Paper ID #34399Impact of Course Modality on Student Course EvaluationsDr. Matthew Aldeman, Illinois State University Matt Aldeman is an Assistant Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches in the Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology programs. Matt joined the Technology department faculty after working at the Illinois State University Center for Renewable Energy for over five years. Previously, he worked at General Electric as a wind site manager at the Grand Ridge and Rail Splitter wind projects. Matt’s experience also includes service in the U.S. Navy as a nuclear propulsion
indicated through the analysis of time entries (sleeping, exercising, class/studying,socializing) were coded either by valuation of change (negative, positive, neutral) or change induration (more, less, neutral). For these coding items, a single rater completed initial coding ofall entries, and the second rater acted as reviewer, revising codes for clarity and consistency asneeded.Emergent Themes In addition to the structured coding items, each rater independently identified a second setof emergent codes, indicating themes not previously identified in either prior research or thediary entries. The independently derived themes were discussed with the project team andmerged into a second set of four thematic codes: social responsibility
Harvard University. One of his major research interests has been the impact of gender on science careers. This research has resulted in two books (both authored with the assistance of Gerald Holton): Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension and Gender Differences in Science Careers: The Project Access Study. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Understanding How Social Agents and Communicative Messages Influence Female Students’ Engineering Career Interest from High School to First Semester of CollegeAbstractMany researchers have investigated how to increase female and minority students’ engineeringcareer
research project to evaluate connections between various forms ofsupport (from faculty, TAs, and peers) and multiple forms of course-level engagement (attention,participation, effort, positive and negative emotional engagement) both in traditional and remotelearning. This study focuses on comparing student perceptions of faculty and TA support acrosstraditional (pre-COVID) and remote learning as necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Tworesearch questions guided this comparison.Research Question #1 (RQ1):Do student perceptions of faculty and TA support differ in traditional vs. remote learning?On traditional college campuses, faculty support their students both directly and indirectly duringclass time (e.g. lecture, in-class discussion) and
motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Two-Step Model for the Interpretation of Meaningful RecognitionAbstractThis qualitative research paper explores how undergraduate engineering students interpretrecognition as meaningful. Presented is the two-step PIER
of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, student applications of the design process, curriculum development, and fulfilling the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collabo- rative learning, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple represen- tations of concepts. Page 26.1701.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Video-Annotated Peer Review (VAPR): Considerations for Development and
discusses this in thecontext of how she plans to marry an engineer, so she can “stay with the kids until they go toschool” and then “work part-time until they get out of school.” For Maggie engineering allows aperson, in this case her imagined husband, to earn enough money to allow her, projected as anequally qualified professional engineer, to stay at home with children or work part-time. Theengineering-as-lifestyle perspective is differently shaded here, when compared to the unalloyedversions from Max and Jake, but our interpretation is that it is the same basic belief about theleading value of engineering—that it provides for a high salary and a comfortable lifestyle. Maggie: If I was married with children= Int: =You knew—You knew I was
AC 2007-1680: TEACHING CHEMISTRY AS A CROSS-CULTURAL SUBJECT : IT& LINGUISTICSMargherita Landucci, Liceo Artistico StataleFabio Garganego, Municipality of Venice Page 12.1349.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Teaching Chemistry as a Cross-cultural Subject IT & LinguisticsAbstractThe main theme of this paper is the language of chemical formulae rather than the languagethat explains chemistry; the focus of our interest is the code used in writing chemicalformulae.The paper describes the nature and scope of a research project started by an out-of-schoolmultidisciplinary team who set up in 1993 and concluded
Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections
engineering major?and (2) Can you describe a time that you felt you did not meet these expectations? Additionally,they were asked to provide their email address if they consented to the possibility of beinginterviewed for our project. Nicole was one of 21 individuals who responded to this samplingsurvey to indicate her willingness to participate in the study.Mackenzie and Benjamin jointly interviewed Nicole at n location on her campus. Benjaminadopted a leading role in conducting the interview while Mackenzie asked questions in line withthe study’s objectives and within the flow of the interview. Benjamin and Mackenzie practicedthese interviewer roles in an earlier, unanalyzed pilot interview to ensure that their speaking andpresence was coordinated
Paper ID #21972The Challenges and Affordances of Engineering Identity as an Analytic LensMs. Christine Allison Gray, Northern Arizona University Christine Allison Gray is a doctoral student in the College of Education at Northern Arizona University. She also serves as a graduate assistant on the Reshaping Norms project in the College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences.Dr. Robin Tuchscherer P.E., Northern Arizona University Dr. Tuchscherer currently serves as an Associate Professor at Northern Arizona University where he has taught since 2011. Prior to academia, he accumulated eight years of professional
