. Hannaford, S. Biology 392 Syllabus, Introduction to Biological Research. 2014 [cited 2019 3/21/19]; Available from: http://www.pugetsound.edu/files/resources/bio392s14sh.pdf.9. Burrows, V. and S. Beaudoin, A Graduate Course in Research Methods. Chemical Engineering Education, 2001. 35(4): p. 236.10. Ollis, D., The Research Proposition. Chemical Engineering Education, 1995. 29(4): p. 222.11. Holles, J.H., A Graduate Course in Theory and Methods of Research. Chemical Engineering Education, 2007. 41(4): p. 226-232.12. University of Florida College of Engineering, EGN 4912, Engineering Undergraduate Research. [cited 2019 3/21/19]; Available from: https://www.bme.ufl.edu/sites/default/files/EGN-4912- Syllabus
and develop their own will be integral to theirsuccess as a practicing engineer. Identifying how most first-year students understand intuition isthe first step in achieving this goal.ReferencesCorbin, J. C., Reyna, V. F., Weldon, R. B., & Brainerd, C. J. (2015). How reasoning, judgement, and decision making are colored by gist-based intuition: A fuzzy-trace theory approach. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 344-355.Cunningham, C. S., Martin, K. M., & Miskioglu, E. (2019, June), Work in Progress: Comparing Creativity and the Perception of Creativity of First-Year and Senior Engineering Students. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A Five-Stage
to empower our graduates to impact society by innovating withinthe contexts of social justice, peace, humanitarian advancement, and sustainable practices.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the National Science Foundation for support of this work (Award #1519453).The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors.References 1. Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) information available at https://info.catme.org/about/overview/ 2. Sgoutas-Emch, S., Baird, L., Myers, P., Camacho, M., & Lord, S. (2016). We’re Not All White Men: Using a Cohort/Cluster Approach to Diversify Faculty Hiring in STEM. Thought and Action, 32(1-Summer 2016), 91-107, 2016. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE
positively correlated with the round 1 and round 2 (stronger correlation)scores and they are even stronger correlated with the number of improvements from round 1(individual score) to round 2 (team score). This may indicate that team-based activities in theclassroom are important. Further analysis would be needed to study the separate effect of round 1performance and team-based improvement.Figure 1: shows a heatmap of Dataset 3’s activity scores, df scores (round 2 minus round 1) andExam 1 Score, in addition to the constructed feature (Number of df score above zero/ Number ofdf). Data is sorted in ascending order of unit 1 exam score. Most activities result in improvedscores after the team discussions, compared to individual work. However, Unit 1
. SIAM review, 167–256, 2003.[3] T. Finin, Social networking on the semantic web. J. Learning organization, 418-435, 2005.[4] N. Lin, Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge University Press,New York, NY, 2001.[5] R. Burt, R, Social Capital: Theory and Research. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA,2001.[6] M. Kilduff, and W. Tsai, Social Networks and Organizations, Sage Publications, London,2003.[7] N. Moolenaar, A. Daly and P. Sleegers, “Ties with potential: social network structure andinnovation in Dutch elementary schools,” European Association for Research in Learning andInstruction (EARLI), Amsterdam, August 25-29, 2009[8] S. Moore, Finders and Keepers: Helping New Teachers Survive and Thrive in Our Schools
Engineers: the Problem and Its Solution,” in Aerospace Meeting and Exhibit , 1995. [3] J. Colwell, “Professional Skills for the New Economy : Their Place in Graduate Education in Engineering and Engineering Technology,” in Annual Conference & Exposition American Society for Engineering Education , 2010. [4] National Academy of Engineering, U. S., The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in The New Century . Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004. [5] National Academy of Engineering, U. S., Educating The Engineer Of 2020: Adapting
SES affected students’ level of university involvement and indirectly impacted graduateschool attendance.SES for college students is most often based on family income (typically a numerical range),mother’s and sometimes father’s education, and/or one or more parent’s occupation(s). Entwisleand Astone8 advocated using three types of capital when calculating SES for youth: financial(based on income), human (based on mother’s education level) and social (based on number ofadults in the home). While we were intrigued with their model, there was insufficient guidancein the research literature as to how these factors were operationalized.SES is challenging to operationalize. There is high non-response rate to questions about familyfinancial
