Paper ID #30014Utilizing Peer Learning Assistants to Improve Student Outcomes in anIntroductory ECE CourseDr. David John Orser, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities David Orser teaches and develops undergraduate education curriculum with a focus on laboratory courses for the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His courses leverage project-based learning, experiential learning, and self-paced activities. David has over ten years of industry experience specializing in mixed-signal high-speed integrated circuit design, power systems, and power electronics.Kyle Dukart
teachers.Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Assistant Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons.) in Electrical Engineering from Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India in 1998, and his MS in 2004 and PhD in 2008, both in Aerospace Engineering from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. He worked as a postdoctoral associate at Depart- ment of Computer Science, University of Vermont and later at Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, where he was also a research assistant
been here since 2006. Prior employment experience includes: Oceanographer for US Naval Research Laboratory (1995-2006), Post- Doctoral Fellow at US Naval Research Laboratory (1994-1995), Hydraulic Engineer at US Waterways Experiment Station, US Army Corps of Engineers (1987-1989). Ph.D. from University of Delaware (1994), M.S. from University of California, Berkeley (1987), B.S. from California State Polytechnic University (1986), all in Civil Engineering. Research interests include theory and modeling of ocean wave dynamics, beach erosion, coastal engineering, nearshore circulation, and ocean wave generation by wind.Ms. Chelsea A. H. Bakenhus, Texas A&M University Ms. Chelsea Bakenhus is currently a second
Science and Engineering project investigating persistence of women in engineering undergraduate programs. Dr. Lord’s industrial experience includes AT&T Bell Laboratories, General Motors Laboratories, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, and SPAWAR Systems Center.Michelle Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle Madsen Camacho received her Ph.D. in Social Sciences (an interdisciplinary concentration in Social/Cultural Anthropology and Sociology) from UC Irvine in 2000. She was a Fulbright Scholar to Bolivia and was a Foreign Language and Area Studies Fellow at Cornell University. She held two postdoctoral positions at UCSD, a Researcher-in-Residence at the Center for US.-Mexican
interested in the innovations of biomedical science. Recently a physicistfrom University of Alabama, Birmingham accidentally produced smooth diamond. The array ofdiamond created was smooth and adhered very easily to metal. Because diamond is durable, itmakes a very good candidate for coating artificial hip replacements. The current coatings weardown or loosen from constant use after about 10 years, which could mean more surgery for therecipient. The diamond coating is projected to last around 40 years which would improve thecomfort and health of the patient.Liguore Laboratories would like to expand our product line to include diamond coatings for hipjoints. The research laboratory is working on replicating the smooth diamonds. In order for
technologies was rated highly, the students were not as satisfiedwith the technology used to deliver the lab exercises. Students stated that the web-based trainingsoftware used to deliver the lab exercises was not particularly user friendly and that some of thecontent was too generic. Students emphasized that they would like to see lab exercises that weremore customized and closely aligned with Boeing practices. Students also expressed that theywould like to be able to continue working on laboratory exercises from home because they feltthat in some cases, two hours was not enough time to complete the laboratory exercises in lab.End of Course Instructor SurveysAt the conclusion of the course, the online instructor and the lab instructors were all
research, particularly in the U.S. Wankat, for example, analyzed Journalof Engineering Education articles from 1993-1997 (n = 230) and 1993-2002 (n = 597).7-8 Sincethe journal did not use author-defined keywords during these periods, the author generated thefollowing list of categories and assigned up to four categories to each article:1. Teaching 7. ABET* 13. Distance Education* 19. Retention2. Computers 8. Learning 14. Communication/Writing 20. Programming*3. Design 9. First Year 15. Ethics 21. Aeronautical Eng**4. Assessment 10. Curriculum 16. Experiential/Hands On* 22. Quality,5. Groups/Teams 11. Laboratory 17
60 systems for communication, lighting, vaccine refrigeration, and water supply and purification in remote areas of the Peruvian Andes.David Wallace, Massachusetts Institute of Technology DAVID R. WALLACE is the Esther and Harold E. Edgerton Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at MIT and is the co-director of the MIT Computer-aided Design Laboratory. He works actively to expand service learning work in engineering at MIT. Having a background in both industrial design and mechanical engineering, he teaches graduate and undergraduate product design courses, including 2.009 Product Engineering Processes, 2.744 Product Design, and 2.670 Mechanical Engineering Tools