. Framing is the set ofexpectations one has about a situation [21, 22]. In our study, some students framed their solutionas meeting the expectations of the instructor, while in other instances students discussed theirsolution as if they were analyzing a bridge that would be built in the real world. Similarly,Koretsky and Nolen found students discussing their projects either in the “school world” or the“engineering world” when examining chemical engineering middle year studio and senior designteams [23, 24], and McNeill et al. found similar results where students distinguished between“classroom problems” and workplace problems” [25]. Gainsburg also found different ways thatstudents framed mathematics in engineering courses: from believing that every
AssessmentMany of the activities presented in this MOOC were directed at students’ personal growth,while others focused on the mastery of core principles. As a result, a strong emphasis wasplaced on students’ personal learning paths and on building meaningful insights through theexercises and projects rather than accumulating “right or wrong” answers. A task list wasdefined for those students interested in earning a course Statement of Accomplishment thatincluded the completion of 5 of the 6 weekly assignments. To complete a Statement ofAccomplishment with Distinction, students had to fulfill all these requirements and alsocomplete at least 2 peer reviews of other students’ work for each submitted assignment.2.6 Weekly AssignmentsThe six creative
mathematics for 3 years. She has worked on diverse projects about learning, including research about discourse, reading, statistics, algebra, and now Statics. Her primary research focus remains improving the quality of mathematics teaching. She can be contacted at kjh262@psu.edu.Christine B. Masters, Pennsylvania State University Christine B. Masters is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Science and Mechanics at The Pennsylvania State University. She earned a PhD from Penn State in 1992. In addition to raising four children with her husband of 20 years, she has been teaching introductory mechanics courses for more than 10 years, training the department graduate teaching assistants for
) and 12 ut (t)] are identical. S67: Right.Participant S66 similarly reasoned about the problem when asked to deduce the step response ofthe system, however, he arrived at a different answer. He concluded the step response, gs (t), to be Page 12.1317.9This response can be also ascribed to the invocation of the interval matching readout strategy.However, participant S66 appealed to the notion of extrapolation not in the sense of an extensionbut as a projection or replication of a given pattern. He argued that because the step function canbe obtained by extrapolating the scaled version of the input function 12 ut (t) as defined over0 ≤ t
expected contributors. Then, the other author along with afaculty member and two graduate students not involved in the research project categorized eachresponse independently. The results were compiled by one of the authors and any differingresponses (fewer than 20%) were discussed until all were in agreement on the categorization.The first four categories were created based upon Eccles’ Expectancy Value Theory: Interest,Importance (Utility Value), Relative Cost and Attainment. Six of 15 of the respondents indicatedinterest in a particular engineering field as a principle reason for selecting their major. This wasthe category with the largest number of motivators. Student 1 stated interest in performingcertain tasks (programming) that led to the
. Harmon, T. C.; Burks, G. A.; Giron, J. J.; Wong, W.; Chung, G. K. W. K.; Baker, E. L., An interactivedatabase supporting virtual fieldwork in an environmental engineering design project. Journal of EngineeringEducation 2002, 91, 167-176.13. Prince, M. J.; Felder, R. M., Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, andresearch bases. Journal of Engineering Education 2006, 95 (2), 123-138.14. Glasersfeld, E. V., Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 1989, 80 (1), 121-140.15. Dewey, J., How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C.Heath and Company: Boston, 1933.16. Jonassen, D. H., Computers as mindtools for schools, engaging
Page 22.1157.5phenomenography to explore specific concepts in computing education.StudyThe main purpose of this study was to uncover the different ways that individuals understanddifferent programming concepts, specifically the concepts of conditional and repetitionstructures. Based on the goals of this project, the following two research questions were posed: 1) What are the qualitatively different ways that the conditional and repetition structures found in most programming languages are understood? 2) What are the ways that first-year engineering students understand these concepts?To answer these questions, a phenomenographic approach was chosen. One of the essentialelements when designing a phenomenographic study is the
develop expertise in theirmajor as well as gain experience in a variety of department-specific subjects.Engineering seminar courses are typically not required but encouraged, particularly for freshmenstudents. A series of introductory seminars targets freshmen and sophomore studentsspecifically to expose them to research areas within a department. Other departmental seminarsconsist of weekly talks given by invited speakers from industry and research, thereby enablingstudents to learn about a broad range of engineering applications. Seminars are typically one tothree units and may be graded on a pass / fail basis.Students at SPri also have the opportunity to take independent study units to participate inresearch projects with faculty and their
Department Head of Graduate Education and co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC). She received her PhD in Linguistics from the University of Chicago and an M.A. and B.A. in English from the University of Georgia. Her research interests include interdis- ciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a National Science Foun- dation CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios for graduate students to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her