information10. More recently, a study has reported how the most successfulinnovators practice and develop specific “discovery skills” that distinguish them from others11.The experts interviewed for this study included recognized innovators and effective innovationmanagers from a variety of disciplines and industries, including materials, biomedical products,computers, and banking. Their innovation expertise was gained and demonstrated in multipleenvironments ranging from academic laboratories to start-up companies and large corporations.Experts also included knowledgeable educators and scholars of innovation from academia. Allinterview subjects expressed interest in innovation education as well as practicing innovation,and half (five) of the interviews
Professional DevelopmentEleven (11) experienced and six (6) inexperienced GTAs were employed in Fall 2007.Experienced GTAs had been assigned a first-year engineering laboratory section and gradednearly all students’ work, including students’ work on MEAs, in at least one prior semester.Inexperienced GTAs had no prior experience with the first-year engineering course. All GTAsreceived four hours of professional development (PD) training prior to the start of the Fall 2007semester. The PD focused on several aspects: connecting engineering practice to teaching, theMEA pedagogy, audience information (first-year engineering students), and practical issues ofMEA implementation and assessment14. GTAs were trained to understand the open-ended andrealistic
success models in engineering, global engineering education, teamwork and team effectiveness, and production systems control and optimization. He worked as a production control engineer in Taiwan, and has taught laboratory classes in manufacturing engineering and freshmen engi- neering in the U.S. He earned his Bachelor and Master degrees in Industrial Engineering from National Tsing Hua University (Taiwan) and Purdue University (U.S.A). His ultimate career goal is to help cul- tivate world-class engineering graduates that can compete globally, as well as collaborate with the best engineers across different cultures.Xingyu Chen, Purdue University
projects, with an emphasis on planning and design alternatives to meet cost,performance, and user-interface goals. One of the course requirements is the completion of theconceptualization and initial development phases of an electronic device that accomplishes astudent-defined task or solves a student-defined problem. Student projects are taken tocompletion in two subsequent self-directed laboratory courses, Project Design and Development,Phase I and II. The students who volunteered to participate in the study (n=40) ranged in agefrom 21 to 35, and most were white, non-Hispanic males from within the state, with nearly halfof them starting as freshman in the ECET program. The cohort included 1 female, 3 African-Americans, 3 Hispanics and 1
coverage of themap with the set of questionsused.Classify questions andanswers based upon thevarious levels of Bloom’staxonomy.Deploy questions and answerchoices to students andestablish a method for datacollection, preferably online orvia some other electronicmeans.System Deployment A custom concept inventory was developed to evaluate students’ understanding of theunderlying concepts and relationships in a mechatronics learning module that is part of a first-semester, first-year introductory engineering course at Virginia Tech. An instructor made athorough analysis of all of the instructional material involved in the unit including an onlinelecture, a homework assignment, and a hands-on laboratory exercise to develop a comprehensivelist
: assessment and the quest for best practices at the Cooper Union., 2005.16. D. P. Ausubel, Novak, J. D. and Hanesian, H., Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York, Holt: Rinehart and Winston, 1978.17. J. D. Novak, and Gowin, D. B., Learning how to learn: Cambridge University Press, 1984.18. J. D. Novak, Gowin, D. B., and Johansen, "Using concept mapping as an assessment method," in North central regional educational laboratory, 1983.19. A. Arruarte, Elorriaga, J. A., and Rueda, U. , "A template-based concept mapping tool for computer-aided learning," in Second IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT'01), 2001.20. Q. H. Malik, Mishra, Punya, Shanblatt, Michael "Identifying Learning
AC 2010-1808: STEPWISE METHOD FOR DEAF AND HARD-OF-HEARINGSTEM STUDENTS IN SOLVING WORD PROBLEMSGary Behm, Rochester Institute of Technology Gary Behm is a Senior Project Associate and Director of the NTID Center on Access Technology Innovation Laboratory and a Visiting Lecturer at NTID. He is a deaf engineer at IBM who received his BS from RIT and his MS from Lehigh University. He currently serves as a loaned executive at NTID/RIT working in the Center on Access Technology and the department of Engineering Studies. At IBM, he is a delivery project manager in the Rapid Application Development Engineering System. Behm has six patents and has presented over 20 scientific and technical papers
Paper ID #22535WIP: Exploration of Conceptions and Attitudes of Colombian and AmericanChemical Engineers about Chemical Engineering o˜Ing. Cristi´ n Eduardo Vargas Ord´ nez, Universidad de los Andes a Colombian chemical engineer with experience in industry, laboratories and educational programs. Cur- rently, I’m candidate of master in Sciencie, Technology and Society and studying a master in Education (STEM). My academical preferences are related with engineering education and education of socially responsible engineers.Dr. Mariana Tafur-Arciniegas, Universidad de los Andes Mariana
