focused on developing students’ competence forteamwork and communication, along with other social competencies needed in the workplace.Faculty described their efforts to design courses affording students a variety of experiences andthe opportunities to reflect on these experiences. Students reported that guest speakers andcompany-based projects afforded them opportunities to develop their professional networks. Animportant resource for experiential learning comes from others via development networks, whichexplain the learning and development acquired from ‘constellations’ of developmentally orientedrelationships experienced in various social contexts [27]. Rich developmental networks inlearning ecologies enrich students’ experiences and
-solve space (P3) and the other three spaces. Where P3 can be thoughtof as the applied, actionable problem-solving space in which students perform computations andcarry out plans, the other three spaces encompass more complex processes like planning,reflection, and conceptual problem solving. Thus, it is within these three spaces that the majorityof metacognitive processes take place. We know from previous work that without scaffolds,collaborative problem-solving interactions are dominated by attempting to solve the problem(P3) [8], meaning that most of the problem solving during the task is computational. However,when provided with explicit scaffolds that supported the implementation of other problem-solving spaces, groups tended to score
the semester when there is more time and TAs are still stressing theimportance of collaboration. However, there were discussions that this is a more expert skill,because TAs who are new may not have the time or capacity to keep track of who is doing welland also reflect on it at the end of class.Figure 4: Guidelines of what to say and how to interact during whole class interventions.Figure 5: Guidelines of how to structure the end of class wrap up to emphasize collaboration. During both workshops there were many discussions about how these guidelines shouldbe shared with other TAs. Both TAs are graduating and will no longer be teaching these courses.A final decision was made to provide new TAs with a cheat sheet of guidelines for
, can reflect their self-efficacy and may correlate to performance/competence with respect to their engineering identity.Attribution theory describes student perception of the cause of an outcome [4]. Attributions inacademia may include effort, knowledge, or ability and are strongly connected to emotions [4].Emotions generally influence daily choices. The way an individual reacts to the outcome of thesechoices may influence future behaviors. However, it is the student’s perception of attributionswhich emotionally influence motivation. Two students may attribute an outcome to the samecause, but view the characteristics of the cause very differently. We are particularly interested inhow these attributions may vary with strength of engineering
, formal instruction on teamwork may be limited.As part of a curriculum improvement process within the Mechanical Engineering department atRose-Hulman Institute of Technology, we are working to coordinate “threads” that cut acrosscourses in the curriculum, e.g., student teaming, technical communication, business acumen,ethics, and ill-structured problems. Each active thread is championed by a small facultycommittee, charged with prompting and analyzing department reflections, moderating anddocumenting departmental discussions of results, and collecting and sharing evidence-basedpractices relevant to the thread. Each thread is following coordinated change processes acrossdimensions presented by Borrego and Henderson [2] in order to have a greater
. Then for each factor participants will be asked how theyhave been influenced by their experiences in the ECE department. At this point, participants mayspeak on recent diversity and inclusion initiatives in the department, including the tip sheet anddiversity and inclusion design sessions put on by our larger NSF-funded study. Finally,participants will be asked how each factor could be improved for themselves or other ECEfaculty.It is possible that reflection during the interview itself will have some effect on participants’intention toward inclusive teaching. To observe this effect, participants will be asked to completean open-ended electronic survey question once before and once after the interview. Before theinterview, we will ask directly
. call uncertainty. More generally,ambiguity by the students over the desired outcome reflects the ill-structuredness of theproblems.However, students also perceived a number of contextual factors as contributing to ambiguity. Ageneral lack of knowledge on their part was seen as creating ambiguity as to how to solve theproblem. From this perspective, ambiguity would decrease with experience, as noted by Dave. Ifgeneral knowledge is an aspect of ambiguity, then the differences between novices and expertsnoted in the literature could be taken as indications of more or less ambiguity in the problem-solving process. Another contextual factor was group problem-solving. The dynamics of groupinteractions can lead to ambiguity, when group members are