time.Nevertheless, it is very clear that the concepts of ‘six sigma’ and ‘lean thinking’ can be used veryadvantageously to the process of course design and can achieve substantial streamlining of theprocess. References1. Kolarik, W.J (1995), Creating Quality: Concepts, Systems, Strategies and Tools, McGraw Hill, USA2. Akao, Y (ed) (1990), Quality Function Deployment, Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press3. Juran, J.M (1988), Juran on planning for Quality, New York, Free Press4. Taguchi, G (1986), Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing quality into products and processes, White Plains, NY: Kraus International, UNIPUB (Asian Productivity organization)5. Shingo, S (1986), Zero Quality Control
://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/385/1049Brothers, S. K., (2007). Game-based e-learning: The next level of staff training. Nursing Homes: Long Term CareManagement 56(3) 78-80.Campbell, E. (2001). Let right be done: trying to put ethical standards into practice. Educational Policy 16(5) 359-411.Charalambos, V., Michalinos, Z., & Chamberlain, R. (2004). The design of online learning communities: critical issues. Educational Media International, 41(2), 135-143. Page 14.1056.6Clawson, A. Deen, E. Oxley, Z. (2002). Online discussions across three universities: Student participation andpedagogy. PSOnline http
illustrate what is described in the text and not be included simply for visual appeal. Page 14.391.5Figure 1: A screenshot of simple heat transfer concepts demonstrated withcommon everyday examples.The remainder of the unit is designed to introduce the fundamentals of heattransfer by illustrating these concepts through cooking, a daily experience of thechildren in the region. Figures depicting the typical cooking practices of theregion are presented to the student. In Uganda, food often cools and is reheated toprevent disease-causing bacteria from spoiling the food. This results in wastedfuel (wood).In the developed on-line unit, principles such as Newton‟s
of group discussionversus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching. Med Educ. 2007, 41(2).3. Beers GW, Bowden S. The effect of teaching method on long-term knowledge retention. J Nurs Educ. 2005,44(11).4. Sundblad G, Sigrell B, John LK, Lindkvist C. Students' evaluation of a learning method: A comparison betweenproblem-based learning and more traditional methods in a specialist university training programme inpsychotherapy. Med Teach. 2002, 24(3).5. Smits PBA, Verbeek JHAM, de Buisonje CD. Problem based learning in continuing medical education: A reviewof controlled evaluation studies. Br Med J. 2002, 324(7330).6. Teshima DY. Outcome measurement of problem-based learning. Clin Lab Sci. 2001, 14(2).7. Nesbit JC, Adesope OO. Learning
learning styles,” presented at the Spring Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, 2016.[3] J. E. Caldwell, “Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.,” CBE Life Sci Educ, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2007.[4] A. Kabalan, “Think–Pair–Share: A Case Study in an Electrical Engineering Class,” asee.org.[5] L. K. Michaelsen, W. Watson, and J. P. Cragin, “Team learning: A potential solution to the problems of large classes,” … Behavior Teaching …, 1982.[6] H. Lodish, D. Baltimore, A. Berk, and S. L. Zipursky, Molecular cell biology. 1995.[7] B. Alberts, Essential Cell Biology, 3rd ed. New York: Garland Science, 2010.[8] D. Richardson, “Kinemage.”[9] M. L. Epstein and G
. Student attendance in the laboratory during the non-required laboratory periods was extremely low. When comparing the treatment group student’sfinal course grades to the low attendance during non-required laboratory periods, it can beconcluded that the students were indeed working on their laboratory materials outside of thelaboratory. TABLE IX TREATMENT GROUP ATTENDANCE NOT REQUIRED DAYS DISCUSSION It was found that the typical practice for learning scientific subject matter in the mid tolate 1800’s was by means of lectures and books. Laboratories were initially reserved forresearchers and not for
Learning in a First Circuits Course. In ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.[13] Katie Evans, Paul Hummel, and Miguel Gates. An Expanded Study to Assess the Effect of Online Homework on Student Learning in a First Circuits Course. In ASEE Annual Conference, 2016.[14] Elizabeth J. Brauer. Webwork development in electric circuits. In 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference, 2008.[15] David Wood, Jerome S Bruner, and Gail Ross. The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2):89–100, 1976.[16] Lev Semenovich Vygotski˘ı. Thought and Language. MIT Press, 2012.[17] Lev S Vygotsky. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Process. Cambridge, MA