“collective intelligence” of a groupsolving simulated laboratory tasks is determined by the type of interactions they have. Thesefindings suggest that effective team dynamics within a learning group improve performance.Other studies link these positive interactions to friendship. Myers found that self-selected groups,which favor group selection among friend groups, reported higher relational satisfaction andlearning during group tasks [21]. Theobald reported that having a friend in a group activity in aSTEM class was predictive of group comfort levels [22].3 MethodsThis study used qualitative methods: narrative analysis was applied to transcripts ofsemi-structured interviews. Interviewers asked second and third year engineering majors at aprivate
Paper ID #32840”I Wish I Would Have Known. . . ”: Characterizing Engineering Students’Reflections on Their Graduate ExperiencesMr. Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University I am a second-year doctoral candidate at Pennsylvania State University in the mechanical engineering department. Member of the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). Current research topics include graduate school attrition and student well-being.Miss Megan ElleryGabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University Gaby Sallai is currently a graduate student in the mechanical engineering department at Penn State. She is working under
and ACS Publications Division of the American Chemical Society.Faber, C., Vargas, P., & Benson, L. (n.d.). Measuring Engineering Epistemic Beliefs in Undergraduate Engineering Students.Ferguson, L. E., & Braten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015a). Measuring meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: a national, cross-sectional study. Journal of Chemical Education. Easton: American Chemical Society Division of Chemical Education.Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015b). Using
vascular smooth muscle cells. His current research interests focus on mechanical stimulation effects on cellular differentiation, natural tissues as bioscaffolds, and tissue engineering mechanically sensitive tissues.Dr. Steven Schreiner P.E., The College of New JerseyProf. Bijan Sepahpour P.E., The College of New Jersey Bijan Sepahpour is a registered Professional Engineer and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the College of New Jersey (TCNJ). He has served as the Chairperson of the ME department at TCNJ from 2006 through 2015. Prof. Sepahpour has been actively involved in the generation of design-oriented exercises and development of laboratory apparatus and experiments in the areas of mechanics of mate- rials
coursemodel traverses from one location in time and space to another.Background: Replication vs. Mutation of the Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics EducationThe Wright State Model (WSM) is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamentalconcepts of Calculus 1, 2, 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-on laboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by decoupling mathematicsprerequisites from engineering coursework—introducing undergraduates to sufficientmathematical tools in the one-semester course to enable them to get started and make progress intechnical engineering coursework, regardless of
University of British Columbia, Chemistry Teaching Laboratory Optimization with CWSEI, 2008—2011 Assistant Professor, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, August 2011—2017 Lecturer, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, January 2018 – presentDr. Pauline Entin, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Dean, College of Arts and Sciences, 2018-present, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Vice Provost for Academic Affairs, 2014-2018, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Associate Dean for Aca- demic Affairs, 2010-2014, College of Engineering, Forestry and Natural Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ Assist/Assoc/Full Professor, Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, 2001-2018
Page 26.1092.2pedagogical workshops, attending a theater performance focusing on inclusive teachingstrategies, and presenting a short lesson to a small group of their peers. The GSIs choose theworkshops based on their teaching responsibilities with topics including: teaching discussionsand laboratory sections, managing office hours, grading, and teaching problem solving skills.The theater performance allows GSIs to observe a novice instructor in a STEM classroom,identify strategies to improve the overall class environment, and reflect on how their suggestedstrategies improve the overall class environment upon a second performance of the sketch.10During the practice teaching or microteaching session, GSIs develop a short 5-min lesson,present it
Engineering, NY, USA. His research and teaching interests include robotics, mechatronics, control systems, electro-mechanical design, human factors/ergonomics, engineer- ing psychology, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, computer vision, biomimetics and biomechanics with applications to industrial manipulation and manufacturing, healthcare and rehabilitation, social services, autonomous unmanned services and STEM education.Dr. Vikram Kapila, New York University Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a DR K