here and you just like push it until it forms to the shape of whatever you're molding. Um so the like thicker ones would slip out of the seal. So they weren't like sealing fully, they weren't making this like cone shape. Um and then the fitter- thinner ones were ripping before it got there. Um, so the polypropylene was actually the only one that created the shape that I was looking for.”Category 2. Practical knowledge. Below we describe three aspects of the ways students gainedpractical knowledge about equipment and experimentation.Engineering experimentation. Coming into the project, the students were unfamiliar withdesigning their own experiments. For example, in his interview Noah reflected on the challengeof
]). TABLE I. LITERATURE DEFINITIONS OF MENTORING Definition Source “a collaborative process in which mentees and mentors take part in reciprocal and dynamic activities [7, p. 35] such as planning, acting, reflecting, questioning, and problem-solving” “a form of teaching where faculty members provide advice, guidance, and counsel in the areas of academic, career, and personal (psycho-social) development, which can occur either individually or [11, p. 48] in small groups” “a dyadic, hierarchical
. Responses that reflected the second most frequent codes, “Broader Scope,” and“Solution-Focused” focused on the diversity/inclusivity issue implied in the scenario and eitherapplied the proposed solution to other, similar issues (broader scope) or tried to find acompromise between the parties involved (solution focused). Subject 719: Broader Scope “...[H]aving our school, our university associating with that person could make other people feel, think that the school associates with those views.” Subject 539: Solution-Focused “...I would offer to talk to the professor about my feelings towards the speaker coming, and then I would also offer if the speaker's not speaking for the entire class, to excuse myself, to say
the exam, this may not be the case (as evidenced by their exam scores). • Several students moved from a constructivist to constructionist approach to study guide preparation after working in the focus groups. • Student strategies for completion of the study guide vary widely, but overall reflect a lack of confidence.We will touch on these points, and more, in what follows.UsageFor many of the students, learning is equated with memorizing or being able to locate necessaryinformation for the exam. They repeatedly expressed a lack of confidence in their examperformance. They guessed at how they performed on the exams and did so ratherconservatively. No one left the exam confident as further evidenced by superstitious
life How well are you meeting the workload demands of your coursework? 12. Academic Disengagement (Liberal Arts Courses) .88 .58 Skipped non-engineering related class Turned in non-engineering related assignments late Came late to non-engineering related class Turned in non-engineering related assignments that did not reflect your best work 13. Academic Disengagement (Engineering Related) .86 .70 Skipped engineering related class Turned in engineering related assignments late Turned in engineering related assignments that did not reflect your best work Came late to engineering related class 14. Frequency of
assumecertain conceptualizations of critical thinking and apply those definitions to interpret studentbehavior. There are very few empirical studies that examine the practice of critical thinking inorder to understand the actual strategies used by students when they participate in what educatorswould consider to be critical thinking tasks. One exception is the Reflective Judgment Model ofKing and Kitchener.10 This model is based on qualitative studies, although it is now measuredusing a quantitative instrument, and has not been used for engineering students. Other examplesexist for specific engineering tasks that require higher order thinking, such as examining theprocesses students use when confronted with a design task.11-13 The purpose of this study
-answer technique witheach interviewee. During this part of the interview the practitioner was asked “What arecommon errors you have seen?” Follow-on questions often included probing such as “How doyou check for those errors?” This technique resulted in the identification of 20 tools. Question-and-answer required less time than the critical incident technique; however, that was due to thelow number of tools identified. In general, the practitioners appeared to struggle to identify thedesired information during this part of the interview. Again, this may reflect the subconsciousnature of the thought processes involved. In order to recognize the thought process, theinterviewee might need to experience a situation where the process is used or have a
modify them, 3) affective qualities such as curiosity, intimacy, and frustration,and 4) metacognitive skills such as monitoring for quality and effectiveness of thought processes.While problem solving does not capture all forms of mathematical activity, frameworks tocharacterize other categories involve similar processes. For example, Harel’s DNR proofframework6,7 consists of three principles: Duality, Necessity, and Repeated reasoning. Theduality principle links students’ ways of understanding (involving one’s interpretations,solutions, and evidence) to their ways of thinking (beliefs, problem solving approaches, andproof schemes). The necessity principle reflects the intellectual need to engage in the process ofcreating or understanding a
