solving strategies in the teaching and learning of engineering drawing subject,” Asian Social Science, vol. 8, no. 16, p. 65, 2012. [4] S. A. Sorby, “Educational research in developing 3-d spatial skills for engineering students,” International Jour- nal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459–480, 2009. [5] J. M. Lakin and J. Wai, “Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioural issues than other talented students,” British Journal of Educa- tional Psychology

Conference Session

Assessing Hard-to-Measure Constructs in Engineering Education: Assessment Design and Validation Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeremiah Pina, Smith College; Glenn W. Ellis, Smith College; Al Rudnitsky, Smith College; Rebecca Mazur, Collaborative for Educational Services; Beth McGinnis-Cavanaugh, Springfield Technical Community College; Isabel Huff, Springfield Technical Community College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Faculty and Student Perspective on Instructional Strategies

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Philip P. Graybill, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, 1964. [3] J. Harp and P. Taietz, “Academic Integrity and Social Structure: A Study of Cheating among College Students,” Oxford Univ. Press. Soc. Study Soc. Probl., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 365–373, 1966. [4] D. L. McCabe, “Classroom Cheating Among Natural Science and Engineering Majors,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 433–445, 1997. [5] D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding, C. J. Finelli, S. M. Montgomery, and H. J. Passow, “Engineering Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Towards Cheating,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 181–194, Jul. 2006. [6] H. J. Passow, M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli, T. S. Harding, and D. D. Carpenter, “Factors

Conference Session

Student Perceptions of Self-efficacy, Success, and Identity

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Isabel Hilliger P.E., Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Constanza Melian, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Javiera Meza, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Gonzalo Cortés, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Jorge A. Baier, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

pedagogical underpinnings of Active Learning in Engineering Education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5– 16, 2017.[3] E. J. H. Spelt, P. A. Luning, M. A. J. S. van Boekel, and M. Mulder, “A multidimensional approach to examine student interdisciplinary learning in science and engineering in higher education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 761– 774, 2017.[4] D. Gerrard and C. Variawa, “Bridges and barriers: A multi-year study of workload- related learning experiences from diverse student and instructor perspectives in first- year engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[5] T. Geyer and W. R. Loendorf, “Handling increased faculty and student workload

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Trowbridge, Arizona State University; Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Arizona State University; Diana Karen Chen, Arizona State University; Jorge Luis Roldan

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

component areas: research,interdisciplinary curricula, entrepreneurship, global experience, and application of engineering tomeet social needs. Each student chooses her own unique set of experiences, to achieve thedistinction of Grand Challenge Scholar, endorsed by both the university and the NAE. Amajority of the experiences must also be aligned with the Grand Challenge(s) they have chosento dedicate their efforts toward solving. At ASU, students choose one of five grand challengetheme areas (Education, Energy, Health, Security, Sustainability) or one of the 14 NAE GrandChallenges [2]. Students are admitted to the GCSP as freshmen, and most start work on theprogram requirements in their first semester. Prior to starting their first semester

Conference Session

Changing the Engineering Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dong San Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Michael C. Loui, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi- year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.[3] Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., Bailey, T., & Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal administration of the persistence in engineering survey. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 371–395.[4] Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.[5] Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist

Conference Session

Retention

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Laggini Fiore, Temple University; Shawn Patrick Fagan, Temple University; David Brookstein, Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Circuit Design and thatboth engineering instructors reported applying the principles to other courses that they teach(outside of SOAR’s purview). We are also optimistic that these two courses are moving in theright direction as both instructors are methodically refining their redesign strategies, which theywill continue to implement this semester and in future semesters. Our goal is to continue ourefforts in both courses and hope to find the right formula for improving them – especially theDFW rate in Engineering Statics – as we move ahead with the project. We look forward toreporting our complete results at the conference in June as well the direction of futureengineering course redesign efforts at Temple University.ReferencesAmbrose, S. A

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Classroom Practice

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dringenberg, Kansas State University; Ruth E. H. Wertz, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

ambiguityand understanding of multiple perspectives. This tool may also be used to track thechanges in student perceptions related to design over time or to measure the impact ofintroductory, on-going, or senior-level design experiences throughout engineeringcurricula at a variety of institution types. LIST OF REFERENCES1 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K. & Colby, A. Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. Vol. 3 (Jossey-Bass Inc Pub, 2008).2 Crismond, D. P. & Adams, R. S. The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education 101, 738-797 (2012).3 ABET. (2011).4 Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D. & Leifer, L. J

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 21: Student Grades and Feedback

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hassan Ali Al Yagoub, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

References[1] Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) and Policy and Global Affairs (PGA). (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Engergizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington DC.[2] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press.[3] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1115/ESDA2008-59324 10[4] Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Occupational outlook handbook.[5] York, T. T., Gibson, C., & Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 11: Leadership and Collaborations in Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Maria Lilley, University of Illinois, Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

in others to continue their efforts, when obstacles or oppositions are encountered, until the goal is achieved.• Inspiring Others: This leader induces positive emotions within a group/person to achieve a goal or become stronger/better individuals. The distinction between a motivator and an inspirer is that inspiration serves to create a positive feeling, but does not necessarily cause the person(s) to apply themselves to achieve the goal/improvement.• Serving Others: The person serves a community or the needs of society. They are not leading for personal gain, but to help those in need or improve societal conditions. They solve problems in society through their technological or scientific advancements. They use the

Conference Session

Changing the Engineering Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reid Bailey, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

], theChair of Scrap (see Appendix) asks the students to design a way to accommodate more studentsin the instructor’s office with only recyclable materials. Assigned on the first day of class anddue in just one week, students work feverishly to design and build some sort of chair or stool.Upon showing their designs proudly to the instructor, they are surprised to hear that they have allmade a crucial mistake. It is rare for any of the students to visit the instructor’s office or ask theinstructor or any students questions about what s/he wants in seating (i.e., they do not talk tousers or the client). While there are certainly barriers to a first-year student going to aninstructor’s office (e.g., it can be intimidating, they not be familiar with

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Faculty Perspectives and Training

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ryan R. Senkpeil, Purdue Engineering Education; Elizabeth K. Briody Ph.D., Cultural Keys LLC; Edward F. Morrison, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

their instructors accordingly.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. EEC-1519412 and the Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (RED)program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] T. A. Litzinger, S. H. Lee, J. C. Wise, and R. M. Felder, “A Psychometric Study of the Index of Learning Styles,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2007.[2] S. D. Gosling, P. J. Rentfrow, and W. B. Swann, “A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 504–528, Dec. 2003