. Donnell, B. M. Aller, M. Alley, and A. A. Kedrowicz, "Why Industry Says ThatEngineering Graduates Have Poor Communication Skills: What the Literature Says," inAmerican Society for Engineering Education, 2011.[5] S. A. Wilson, "Understanding the Gap Between Communication in the Classroom andCommunication During an Industrial Internship," in 2019 American Society for EngineeringEducation Conference, Tampa, Fl, 2019.[6] S. Danielson, A. Kirkpatrick, and E. Ervin, "ASME vision 2030: Helping to informmechanical engineering education," ed, 2011, pp. T1J-1-T1J-6.[7] J. D. Ford and L. A. Riley, "Integrating Communication and Engineering Education: ALook at Curricula, Courses, and Support Systems," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92,no
George Saridakis. (2008). “The Role of Higher Education Skills and Support in Graduate Self-Employment.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (6): 653–72.Haynie, J. M., Shepherd, D., Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2010). A situated metacognitive model of the entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 217-229.Huang-Saad, A., Bodnar, C., & Carberry, A. (2020). Examining Current Practice in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419890828Jesiek, B. K., Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global engineering competency in context: Situations and behaviors. Online Journal for Global
concepts from PSPFC. The questions also providedopportunities for participants to highlight supports or barriers within their current workenvironment that affected their level of use selection.Course WorkAs part of the mentored teaching courses (PSPFC 1002 and 1004), students reflected on majortakeaways from their experience within a final report. For example, students are asked todescribe the main takeaways from their participation in the observations of peers teaching. Inaddition, students include a discussion about the impact of the course on their future careergoal(s) and their preparedness for their career goal(s). A review of this course work providedinsights into students’ perceptions and attitudes during their mentioned teaching
separated are coded A (Achievers), S (SupportSeekers), P (Purpose Seekers) and P&S (Purpose & Support Seekers). The overall JMP analysisis shown in Figure 6. It is important to note that previous iterations of the regression utilized afull factorial method and generated biased results and very weak correlations for all but the two- Page 26.1142.8dimensional and single variables shown below. The results below were achieved after reducingthe regressed variables by eliminating the three-dimensional analysis and the cross of timing andlevel. Neither of these two analyses provided explanatory value. Summary of Fit RSquare
whole to their object(s). We use the term object here in its activity theory sense to referto the problem or purpose towards which an activity is directed. An activity is a set of variousactions (such as ideating, negotiating, planning, agreeing, disagreeing) carried out by a group, asocial unit such as a team, motivated by a socially constructed goal. For our use, the activitiesstudied in this paper are team meetings in which a team uses a whiteboard to mediate a decisionor series of decisions.Togethering, as described by Radford and Roth, “has the purpose of realizing a collectivelymotivated object”9. The concept of togethering allows us to analyze the actions and interactionsof the team members from the different perspectives of the team
universal education”, International Review of Research in Open and Dis- tance Learning, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008. [3] David Wiley, T.J. Bliss, and Mary McEwen, Open Educational Resources: A Review of the Literature, chapter 63, pp. 781–789, Springer, fourth edition, 2014. [4] John Hilton III, “Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions”, Education Tech Research Dev, vol. 64, pp. 573–590, 2016. [5] Lori Breslow, David E. Pritchard, Jennifer DeBoer, Glenda S. Stump, Andrew D. Ho, and Daniel T. Seaton, “Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edx’s first mooc”, Research and Practice in Assessment, vol. 8, pp. 13–25, 2013. [6] Jean Jacoby, “The
No.DUE 1525831).References[1] U. National Academy of Engineering, The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[2] G. Clough, "Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century," National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, 2005.[3] A. S. o. C. E. B. o. K. Committee, "Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future," 2008: ASCE.[4] O. S. Board, E. National Academies of Sciences, and Medicine, Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges. National Academies Press, 2019.[5] W. Oakes, "EWB-USA and EPICS: Academic Credit
inengineering contexts.Although using larger samples relates to greater confidence in results [22], the sample size used inour analysis provides adequate interpretability of validity evidence of the resilience measure. Theliterature suggests that a sample size of 100 to 150 is acceptable for a CFA [23-26]. Following upon this study, we will explore the psychometric characteristics of the CD-RISC with a largersample in order to explore the dimensionality of the instrument. Lastly, we will conduct studiesthat examine how resilience moderates student engagement in predicting academic achievement.References[1] A. S. J. A. p. Masten, "Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development," vol. 56, no. 3, p. 227, 2001.[2] K. M. Connor and J. R