progress (WIP) paperprovides an overview of our study that explores how elements of Making have been integratedinto specific engineering courses to emphasize real-world context, and increase studentengagement.We utilized a case study approach of three engineering courses at Arizona State University.These courses were selected to reflect three distinct required subject areas that fall within themezzanine, which designates the middle sophomore and junior years. Our case study approachincludes data collection through faculty interviews, observations, and course related documents.Preliminary analysis of the interview data reveals that faculty members utilize Makingapproaches in a variety of ways. Evidence of Making in the engineering curricula
based on DLMs in their classrooms in the same spring semester of 2016. DLMswere used to teach selected heat transfer concepts at each school. Instruction time in both classeslasted for 50 minutes per class period.MaterialsOnline Survey. Participants responded to online survey statements using a 7-point Likert scale (1= not at all true of me, 7 = very true of me) self-report of how the intervention has influencedthem. Situational interest was assessed using a situational interest survey adapted from earlierinstruments [17, 18] to reflect the learning activity. Triggered situational interests sub-scalescomprised 4 items respectively, while two forms of maintained (feeling-based and Value-based)situational interests maintained sub-scales comprised
engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: Epistemologies and Discourse Analysis for Transdisciplinary Capstone Projects in a Digital Media ProgramAbstract: This work in progress explores the epistemologies and discourse used byundergraduate students at the transdisciplinary intersection of engineering and the arts. Ourresearch questions are focused on the kinds of knowledge that students value, use, and identifywithin the context of an interdisciplinary digital media program, and exploring how theirlanguage reflects this. Our theoretical framework for analyzing epistemology draws uponqualitative work in STEM epistemology [1]–[3], domain specificity [4], [5
Figure 1: Study ProcessLearning StyleWe relied on the Index of Learning Style (ILS) that assesses preferences on four learningstyle dimensions using a model developed by Felder and Silverman12. The model defineslearning style as ‘the characteristic strengths and preferences in the ways individuals take inand process information’ and asserts that individuals have preferences along four bipolardimensions: Active-Reflective, Sensing-Intuitive, Visual-Verbal, and Sequential-Global.Hawk and Shah have described the styles as follow 8. Active learners prefer doing things,particularly in groups. Reflective learners work better alone with time to think about the taskbefore doing it. Sensing learners like facts, data, and experimentation and work well
currently included in the CCW framework, such as spiritual capital. Thus,we believe that our work has the potential to extend these frameworks.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), undergrant number 1463808. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin these findings are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References1. Frehill LM. The Gendered Construction of the Engineering Profession in the United States, 1893-1920. Men Masc. 2004;6(4):383-403. doi:10.1177/1097184X03260963.2. Pawley AL. What counts as “engineering”: Towards a redefinition. In: Pawley AL, Riley DM, eds. Engineering and Social Justice: In
, promotingracial understanding, and helping others in need) are more associated with personality traits. A T-test did not confirm that any of the changes were statistically significant. Possiblereasons may be attributed to: we were unable to match the results of individual participants fromtime 1 to time 2—all responses were anonymous and we did not include a way to match time 1and time 2 responses for each participant; the sample size at time 1 (n = 84) was noticeablysmaller than the sample size at time 2 (n = 115); the time between surveys was only 3 weeks;apart from requiring field observations and testing prototypes with actual children, no otherinterventions were made to promote self-awareness or social-awareness (e.g. critical reflection
that were (at the time of this paper) informally committed. These experienceshave led us to carefully document and reflect on our recruitment experiences and in what followswe present data and analysis of these experiences. In turn, we speculate about the broadercontext that may be generating the unusual difficulties we have faced in securing fieldworkparticipation.Encountering difficulties in mediated recruitmentIn the first phase of research, we employed a direct recruitment strategy, which involved aresearcher directly contacting potential study participants (i.e. new engineers) and asking them tobe involved. While this process yielded eight engineers who consented to be part of the study,none ultimately were enrolled in the study because
court provided evidence based data tosupport their conclusions and a means to assess conceptual understanding in this PBL scenario.Student reflection and instructor feedback in addition to the three tiered framework rubricfacilitated assessment of the student cognitive learning process. Additionally, it was observedfor a seven contact hour a week course that students were engaged in the project between 10-12hours/week gaining more practical, hands-on experience in engineering materials and theirmethods of deterioration. As a result of this experiential learning, the students involved in PBLprojects (as compared to semesters in which students did not use PBL) produced better qualitywork as demonstrated through increased time on task, improved