2006-1264: EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIVITY ON STUDENTPERFORMANCEDaria Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado-Boulder DARIA KOTYS-SCHWARTZ is a doctoral candidate and instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering at The Ohio State University. Her research interests include polymer processing, development of student assessment measures, gender disparity in engineering and innovative instructional methodology.Lawrence Carlson, University of Colorado-Boulder LAWRENCE E. CARLSON is a founding co-director of the Integrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory and Program, as
2016 semester, introductory civil engineering, arequirement for all students seeking to major in civil engineering, consisted of two one-hourlectures per week supplemented by one three-hour laboratory meeting during which studentscompleted standalone labs meant to supplement content introduced during lecture. In thetraditional version of introductory civil engineering, guest lecturers specializing in one of thesub-disciplines of engineering—structural engineering, environmental engineering,transportation engineering, water resources engineering, geotechnical engineering, andconstruction engineering—were invited to offer students a general overview of their areas ofexpertise.The curriculum for the PBL sections of introductory civil engineering
question:How did the implementation of a gamification platform impact students’ academic motivationtowards homework within a freshman design course?MethodsGamification Platform DesignThe 3D Game Lab platform was originally designed in the fall of 2015, and was created withnine different levels that students could move through by acquiring experience points (XP).Each quest provides students with a number of experience points (XP) that combine together toachieve students overall XP within the 3D Game Lab platform. This platform builds off anexisting beta software platform that has been developed by GoGo Laboratories.19 3D Game Labconsists of a software platform that allows individual instructors to build in quests (or activities)for students to complete
. David Whittinghill is an Associate Professor of Computer Graphics Technology and Computer and Information Technology. Dr. Whittinghill’s research focuses on gaming, simulation and computer pro- gramming education and how these technologies can more effectively address outstanding issues in health, education, and society. Dr. Whittinghill leads projects in pediatric physical therapy, sustainable energy simulation, Chinese language learning, virtual reality, and games as a tool for improving educational out- comes. Dr. Whittinghill is the director of the Games Innovation Laboratory (www.gamesinnovation.org).Dr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University at West Lafayette Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and
admitted (e.g., low STEM gender stereotypes), find more successas students and as professionals [22].In response to these findings, interventions developed to challenge students’ stereotypes ofSTEM professionals – with a goal of strengthening interest and buffering against attrition – arebecoming more frequent. Some have focused on the type of people who are interested andsuccessful in STEM: since biased representations of STEM professionals generally portray themas white and male, educators have attempted to change these portrayals by spotlighting thediversity that already exists in the field [23], [24]. Other stereotypes pigeonhole STEM careers asthose that focus excessively on laboratory work and mechanical tinkering, overlooking both thesocial
ofEngineering (level 8), Masters (level 9) and finally, PhD (level 10). As a result, the school has avery broad student demographic. Many students who cannot gain direct entry to a universityprogram join this technical institute at a lower point on the ladder, work their way up, andeventually sit beside those who entered directly from high school.Academic staff members are employed to teach and typically have 18 hours of classroom activityper week. Although research is encouraged, and the School has several highly regarded researchgroups, the majority of staff members devote most of their time to teaching—both in the classroomand the laboratory. Laboratory groups of 16 students per staff member facilitate close contact andallow staff and students to
up in the AIChE Concept Warehouse [8]. Each week, LAs received a promptasking them to read a short article about learning and pedagogy and relate that to their teachingexperiences through a 250-word written reflection.For recruitment of faculty to include LAs in their course instructional team, we targeted large-enrollment classes (over 100 students), but did not exclude other courses with enthusiasticinstructors. We specifically targeted introductory courses that had a history of hiringundergraduate students to facilitate laboratories and recitations. The LA Program added thepedagogy elements (both the workshop and the online reflection) and, in some cases, shifted tomore structured, regular meetings with the instructional team; thus, we
impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context i. Recognition of the need for and an ability to VII engage in life-long learning. j. A knowledge of contemporary issues V & VI k. An ability to use the techniques, skills, and VI & VII modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practiceTaxa I—Pre-knowledge Conceptual Experiences: hands-on laboratory experiences viademonstrations, physical models, practical applications to demonstrate, visualize and observebasic concepts.Taxa II—Basic Conceptual Knowledge: learning, understanding, memorizing basic engineeringconcepts, definitions, terms, symbols, theories
in the general area of systems theory with focus on control and communications systems. His research has been funded by national funding agencies, national laboratories, and by various companies. He has also been active in designing and implementing various international graduate programs with Latin American and European countries. He was a co-founder in 1990 of the ISTEC consortium, which currently includes more than 150 universities in the US, Spain, and Latin America. He has published 7 books, and more than 300 peer- reviewed papers. His PhD students hold academic positions in the USA and in Europe, and senior technical positions in various US National Laboratories. Professor Abdallah is a senior member of
Columbia University and the Cooper Union in New York City. She received her PhD from Columbia University in 2006, where her research focused on the mechanical and frictional properties of articular cartilage. Dr. Basalo ’s teaching experience includes Thermodynamics, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami
profesional de la información , 21 (2), 136-145.[5] Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., Wahlout, J., Castaño-Muñoz, J., Espasa, A., & Tovar, E. (2015). Setting-up aEuropean Cross-Provider Data Collection on Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Openand Distributed Learning , 16 (6), 62-77.[6] Farias, R., Durán, E.B., & Figueroa, S.G. (2008). Las Técnicas de Clustering en la Personalización deSistemas de e-Learning. In XIV Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación (CACIC).[7] Lloyd, S.P. (1957). Least squares quantization in PCM. Technical Note, Bell Laboratories. Published in 1982in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 28, 128–137.[8] Forgy, E.W. (1965). Clustering analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus
two courses. This paperfocuses on the honors sequence, specifically the first course in the sequence, 1281H, whichemphasizes problem solving through computer programming. Course Structure and Classroom ConfigurationFirst-year engineering students enrolled in the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors (FEH)sequence at The Ohio State University complete a two-semester sequence of classes that cover awide variety of fundamental engineering topics and laboratory exercises were eligible toparticipate in the study.The first course (ENG 1281.01H) emphasizes problem solving and computer programming inMATLAB and C/C++. All courses include a laboratory component designed to expose studentsto a wide variety of engineering disciplines and topics
served as Director of Research & Development for a multimedia development company and as founding Director of the Center for Integrating Research & Learning (CIRL) at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University. Under Dr. Spiegel’s leadership, the CIRL matured into a thriving Center recognized as one of the leading National Science Foundation Laboratories for activities to pro- mote science, mathematics, and technology (STEM) education. While at Florida State University, Dr. Spiegel also directed an award winning teacher enhancement program for middle grades science teachers, entitled Science For Early Adolescence Teachers (Science FEAT). His extensive background in science education
investigated uses a semester long team-based designproject to introduce students to the engineering design process. Course enrollment representsapproximately 80% of all incoming first-year engineering students (total enrollment = 660; 525identified as first-year students). Other students in the course include upper level students thattook the course out of sequence from the traditional plan of study. Due to the volume of students,the course offered two large auditorium style lecture sections and multiple (32) smallerlaboratory sections. Each week students would meet in their smaller laboratory classes,maximum of 32 students. Additionally, students were required to attend one of the two largerlectures (~350 students per lecture), each week.Students