Roscoe, R.D., 2002, The Processes and Challenges of Conceptual Change. In M. Limon and L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering Conceptual Change. Issues in Theory and Practice. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3-27.3) National Research Council, 1997, Science Teaching Reconsidered, A handbook. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 88 p.4) Chi, M.T.H., 2005, Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions are Robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 161-199.5) Evans, D.L. (moderator), Midkiff, C., Miller, R.L., Morgan, J., Krause, S., Martin, et al., 2002, Tools for Assessing Conceptual Understanding in the
,2003). Furthermore, Preparing Our Children (NSB, 1999) urges partnerships betweenuniversities and local schools to increase the mathematics and science abilities of high schoolgraduates. TechSTEP directly addresses these concerns.“the University”’s STEM Talent Expansion Program (TechSTEP) has two major componentsthat will yield increased numbers of graduates in engineering, mathematics, and science. Onecomponent is a high school partnership program focused on recruiting new students into ourSTEM programs, while the other component is a summer enrichment and mentoring programfocused on increased retention of first-year college students. The recruiting component is an expansion of pilot
, Canberra:Engineers Australia. http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/about-us/course-accreditation/publications/publications-and-supporting-documentation.cfm, accessed July-15 2006.5. S. Florman, Non-technical studies for engineers: The challenge of relevance. European Journal ofEngineering Education, 1997. Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 249-258.6. C. Dillon, Engineering education: time for some new stories. Engineering Science and EducationJournal, 1998. Vol., No. August, pp. 188-192.7. L. Pascail, The emergence of the skills approach in industry and its consequences for the training ofengineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 55-61.8. L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini and J. F. Volkwein, Engineering Change
School. Eds: Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R..National Academy Press (Washington; 1999).3. Greenberg, J. E., Smith, N. T., and Newman, J. H. (2003) Instructional module in Fourier spectral analysis, basedon principles of ‘how people learn’. Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 155-1654. Pandy, M. G., Petrosino, A.J., Austin, B. A., and Barr, R. E. (2004) Assessing adaptive expertise in undergraduatebiomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 1-125. Gunter H.E., Bonventre, J.V., D’Avila M.A., Sadeghpour S., Vijaykumar R. (2003), “Education Innovation inPhysiology” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Nashville, TN,June 22-25, 2003.6. Henrickson S.E., Gunter H.E., D’Avila M.A
. Paper presented at the annual American Association for Engineering Education Conference, Austin, TX. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/search/proceedings5. Dyer, J. Gregersen, H., Christensen, C.M. (2011 ). The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators.6. Kay, R.H., and Lauricella, S. (2011). Unstructured vs. Structured Use of Laptops in Higher Education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 10, 33-43.7. Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245-263.8. Mackinnon, G. R., & Vibert, C. (2002). Judging the
recipients. [16]The second phase of this research was guided by the research question, "What has been theimpact of efforts to motivate faculty to innovate with technology in engineering education?” Thegoal of this phase of the research was to determine if the engineering education environment haschanged to being one that rewards faculty members for their innovations associated withcourseware, and if it has changed, how so and to what extent?2.0 Context for the StudyIn the higher education environment of the late 1990's within which the Premier Award wasimplemented, the culture of engineering education was such that few faculty members werecreating courseware materials, and the quality of materials varied widely. Engineering
Ergon. 2012;43(1):184–90.6. Martin JL, Murphy E, Crowe J a, Norris BJ. Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics. Physiol Meas. 2006;27(8):R49–62.7. Garmer K, Ylv J, Karlsson ICM. User participation in requirements elicitation comparing focus group interviews and usability tests for eliciting usability requirements for medical equipment : a case study. Int J Ind Ergon. 2004;33:85–98.8. Gause D, Weinberg G. Exploring Requirements: Quality BEFORE Design. New York: Dorste House; 1989.9. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S. Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap. In: International Conference on