journal article and five conference publications connected to this project.Data CollectionThe primary source of data were interviews conducted in dyads with collaborating engineeringand education faculty members. Semi-structured interviews lasting approximately 60 to 90minutes were designed and implemented to elicit understandings about futures, values, systems,and strategic thinking and how these ways of thinking were used by the engineer-educator teams.Dyads were first asked to describe their collaborative projects followed by a moment to reflectindividually. The individual reflection involved writing about their thinking related to theirengineering-education collaboration. This activity was used to prepare participants forverbalization of
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Impacting Students from Economically Disadvantaged Groups in an Engineering Career PathwayAbstractThis work in progress describes the overall initiative in the program for engineering access,retention, and low-income-student success. It discusses the program structure, implementationof activities, outcomes for the first of five years of project, and reflections on our initial findings.IntroductionThe Program for Engineering Access, Retention, and LIATS Success (PEARLS) was establishedwith the objective of increasing success statistics of low-income, academically talented students(LIATS) in the College of Engineering (CoE) of the University of Puerto
, students arerequired to keep an informal design notebook. Students are encouraged to use the notebooks as ameans of documenting their progress through the design process. This notebook is collected, anda portion of the notebook is graded. The professor reads 35 entries marked by the student as“quality entries.” These entries are graded on the perceived usefulness to the individual studentand the design group rather than a strict set of formal requirements. The graded portion of thesenotebooks is a relatively minor part of the notebook as a whole. Non-graded entries are risk-freeinformal writing in which the student reflects on aspects of the design process as well as thecomposition of oral presentations and bi-weekly reports. The notebook’s value
eleven engineering programs Pierre G. Lafleur, Yves Boudreault and Richard Prégent École Polytechnique de Montréal, Québec, CANADAContextFor 135 years, École Polytechnique de Montréal has provided an engineering program in theprovince of Québec, Canada. During its long history it has, successfully, faced and overcamemany challenges in several areas such as teaching, research, funding, and internationalcollaborations. The recent process through which it has, thoroughly, remodeled its elevenengineering undergraduate programs is, however, quite unique. This remodeling, in part,reflected on the basic mathematics courses and the complementary courses (social andeconomical aspects of engineering, ethics, etc.). It
laterassessed by faculty members. The LOs are observable demonstrations of student learning thatoccur after a significant set of learning experiences. Typically, these demonstrations orperformances reflect what students know, what they can actually do with what they know, andtheir confidence and motivation in demonstrating what they know.Although the OBE2,3 is a very promising approach which answers the needs for students to haveskills that can make them competitive once they join the workforce, there are a number of issuesthat need to be carefully addressed for the OBE to be successful and to have efficientimplementation. Issues such as the evaluation and the assessment of the student’s work, the
intrigued them.As is by now well understood, however, the modern situation is different. All a student needsto do is demonstrate skills in math and physics in high school and they will immediatelybe told by their counsellors that engineering is a good fit. And the students, by and large,accept this and apply to college as prospective engineering majors. It is only after arrivingat college that they begin to wonder exactly why they said they wished to be engineers -whether it really is the right avenue for them.The intent of our work is to support the education of mechanical engineers in a way thatcomplements traditional engineering education, as reflected in courses such as dynamics,vibrations, and so on. In such courses, the aim is to transmit a
Ecological Perspectives, (Hoffman, R. and Palermo, D. eds.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.5. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. Reading Teacher, 39, 771-777.6. Scardemalia, M., Bereiter, C. & Steinbach, R. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8, 173-190.7. Campione, J.C., Brown, A.L. and McConnell, M.L. (1988). Metacognition: On the importance of understanding what you are doing. In Research agenda for mathematics education: The teaching and assessing of mathematics problem solving (R.I. Chales and E.A. Silver, eds.) (pp.93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.8. Schoenfeld, A.H. (1991). On