engaging incritical thinking and metacognition.Perceived teaching approaches. The second theme describes how students perceive facultyteaching approaches within their departments, again with two emergent dimensions: traditionalversus contemporary and prescribed versus open-ended. The traditional versus contemporarydimension focuses on the pedagogical practices used in non-laboratory and laboratory courses.Traditional approaches are those considered prototypical of engineering. For example, studentsdescribing traditional approaches talk about classes dominated by lectures in which students arerequired to take notes or read PowerPoint ® slides, and course assessments consist mostly ofindividual assignments and quizzes. Similarly, students in
laboratory course in which he repeatedly enrolled, building Lego cranes to lift andmove loads and completing other open-ended problems. But it was a voluntary activity as partof a high school English course that helped to cement his love for engineering. As a sophomore, Page 12.1277.8Joe worked with a friend to build a trebuchet that was twelve-feet high and could catapult a one-gallon bottle of water the length of a football field. He even moved the trebuchet to MT tocontinue tinkering with it, and housed it in the garage of his apartment building, while his vehiclesat in the driveway, exposed to the elements. Additionally, as a hobby, Joe began
. Then new teams, inwhich each team member had expertise regarding a different learning activity, were formed andcharged to rank the five activities from least- to best-aligned with formal cooperative learningprinciples. In a separate learning activity, student teams postulated the values and philosophy ofan engineering instructor who incorporates cooperative learning in his/her classes.Student teaching and research philosophies and their elevator speeches went through at least oneiteration cycle, with students receiving feedback from classmates, the course instructors, and, inthe case of the teaching philosophies, peers from the Laboratory for User-Centered EngineeringEducation (LUCEE8) at the University of Washington (LUCEE is devoted to
), 339.2. Heller, R. S., Beil, C., Dam, K., & Haerum, B. (2010). Student and Faculty Perceptions of Engagement in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 253-261.3. Lin, C., & Tsai, C. (2009). The relationship between students' conceptions of learning engineering and their preferences for classroom and laboratory learning environments. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 193- 204.4. Prince, M
moredetail the ways in which writing supports learning. For example, recent work by Carter, Ferzli,and Wiebe has examined the ways in which writing in disciplinary courses in college helpsstudents develop a strong socialization into the practices and norms of the discipline, acting as ameans of enculturation [49]. Their study, in many ways, seeks to bridge the divide betweenlearning to write and writing-to-learn by identifying ways in which learning to write in aparticular discipline supports not only students’ ability to communicate in their chosen field, butalso supports their broader learning of that field. Their study of students in a biology lab suggeststhat the laboratory report, when framed in terms of a model of apprenticeship and
student acquisition of data in physics learning cycles. J. Res.Sci. Teach. 1985, 22 (4), 303-25.22. Hall, D. A.; McCurdy, D. W., A comparison of a biological sciences curriculum study (bscs) laboratory anda traditional laboratory on student achievement at two private liberal arts colleges. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1990, 27 (7),625-36.23. Renner, J. W.; Paske, W. C., Comparing two forms of instruction in college physics. American Journal ofPhysics 1977, 45 (9), 851-859.24. Spencer, J. N., New directions in teaching chemistry: A philosophical and pedagogical basis. J. Chem.Educ. 1999, 76 (4), 566-569.25. Hanson, D.; Wolfskill, T., Process workshops - a new model for instruction. J. Chem. Educ. 2000, 77 (1),120-130.26
. For this week, twocompletely different topics were being studied: electrochemistry in particular batteries and areview electrolysis as well as coordination compounds and complex ion solubility. Two differenttopics were being studied in one week based on the calendar and trying to incorporate the conceptof coordination compounds before they were covered in the laboratory class.Examples of student responses in week 12 reflect the conceptual confusion on the coordinationcompounds. Student 1 stated “What remains unclear to me is how to name complex ions, ligands,and determining which are cis-trans.” Student 2 noted: “Identifying the coordination number(number of attached ligands), oxidation states of metals in the coordination compounds
University of Louisiana at Lafayette. His research interests are in Hydrology, Water Resources, Rainfall Remote Sensing, Water Management, Coastal Hydrology, and Advances in Hydrology Education ResearchProf. David Tarboton, Utah State University David Tarboton is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University. He received his Sc.D. and M.S. in Civil Engineering (Water Resources and Hy- drology) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his B.Sc Eng in Civil Engineering from the University of Natal in South Africa. His research and teaching are in the area of surface water hydrol- ogy. His research focuses on advancing the capability for hydrologic