2003. She has been a research associate in the Laboratory for Responsible Manufacturing (LRM) at Northeastern University since September 1999. She has also been employed as an Assistant Professor by Yildiz Technical University till February 2006. Dr. Kongar is currently an Assistant Professor at Bridgeport University and a Part-Time Researcher in the Center for Industrial Ecology at Yale University. Her research interests include the areas of supply chain management, logistics, environmentally conscious manufacturing, product recovery, disassembly systems, production planning and scheduling and multiple criteria decision making. She has co-authored several technical
Laboratory for Responsible Manufacturing (LRM) at Northeastern University since September 1999. She has also been employed as an Assistant Professor by Yildiz Technical University till February 2006. Dr. Kongar is currently an Assistant Professor at Bridgeport University and a Part-Time Researcher in the Center for Industrial Ecology at Yale University. Her research interests include the areas of supply chain management, logistics, environmentally conscious manufacturing, product recovery, disassembly systems, production planning and scheduling and multiple criteria decision making. She has co-authored several technical papers presented at various national and international
experimentation projects EAS 112 Methods of problem-driven, use of algorithm development, use Engineering Analysis18 spreadsheet and of computer tools, statistics, programming to develop numerical methods, algorithms to solve programming concepts engineering problems EAS120 Chemistry with a second semester science laboratory taught from an Applications in BioSystems course, provides background engineering perspective, for further study of chemistry includes design and analysis and
and power. He has received several patents and published over a hundred technical papers related to pulsed flow, combustion systems, and biological fluid flow. He established the Combustion & Propulsion Research Laboratory in Indianapolis and a pioneering Purdue University research program in wave rotor constant-volume combustion in collaboration with engine industry. He was twice awarded the Abraham Max Distinguished Professorship, as well as the Frank Burley Distinguished Professorship – the highest honors of the Purdue University School of Engineering and Technology for research and service accom- plishments, respectively. He has consulting experience related to injury and patent litigation, emissions
, 34(1), 61-84.6. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing Engineers, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.7. Florman, S.L. (1994). Existential Pleasures of Engineering, New York, N.Y.: St. Martin’s Press.8. Lin, C.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2009). The relationship between students’ conceptions of learning engineering and their preferences for classroom and laboratory learning environments. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 193-204.9. Stevens, R.,O’Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D.L. (2008). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 355–68.10. Turns, J., Atman, C., Adams, R., & Barker, T. (2005). Research on engineering student
assignment, laboratories, and, often, group projects. Adding to the confusion,engineering faculty do not always understand how the common forms of “active learning” differfrom each other and most are not inclined to search for answers Of the most known and utilizedclassroom-based pedagogies in engineering education today, and appear to be moving in thesame broad direction, are: problem-based learning, cooperative learning, and collaborativelearning 2. Page 15.919.2Problem-based learning (PBL) starts when students are confronted with an open-ended, ill-structured, real-world problem and work in teams to identify learning needs and develop a
material with the students.(2)There are several strands of pedagogies of engagement under the umbrella of active learningmethods that have received attention by engineering educators world-wide. (2, 3) For many Page 24.949.2faculty, there remain questions about what “active learning” is and how it differs from traditionalengineering education, since the latter involves activities through homework assignment,laboratories, and, often, group projects. Adding to the confusion, engineering faculty do notalways understand how the common forms of “active learning” differ from each other and mostare not inclined to search for answers. Of the most known and
throughout the entiresemester. These groups were arranged such that neither gender was placed in a minority. Afterthe completion of the semester-long data collection, researchers selected consented groups basedon complete attendance, meaning that no group member was absent from a week of datacollection. Participant demographics, such as age, race, and engineering major, were notcontrolled in this study. Groups were spread across four registered sections, each taught by threeteaching assistants. In this paper, we analyze data from two weeks of 50-minute discussionsessions held in a laboratory classroom.Data AnalysisGroups’ video and audio data were collected as they solved each task. This study analyzes datafrom 22 total video recordings, one from